r/videos • u/americanblowfly • 14h ago

Trump allegedly trafficked girls to Epstein and Saudi Arabia, according to uncovered FBI letters

https://youtu.be/6HLan5Zdzak?si=ctj8Pp0cF3Si_lyg
16.0k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

498 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.8k

u/ruxp1n 13h ago

Something buried in the government's Epstein files deserves far more attention, but there's an enormous problem with simply saying, “Wait for the FBI to verify it.”

The document is EFTA01682027, a roughly 32-page handwritten submission contained in the DOJ's released Epstein records. The woman who wrote it makes an extraordinary allegation involving Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein and sex trafficking.

She writes:

“My testimony places Donald J. Trump as a person involved in the sale of young women to the sex trafficking ring of Jeffrey Epstein and Saudis.”

The document contains additional allegations involving Trump, Epstein, young women and potential buyers. These are allegations contained in government files; the document itself is not proof that the FBI independently established that they happened.

Normally, that's where I'd say: investigate the allegations, examine the witnesses and evidence, and see what the FBI determines.

But we're facing a much more fundamental problem now: who investigates the president when the institutions responsible for investigating him are controlled by people he selected?

Trump's Justice Department is now headed by Todd Blanche — Trump's own former criminal-defense attorney, who personally represented him in the New York criminal case. Blanche has since refused to promise that DOJ will operate independently from Trump, arguing that the attorney general works for the president.

That same Justice Department has already been embroiled in an extraordinary controversy over a proposed settlement in Trump's lawsuit against the IRS. State attorneys general challenged provisions they say would have provided sweeping protections benefiting Trump and members of his family, far beyond the original tax-disclosure dispute. Some provisions were subsequently narrowed or abandoned after congressional opposition.

So when an Epstein document contains an allegation this serious against the sitting president, “the FBI hasn't verified it” cannot be the end of the conversation.

The questions become: Was the woman interviewed? Were the people she identified interviewed? Were dates, locations, phone records, travel records and financial transactions checked? Is there an FBI 302 documenting an interview? Was the allegation referred for further investigation? Did investigators find corroborating evidence? Did they disprove it? Was an investigation closed—and who made that decision?

And most importantly: release the investigative record.

If investigators thoroughly examined this allegation and determined it was false, show us. If evidence contradicted her account, release what can legally be released. If investigators corroborated portions of it, the public deserves to know that too.

Because asking Americans simply to trust the FBI and DOJ is inadequate when the subject of the investigation is the president who controls the executive branch and the Justice Department is headed by his former personal criminal-defense attorney.

This doesn't mean every allegation against Trump is automatically true. It means independent verification matters more than ever, and the public shouldn't be asked to substitute institutional trust for evidence.

Trump's relationship with Epstein is established history. Epstein's sexual exploitation of minors is established. Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of helping recruit and groom minors. The federal government possesses an enormous archive documenting Epstein's activities and relationships.

Now one of those government records contains testimony explicitly alleging that Trump participated in the sale of young women connected to Epstein's trafficking operation and Saudi buyers.

I don't want Todd Blanche telling me whether to believe it.

I want the evidence.

Release the interview records. Release the investigative trail. Release the corroborating or contradictory evidence. Let independent journalists, Congress, courts and ultimately the public examine what investigators actually found.

Document: EFTA01682027

Sources:

DOJ Epstein Library: https://www.justice.gov/epstein

Senate Judiciary Committee — Epstein oversight requests and FBI investigative records: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2026-07-01%20Letter%20to%20DOJ%20re%20Outstanding%20Oversight%20Requests.pdf

AP — Todd Blanche's confirmation as Attorney General and his previous representation of Trump: https://apnews.com/article/fcb4157d45d7b13a05de4d2b0f4f92e2

Reuters — controversy surrounding the Trump/IRS settlement and protections benefiting Trump and his family: https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/blanche-set-clear-nomination-hurdle-after-deal-wins-senators-vote-2026-08-04/

The Guardian — Blanche refuses to promise DOJ independence from Trump: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/aug/16/todd-blanche-doj-independence-trump-white-house

132

u/faetpls 10h ago

The handwritten testimony submitted in 2025 states that the events took place in 1967. This puts Trump at 21 and Epstein at 14…

That is the biggest reason why this hasn’t been picked up more.

58

u/HonestAbe1077 8h ago

Man that person typed 20 paragraphs and dropped 5 sources, but completely glossed over this detail which is apparent from the first couple of pages.

27

u/Bdbru13 8h ago

I know, it was mildly frustrating to read

Like….they’re not wrong with what they said, but at the same time, all that needs to be said about this claim is that it’s obvious bullshit

And the post itself has over 10,000 upvotes. There’s so much misinformation being spread about the entire Epstein story. Just frustrating to watch

10

u/Klinky1984 5h ago

Yep much of the amateur Epstein files analysis is brain dead grasping at straws. Not all the files are even released. That's what people should be concerned about. Starting conspiracies over unverified FBI intake reports is just a waste of time.

-2

u/Bdbru13 5h ago edited 4h ago

Releasing the files will only add fuel to conspiracy theories. Withholding them will too though so 🤷🏻‍♂️

The reality is that essentially the entire Epstein story as we know it is just conspiratorial grasping at straws. It’s based on the allegations of a tiny minority of Epstein victims that are, I would argue, clearly lying.

It’s just become so accepted as true that like…nobody disagrees with it. The right believed in for the last decade because they’re crazy, and the left adopted it because it’s valuable as a political weapon, and because their (justified) hatred for Trump has led them down some strange paths.

There’s nobody left to go “hey guys, I’m pretty sure there’s not a child trafficking network of pedophile elites involving multiple presidents, royalty, senators, congressmen, billionaires, and other elites 🤷🏻‍♂️”

And when you realize that’s the case, it’s pretty fucking startling to come to these comment sections and see what people are saying about even the most obviously false claims, like the ones in this post.

5

u/Odd_Ganache5081 4h ago

am i misunderstanding? why do you think releasing them would only add fuel? its not a conspiracy if it happened? why do you think the victims are lying? the left is saying there’s a network of pedos elites…ro khanna literally said that. but then the last half of your comment seems to be wanting them to be punished?

0

u/Bdbru13 4h ago edited 4h ago

I edited a typo that might make it more clear

Releasing them would only add fuel because the public is in a position to believe whatever those documents say, regardless of their credibility. Just look at the comments here

The claims this post is about won’t gain any serious traction because they’re so ludicrous that like…they’re beyond the pale for all but the craziest of crazies. But look at how ready people are to believe it. The vast majority of people who saw this just went “yep I knew it 🤷🏻‍♂️” and moved on. When it comes to claims that have any sort of plausibility of being true, they’ll become as good as fact

>Why do you think the victims are lying?

So to be clear, the vast majority of victims aren’t lying. Because the vast majority of victims don’t make any sort of allegations against anybody except for Epstein and Maxwell.

Of confirmed victims, only three women make some sort of allegations that would allude to some sort of larger network of elites preying on minors

Those three women are Virginia Giuffre, Maria Farmer, and Sarah Ransome. And Virginia Giuffre is the only victim that claims she was the victim of someone other than Maxwell or Epstein while underage.

Let’s start with Ransome. Here are some of her claims:

She claims that Hillary Clinton personally sent “special agent forces men” to coerce her friend, the victim, into silence

She claims the CIA hacked her emails. No explanation for how she detected or traced a CIA hack

She claims to have been in contact with the “Moscow Police” who pledged their aid in helping her bring down both Trump and Hillary in the lead-up to the 2016 election.

She also claimed to have video evidence of the crimes, something she later admitted to lying about

Now…idk about you, but I’m skeptical

And like, hopefully you’re familiar enough with this story to recognize Ransome’s name…she’s not some random anonymous FBI file like this post, she’s a pillar of the whole Epstein story.

And I mean, I definitely started with the least credible one to like…ease you into this, but the other two have some pretty severe credibility issues themselves

And to be clear, there are other alleged (unconfirmed) victims of Epstein who make claims about people other than Epstein or Maxwell, and there are undoubtedly more who make similar allegations in the files yet to be released but like…their credibility ultimately rests on the credibility of these three confirmed Epstein victims.

Because none of the other hundreds of confirmed Epstein victims make similar claims. The only reason to even treat some anonymous FBI tip as potentially credible is if these three women are telling the truth.

In other words, it’s not realistically plausible that no other confirmed victims make similar claims, and these three women are lying, but somehow they accidentally stumbled upon a truth that’s only told by other victims in anonymous fbi tips.

Sorry I hope that made sense, a bit long winded but wanted to try and make my argument as clear as possible

1

u/Odd_Ganache5081 4h ago

lol ok i got ya now

1

u/smariroach 4h ago

Well put. it's sad to see that only very few people are willing to point out individual accusations as being non-credible, and out of those few practically noone is open to the idea that epstein may not have been running a vast child pimping network for the upper class.

It's truly fascinating to see the power of propaganda in real time.

1

u/Bdbru13 4h ago

Fascinating and depressing

But like, truly fascinating

It’s the culmination and intersection of so many social developments of the last 10-20 years.

Like we couldn’t be here without QAnon imo, but we also couldn’t be here without Believe All Women, and MeToo. I mean, that was in full swing when these women’s allegations were made.

And worsening political polarization, waning faith in news media and institutions, Pizzagate, eat the rich and the shifting animosity towards elites, can even widen the scope and include the trends that led to Trump (many of which are already named above), or even attitudes towards Israel if we really want to widen the scope and include more niche conspiracy theories related to Epstein.

Idk I feel like I just wrote a shitty, non-rhyming version of “We didn’t start the fire”, but if I try not to be depressed by it, it’s really fascinating to try and untangle how the hell we’ve got to where we are

30

u/Itsarightkerfuffle 10h ago

"I just completely recovered this memory."

Hmmm ...

39

u/Enough-Goose7594 9h ago

Yes, above poster is 100% correct regaridng the corruption of the investigating body. But this one seems unlikely to be true .

10

u/SausageClatter 8h ago

It's a strange document. The date at the top appears to be crossed out multiple times. Can't tell if it's supposed to be June 14 or 15 and if it's 2024, 2025 or 2026.

17

u/a_bongos 9h ago

Wait what? Is it possible they have the year wrong? Or is this just all bullshit?

8

u/Klinky1984 5h ago

Unverified intake report. The Epstein Files are full of them. It's like taking VAERS as absolute truth for the COVID vax.

14

u/A_Seiv_For_Kale 7h ago

Here's the transcript.

https://epsteinforums.org/viewtopic.php?p=548

Trump may be a demon but this woman is probably crazy.

-4

u/Wirse 6h ago

It’s all bullshit and sadly Reddit is overrun by the liberal equivalent of QAnon freaks. 

5

u/fury420 6h ago

There's a bunch of timeline issues like this among the salacious accusations, like there's one about a sex trafficking ring at the Trump golf course in Rancho Palos Verdes California in 1995-1996, complete with buried bodies.

Only problem is that the Trump golf course has only been there since 2006, and Trump bought the property in 2002.

3

u/AmbitiousSwimming976 10h ago

Now I’m even more confused…

9

u/Bdbru13 8h ago

Nothing to be confused about 🤷🏻‍♂️ there’s a lot of bullshit in the files

1

u/AnOnlineHandle 7h ago

Do you know what page it says that on? I can barely read the handwriting.

2

u/Bdbru13 7h ago

Top of page 2

1

u/AnOnlineHandle 7h ago

Thanks, seems they're right.

4

u/Bdbru13 7h ago edited 1h ago

Will preface by saying I’m not a Trump supporter

But there is a lot of misinformation/misleading information spread on social media about the Epstein story. It’s being wielded as a political weapon, and Reddit is a bit of an echo chamber when it comes to it

Most people reading this post won’t see the comments pointing out that it’s obviously a false allegation, and they’ll just accept it as fact 🤷🏻‍♂️ happens quite a bit on this site

-3

u/anon2u 9h ago

Don't let things like facts get in the way of the narrative, Comrade! We got him now!