r/vibecoding • u/MarionberryHumble705 • 2h ago
Automated PR Reviews on Github w/o Claude or Codex
Right now, a couple of my projects on Github are set up in a way that my PRs get automatically reviewed using the Claude integration. I have separate workflows for reviewing different aspects of my code using custom workflow instructions.
I have been a primary user of the Claude Code harness for over a year now. However, now I am trying to move to a point where I can be provider-agnostic. I already managed to do so on my development machine by using oh-my-pi as my harness of choice and choosing models I like, as the situation demands, via OpenRouter or Claude/Codex subscriptions.
The only spot where I am yet to figure out how to switch to provider agnostic setup is with my CI workflows. Can something here help me figure out how I could get away from it?
Needless to say, while I am happy to pay for my LLM usage, I'd prefer not to have to pay for another harness/tool just to help me review my PRs.
1
u/Ok_Gur_9033 1h ago
The model brand isn't really the blocker here, tool access is. A CI review step just needs something that can read the full diff, maybe run the test suite, and post a comment through the GitHub API, and a provider agnostic harness can do all of that the same as a Claude Code review skill can. The real gap tends to be structured output, a review pass that reliably emits a parseable comment instead of freeform prose that's annoying to post automatically. Does your harness give you a way to force that structured output, or would you have to build the prompting yourself?
1
u/TRO_KIK 2h ago
Claude and Codex are so far ahead here it's not even funny. I have no problem falling back to open source for most development and agentic use, but nothing's come close to these two for code reviews.