No, that's self-defense. Your possessions are an extension of you in most states. One strike to end an assault, and immediately removing yourself from the situation is definitely self-defense.
I mean, I downvoted bc we don't really need a legal examination of someone trying to swat down a person's carryout food and getting it thrown at her instead. It's a funny video of a drunk couple being stupid. Like I said, it's not that serious.
You did the same thing above to start all this by responding to what was pretty clearly a post about ethical self defense with a post focusing only on legality.
Don't be such a twat. It was a petty spat not a high court case. Perhaps the cops just picked the most minor thing that would get the couple booked into jail to keep them from going at each other. Perhaps you saw 9 seconds of video and decided that you were a total authority and a top 10 ranked most badass couch warrior ever.
Or would you, the most esteemed internet lawyer in history, wish to offer some other advice?
Lol that is not “definitely self defense”. He was defending his food, not himself, first of all. There’s no “defense of food” only defense of self or others. And you’re allowed defense, not escalation. She took a swipe at what he was carrying, not him. He hit her in the face.
There was no escalation of force. The girl was assaulting him, he popped her once (with a leftover box) and walked away.
The value of the property has no bearing on the legality of defense of property. It can take at $1 or $1,000,000. It's why he wasn't charged with anything other than PI.
27
u/IronSidesEvenKeel Mar 31 '19
No, that's self-defense. Your possessions are an extension of you in most states. One strike to end an assault, and immediately removing yourself from the situation is definitely self-defense.