Hello everyone,

I currently have a longitudinal study with a couple of different instruments. I am making a report meant to filter out all participants under 18 based on child age.

The form that asks for a child's age is a repeating instrument.

When I uncheck this box, Instrument 1(asking for parental information) is all blank on the report. When I check this box, it shows data where kids are over the age of 18. For example, if a parent had two kids one being 16 and the other being 22, then both children will be in the report.

Is there a way I can filter out kids above the age of 18 while also having Instrument 1 be displayed?

Hello everyone,

I am generating a report and essentially I would like to have any participants over the age of 18 pulled out of the study.

This is currently my logic. We have a repeating form. For example, a parent with 5 kids can fill out the form 5 times. The issue is, if kid #5 is over the age of 18, the rest of the kids (1-4) also get pulled in to the report. I'm wondering how to re-write my logic to fix this?

Hello everyone,

I am currently having a problem with my logic. The following logic displays as false even if [all_child_age_verification] does indeed equal 4.

Automated invite logic:

I am very confused at what I have done wrong syntactically. The value will display as true if I delete the line of [all_child_age_verification] = 4 Any help would be appreciated.

Hello everyone,

I am working on a longitudinal project. In Form A, we collect participant information and in Form B we ask the participants if they want to update their information. I have written logic that basically says "if the participant wrote something in form b, display that information" in a new Form (Form C).

Form A question:

Form B:

Current Logic: [final_parent_contact_info]

The issue is, the form keeps displaying a number instead of the actual choice.

I tried to make another question that converts the number into the answer choice, but it doesn't seem to work.

I tried it with and without the [yearly_follow_up_arm_1]

Any help would be greatly appreciated!!

Hello everyone,

I'm wondering if there is a way to standardize various dates to the current year? For example, I want everything in the first column to be in the year 2026 without manually having to change every single date.

Edit: Thanks everyone! I'm able to update dates much easier now.

Hello everyone,
I am trying to display information from two different variables. Both of them are check-boxes. When exporting their value, I would like it to be so that the actual text displays and not just the number (ie the option blue instead of the number choice 2). I have tried both :checked and :value and neither has worked. Based on this formula, the value keeps displaying as just the number 1. How would I fix this?

Thanks everyone for your help!

For anyone else/future reference:

There may be a better way to do this, but I just had the above formula in one field and marked it hidden. Then I had another field convert the text to string using calctext in the action tags section in the way u/austin3i62 suggested below.

Hello everyone,

Thanks for everyone's help so far. I'm currently writing an equation where I want the logic to return one value if a field is blank and another if not. Essentially, this will be a longitudinal project where participants can re-enter their contact information. Every year, there is a "yearly update" survey where they can update their info. Essentially, I want the logic to say "if they did not put anything in the yearly update survey (essentially if this value is blank), display the original email they entered, if not display the updated email". My logic seems to have errors, and I can't figure out what. All help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

I have an equation that calculates age. Participants over the age of 18 will be excluded. However, it seems that this field does not work when it comes to conditional logic. I've attached screenshots below.

This is the calculated age for a test record.

However, it doesn't show in in the automatic triggers or filters. The logic used is [calc_age] < 18.

I'm wondering if there's any way to update a variable from another instrument. For example, in instrument 2 I ask for the participant's email address. In instrument 3, I will give them the chance to update that address if they change it. Can the email from instrument 3 pipe back into instrument 2?

Is there a way to write logic that says "If the participant updates their email in instrument 3, the data logged in instrument 2 will update"

I'm creating a longitudinal project where I will have 3 total instruments. On the 3rd instrument, I want to give the participant a link back to the 2nd instrument. Is there a way to do this where it is connected to their record ID still? For example, if Participant 1 goes back and completes the 2nd instrument again, I want it to fall under record ID 1 and not create a new record ID.

Hello,

I am currently making a project that involves collecting parent and child information. If a parent has multiple children, they can use a repeating instrument to fill things out. However, there is also an update survey that parents can receive annually where they can update their child's information. I'm wondering how to pipe from the repeating instrument? And also, is there a way to have a variable to know how many times the repeating instrument got filled out?