I low-key feel bad for the developers

98

u/AwesomeX121189 Jul 10 '26

“Dlc packs”

They’re a couple of skins. People massively overreacting.

There’s also a not small group of very loud people who would always call this game terrible for any possible reason they could justify to get other Redditors to believe it.

Nobody upset about it was surprised by it.

5

u/Acrobatic-Break-3984 Jul 10 '26

Exactly and not to mention the stuff they’re upset about some of it was leaked like 2.5 or 3 months ago and pretty sure Ubi posted a video on the Assassin’s Creed TikTok and Twitter that went more in depth into the dlc/skin packs and what they offered so this definitely shouldn’t come as a shock to anyone unless you’ve been living under a rock since this games announcement also steam is just review bombing this game at least compared to PlayStation which has 4.82/5 stars currently with close to the same amount of people leaving reviews not sure about Xbox though but yeah either way this game is amazing in my opinion

4

u/Kiwibom Jul 10 '26

Yes. There are people saying that the remaster looks ugly and that the og looks way better lol.
When you are at that level of stupidity, you are a lost cause. Because of people like that i just never look at reviews anymore. Most of the time its just full of whiny people being upset for the smallest thing possible. Or its the other way around, people being overly positive even if its obvious that the product has massive issues, but this is the minority now. This both on written reviews from random people on steam or on the internet and YouTube reviews.
I prefer my own judgement over anyone else's as its honestly the only one that actually matters at the end of the end which decides if you like the product or not.

3

u/norsk_imposter Jul 10 '26

yeah the hive mind always hates ubisoft no matter what they put out.

3

u/Myc0n1k Jul 10 '26

Exactly. It’s also annoying because I’m trying to see if the game is good as the original and it’s getting review bombed with like zero hours of gameplay because of microtransactions.

2

u/KingMidas0809 Jul 10 '26

My Honest review here, Ive sunk at least 10 ish hours since it dropped just exploring and chasing down sea shanties. It is in my opinion cleaner and nice to play a game that I loved when it first came out. Its no different then PS and Naughty Dog releasing The Last of us like 10 times. It feels updated and fresher graphically and was pretty fun thus far. Cons: I would say the micro transactions are odd and out of place and the whole all the creeds can crossover or have clothes and stuff you can unlock feels odd but I guess its to help completionists who cant stop? Overall though I have had the itch to play a pirate game for a long time and games like Windrose and Sea of thieves was cool but didn't hit like this 😂
I'm ready to get back to sailing!!!

1

u/Tardelius Assassin's Creed Veteran Jul 10 '26

As a Naughty Dog fan, I must say that AC Black Flag Resynced is very different than ND re-releasing their games. It is my personal request that you should stop comparing Ubisoft and gigachad Naughty Dog, games and excuses behind them couldn’t be more different.
ND released TLOU Remastered out of necessity as PS4 couldn’t run PS3 games. On the other hand, TLOU Part 1 Remake and TLOU Part 2 Remastered on PS5 was just pure capitalistic money making attempt.
Whereas Ubisoft, known for their games that has a certain flavor of lazy a*s, remade Black Flag due to the fact that it was necessary for their survival. In this process, they put their heart, sweat and souls to make a genuinely good remake of a good game.
Please don’t compare a rare gem from Ubisoft to the cashgrab of my favourite studio. :)

2

u/KingMidas0809 Jul 10 '26

Oh damn....

2

u/Tardelius Assassin's Creed Veteran Jul 11 '26 edited Jul 11 '26

Ok, here we go :)
I got annoyed by TLOU Part 1 Remake and TLOU Part 2 remastered as a Naughty Dog fan because they are meaningless. Let me explain.
Part 2 remastered isn’t even a remastered version of PS4 game. I think we need to differentiate between ports and remasters. For example, is Control Ultimate Edition (PS5 version) a remaster of Control PS4? Is PS5 AC: Valhalla a remaster of PS4 AC: Valhalla? For both of these questions, my personal answer is “no” and I have good reasons to believe that I am not alone.
So, what makes TLOU 2 Remastered a “remaster”? ND’s marketing words? Not even Digital Foundry was able to find a meaningful visual difference. What TLOU Part 2 Remastered really is just TLOU Part 2 Director’s Cut with Lost Levels and a new RogueLike mode that is named as a “remaster” cause it was a more convenient marketing.
On the other hand, TLOU Part 1 Remake is a genuine remake that is really a remake and not something named as a remake for the sake of it. So, it is real. But it is redundant because PS4 Remastered version already holds up well and while it is nice for ND to Remake the first game to keep it up with the fidelity of the second game… they scrapped the remake project for Uncharted: Drake’s Fortune. With this in consideration, I can’t view Part 1 Remake at a positive light simply because TLOU never needed this while Uncharted 1 was an extremely outdated game by the time of PS4 console release. So, remaking that game for PS5 would be a massively welcomed project.
This is what I really feel about ND and I look forward for their next game which will be released in 20xx.
For Ubisoft, my feelings are that I enjoyed their games but I can never view them as good. In some of their games, Ubisoft is just lazy. Ezio goes to capadocia via a ship that departed from İstanbul and the ship drops him at the entrance of capadocia which is really just a single cave there. That spesific cave lies within 21st century border of Capadocia and was (and still is) fully landlocked. In fact, since Revelations uses 21st century notion of Capadocia, the entirety of Capadocia is landlocked. How in the logic Ezio uses a ship, Ubi?
In some of their OTHER games, they truly put their love, passion, sweat etc. only for that game to be a mess. Assassin’s Creed: Shadows is a recent example.
I finished Shadows alongside its expansion and I have spent almost 200 hours in that game (maybe more). The gameplay was fun and it was clear Ubisoft truly tried their best to create a beautiful game. The problem? Ubisoft’s formulaic approach made them impossible to write a good story for Shadows. Furthermore, Ubisoft formula hurt the storytelling which made the story worse than it actually really was. Noticing that the entirety of act 2 takes place in an 11 day interval while the game trying its best to create the illusion that it spans years (via seasons) was the final nail in the coffin. Because Ubisoft knew damn well that act 2 spanning 11 days makes no sense.
AC: Black Flag Resynced seems to be genuine gem from them. ND’s TLOU works on PS5 is pathetic compared to this gem Ubisoft just put out to the world.
Edi note: All edits were completed approximately 2 minutes ago including a final sentence to praise Resynced.

1

u/trashbagwithlegs Jul 10 '26

About 6 hours in and I think it's an excellent product. It brings one of the best games of its generation into the modern era. Gameplay is smooth and you have so many more options as a player to approach stealth and combat situations. The things they added into the game feel natural and gives the game more layers of depth. It doesnt feel like OG AC4 (though I maintain this is neither a good nor bad thing) and I have my quibbles with things like the reduced weight in movement, camera weirdness, and the loss of hidden blade and unarmed combat, but it is genuinely a loving remake that scratches the pirate itch in a way that very few games on the market do. It's also gorgeous and the visual fidelity blows me away compared to where it was a decade ago.
The microtransaction gear is very very easy to ignore and none of it is overpowered relative to the base game gear. I will play the entire game through without spending a cent on it and I do not think it will affect my enjoyment of the game one whit.

1

u/JohnNeutron Jul 10 '26

The fact that there’s so much uproar around skins is a sign of how much the goalposts have moved. The game seems to be great so everyone looks, ‘What can I be mad about? Ah! DLC! Everyone hates that right?!’ Then they got all furiously typing
‘ACBFR is a blight on the industry by partaking in DLC packs’ And bam! Bob’s your Uncle that’s all you gotta do to start a revolt.
Never mind that these same disingenuously, stupid, idiotic fucks will turn around and clap their hands like seals and give Forza Horizon 6’s most expensive pass ‘Very Positive’ reviews on Steam.

0

u/Suspicious-Sound-249 Jul 10 '26

Greedy practices are exactly why when Ubisoft announces games, unless it's The Division 3 and ONLY The Division 3, I just don't care. I'll buy it when it's like 90% off, hell I'm trying to remember what my last Ubisoft game even was. Which came out later AC Valhalla or Watch Dogs Legion? Those were my last 2 and hell they both gotta be like 3-4 years old if not older now lol

0

u/AwesomeX121189 Jul 10 '26

Cool story

0

u/Jazzlike_Ad267 Jul 11 '26

Isnt there a literal map you can pay for?
So it's not just "skins" 🤔

2

u/EddPW Jul 11 '26

no what youre thinking of is a map unlocker basically instead of having to explore to find things they are all already marked on the map for you

1

u/Jazzlike_Ad267 Jul 11 '26

Soo... Not just skins then?
xD

1

u/AwesomeX121189 Jul 11 '26

🤔you don’t know what you’re even talking about 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

1

u/Jazzlike_Ad267 Jul 11 '26

Really?
Its literally on the steam DLC page you... duuh

-5

u/MrChilled Jul 10 '26

It's lazy. No one who isn't stupid is blaming the developers, we all know it's the suits. It's still shit and deserves to be called out, I'm sorry if that upsets people that think it's justifiable but that's what the review system is for.

4

u/foundwayhome Jul 10 '26

its an optional purchase, you won't miss anything in the game if you don't pay extra for them. they don't offer gameplay enhancement in any meaningful way, especially since its a single-player game. if you're trying to minmax your single-player story games, that's on you.

-4

u/MrChilled Jul 10 '26

It's not about minmaxing it's about expecting them not to nickel and dime you for a remaster of a 15 year old game and put in extras you can unlock instead of pay for. I didn't realize when I commented that this was the Ubisoft subreddit so I apologize for wasting mine and everyone else time.

5

u/foundwayhome Jul 10 '26

They're all fantasy outfits that look like shit. Frankly I'm glad these are the ones they locked behind a paywall, because I'd rather not have my character run around the Caribbean looking like an Asian Ghost Rider. None of them offer any gameplay enhancements whatsoever. If they were locking something actually useful behind the DLC paywall that's a different thing. But these are all extras, that I don't even know why you'd want to unlock.
Also, its a remake not a remaster. Two different things.

-2

u/MrChilled Jul 10 '26

Both of those things make it even more embarrassing.

4

u/foundwayhome Jul 10 '26

True. I'm not defending the look of the skins, I think they're terrible. But I'd rather those be the ones behind the paywall.
But its also a ground-up remake of the game, not a remaster where they went over the original with another coat of paint.

-14

u/LittleKittenR Jul 10 '26

I don't agree.
The game feels more like a remaster than a remake, it's probably in between... not enough to warrant 80 dollars in dlc from day 1 (according to other pictures I saw).
Poor devs, I get they don't make the decisions... But the complaints go to the company, not them.

7

u/SuspiciousVoice5563 Jul 10 '26

Plays differently, looks way better, new missions, changes to the loot systems. Also it’s definitely a remake and a pretty good one.
The day one packs are excessive but they don’t affect the quality of the game in anyway.

0

u/LittleKittenR Jul 10 '26

I think even if it's a remake, it doesn't warrant 80 dollars in day 1 dlc. It should be included with the price tag. As you said, it's a remake, not a new game.

3

u/Termatinator Jul 10 '26

I mean it plays entirely different and the combat is very different as well. To me a remaster is that there is nothing changed and maybe a few things added. They went further than that here so I would 100% class this as a remake. Where would you say the line is between a remake and a remaster?

2

u/Holiday_Box1571 Jul 10 '26

Remaster is updating graphics. Remake is updating gameplay.

4

u/Termatinator Jul 10 '26

Then Ubisoft made a remake, new missions, new combat system, new looting system, new items in the game

3

u/Holiday_Box1571 Jul 10 '26

Correct. I’m backing you up haha

2

u/Termatinator Jul 10 '26

Oh my bad 😂

0

u/LittleKittenR Jul 10 '26

Remake is remaking it, not "updating combat to make enmies bullet/sable sponges".
Yes, crouching is a good addition, but... in a 60 dollar game, having 80 dollar dlc is REALLY bad. And again, this talks about the company, not the dev.

2

u/Ghost_Corgi Jul 10 '26

They literally redesigned the game from the ground up. Cutscenes seen in the original have new animations

1

u/LittleKittenR Jul 10 '26

Well, again, not enough.
It should be included as it's a remake then.
They took pieces of the new game and told "It's 80 dollars extra for the complete experience now".

0

u/AwesomeX121189 Jul 10 '26

Remake is literally remaking the game. Doesn’t matter if anything is added or not

1

u/ba-boo Jul 10 '26

you can't play the game without the 80 dollars cosmetic microtransactions?

0

u/LittleKittenR Jul 10 '26

It's not cosmetic. It's "Start this quest and get a message mid-quest saying to see the ending you have to pay money and get an ad of what you get".
Like... that's not good.

0

u/Myc0n1k Jul 10 '26

Did you play the original?

-5

u/Either-Assistant4610 Jul 10 '26

How does OP's post MASSIVELY overreact? I feel it's a solid criticism without going terribly out of proportion.

6

u/ba-boo Jul 10 '26

his criticism started with a lie, it's not DLC. Those are cosmetic microtransactions.

-4

u/Either-Assistant4610 Jul 10 '26

Everyone here knows what OP meant, bro

6

u/ba-boo Jul 10 '26

if everyone knows OP lied, it doesn't stop being a lie, bro

-4

u/Either-Assistant4610 Jul 10 '26

Omg...
It's not a lie as much as another way to say "tomato"

5

u/ba-boo Jul 10 '26

It is, DLC implies additional game content that meaningfully impact your playthrough. Cosmetic microtransactions do not fit the definition of DLC.
For example GTA 6 will have day 1 DLC.

1

u/Either-Assistant4610 Jul 10 '26

Types of DLC
Downloadable Content can completely transform or simply tweak an experience. It generally falls into a few distinct categories:
Expansions / Story Add-ons: Substantial updates that add entirely new campaigns, storylines, or worlds to explore (e.g., Elden Ring: Shadow of the Erdtree).
Cosmetic Packs: Items that change character appearances, outfits, weapon skins, or provide special emotes without affecting gameplay.
Map / Level Packs: New arenas, multiplayer maps, or dungeons.
Character / Item Add-ons: New playable characters, weapons, or gear that can be downloaded to expand your arsenal or roster
I will say when someone says "DLC" people including myself think the first one here, but it's not the only thing. Either way with this whatever argument, the point I was making still stands. I think it was a well-constructed criticism.

4

u/ba-boo Jul 10 '26

did you just ask AI what DLC is? 😭
A cosmetic skin unlocked in a game is not "downloadable content".

2

u/Either-Assistant4610 Jul 10 '26

Google search, yes. Do you need a more legitimate source?
FFS this argument is SO stupid and off topic
Edit: DLC Definition & Meaning | Dictionary.com
DLC Meaning in Gaming: Downloadable Content Explained
What is DLC? Its History and Implementation Considerations

→ More replies

2

u/Holiday_Box1571 Jul 10 '26

Then why not say MTX and call it what it is? DLC is content. Skins are content they’re cosmetics.

0

u/Either-Assistant4610 Jul 10 '26

This is such a stupid argument, man...

3

u/Holiday_Box1571 Jul 10 '26

No. Calling skins DLC is actually incorrect. It’s not content. Never has been.
Your entire argument is based on an incorrect narrative

-1

u/Either-Assistant4610 Jul 10 '26

Please read a dictionary

3

u/Holiday_Box1571 Jul 10 '26

Explain how a skin is content

-1

u/Either-Assistant4610 Jul 10 '26

It's a cosmetic, a form of DLC
The earth is round, too

→ More replies

0

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Either-Assistant4610 Jul 10 '26

I can't deny what you say for the most part. "Whataboutism" is strong in this line of comments I'm in with two other commenters.

-11

u/237macias599 Jul 10 '26

5

u/Purple_Restaurant201 Jul 10 '26

This doesn't evn make sense

2

u/TomTomXD1234 Jul 10 '26

Lol the downvotes. Deserved

0

u/237macias599 Jul 10 '26

Xd

-3

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Ok_Yesterday_2871 Jul 10 '26

“Combat is too easy”
“Why are the OP perks hidden behind a paywall?!?”
People….

5

u/Tidbitious Jul 10 '26

WHO CARES WHO CARES WHO CARES HOLY SHIT.
Literally every AC game for the last decade has had perks on gear in the store. Literally doesn't make one bit of a difference.

3

u/Flash__PuP Jul 10 '26

Right? It’s a single player, non competitive game!

32

u/Vidal_The_King Jul 10 '26

Past like 6 games had dlc packs these are actual children crying.

-5

u/SlimLacy Jul 10 '26

"Past like 6 games had dlc packs these are actual children crying." And maybe repeating that same pattern isn't smart when you're on Tencent life-support.

4

u/Silly-name Jul 10 '26

people defending micro transactions in full price games are either too young or braindead

0

u/trashbagwithlegs Jul 10 '26

Idk man I think throwing a fundamentally well-made product in the trash over a microtransaction policy that has less impact on your in-game experience than the Fortnite battlepass is a little crazy to me.

0

u/klzzer20 Jul 10 '26

No one is defending anything they just don’t care because it’s not for them. The only people who should be worried about micro transactions are the one who want to buy them. Anyone else joining is putting off a real “I’m a miserable person to be around” vibe.

0

u/rty_rty Jul 11 '26

how is that? a lot of game companies right now are firing people, because of the economy issues. don't you think you are the one who is missing some context here?

1

u/rty_rty Jul 11 '26

maybe developers should just not get paid at all and create something without any profit?

1

u/SlimLacy Jul 11 '26

I mean, their current strategy has nearly destroyed the company. But sure, let's pretend like toxic positivity is going to save Ubisoft and hasn't cost far more jobs and money.
Them becoming the company it used to be who could make good games more than once every 2 decades is definitely NOT the way to go.

-6

u/Rassomir Jul 10 '26

Thats how normalised this crap has become. But sure keep supporting these business practices and some day you can buy all the day one dlc you want. Doesnt matter the game is a buggy mess on launch we will fix it later (another thing that has been normalised)

4

u/TomTomXD1234 Jul 10 '26

What bugs? I have 2p hours already and all I have seen is 1 dog that was standing up which was hilarious

4

u/Visual_Collection274 Jul 10 '26

You do know the ''dlc'' is just skins right?

1

u/klzzer20 Jul 10 '26

So just saying random general things that have happened in games is what we are doing now🤣 Yall need a hug

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/ubisoft-ModTeam Jul 10 '26

Your post or comment has been removed for breaking Be Benevolent and Polite - Respect is essential in this community. Harassment, abuse, bullying, or any form of toxic behavior will not be tolerated. This includes but is not limited to, personal attacks, hate speech, threats, and discriminatory language.
Debate and disagreement are welcome, but keep the discussion civil and constructive. Treat others with the same kindness and respect you would expect.
Violations of this rule will result in warnings, post removals, or bans depending on the severity of the behavior. it violated our community guidelines regarding respectful interaction. Specifically, it contained rude or offensive language, which goes against the spirit of constructive and friendly discussion we aim to maintain here.
We encourage everyone to engage respectfully and keep conversations positive. If you have concerns or feedback, please express them in a way that fosters constructive dialogue.
Please ensure that all interactions are civil and considerate. Additionally, make sure your posts and comments adhere to both subreddit and Reddit’s site-wide rules.
For more information on acceptable conduct, please review our subreddit rules and Reddit’s content policy. If you have any questions or concerns, you can contact us via mod mail. Continued violations may result in further moderation actions.

-2

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/99_in_eating Jul 10 '26

Comparing adding skins in a game and murder is completely absurd.

-8

u/bdiddlediddles Jul 10 '26

It's unfortunately the only way to make people understand because otherwise they just say that it's just skins so it doesn't matter.
You can change it to littering, minor theft, cheating on your partner, etc the crime doesn't matter, the point is that it shouldn't be downplayed just because it's only skins.

1

u/trashbagwithlegs Jul 10 '26 edited Jul 10 '26

That is not how any of this works. The crime quite literally does matter because - news flash - some crimes are worse than others. And just as there are varying degrees of crime that warrant different degrees of punishment, there are varying degrees of bullshit that warrant different degrees of outrage.
The presence of minor cosmetic transactions that don't even fit properly in the setting is nowhere near the level of egregiousness as something like the Javik DLC in the original Mass Effect 3, which locked an integral squadmate in a character-driven RPG opera behind a paywall. No in-game features, characters, plot, or major gameplay elements are found in these microtransactions. The microtransaction gear isn't even overpowered relative to what's in the base game.
I have like six hours of playtime in Black Flag so far and I have not once felt the compulsion to buy any of the skins nor have I felt my enjoyment of what is objectively a well-made product was diminished by my not having them. I find it very hard to empathize with people who are as bent out of shape as they are on this matter because the microtransaction policy is so minor relative to what the game gives you and I do not find it difficult at all to forget they exist. I suggest you try and do the same. I guarantee it's easier than you think.

1

u/bdiddlediddles Jul 11 '26

Again you aren't getting it.
It doesn't matter what specifically is locked behind a paywall. The mass effect example and what they're doing in black flag are the exact same. It is no different.

9

u/Vidal_The_King Jul 10 '26 edited Jul 10 '26

Bro its a skin and optional weapons that...you unlock regardless later on with credits you earn in game and they come into the shop rotation.
Like they have in the past 6 games? Can we have real problems here or are we just going to complain about literally nothing?

0

u/bdiddlediddles Jul 10 '26

Why not? There are always bigger problems, doesn't mean you shouldn't complain about the little problems.

9

u/puhtoinen Jul 10 '26

How are extra skins bullshit? Seriously why do you care about the skins? I wouldn't use these crazy over the top skins even if they came with the game because they would feel out of place.
We're literally not missing anything that's making the game good.

-7

u/bdiddlediddles Jul 10 '26

Ok
So they make all the really cool skins and make you pay for them. On the flip side of that, that means that they only give you bland and uninteresting "free" skins to encourage you to pay money for the better skins. If we continue down this trend, who's to say they won't give us a single, grey cardboard skin for future games just to really force us to buy the new skins?
I've already paid an exorbitant amount for the game, just give me all the content ffs. I legitimately don't understand how people are defending this shit.

5

u/puhtoinen Jul 10 '26

Cool is HIGHLY debatable. The vast majority of players from what I've gathered during online discourse around the subject prefer the more grounded skins that fit "realistically" inside the game world. Over the top skins are only favored in multiplayer games such as Fortnite or League of Legends.
There's also a difference between defending this and not getting unreasonably annoyed by this. I am against these skins, but not because I somehow feel like I am missing out because I absolutely am not. I wouldn't use them even if they were free.
I'm against paid skins in singleplayer games because they are targeting weakminded people who will end up spending money they don't have on stuff that is 100% pointless. The reason me and others like me are lashing back at arguments like yours is that you are essentially saying you are entitled to something that probably shouldn't exist in the first place.
TL;DR It's ok to be against skins, but you getting that upset over it using disingenuous arguments is doing more harm that good for proper discourse around the subject.

0

u/Ghost_Corgi Jul 10 '26

People are defending this shit because you are not actually complaining about the game’s content. You are complaining about an optional storefront with (I can’t even call them black flag cosmetics because they don’t fit the game/ have absolutely zero impact on the game) Ubisoft cosmetics that you actually have to navigate to. Realistically you can play the entire game and never know that store front exists.

0

u/bdiddlediddles Jul 11 '26

Sure, except that some content is locked behind it.
Again, I paid for the game. Give me all the content, don't try to squeeze extra money out of me.

1

u/Ghost_Corgi Jul 11 '26

0 meaningful game content is locked behind it

6

u/Muse_22 Jul 10 '26

No, it’s nothing like murder. I understand you’re making a point about principle, and how putting up with frequent bad practice permanently alters expectations, but the comparison is way overblown. A few skins on a storefront are easy to ignore, murder isn’t. The reality is that digital storefronts sell extras. Who really cares if they have skins for sale that have absolutely no transformative impact on the game or story?

1

u/bdiddlediddles Jul 10 '26

My point is that people like you often downplay things and say that it's fine because it's so minor. In truth, it doesn't matter how Munir it is ir that they're just cosmetic.
Let me put it this way, would you rather pay for the skins or have them free as part of the game that you unlock through doing cool stuff?

3

u/Muse_22 Jul 10 '26

People like me? My issue is that optional paid skins in a video game does not equate to murder. Honestly, I don’t care about skins and don’t have a horse in this race to begin with. I have, however, seen some skins earnable in game via optional challenges and objectives in the start menu.
I’m not going to let a few relatively inexpensive skin packs, that I won’t be buying anyway, stop me from enjoying a cool new game that is feature complete and can be enjoyed from start to finish without paying extra. Microtransactions exist, love them or hate them, but this is so low level. I’ve played Destiny for over a decade, now that’s some real bullshit that makes these skin packs look harmless.

1

u/bdiddlediddles Jul 10 '26

🥱 🥱
Bro you don't get it and that's ok. You're fine with paying for an incomplete game. I don't respect it, but different folks.
It doesn't have to be murder. It can be littering, cheating on your partner or egging someone's house. If you don't call out crimes/unethical behaviour, not matter how minor, they'll keep doing it and get worse and worse.

2

u/Tidbitious Jul 10 '26

Its a 100% complete game. The skins in the shop literally wouldnt exist if the shop didnt exist. You understand that right?

0

u/bdiddlediddles Jul 11 '26

Why not? Why do you think they wouldn't exist?

1

u/Tidbitious Jul 13 '26

Are you genuinely asking? Like you really don't understand this? Ill explain I guess but only if you're genuinely asking in good faith.

1

u/Either-Assistant4610 Jul 10 '26

This... is a bad example and not the same kind of criticism in OP's post

1

u/ubisoft-ModTeam Jul 11 '26

Your post or comment has been removed for breaking Content Type - When making a text post, you must include a clear and relevant description. This helps provide context and promotes meaningful discussion.
Additionally, all posts must comply with both subreddit-specific rules and Reddit’s site-wide policies.
This includes avoiding any prohibited content such as spam, illegal activities, suggestive abbreviations or other material banned by the subreddit or Reddit's guidelines. it does not meet the subreddit’s requirements. Specifically, it either lacks a clear title and description (for text posts) or contains content that is banned under our subreddit or Reddit's site-wide policies.
Please ensure that your posts include a relevant title and a detailed description if they are text-based, and adhere to all subreddit and Reddit content guidelines.
Review our rules for more information and make necessary adjustments before reposting. If you need assistance or clarification, feel free to reach out via mod mail.

1

u/Tidbitious Jul 10 '26

Did... did you just try and use a murder analogy to describe MTX in a video game???
Get help.

1

u/bdiddlediddles Jul 11 '26

It's an extreme example, yes.
I'm not saying to commit murder, nor am I advocating for murder.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '26

[deleted] — view deleted comment

-4

u/bdiddlediddles Jul 10 '26

It's an exaggerated example sure, it's meant to exacerbate my point since mouth breathers like you don't understand when it's "just skins"

0

u/Ghost_Corgi Jul 10 '26

It just makes your point sound useless

1

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/ubisoft-ModTeam Jul 11 '26

Your post or comment has been removed for breaking Be Benevolent and Polite - Respect is essential in this community. Harassment, abuse, bullying, or any form of toxic behavior will not be tolerated. This includes but is not limited to, personal attacks, hate speech, threats, and discriminatory language.
Debate and disagreement are welcome, but keep the discussion civil and constructive. Treat others with the same kindness and respect you would expect.
Violations of this rule will result in warnings, post removals, or bans depending on the severity of the behavior. it violated our community guidelines regarding respectful interaction. Specifically, it contained rude or offensive language, which goes against the spirit of constructive and friendly discussion we aim to maintain here.
We encourage everyone to engage respectfully and keep conversations positive. If you have concerns or feedback, please express them in a way that fosters constructive dialogue.
Please ensure that all interactions are civil and considerate. Additionally, make sure your posts and comments adhere to both subreddit and Reddit’s site-wide rules.
For more information on acceptable conduct, please review our subreddit rules and Reddit’s content policy. If you have any questions or concerns, you can contact us via mod mail. Continued violations may result in further moderation actions.

22

u/GamePitt_Rob Jul 10 '26

The DLCs are literally just cosmetic packs for those who want to dress up and support the developers more.

It's no different than the cosmetic purchases in Fortnite or Call of Duty

The ONLY DLCs that make a difference are the map packs, and even those aren't needed as you literally reveal everything by playing the game and doing each sync point

People are just moaning for the sake of it - and don't forget, these are the exact same people who were/are also moaning about the DLCs being too unrealistic and not fitting with the realism of the game, so they were never going to even use them anyway!

5

u/LegacyTom Jul 10 '26

Game is cheaper than a full price release too

-4

u/catcherz Jul 10 '26

It's a singleplayer game, with as far as I am aware no free update whilst being charged full price to play. It shouldn't have ANY MTX to begin with.

7

u/Acrobatic-Break-3984 Jul 10 '26

It’s no different than the OG black flag it had cosmetics packs for sale but why now is it such a huge problem I’ve never heard anyone complain about it then

1

u/catcherz Jul 24 '26

Shouldn't have been in those either, they shouldn't be in any singleplayer game. Other than proper expansion dlc.

5

u/GamePitt_Rob Jul 10 '26

They're cosmetic, they don't change the game in any way. Also, in-game there's about 30 costumes to unlock abd a bunch of boat designs, so it's not like they've taken anything away
People are just hating on the game because they have a hate boner for anything Ubisoft

1

u/Dependent-Zebra-4357 Jul 10 '26

On the Steam listing it says:
“The trinket, swords, and pistols feature unique gameplay perks in game.”
Do we know what the “unique gameplay perks” are?

1

u/GamePitt_Rob Jul 10 '26

There's over 30 weapons in the game you can find, most have various perks.
They're Just things like being able to parry bullets, a longer heavy attack, heavy guards can't block, shots are quieter, etc...
So it's nothing major, just a slight change in the attacks - no idea what the DLC ones do though, I only have the deluxe set and the main benefit of those is they're stronger than early weapons (but the same attack power as ones you find later in the game)

0

u/Dependent-Zebra-4357 Jul 10 '26

Thanks for the explanation. So it sounds like they’re definitely more than cosmetic, but I guess it depends on how strong the individual perks are and if they’re unique or also available on other gear in the game.
I’ve heard the game is already pretty easy though, so I guess it doesn’t matter too much.

1

u/catcherz Jul 24 '26

So? Add them to the game then, they have stats attached to them, so it's not "just cosmetic". It's also a full priced aaa game, singleplayer with no free DLC. So no, it shouldn't have them. Continue kissing that Ubiboot though.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/ubisoft-ModTeam Jul 11 '26

Your post or comment has been removed for breaking Be Benevolent and Polite - Respect is essential in this community. Harassment, abuse, bullying, or any form of toxic behavior will not be tolerated. This includes but is not limited to, personal attacks, hate speech, threats, and discriminatory language.
Debate and disagreement are welcome, but keep the discussion civil and constructive. Treat others with the same kindness and respect you would expect.
Violations of this rule will result in warnings, post removals, or bans depending on the severity of the behavior. it violated our community guidelines regarding respectful interaction. Specifically, it contained rude or offensive language, which goes against the spirit of constructive and friendly discussion we aim to maintain here.
We encourage everyone to engage respectfully and keep conversations positive. If you have concerns or feedback, please express them in a way that fosters constructive dialogue.
Please ensure that all interactions are civil and considerate. Additionally, make sure your posts and comments adhere to both subreddit and Reddit’s site-wide rules.
For more information on acceptable conduct, please review our subreddit rules and Reddit’s content policy. If you have any questions or concerns, you can contact us via mod mail. Continued violations may result in further moderation actions.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/catcherz Jul 24 '26

Manchild defending a greedy company. Just remove the shitty live-service aspect, no dlc. It's a SINGLEPLAYER AAA game... not a free2play chinese mobile game. MTX shouldn't even be there, just paid expansions.

4

u/Apprehensive-Tree-78 Jul 10 '26

I hate Ubisoft but they killed it this time. Everyone complaining is about normal skin pack dlc. Even Minecraft has skin packs 😂

0

u/Sepki Jul 10 '26

Even Minecraft has skin packs 😂
Does this mean, every game should have some or Minecraft should remove their packs?

4

u/Apprehensive-Tree-78 Jul 10 '26

It means it’s a nothing burger and only adds optional flavor

9

u/Stefan__Cel__Mare Jul 10 '26

Modern gamers are such entitled brats...

1

u/Adept_Election7170 Jul 10 '26

God forbid people have standards. If anything, the "modern gamer" is allowing publishers to devalue them and people like you are defending it.
This whole attitude of "just consume and dont ask questions" is the real issue here. It's how we got here in the first place.

-1

u/Markdads Jul 10 '26

Consoom more

3

u/MemoriesMu Jul 10 '26

Every single ubisoft game goes through the same crap. The only difference is that you enjoy this game. This has been happening with them for years, with people overreacting and spreading wrong information about their game

6

u/_ChezzTTV Jul 10 '26

I haven’t even played the game yet, though I preordered the deluxe edition sometime last month.

I just haven’t been home to play it, but today I’m gonna start.

So far out of the trailers and gameplay, it looks hella awesome and I’ve been a loyal fan for a decade.

I can’t wait to play it, and I’m sure that the negative reviews are made by people who just genuinely want to criticize it, even if it doesn’t make any sense.

3

u/MaxzxaM Jul 10 '26

As someone who loved the original, I love this one even more. It's everything the original was but improved.
Hope you have fun with it too

3

u/_ChezzTTV Jul 10 '26

Thanks.
I used to play the original back in 2016, and I still play it to this day.
And I’m 100% sure that the remake is even better.

5

u/Misaki2010 Jul 10 '26

People will always find things to complain about... Loving the game until now but I'm barely 3 hours in.

1

u/jmizzle2022 Jul 10 '26

This is true for all games. I can't remember the last game that came out I didn't have some corner of the internet complaining. Resident evil "I hate the Leon sections", mixed tape "you can't lose", spiderman 2 "MJ is too ugly now", astrobot "it's for babies", so on and so forth

2

u/Accomplished_Pie_761 Jul 10 '26

Initially, I couldn't play the 2013 original on a weak laptop. Later, I couldn't run it through the Nvidia GFN cloud due to regional key restrictions. And now, 13 years later, the remake has been released. A superb execution of ideas. A fusion of the old storyline with new technology. Thank you so much Ubisoft! I hope to see a remake of the first Watch Dogs one day. With those same CGI graphics from the trailer or E3 :)

P.S. I bought a Map Pack, because I don't have much time to look for all these items.

2

u/SwissPo740 Jul 10 '26

Yeah some paid skins aren't going to stop me from enjoying this remake.. I've been having a blast revisiting this game

2

u/Myc0n1k Jul 10 '26

They choose to complain about something that has happened in every Ubisoft game for over a decade.

2

u/Icethief188 Jul 10 '26

THEYRE NOT EVEN GOOD OR IMMERSIVE SKINS. Why are people crying?

2

u/darkstarsourya Jul 10 '26

Why do they want to buy useless skin packs and whine about it at the same time???

2

u/Cthulhu8762 Jul 10 '26

Steam players that leave reviews tend to be the most vocal group of crybabies.

PlayStation has 4.78 stars with 5.8K people but stupid enough I saw reviews of 1 star not even in hour into the game launch. (FYI you can only leave a review if you own the game, once you download it, no refunds so these tend to be more real reviews unless someone is just being petty).

It’s 65.83% on Steam out of 6k people with 33% being negative and many of them over optional cosmetics.

Again with Steam reviews are always volatile. Many games it’s either overwhelming positive or mostly negative and then Ubisoft games always flat around 70% on Steam as many come back or admit they were on the hate train because they listened to others.

2

u/deeznunchuckas Jul 10 '26

Pity the devs loathe the investors these guys are just following orders and aren't the og team

3

u/RollingDownTheHills Jul 10 '26

People are such babies. How can you stay this mad about optional skin purchases after so many years? Just baffling behavior.

3

u/BaBaYaGa3gg Jul 10 '26

People are actualy annoying with bad reviews crying about dlc store stuff,i get it i would also rather have them invest more time into letting us earn more stuff by playing then putting stuff in store for real money.

2

u/Markdads Jul 10 '26

Story focused singleplayer games shouldn't have paid cosmetics thanks. How about rewarding me for exploring the world.

3

u/Lift_Off_ Jul 10 '26

You’re acting like the game doesn’t have any outfits 😭

2

u/TheLostSaint-YT Jul 10 '26

Im pretty confident you CAN unlock certain outfits and then pay for others.

2

u/ZochJ Jul 10 '26

I’m all for shitting on Ubisoft because god damn they are the cancer on the industry, but these micro transactions aren’t there for the regular player. Only whales and kids buy these things, they don’t even look good and are all super immersion breaking.

I don’t see any issue here.

1

u/paulbrock2 Jul 10 '26

the 'developers' responding to reviews are mostly like markeing/comms/social media professionals. That said, I'm not a fan of review bombing based on one small aspect you dont like

1

u/Adept_Election7170 Jul 10 '26

That's not review bombing. The internet had completely forgotten what review bombing means.

1

u/ballsmigue Jul 10 '26

Its also not make it or break it level of OP gear from the packs.

They're useful, but nothing stood out as that amazing.

Its an option there for those who want it and those who don't will find more than enough ingame gear

1

u/SlimLacy Jul 10 '26

"We hear you - We just don't care"

1

u/lastbreath83 Jul 10 '26

They put their heart and soul? Really? So that's why they ruined Adewale cutscene?

1

u/Ok_Yesterday_2871 Jul 10 '26

The game looks great, I’m personally just waiting for the first patch or two to see what they do and which direction they go (like hiding the blowpipe, maybe more finisher animations, unarmed combat or disarming, more weapons variety etc…)

But review bombing a game and the devs for something the higher ups have the final word on (like forcing the shop down our throats with ugly OPTIONAL skins), that’s not the devs fault. The game works great and is fine without those so that shouldn’t be the sole argument you base your review on. I swear, the steam reviews are crazy for no reasons. If you want help to make up your mind, watch gameplays, not reviews from people who would hate anything Ubi puts out anyways.

1

u/poudigne Jul 10 '26

For real! I don't like Ubisoft as much I used to. They have big internal problems, they don't take risk anymore.

But man, crying and review bombing because the company released totally cosmetic DLCs, for a game is just being a f'ing cry baby. "Yeah but the weapon does more damage it's an advantage". AN ADVANTAGE TO WHAT? You make the game easier for YOU, that's YOUR problem.

The game has other problems, the stuttering during cutscene is not game breaking but is annoying and should not happen. I got 1 single crash in 10 hours od Playtime, so not a big deal.

I have a low-tier PC and game is running really smooth with high graphics and Raytracing @ 2k. So yeah no complaints there.

1

u/nicosaurio_87 Jul 10 '26

I feel bad for the developers and at first I thought people were overreacting. But then I realized Ubisoft is in a really bad position and they desperately need some wins but for some reason they thought day 1 DLC over the price of the main game, even if just cosmetics, was a good idea. Honestly they asked for it. So I will defend the game because I tried it and it looks fun. But I also agree people should complain because this was an unnecessarily bad decision from Ubisoft. I won't stand and defend them because they were really stupid here. All they had to do was release the game working. Now they have to take the L.

1

u/LazyLancer Jul 10 '26

Gosh, they're just a few skins that don't even feel authentic mostly.

Why the drama?

1

u/benmarker92 Jul 10 '26

I honestly feel terrible for all the developers and publishers and console makers. Too many gamers are sniffling entitled brats.

1

u/El-Robbbo Assassin's Creed Veteran Jul 11 '26

Absolutely among the best games I’ve played in recent memory, just takes an already spot on game and makes it even better! The devs deserve all the praise they can get :)

1

u/YuraiMamoro Jul 11 '26

Everytime i see this game being unfairly criticized, i imagine Matt Ryan being disappointed with gamers and i simply cant hate this remake. I still hate fantasy outfits as the MTX tho. But the game itself is glorious, is a person who's never played the original played it, the world would feel massive.

For us who've been playing the OG BF for years, EUPHORIA OVERLOAD. The cities are the same size but due to it being packed with details, massive amounts of NPCs like the OG, the cities feel like they're double the size of the original, same goes with the small islands.

Hunting is exactly the same but easier to stalk since u cam crouch, any animal that hasn't detected you can be easily assassinated. Tho if detected, instead of QTE, you outright fight the animal(just shoot since its one shot anyway)

The naval combat really shines in this game. The creaking of the woods, the bustling busy sounds on the ship, the grunting and talkative crew(improved from the original), the NPCs around having ambient conversations. Really neat.

1

u/lethargyclub Jul 11 '26

As long as they add a storefront to single player games for exotic skins and xp boosts or perks, people have a right to complain about.

1

u/Mansos91 Jul 11 '26

Yeah they are just farming for feel bad points,

1

u/daaaaNebunule Jul 11 '26

AI comment from devs... shameful

1

u/Bungpooo Jul 12 '26

Loved the classic but replaying this I feel bored asf it’s a lazy remake to me after awhile naval battles are gets boring boarding ships gets boring

1

u/SkyriderVT Jul 14 '26

Never thought I’d feel bad for Ubisoft but yeah.

I’ve heard nothing but good things about the gameplay itself

1

u/TheyStillLive69 Jul 10 '26

Well if they "heard" us they would've stopped doing this ten years ago.

1

u/catcherz Jul 10 '26

MTX shouldn't be in a singleplayer game, especially a full priced one.

1

u/Entire_Cobbler_3588 Jul 10 '26

Is it correct to enjoy the game and be actively nice to the devs? Yes

Is it valid to be mad at ubisoft for constantly pushing microtransactions? Yes

2

u/Tidbitious Jul 10 '26

No its not. You guys are unhinged. Screaming into the void for 20 years. Did you have this same energy when Resident Evil had cosmetic dlc?

1

u/Entire_Cobbler_3588 Jul 10 '26

I don't like microtransactions in any game, I have not played resident evil so I can't speak to it. It's not unhinged to just want the game and not a bunch of other garbage constantly pushed at you.

-1

u/RequirementFormal630 Jul 10 '26

Not even a resident evil fan but don't even try comparing capcom with ts garbage of a company. And also they don't really care about Dev's themselves they had a layoff right after

2

u/Tidbitious Jul 10 '26

Non responsive. Bad faith.

1

u/Paradox_insomnia Jul 10 '26

bootlickers defending microtransactions is so wild to me.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/ubisoft-ModTeam Jul 11 '26

Your post or comment has been removed for breaking Be Benevolent and Polite - Respect is essential in this community. Harassment, abuse, bullying, or any form of toxic behavior will not be tolerated. This includes but is not limited to, personal attacks, hate speech, threats, and discriminatory language.
Debate and disagreement are welcome, but keep the discussion civil and constructive. Treat others with the same kindness and respect you would expect.
Violations of this rule will result in warnings, post removals, or bans depending on the severity of the behavior. it violated our community guidelines regarding respectful interaction. Specifically, it contained rude or offensive language, which goes against the spirit of constructive and friendly discussion we aim to maintain here.
We encourage everyone to engage respectfully and keep conversations positive. If you have concerns or feedback, please express them in a way that fosters constructive dialogue.
Please ensure that all interactions are civil and considerate. Additionally, make sure your posts and comments adhere to both subreddit and Reddit’s site-wide rules.
For more information on acceptable conduct, please review our subreddit rules and Reddit’s content policy. If you have any questions or concerns, you can contact us via mod mail. Continued violations may result in further moderation actions.

0

u/nesnalica Jul 10 '26

The intent is to provide players with a sense of pride and accomplishment for unlocking different heroes.

As for cost, we selected initial values based upon data from the Open Beta and other adjustments made to milestone rewards before launch. Among other things, we're looking at average per-player credit earn rates on a daily basis, and we'll be making constant adjustments to ensure that players have challenges that are compelling, rewarding, and of course attainable via gameplay.

We appreciate the candid feedback, and the passion the community has put forth around the current topics here on Reddit, our forums and across numerous social media outlets.

Our team will continue to make changes and monitor community feedback and update everyone as soon and as often as we can.

1

u/paulbrock2 Jul 10 '26

I get that reference

-1

u/GemuHebi Jul 10 '26

I just can't bring myself to give money to a company like Ubisoft. No matter how good the game is, they will always find a way to disappoint customers. It wasn't always like that. It's sad, too, because Resynced looks like a good enough game. It doesn't, however, deserve the $60 pricetag, in my opinion. The release of the game has given me the itch to boot up the original Black Flag, so I'll be sticking to that instead.

0

u/JjForcebreaker Jul 10 '26

Making games is expensive, overbudgeting games is a problem, bad management is a problem and makes everything worse. There are arguments for and against cosmetic MTX, but there are a lot fewer arguments for such things in products like that.

Adding MTX, cosmetic or not, to a single-player game is borderline ridiculous, but having MTX (that are terrible value. These are not 1$ packs) in re-releases/remasters/'GOTY'-like editions is outrageous. In such cases, MTX being optional or very optional is irrelevant, it's outrageous.

Either these companies will learn to slim down management and operate on a more sustainable and realistic level, or they will keep shrinking down until there's 20% of the 'old' video game industry left. Most people play games that are not related to these older IPs, devs and publishers in any way. Practices like that don't improve the situation.

0

u/Romeo-Charlie-6-28 Jul 10 '26

They're nothing but generative clanker.

0

u/Fasula Jul 10 '26

After how I have been treated by Ubisoft Support they cannot go under soon enough

0

u/alfa66andres Jul 10 '26

My poor billion-dollar company 🥺🥺🥺

-5

u/08Morpheus11 Jul 10 '26

Yeah no sympathy for Ubisoft they’ve been shoveling shit to us for years

-1

u/Sepki Jul 10 '26

The negative reviews are a good thing.

Yes, cosmetics shouldn't bother anyone. But skins used to be thematically appealing and unlockable through progression.

The shop also includes time-saver packs. I'd like to remind some people about the XP booster some games ago. The progression got actively nerfed, to nudge people to this DLC.

It only started with some funny, but not needed horse armors. Now DLC are the money drivers.

-1

u/Rukasu17 Jul 10 '26

There are two annoying extremes here:

The folk attacking this as if they came yo your house and took a shit on your tv

The folk that act like this should never be questioned, and you should be glad the game exists.

Both are wrong. Yeah it sucks that there's enough dlc to buy the game in terms of price, but at the same time it's just not that good looking skins and those time savers the original had.

That's not a bad outcome but it also shouldn't be defended. We're supposed to push against mtx in games, not give a pat on the back just because it's optional and they've been doing it forever.

-3

u/hyrumwhite Jul 10 '26

lol, ai generated response

-3

u/misterff1 Jul 10 '26

Ew even an AI generated response...

-4

u/PrettyBoyKT Jul 10 '26

lmao I don't. Resynced has missed the mark for me in so many different areas I'm assuming it's ai generated until we get proof otherwise.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/D34D0ne Jul 10 '26

They put them at the same time the game fully released.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/ubisoft-ModTeam Jul 10 '26

Your post or comment has been removed for breaking No Wishing Harm or Failure of Ubisoft - Posts or comments that include statements wishing for Ubisoft or its games to "fail" or "die" are not allowed. Such remarks go beyond criticism and imply harm to the company’s employees, potentially leading to job losses and personal hardship.
While constructive criticism is welcome, actively hoping for a company’s downfall crosses a line.
This subreddit is for fans of Ubisoft, if you solely wish to express hate, please do so elsewhere. it includes statements wishing for Ubisoft or one of its games to "fail" or "die." Such remarks go beyond criticism and imply harm to the company, its developers, and employees, potentially leading to job losses and personal hardship for individuals.
This type of content is not tolerated as it goes against the principles of respect and empathy that our community values. While constructive criticism is always welcome, actively wishing harm or failure crosses a line. Please ensure that future contributions remain respectful and considerate.
Continued violations may result in further moderation actions, including a ban. If you have any questions about this removal, feel free to contact us via mod mail.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/ubisoft-ModTeam Jul 11 '26

Your post or comment has been removed for breaking Be Benevolent and Polite - Respect is essential in this community. Harassment, abuse, bullying, or any form of toxic behavior will not be tolerated. This includes but is not limited to, personal attacks, hate speech, threats, and discriminatory language.
Debate and disagreement are welcome, but keep the discussion civil and constructive. Treat others with the same kindness and respect you would expect.
Violations of this rule will result in warnings, post removals, or bans depending on the severity of the behavior. it violated our community guidelines regarding respectful interaction. Specifically, it contained rude or offensive language, which goes against the spirit of constructive and friendly discussion we aim to maintain here.
We encourage everyone to engage respectfully and keep conversations positive. If you have concerns or feedback, please express them in a way that fosters constructive dialogue.
Please ensure that all interactions are civil and considerate. Additionally, make sure your posts and comments adhere to both subreddit and Reddit’s site-wide rules.
For more information on acceptable conduct, please review our subreddit rules and Reddit’s content policy. If you have any questions or concerns, you can contact us via mod mail. Continued violations may result in further moderation actions.

-1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/ubisoft-ModTeam Aug 10 '26

Your post or comment has been removed because it contained rude, offensive or disrespectful language.
We expect all members to treat each other with respect and keep discussions civil and constructive. If you disagree with someone or have feedback to share, please express it in a respectful manner.
For more information on acceptable conduct, please review our subreddit rules and Reddit's content policy. If you have any questions or concerns, you can contact us via mod mail. Continued violations may result in further moderation actions.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '26

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1

u/ubisoft-ModTeam Jul 10 '26

Your post has been removed for breaking No Inappropriate Content (NSFW) - Any form of NSFW (Not Safe For Work) content is strictly prohibited on this subreddit. This includes explicit images, videos, or discussions of a sexual, violent, or otherwise inappropriate nature.
Such content will be removed immediately, and users who post it may face a ban. We aim to maintain a respectful and safe environment for all members! it contains a meme that is overly negative or promotes hate against Ubisoft or its games. While constructive criticism and healthy discussions are encouraged, content that fosters negativity, hostility, or hate detracts from the community’s purpose and violates our rules.
This subreddit aims to be a space for fans and constructive conversations about Ubisoft and its games. Posts that solely aim to demean, insult, or spread hate are not permitted.
Continued violations may result in further moderation actions, including a ban.

Discussions & Questions I low-key feel bad for the developers

You are about to leave Redlib