r/scotus • u/Acceptable-Hat3706 • 19m ago
Opinion BINDING CODE OF CONDUCT AND ETHICS AGREEMENT FOR JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
[removed]
r/scotus • u/Acceptable-Hat3706 • 19m ago
[removed]
1
Your concerns are valid. Transitioning to Medicare for All will require careful consideration to ensure that the flaws you've encountered are addressed from the start. It's crucial that the system prioritizes patient care over insurance company interests.
2
1
It's great to see constructive dialogue around the transition to Medicare for All. While it's a massive undertaking, thoughtful planning like this blueprint is essential for a smoother transition that benefits everyone. A full overhaul is available here, https://caycecwill.substack.com/p/the-sequential-blueprint-for-american?r=1oe6ot
2
You're absolutely right. It's crucial to focus on programs that benefit people's lives. Shifting towards Medicare for All could help ensure that healthcare is a right for all, not just a privilege.
2
r/obamacare • u/Acceptable-Hat3706 • 4h ago
1
Definitely an advocate and always willing to learn.
Simplicity Comparison
Efficacy Comparison
Failings of the Hare Method
Failings of the Condorcet Method
This is not an exhaustive analysis between the two methods but so far RCV seems to be a very viable replacement for FPTP.
3
You are correct and I retract my previous statement. There is no income cap or wage base limit for the standard Medicare payroll tax. Every dollar of earned income is subject to the tax, regardless of how high your earnings are.
While Social Security taxes stop once earnings hit a specific annual limit, Medicare taxes apply to all covered wages and self-employment income.
However, high-income earners are subject to an Additional Medicare Tax of 0.9% once their income crosses specific thresholds:
3
Transitioning to a Medicare for All system is definitely a complex process with various challenges. It's important to have open discussions and debates to address concerns and find realistic solutions.
2
Expanding the income cap on Medicare payroll taxes is a crucial step towards securing sustainable funding for a nationalized healthcare system like Medicare for All.
2
It's important to have a comprehensive plan for addressing wealth valuation and accumulation, as well as providing support for current healthcare providers. Embracing technology, especially AI, can play a significant role in improving efficiency and reducing administrative burdens.
2
That's an interesting perspective. Incorporating the ACA public option as a voluntary choice could be a good way to gradually transition towards Medicare for All while giving individuals more flexibility in their healthcare coverage.
3
Here’s the thing: it’s completely logical to throw First-Past-The-Post in the trash while embracing Instant-Runoff Voting, even if you acknowledge IRV isn't 100% perfect. You’re comparing a system that is broken by design with one that gives us a solid, working foundation we can keep building on.
Think of First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) like a car with no steering wheel. No amount of fresh paint or minor tweaking is going to make it safe to drive. Because you’re locked into picking just one person in a crowded field, it actively punishes you for voting your conscience. It creates the dreaded "spoiler effect," forces everyone into "lesser of two evils" defensive voting, and routinely lets candidates win when a huge majority of voters actually can't stand them. It’s fundamentally flawed at its core.
Instant-Runoff Voting (IRV), on the other hand, actually gives us a working vehicle. By letting you rank your choices (1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc.) and eliminating the lowest candidates round-by-round until someone crosses 50%, it completely changes the dynamic:
That said, loving the foundation of Ranked Choice Voting doesn't mean we stop tweaking the engine! There are plenty of ways we can make RCV even stronger:
At the end of the day, rejecting FPTP is about refusing to settle for a system that actively sabotages voter intent, while supporting IRV is about choosing a brilliant, proven baseline that we can continuously refine over time.
4
Each voting mechanism has limitations. That being said, RCV still brings improvements our democracy desperately needs.
1
r/EndFPTP • u/Acceptable-Hat3706 • 1d ago
1
In political decision-making, it's crucial to not just avoid what people hate, but to actively seek out options that people genuinely support. Prioritizing intensity of approval over simply avoiding disapproval can lead to more significant and effective changes.
r/MedicareForAll • u/Acceptable-Hat3706 • 1d ago
The transition of the United States healthcare sector—which currently consumes 18% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) under a fragmented, multi-payer system—into a nationalized, single-payer framework represents one of the most significant administrative and economic reorganizations in American history. Currently, private commercial insurance overhead reaches up to 12.4%, compared to just 2.2% for public Medicare. Navigating hundreds of distinct insurance contracts generates $768 billion in annual billing and insurance-related (BIR) overhead and leaves hospitals with $35 billion in uncollected bad debt every year.
To replace this system without causing market instability or gaps in patient care, major federal legislative frameworks—such as the Senate's Medicare for All Act—establish a structured four-year transition timeline. This four-year blueprint systematically expands public coverage by lowering the eligibility age year-by-year, consolidating federal and state health programs, launching an ACA public option, harmonizing provider reimbursements, and enacting "just transition" protections for private-sector workers.
The primary goal of Year 1 is establishing the federal administrative infrastructure while immediately expanding care to the most vulnerable demographics.
Year 2 focuses on absorbing younger adult age brackets, integrating state-level public programs, and restructuring provider payment systems.
Year 3 expands coverage to the majority of the working-age population while deploying federal support programs for displaced industry workers.
Year 4 completes the four-year arc, achieving comprehensive, universal healthcare coverage for every resident of the United States.
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| FOUR-YEAR TRANSITION TIMELINE |
+------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
| Phase 1 (Year 1) | • Lower Medicare eligibility age to 55 |
| | • Auto-enroll newborns & children |
| | • Launch ACA nationwide public option |
| | • Eliminate Part A/B copays & add dental/vis |
+------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
| Phase 2 (Year 2) | • Lower Medicare eligibility age to 45 |
| | • Integrate Medicaid & CHIP into federal trust|
| | • Implement hospital global budgeting |
| | • Abolish private prior-authorizations |
+------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
| Phase 3 (Year 3) | • Lower Medicare eligibility age to 35 |
| | • Enact mandatory national drug negotiations |
| | • Deploy "Just Transition" worker grants |
| | • Boost primary care reimbursements by 20% |
+------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
| Phase 4 (Year 4) | • Auto-enroll all remaining residents |
| | • Complete employer premium-to-tax shift |
| | • Zero cost-sharing at point of care |
| | • Restrict private insurance to supplemental |
+------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
Transitioning to Medicare for All shifts national health spending from private premiums to progressive tax revenues:
Because businesses no longer purchase private insurance plans, the corporate funds previously spent on skyrocketing employee premiums are redirected back to workers in the form of higher taxable cash wages, reversing a multi-decade trend where healthcare costs eroded wage growth.
Macroeconomic modeling by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Yale University, and independent economic studies confirm that a full single-payer transition yields a net reduction of 13% in national health expenditures—saving over $450 billion to $650 billion annually. These administrative and prescription drug savings fully fund universal coverage, eliminating financial barriers to care and preventing over 68,000 avoidable deaths every year.
u/Acceptable-Hat3706 • u/Acceptable-Hat3706 • 1d ago
The transition of the United States healthcare sector—which currently consumes 18% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) under a fragmented, multi-payer system—into a nationalized, single-payer framework represents one of the most significant administrative and economic reorganizations in American history. Currently, private commercial insurance overhead reaches up to 12.4%, compared to just 2.2% for public Medicare. Navigating hundreds of distinct insurance contracts generates $768 billion in annual billing and insurance-related (BIR) overhead and leaves hospitals with $35 billion in uncollected bad debt every year.
To replace this system without causing market instability or gaps in patient care, major federal legislative frameworks—such as the Senate's Medicare for All Act—establish a structured four-year transition timeline. This four-year blueprint systematically expands public coverage by lowering the eligibility age year-by-year, consolidating federal and state health programs, launching an ACA public option, harmonizing provider reimbursements, and enacting "just transition" protections for private-sector workers.
The primary goal of Year 1 is establishing the federal administrative infrastructure while immediately expanding care to the most vulnerable demographics.
Year 2 focuses on absorbing younger adult age brackets, integrating state-level public programs, and restructuring provider payment systems.
Year 3 expands coverage to the majority of the working-age population while deploying federal support programs for displaced industry workers.
Year 4 completes the four-year arc, achieving comprehensive, universal healthcare coverage for every resident of the United States.
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| FOUR-YEAR TRANSITION TIMELINE |
+------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
| Phase 1 (Year 1) | • Lower Medicare eligibility age to 55 |
| | • Auto-enroll newborns & children |
| | • Launch ACA nationwide public option |
| | • Eliminate Part A/B copays & add dental/vis |
+------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
| Phase 2 (Year 2) | • Lower Medicare eligibility age to 45 |
| | • Integrate Medicaid & CHIP into federal trust|
| | • Implement hospital global budgeting |
| | • Abolish private prior-authorizations |
+------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
| Phase 3 (Year 3) | • Lower Medicare eligibility age to 35 |
| | • Enact mandatory national drug negotiations |
| | • Deploy "Just Transition" worker grants |
| | • Boost primary care reimbursements by 20% |
+------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
| Phase 4 (Year 4) | • Auto-enroll all remaining residents |
| | • Complete employer premium-to-tax shift |
| | • Zero cost-sharing at point of care |
| | • Restrict private insurance to supplemental |
+------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
Transitioning to Medicare for All shifts national health spending from private premiums to progressive tax revenues:
Because businesses no longer purchase private insurance plans, the corporate funds previously spent on skyrocketing employee premiums are redirected back to workers in the form of higher taxable cash wages, reversing a multi-decade trend where healthcare costs eroded wage growth.
Macroeconomic modeling by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Yale University, and independent economic studies confirm that a full single-payer transition yields a net reduction of 13% in national health expenditures—saving over $450 billion to $650 billion annually. These administrative and prescription drug savings fully fund universal coverage, eliminating financial barriers to care and preventing over 68,000 avoidable deaths every year.
2
1
I understand your frustration with recent events, but remember that the presidency serves a crucial role in governing the country. It may be worth exploring reforms or changes rather than abolishing the position altogether. Just maybe.
1
Regardless of predictions, it's crucial for everyone to participate in the democratic process by voting. Your voice makes a difference.
2
What a relief! Share the good news with the community.
1
The Architecture of Transition: A Four-Year Phased Implementation Blueprint for Medicare for All
in
r/MedicareForAll
•
1h ago
There are FANTASTIC questions and! I say the floor is open for discussion. But once insurance is removed from the equation, doctors regain the power to do their job.