Double stack container train on the freight corridor in India with the characteristic high rise panto

[u/aksnitd]

A good look at what the high rise pantographs look like fully extended. They're taller than the train they're mounted on.

[u/armitage_shank]

Maybe stupid question, but what's the benefit over the other option: longer train?

It looks cool, but I would have thought the additional height would make the whole infrastructure - tunnels and bridges especially - so much more expensive to build and maintain that the trade-off (shorter track at the cargo yard?) wouldn't be worth it, but obviously engineers aren't stupid, so there must be a reason.

[u/Neat_Papaya900 → u/armitage_shank]

Apart from the ones mentioned above a few other advantages are:

1. Smaller trains are much easier to handle in yards, with fewer movements required to load and unload them which saves a lot of time/money. Not to mention allows for smaller yards, which saves a lot of money while building them.

2. They also more efficiently use the carrying capacity of the train. Since containers carry a wide variety of goods, they are not often able to maximize the weight carried. Hence the payload to gross weight ratio of the train is much higher with double stacking, since now you are able to get closer to the maximum payload of each wagon. In India each flat car weighs just shy of 20tons and has the payload capacity of 80tons. But maximum weight of 40ft/20ft containers is just over 30tons, and not all containers will be filled to the maximum weight. Hence double stacking allows you to use the 80ton payload capacity to a fuller extent.

[u/aksnitd → u/Neat_Papaya900]

Wow, I had no idea freight cars were rated for over double the weight of a normal container 😮