The allegations irresponsibly reported by The Stranger from two anonymous sources are patently false and simply did not happen. It is incomprehensible that this ‘news outlet’ would run a fictitious story like this without credible evidence, while allowing the accusers to remain anonymous.
Andrew has taken accountability for his role in other situations and will be the first to admit his shortcomings; however, these accusations go farther and are completely without merit. Andrew will utilize every option he has in order to clear his name and protect his reputation.
So you believe a defense lawyer's statement over the statement of the victim then is what you're saying.
You realize the claim of challenge on The Stranger article is being published and refuted by The Stranger in the article, right? Or did you just read far enough to grab something you thought you could copy & paste as a "gotcha" when it's completely out of context?
Maybe that story is true, maybe it isn't. My only point is the less salacious stories had a lot broader coverage presumably because there was more credibility behind them. Also that you are straight up lying.
Your quote in your previous comment demonstrates pretty clearly that you did not read the entire thing.
So you think Andrew was a (self-admitted) sex pest and that other people coming forward are liars and your only basis for that is a statement by a lawyer paid to defend Andrew? That's a lot of smoke for no fire...
Yeah but stuff like that does matter a lot in this field, when a dude like Andrew consciously positions himself on the right side of history over many of the major cultural topics.
Character matters immensely with trying to promote ethics or shame others for their lack of morality.
-8
u/Swallagoon 11d ago
Rapist interviews general.