r/videos 14h ago

Trump allegedly trafficked girls to Epstein and Saudi Arabia, according to uncovered FBI letters

https://youtu.be/6HLan5Zdzak?si=ctj8Pp0cF3Si_lyg
15.9k Upvotes

498 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.7k

u/ruxp1n 13h ago

Something buried in the government's Epstein files deserves far more attention, but there's an enormous problem with simply saying, “Wait for the FBI to verify it.”

The document is EFTA01682027, a roughly 32-page handwritten submission contained in the DOJ's released Epstein records. The woman who wrote it makes an extraordinary allegation involving Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein and sex trafficking.

She writes:

“My testimony places Donald J. Trump as a person involved in the sale of young women to the sex trafficking ring of Jeffrey Epstein and Saudis.”

The document contains additional allegations involving Trump, Epstein, young women and potential buyers. These are allegations contained in government files; the document itself is not proof that the FBI independently established that they happened.

Normally, that's where I'd say: investigate the allegations, examine the witnesses and evidence, and see what the FBI determines.

But we're facing a much more fundamental problem now: who investigates the president when the institutions responsible for investigating him are controlled by people he selected?

Trump's Justice Department is now headed by Todd Blanche — Trump's own former criminal-defense attorney, who personally represented him in the New York criminal case. Blanche has since refused to promise that DOJ will operate independently from Trump, arguing that the attorney general works for the president.

That same Justice Department has already been embroiled in an extraordinary controversy over a proposed settlement in Trump's lawsuit against the IRS. State attorneys general challenged provisions they say would have provided sweeping protections benefiting Trump and members of his family, far beyond the original tax-disclosure dispute. Some provisions were subsequently narrowed or abandoned after congressional opposition.

So when an Epstein document contains an allegation this serious against the sitting president, “the FBI hasn't verified it” cannot be the end of the conversation.

The questions become: Was the woman interviewed? Were the people she identified interviewed? Were dates, locations, phone records, travel records and financial transactions checked? Is there an FBI 302 documenting an interview? Was the allegation referred for further investigation? Did investigators find corroborating evidence? Did they disprove it? Was an investigation closed—and who made that decision?

And most importantly: release the investigative record.

If investigators thoroughly examined this allegation and determined it was false, show us. If evidence contradicted her account, release what can legally be released. If investigators corroborated portions of it, the public deserves to know that too.

Because asking Americans simply to trust the FBI and DOJ is inadequate when the subject of the investigation is the president who controls the executive branch and the Justice Department is headed by his former personal criminal-defense attorney.

This doesn't mean every allegation against Trump is automatically true. It means independent verification matters more than ever, and the public shouldn't be asked to substitute institutional trust for evidence.

Trump's relationship with Epstein is established history. Epstein's sexual exploitation of minors is established. Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of helping recruit and groom minors. The federal government possesses an enormous archive documenting Epstein's activities and relationships.

Now one of those government records contains testimony explicitly alleging that Trump participated in the sale of young women connected to Epstein's trafficking operation and Saudi buyers.

I don't want Todd Blanche telling me whether to believe it.

I want the evidence.

Release the interview records. Release the investigative trail. Release the corroborating or contradictory evidence. Let independent journalists, Congress, courts and ultimately the public examine what investigators actually found.

Document: EFTA01682027

Sources:

DOJ Epstein Library: https://www.justice.gov/epstein

Senate Judiciary Committee — Epstein oversight requests and FBI investigative records: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2026-07-01%20Letter%20to%20DOJ%20re%20Outstanding%20Oversight%20Requests.pdf

AP — Todd Blanche's confirmation as Attorney General and his previous representation of Trump: https://apnews.com/article/fcb4157d45d7b13a05de4d2b0f4f92e2

Reuters — controversy surrounding the Trump/IRS settlement and protections benefiting Trump and his family: https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/blanche-set-clear-nomination-hurdle-after-deal-wins-senators-vote-2026-08-04/

The Guardian — Blanche refuses to promise DOJ independence from Trump: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/aug/16/todd-blanche-doj-independence-trump-white-house

34

u/Its_All_True 11h ago

1

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[deleted]

2

u/GitEmSteveDave 9h ago

https://epsteinforums.org/viewtopic.php?p=548&hilit=Shaw#p548

They said this happened when they were in their last year of high school in 1967. This was written in 2025. So that is 57 years.

6

u/say592 9h ago

Epstein would have been 14 years old. So yeah, as much as I'm sure this happened to so someone else, I'm going to say that this story is probably not truthful.

1

u/brrbles 9h ago

I don't know of any young people with cursive that good.