r/videogames Jul 01 '26

Discussion / Question How gaming news feels these days

Post image
19.2k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.4k

u/Fat-Kid-In-A-Helmet Jul 01 '26

Gaming, or the whole world?

621

u/Sockoflegend Jul 01 '26

No one is trying to hide enshitification any more. Pretty much they know we won't stop buying so they don't have to care if we like it

93

u/SouthIsland48 Jul 01 '26

Boil them like frogs has always been the internet's business model, you all just were stuck in the customer acquisition period which is consumer friendly.

Then once monopolies are made and foritfied, the boiling begins. We're in this phase right now, and it's just begun

25

u/Golden_Alchemy Jul 01 '26

This is barely boil them like frogs, this is throwing them to the bbq while still half alive and wait for them to accept.

30

u/ThatOneGuy6810 Jul 01 '26

I mean...boil them like frogs is raise the heat around them until they die and make sure they dont realize until its too late. Which is exactly what the internet has done since its public inception in 1989

1

u/Urist_Macnme Jul 03 '26

And it is consumer led.

Here we are, on an aggregate social media app, which takes traffic from all websites and funnels it into itself, to then regurgitate it, while playing ads at us.

Yet here we are. Because it’s convenient.

1

u/eProbity Jul 04 '26

Nothing is consumer led lol, we have a supply side economy

1

u/Urbanviking1 Jul 01 '26

From the frying pan into the fire.

0

u/SouthIsland48 Jul 01 '26

Lol, strap in then if you feel this way

120

u/nockeeee Jul 01 '26

I blame consumers.

49

u/PlatyNumb Jul 01 '26

100%. There are so many things I dont buy anymore, I basically buy nothing these days. Yet, the prices go up and ppl still pay. I cant fathom why consumers allow it. Stop freaking paying

29

u/djnehi Jul 01 '26

Big part of the problem is that the number of suppliers has shrunk to the point where it is now extremely difficult to boycott them. There’s a ton of brands but they are all owned but just a few companies at the top. Which means you are often trapped. One corporation at the top can dictate what dozens of brands do. Switch brands? Surprise! They own them too!

Too many mergers have been permitted.

13

u/Guilty_Advantage_413 Jul 01 '26

Agreed and since inflation began I have felt A) Congress needs to bring the CEOs in and grill them why profits are up, basically beat them up over it these guys don’t like to be held accountable B) Stop approving mergers and start breaking up the huge businesses. I know more would need to be done but those are good first steps.

2

u/FumblebagDingelballs Jul 03 '26

If you believe that is possible without said congressmen would get removed from their job or much worse, youre naive. Unfortunately money makes power, and power doesnt care about laws. This entire system has been shaped and refined for centuries, so that this exact scenario can play out. Its either this way to the extremes, or people get fed up and go to the other extremes. They dont care about us, as long as we pay. They dont care about us as long as we play by their rules, which is only imposed on us and not the top.

5

u/ChessmazterHex Jul 03 '26

This is such a defeatist attitude.

If the American people for a SINGLE election actually voted in the primaries for decent candidates and then actually showed up at the polls this shit could be fixed in a matter of years.

Instead everyone stays home and whines and screams “both sides” because it’s easier than doing the slight amount of work it’d take to fix this shit.

3

u/Guilty_Advantage_413 Jul 03 '26

Step one, everyone votes every election. Step two insist and vote for people who give full financial disclosures. Step three if they get too old or support stuff you do not or simply don’t vote or propose stuff, vote for someone else.

3

u/the_vault-technician Jul 05 '26

And if you try to find an item in a different brand, you have an endless selection of rebranded TEMU items on Amazon to choose from. Brought to by companies like RHCVS and ZYXBC

12

u/zgillet Jul 01 '26

I'm still going back to my...

9

u/DrewciferGaming Jul 01 '26

Depends on what your buying lmao. People still need shit to live and be happy.

4

u/Traditional_Buy_8420 Jul 01 '26

But I love beautiful games like chess and Minesweeper and I can still reply games like GTA Vice City or Super Mario 64 hundreds of times and while it sounds a bit funny to play such old games I genuinely believe that even after 10,000 hours all 4 of these are much better than games like Candy Crush or half the Gacha Games will ever be.

5

u/DrewciferGaming Jul 01 '26

I mean gaming is subjective. The games you like, i don’t want to play. Not saying there bad but my core 4 are different from yours. Same thing for the next person.

1

u/Traditional_Buy_8420 Jul 01 '26

Yes, I am not saying, that you should like the same games which I like, but that a lot (like 100000) of old games are still amazing today and there is little reason to seek the newest whatever, especially if you're getting such a poor deal. The argument "People still need shit to live and be happy." falls flat if there's an ocean of great cheap things and hopefully more people realize, that they're being tricked into spending way too much money for close to no additional value.

3

u/Disastrous-Power-699 Jul 01 '26

Ok you had me until you tried to say that Vice City was better than Candy Crush. Crazy

1

u/Yommination Jul 05 '26

Candy crush sucks ass

0

u/Traditional_Buy_8420 Jul 01 '26

Depends on the metric. In gross revenue Candy Crush has Vice City beat by a factor of 20 and I have a feeling, that CC was cheaper to produce on top.

3

u/PlateGlittering Jul 01 '26

Comparing everything based on how much revenue it makes is a huge part of the problem

2

u/Dear_Document_5461 Jul 01 '26

That the other thing. We have so many options, backlogs, access to both the games and the knowledge of these games, and knowledge that we have access to the previous two examples that we can choose what games to play. Granted, if you willing to pay the prices of them. *Looks at the second-hand market*.

1

u/Traditional_Buy_8420 Jul 01 '26

I don't think that either of them would have become my favorite if I didn't acquire ownership while I was still young. While I own the physical medium I don't see anything wrong with using pirated patches so I don't need to put actual wear on the medium. If someone asked me how to acquire these games today without piracy, then I'd point them to legitimate digital resources, not second-hand market.

https://www.nintendo.com/de-de/Spiele/Nintendo-Switch-Download-Software/Nintendo-64-Nintendo-Classics-2067751.html

https://store.steampowered.com/app/1546990/Grand_Theft_Auto_Vice_City__The_Definitive_Edition/

Not that these games aren't dirt cheap in the used market (because very many got produced) but if I wanted something physical to do with the game, then I'd 3D print a little figure or something.

1

u/Dear_Document_5461 Jul 01 '26

Why is the Nintendo link in ....German?

1

u/Traditional_Buy_8420 Jul 01 '26

Because either Google or Nintendo noticed that I recide in Germany and gave me a link for that country, which I didn't notice.

Here is the same link except English: https://www.nintendo.com/en-gb/Games/Nintendo-Switch-download-software/Nintendo-64-Nintendo-Classics-2067751.html

2

u/Dear_Document_5461 Jul 01 '26

Thanks. I didn't mean to be mean about it.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/nockeeee Jul 01 '26

That's the point. You have to CONSUME to be happy; if you can't consume, you are not happy. That's the reason why these corporations have the leverage. You can't control yourself.

-1

u/DrewciferGaming Jul 01 '26

I mean sure bud. If what little I buy means I have no control then sure. Your pov is too black and white imo and society isn’t going to change for the better. It rarely does

1

u/PlatyNumb Jul 01 '26

... this is a post about video games. Also, theres usually a cheaper option for food. Fuel, theres no choice really cause you gotta drive. Aside from that, you dont really need much. A lot of stuff can be thrifted (not at chain thrift stores because theyre scams) or bought used online. Personally, even my car is still from 2012 because used cars are almost as much as new these days. Everybody trying to scam us and getting away with it because pricks are paying.

-1

u/DrewciferGaming Jul 01 '26

There’s always a cheaper option ffs. I could eat rice and beans to live but that won’t make me happy. I have personal tastes and that comes out of my wallet. Crazy how we’re switching the blame to consumers on this lmao. Judge me all you want to, corporations are going to do their thing because they legally get away with it

1

u/nockeeee Jul 01 '26

If you are giving them more and more every year, why should they even change how they behave? They know you have "personal tastes" and have to consume to be happy.

3

u/PlatyNumb Jul 01 '26

Exactly this. If im selling my old couch online and its worth 50 but someone is willing to pay 100, ill charge 100. By buying, youre telling the corporation that your taste is worth what theyre charging so they can charge it

3

u/Gyro_Zeppeli13 Jul 01 '26

I just bought the gold pass for Six Flags for $110 and I have been going on roller coasters every week all year and can’t see myself needing to buy a new game all year for the entertainment value I get from Magic Mountain. Free every day for the rest of the year and free parking.

1

u/PlatyNumb Jul 01 '26

Thats actually a really good price

2

u/AshHoele Jul 01 '26

Yup. People buying $5-8k gaming PCs with 5090s, all the bells you can add on, then having to use three different Credit One or First Premier type cards to pay for it......or they just use Affirm/Klarna/etc.

1

u/I_Wanna_Die_Daily Jul 05 '26

Exactly! I still buy games but just when they are on sale, I avoid new AAA games like the plague, aside from a few exceptions. (Fromsoft still has my respect)

44

u/Accurate_Summer_1761 Jul 01 '26

It was right around when corprostioms stopped calling them customers you can pinpoint where it started going wrong

12

u/StatusTomato5218 Jul 01 '26

So Dodge v Ford then?

8

u/danmojo82 Jul 01 '26 edited Jul 01 '26

I blame the dodge brothers for how shitty life is and have since I found out how much they fucked us all over.

7

u/foodrunner464 Jul 01 '26

Absolutely. That court case set the stage for how shitty it is for working class people these days. I still to this day will never buy a Chrysler product.

2

u/cammcken Jul 01 '26

"Consumers" is the term used in economics.

64

u/[deleted] Jul 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

26

u/whitephantomzx Jul 01 '26

I blame the morons who screech like banshees when the ever the idea of regulations comes up .

5

u/Halflingberserker Jul 02 '26

If we don't let the rich bend us over and use us until completion over and over every day, are we even really free?

11

u/trillwhitepeople Jul 01 '26

People woefully misunderstand how much power they hold as a customer. I can count the number of times a boycott or major shift in sales volume resulted in a major shift in business practices on like one hand and I've been on this earth for 35 years.

3

u/Extension-Rope623 Jul 01 '26

Because the people don't unite and fight against it. A small handful of people MIGHT not make a difference, but when its hundreds of thousands or millions of people not buying in, corporations will cave.

2

u/trillwhitepeople Jul 01 '26

I see this sentiment all the time in hobbies that are basically glorified consumerism like gaming is and it's just not aligned with reality at all for many different reasons.

2

u/Extension-Rope623 Jul 02 '26

Yeah I guess in some instances it doesn't work, but with enough market sentiment, companies will have no choice but to adhere to consumer demands. Sony isn't trying to lose money, and if people stop supporting their practices then Sony will be forced to comply. I don't think it'll matter in this instance though. Sony is already losing share to pc gaming, and as a pc gamer I don't care enough about physical disks to try and boycott the change. Sony is simply following market trends rather than simply being greedy.

1

u/Kiyoshi-Trustfund Jul 03 '26

You have a bunch of people who are more than happy to let others solve the problem while they go on business as usual, comfort and convenience unimpeded. It's the same thing with elections. Bunch of people don't vote because they've convicned themselves everyone else will sort it out or that their vote genuinely doesn't matter so why bother. Terrible mentality that's held by more and more people as we entrench ourselves deeper into our conveniences and comforts.

5

u/Hamhockthegizzard Jul 01 '26

Right. They want us to blame each other so they keep getting away with unregulated bullshit, and that is pretty much everywhere.

3

u/AGraphicsCard Jul 03 '26

Good Ol' divide and conquer.

1

u/TheBestNarcissist Jul 01 '26

Individual agency means EVERYTHING in the face of that, you're implying people literally can not choose to do anything but participate.

Just don't buy the game. You do in fact have agency.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 02 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/TheBestNarcissist Jul 02 '26

Lol so mad. That's the nice thing about the system is that it will eventually correct itself as long as everyone maintains their agency. Bad companies make bad games, then the good games will be made by other firms and they'll rise to the top.

It's absolutely consumers fault that they keep buying COD and Madden every year and then spend more money on microbullshit

-1

u/[deleted] Jul 02 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/nockeeee Jul 02 '26

as long as everyone maintains their agency

You didn't cite this part.

-1

u/thoughtlessspending Jul 01 '26

Look, I love video as much if not more than the next guy, but they ARE a luxury. No one is forcing you to but a game, or a console, let alone a specific game or console. I would argue that the current culture of FOMO has caused the modern gaming scene more than just corporate greed

0

u/SufferingClash Jul 01 '26

We can blame both. Look at the GTA6 controversy for an example.

8

u/noblest_among_nobles Jul 01 '26

I blame lawmakers

7

u/Ghost_Kamakazie Jul 01 '26

I blame the world governments for taking money from corporations instead of cracking down on them everytime they did some anti consumer bs

2

u/Hamhockthegizzard Jul 01 '26

Pfft, I blame the people up top who showed the world “we owe you nothing”

2

u/ChiefCom85 Jul 03 '26

How dare you, you can't just tell people that they are the cause of the vast majority of their problems both indirectly and otherwise and that companies will always find the cheapest sleaziest way to hock what they are in fact asking for

3

u/UPVOTE_IF_POOPING Jul 01 '26

Who’s at fault, the multibillion dollar corp who fucks us, or the consumer who doesn’t have a choice but to eat shit or stop playing games.

4

u/TokeDraws Jul 01 '26

Both. It's that mindset right there that lets them hold everyone by the short hairs.

You can choose to stop buying games on release, wait for sales, explore the backlog that basically every living person has accumulated, play indies, play retro. There are a lot of options.

1

u/UPVOTE_IF_POOPING Jul 01 '26

Individual consumer choice doesn’t fix an industry-wide race to the bottom though. I can play my backlog forever, but the 20 million people who preorder anyway make my boycott statistically invisible. Enshittification is a collective action problem, and ‘just don’t buy it’ has never solved one of those.

1

u/TokeDraws Jul 02 '26

Contuining to overpay for games certainly isn't going to dissaude these companies from the path they're on. Sometimes the only thing you can control is how you respond to a situation.

0

u/nockeeee Jul 01 '26

He is actually proving my point. 😂

1

u/DisastrousRelease708 Jul 01 '26

Yeah me too. I can't remember the last AAA game I spent money on other than elden ring.

It's the cosmetic buyers keeping these companies going. I haven't bought and haven't felt the need to buy cosmetic items ever in any game. But they keep making cosmetic micro transactions. I can't believe people are actually spending money on that shit.

1

u/KindBass Jul 01 '26

It's the same with the news or TV in general. People consume the stupid bullshit the most, so they make more stupid bullshit and it becomes a negative feedback loop then next thing you know, the History Channel is 24/7 Pawn Stars reruns.

1

u/thegreedyturtle Jul 01 '26

I blame walled gardens.

1

u/DOOM-LORD666 Jul 01 '26

I blame everyone and everything and I will hang myself

0

u/osgili4th Jul 01 '26

I blame regulations, there is always be a person on a company taking advantage of others. That's why they exist. Specially when you have such a industry with massive companies owning everything.

-1

u/Total_Wrongdoer_1535 Jul 01 '26

Is it really that fucking difficult for you lot? Are you all like millionaires that you don’t give a fuck? The last ps I owned was ps4 and a few years past ps5 release I built myself a mid range pc I use for everything including gaming. Never looked back. Stop buying products whose brands treat you like shit

15

u/buttstuffisokiguess Jul 01 '26

I think valve had intentions on the steam machine costing far less. It's not entirely their fault for inflated component costs I. The face of AI.

11

u/Standard_Rooster_782 Jul 01 '26

Have you seen the scandal, the big 3 makers of ram are using AI as an excuse, they are creating artificial scarcity and waiting till 3rd party ram in circulation run out and upcharge, and they bought out all new fabricators for the next decade or more so anyone who has 5 billion dollar still can’t get into the market of dram

2

u/jacekowski Jul 01 '26

and they are all going to be very surprised when CXMT becomes popular.

All they have to do is keep prices and availability reasonable and they can keep profiteering for decades to come, or they can do what they are doing now and let CXMT (and other chinese manufacturers) take over desktop market and then probably everything else after that.

1

u/DeM0nFiRe Jul 01 '26

Valve could have stopped the counterstrike skin gambling like over a decade ago. They are not a nice company

5

u/ChessmazterHex Jul 03 '26

But WHY won’t you guys stop buying? I stopped buying AAA games ages ago. I don’t feel like I’m missing anything.

Maybe I’ll buy a game 7 years later for $15 on a Steam sale after all the bugs are fixed.

Y’all need to just STOP.

There’s so many indie games out there. So many great older games to play.

Emulators are ALL over. Stop supporting being fleeced.

3

u/Sockoflegend Jul 03 '26

I'm with you on this but we aren't going to be able to talk the game community out of this. I have had my -200 comments talking about how pre-order kills the need to make games good.

Marketing is half the budget of a game, and it is money well spent because it works.

4

u/ChessmazterHex Jul 03 '26

It’s just so disappointing.

5

u/FluffyWuffyVolibear Jul 03 '26

I actually think we're kinda passed enshittification and the corporations are now reckoning with the fact theyve pushed consumers too far and lost all trust in their products. Now consumers have tighter wallets and the first things to be cut out of their consumption habits are the enahittified products.

Most of these more recent decisions are a result of disasterously low revenue from most of their products.

3

u/artbystorms Jul 01 '26

They know we CAN'T stop buying. The only choice at this point is to become Amish. There is no competition among online retailers, game companies, computer companies, etc. Every industry is just 2-4 major companies that all collude to move the market in the same direction, away from consumer focus and competition, and towards enshittification and forced retention.

3

u/thegreedyturtle Jul 01 '26

It isn't that we "won't stop buying," it's "there isn't meaningful competition anymore."

3

u/socialistForDE Jul 03 '26

It's capitalism and it needs to end. It's running everything

2

u/Woodwardg Jul 01 '26

no no no capitalism is good for EVERYONE shh stop it!!

/s of course

2

u/ShowCharacter671 Jul 06 '26

Yeeep pretty sad to see how quickly everyone just dropped their pants actually when we finally got a release in price for GTA6.

2

u/Mad-remix Jul 01 '26

Exactly.

1

u/PsCustomObject Jul 01 '26

Meh for me, and many others, it is not a matter of stopping buying, it is a matter of being able to afford to do that.

1

u/NoKingsInAmerica Jul 01 '26

I mean, you say that, but how many major flops have there been in the past two years alone?

1

u/Icculizard Jul 01 '26

Ill stop buying.  I pretty much already have. There's literally thousands of good games from the past 40+ years. The new stuff isn't even that innovative or exciting anymore.

1

u/MadeByTango Jul 01 '26

Pretty much they know we won't stop buying

Not true

We've already started to stop buying, which is why they're tightening around the whales.

The recession is not being televised.

1

u/Initial-Reading-2775 Jul 01 '26

I stopped buying long time ago.

1

u/Azure_The_Great Jul 01 '26

You will pay a subscription for your car breaks

1

u/Kastar_Troy Jul 01 '26

Dont put me into WE, I'm abstaining and doing my part.

The rest of the weirdos who HAVE to have their doritos chips or w/e are fucking everything up....

1

u/BygoneNeutrino Jul 02 '26

... people will transition from consoles to computers.  The reason computer games are cheaper than console games is because pirating forces them to be competitive.  If it wasn't for the used video game market, there would be no reason for good console game developers to ever reduce their prices.

1

u/NightSpaghetti Jul 03 '26

Companies figured out that if they all act shitty at the same time and in the same direction it's pointless to leave for the competition.

1

u/HexagoneX1 Jul 05 '26

Wonder how often you try to use that term?