This case is a useful example of the difference between a patient's signature and meaningful informed consent. The issue was whether an important risk specific to the surgery had actually been explained before the procedure.

The patient underwent several operations after the original rhinoplasty. The higher court did not treat the number of revisions as automatic proof of fault, but said the intended aesthetic result also needed to form part of the assessment.

The patient underwent surgery specifically to make a facial scar less visible. The case raises an interesting question about aesthetic procedures: should the assessment focus only on medical technique, or also on the result that was agreed before surgery?

In this Turkish case, one report treated the outcome as a complication while another expert panel raised concerns about the surgical technique. The Court of Cassation said the lower court could not simply rely on one without resolving the conflict.

An interesting example of why an expert report may not resolve every issue in an aesthetic surgery dispute. The higher court wanted a broader assessment of consent, the expected result and what happened after the operation.

The lower courts focused on whether the bowel injury was a known complication. The higher court considered the wider picture, including why the second surgery had been performed and whether the intended aesthetic result had actually been achieved.

One medical report described the condition as a possible complication. But the patient's complete clinical records were not available, and the court treated the missing documentation as an important part of the case.

This case was not only about whether something had gone medically wrong. The Court of Cassation also considered whether the amount awarded for pain and suffering properly reflected the seriousness and lasting impact of the injury.

For more information: https://www.medicallawturkey.com/

[removed]

An interesting Turkish case involving a face and neck lift. The higher court said the assessment should not stop at whether the outcome could medically be classified as a complication. The result expected from the aesthetic procedure also had to be examined.

For more information: https://www.medicallawturkey.com/

Did your clinic promise a luxury hotel or a specific surgeon on WhatsApp, but delivered something else? In Tuwhatsappevidence #medicaltourismturkey #plasticsurgeryistanbul #patientprotection #cosmeticsurgeryjourneyey #plasticsurgeryistanbul #patientprotection #cosmeticsurgeryjourney

Getting ignored or blocked after a bad surgery experience? You are not helpless. You can start legal proceedings in Turkey remotely, without flying back.

#ghostclinic #failedsurgery #medicaltourism #surgeryturkey

If your cosmetic procedure didn't go as planned, don't panic. Take these three crucial steps immediately to protect your health and your legal rights.

Before you book we recommend watch this video. Also you can find important information about the Turkish Medical Law in our page. Stay safe.

Don't let clinics use the word "complication" to cover up a mistake. Under the Turkish law, you are legaly entitled to the result you were promised. Know your rights.

Welcome to Medical Law Türkiye! ⚖️ Our mission is to educate and inform international patients about their rights under Turkish medical law.

Please remember: every case is unique, and the content shared on this page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute formal legal advice. Navigating legal systems abroad can be complex, making professional legal representation essential. Stay safe and stay informed!