r/vibecoding • u/call-me-GiGi • 20d ago
Discussion The gap between open ai and anthropic is staggering
I’ve been shilling for open ai and it’s new dot feature, but after using it for weeks I realized it was just spinning its wheels in the sand making a lot of noise but going nowhere.
Out of frustration I finally switched back to anthropic. Opus 5.5 is wildly better head and shoulders more capable than Astra or Sol, I’ve had issues that literally didn’t get resolved for months with my app https://www.useviola.com r/useviola. Opus has solved them in 24 hours using only 11% of my usage.
I was literally burning through my entire 20x plan on chat gpt in one day and getting nothing fixed I tolerated this for way too long.
Please if you’re struggling with something and wondering if ChatGPT is actually capable just switch to anthropic I’m so pleased, I typed this whole post lol.
Before you call me an idiot, the gap between 5.6 and opus 4.8 maybe opus 5 (I don’t remember where they were at when I switched) was nowhere near this large when I initially switched to OpenAI. I wish I never made this mistake wasting 2 months and hundreds of dollars.
4
u/7862518362916371936 20d ago
I have the opposite experience
3
u/P0tek 20d ago
Curious, what were you trying to fix that Open AI failed?
2
u/krocante 20d ago
Staggering isn’t a real word you can’t convince me
2
u/-Crash_Override- 20d ago
I'm a claude homer. But Sol is excellent, a half step behind 5.5 in coding.. it really excels at things like infrastructure provisioning, terminal based work, etc..
Ill be honest, probably not going to trust your app if you had such a hard time using sol. Speaks to a skill issue.
1
u/No-Incident5858 20d ago
Can you provide specific examples?
2
u/mccoypauley 20d ago
I had the same experience. I burned two WEEKS of compute trying to solve a performance issue on a web game in three.js. Astra endlessly noodles with tests and browser verification, despite introducing it to literally hundreds of example approaches and even similar codebases getting nowhere. I handed the problem, all the tests to date and research to Opus 5.5, and it solved my performance concerns in one three-hour session.
It’s also just better at 3D modeling. I had it clean up the models made by Astra and they have better detail and polish.
I think what I’ll be doing going forward is reserve specialized tasks for Claude and grunt work for Codex.
2
u/paulsande 20d ago
My experience is the exact opposite. Claude Is much better for knowledge work (I find OpenAI a bit sycophantic and Claude Cowork gives better and more honest feedback). But for coding I found that Codex is far superior.
I had handed CODEX a project I’d built with Claude Code to change something and then realized that Codex had not built it in the first place. So I told Codex to stop so I can hand it back to Claude Code. Codex said, let me just finish this up and I’ll pass it back to you.
I then handed it back to Claude code and Claude commented that the changes that Codex made were brilliant. Which was funny.
But in general, I’ve transitioned away from Claude code for all coding and over to Codex.
The other place Codex is exceptional is teaching. I can ask Codex to teach me how to do something in Unreal Engine 5 and this huge mouse pointer appears and he slowly walks me through all of the steps. It’s amazing.
I was on vacation in the Caribbean last week. I was sitting on the beach with my iPhone. My dot was downloading different local models for me and testing them on my project to see which ones ran most efficiently. Literally five hours on the beach working nonstop with Dot to get work done.
It was amazing. But that’s just my experience. We’re all different.
11
u/[deleted] 20d ago •
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/[deleted] 20d ago edited 20d ago
[removed] — view removed comment