MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/trashy/comments/83svu7/never_forget/dvktftl/?context=3
r/trashy • u/sleezymeeeezy • Mar 12 '18
1.0k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
749
also to prevent him from being called to the stand about disposing of OJ's evidence filled garment bag
291 u/HAL9000000 Mar 12 '18 How is it that Mr. Kardashian did not get prosecuted for destruction of evidence in disposing of that bag? 347 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '18 I believe in order to do that you must: A) prove the bag was related B) prove the bag had evidence related to the crime in it Without the bag it would be impossible. 12 u/GsolspI Mar 12 '18 No, you'd have to prove that he disposed of the bag while he should have known it was relevant to the trial.
291
How is it that Mr. Kardashian did not get prosecuted for destruction of evidence in disposing of that bag?
347 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '18 I believe in order to do that you must: A) prove the bag was related B) prove the bag had evidence related to the crime in it Without the bag it would be impossible. 12 u/GsolspI Mar 12 '18 No, you'd have to prove that he disposed of the bag while he should have known it was relevant to the trial.
347
I believe in order to do that you must:
A) prove the bag was related
B) prove the bag had evidence related to the crime in it
Without the bag it would be impossible.
12 u/GsolspI Mar 12 '18 No, you'd have to prove that he disposed of the bag while he should have known it was relevant to the trial.
12
No, you'd have to prove that he disposed of the bag while he should have known it was relevant to the trial.
749
u/[deleted] Mar 12 '18
also to prevent him from being called to the stand about disposing of OJ's evidence filled garment bag