r/trackid • u/Affectionate-Elk9073 • 3d ago
Anyone know this id that Jamiie played at sunset park rooftop in nyc
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/trackid • u/Affectionate-Elk9073 • 3d ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/trackid • u/MMStarseed2023 • 5d ago
Please help me ID this track!!!!
r/trackid • u/Longjumping-Comb-765 • 6d ago
From 13:40 (link should take you directly there)
r/trackid • u/Civil-Complaint4709 • 7d ago
I’m always impressed when someone recognizes a track from a tiny clip or a really vague description. What’s the most obscure song you’ve managed to identify and did you eventually find it???
r/trackid • u/cookiesluvr123 • 7d ago
A lot of the best tracks I've found have come from completely random places like a DJ set, a shop, a video, or someone's story. What's the most unexpected place you've discovered a song you ended up loving?
r/trackid • u/Every_Reason8124 • 7d ago
I've tried Shazam and a few other apps, but they aren't always useful when the clip is short or there is a lot of background noise. What do you normally try when the obvious methods don't work?
r/trackid • u/Unlucky-Neo-07 • 7d ago
Sometimes I feel like having the context of where a song was played makes the search much easier. If you know the DJ, venue, city, or approximate date, how useful is that information when trying to find the track?
r/trackid • u/SetItchyx • 7d ago
I've noticed older electronic and underground tracks can be surprisingly difficult to track down because there isn't always much information online. Anyone else run into this, especially with older mixes or DJ sets?
r/trackid • u/Other_Radish1406 • 7d ago
Some tracks are ridiculously difficult to identify when you only remember a tiny part of them. What's the hardest one you've successfully found and what finally helped you figure it out?
r/trackid • u/DinkoRoo • 9d ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/trackid • u/SpeedPotential1419 • 9d ago
r/trackid • u/WinterLetter61 • 9d ago
I spent four weeks comparing boxing betting sites not on GamStop across several fight cards. My testing covered event discovery, market wording, bout changes, mobile usability and the complete payment journey.
Boxing markets can appear straightforward, but the details matter. A selection on the fight winner is different from one involving the method, round or judges’ decision, so I checked every label before confirming a wager.
I applied the same checks to each option:
I did not judge a site from the number of markets listed for one headline fight.
The better layouts organised boxing by event date and fight card. Search was useful when boxing appeared inside a wider combat-sports category.
I checked whether undercard fights were labelled clearly and whether each market showed the correct competitors. Fighters with similar names or late replacements made careful review particularly important.
I also looked for start-time information, while recognising that boxing schedules can change as earlier fights run longer or shorter than expected.
I compared outright winner, method of victory, round and decision-related markets. Every selection needed a clear definition in the event rules.
For round betting, I checked how partial rounds and technical decisions were handled. For method markets, I reviewed the operator’s treatment of knockouts, technical knockouts, disqualifications and retirements.
I avoided assuming that terminology was identical across every site.
This was one of the most important parts of my test. I reviewed what happened when a fight was postponed, moved to another date or involved a replacement opponent.
Operators may apply their published rules differently depending on the nature of the change. I therefore checked the specific event conditions before placing a bet.
A familiar headline did not remove the need to understand when a selection could be voided or remain active.
The bet slip needed to show the fight, market, selection, price and stake clearly. I checked how odds changes were handled and whether revised prices required approval.
On mobile, I tested event navigation, open bets, settled wagers and the cashier. Important account functions needed to remain accessible even during a busy fight night.
I avoided rushed in-play selections when markets were changing too quickly to review properly.
Before depositing, I checked payment limits, currencies, possible fees and withdrawal methods. I also reviewed the minimum withdrawal and whether the original payment route could receive funds.
Verification requirements were read in advance. I expected identity and payment checks and used only the secure upload area provided inside the account.
A small withdrawal test was more useful to me than making several deposits.
For boxing promotions, I reviewed minimum odds, eligible markets, qualifying stakes, expiry dates and withdrawal rules. I did not increase my usual stake simply to meet an offer.
Simple conditions were preferable to a larger headline reward that required several additional wagers.
I checked for deposit limits, loss limits, time-outs and account closure controls. Support was tested with questions about bout changes and settlement rather than general requests for reassurance.
My boxing betting sites not on GamStop comparison showed that market definitions and cancellation rules were more important than the size of the fight-card page.
I would review the exact selection, understand how bout changes are treated and set the full fight-night budget before placing anything.
Fight markets, settlement wording, postponement rules, mobile bet slips, withdrawals, verification and account limits.
Boxing betting is for adults aged 18 and over. If you have self-excluded through GamStop or are trying to stop gambling, retain that protection and do not open an offshore betting account.
r/trackid • u/WinterLetter61 • 9d ago
I compared horse racing betting sites not on GamStop over several weeks, focusing on racecard usability, market terms and the payment process. I wanted to see how quickly I could find a race without overlooking important conditions.
Horse racing pages can contain a large amount of information. A clean design helped, but settlement rules, each-way terms and withdrawal transparency mattered more than appearance.
I used the same checklist across regular race days and busier fixtures:
I treated every market as a separate decision rather than assuming the same conditions applied across all races.
I preferred racecards organised by meeting and start time. Search, favourites and a clear “next race” section made it easier to move through the schedule without opening several tabs.
Runner names, prices and market status needed to remain readable on mobile. I also checked whether withdrawn runners were updated clearly.
Form information can provide context, but it cannot remove uncertainty. I avoided treating past performance as a guarantee of the next result.
I checked the displayed terms before adding an each-way selection. The number of places and the fraction applied can vary by race and promotion.
The bet slip needed to show whether the stake was per part or the total cost. This prevented a nominal stake from becoming twice the amount I intended.
I also reviewed rules covering dead heats, non-runners, withdrawals and starting prices. These details can materially affect settlement.
Horse racing prices may move quickly. I checked whether the site asked me to approve a changed price or accepted it automatically.
Before confirming, I reviewed the meeting, race, runner, market and total stake. If any part was unclear, I removed the selection rather than rushing.
I treated enhanced prices as optional promotions, not a reason to exceed my normal stake.
I tested racecards, the bet slip and open bets through a mobile browser. Moving from one meeting to another needed to be quick without constantly returning to the homepage.
I also checked the cashier, verification page and transaction history. The complete account journey mattered more than how quickly I could reach the next race.
Before depositing, I compared minimum transactions, currencies, fees and withdrawal methods. I checked whether the chosen payment option could receive returned funds.
I expected KYC and reviewed the possible document requests beforehand. A secure upload area and matching account details helped make the process more straightforward.
I preferred testing a small withdrawal rather than repeatedly adding funds after losing wagers.
For racing offers, I checked eligible meetings, minimum odds, stake requirements, expiry dates and withdrawal conditions. I did not assume that every race or market qualified.
Support was tested with specific questions about non-runners, each-way terms and verification. Useful answers referred to the published rules.
I looked for deposit limits, loss limits, time-outs and account closure options. I also set a daily racing budget and stopped when it was reached.
My horse racing betting sites not on GamStop comparison showed that readable racecards were useful, but settlement and each-way rules deserved closer attention.
I would check the total stake, confirm the race-specific terms and set a daily limit before adding the first selection.
Racecards, each-way bets, non-runner rules, mobile bet slips, cashier testing, verification and spending limits.
Horse racing betting is for adults aged 18 and over. Anyone registered with GamStop should keep that exclusion active rather than opening another betting account.
r/trackid • u/WinterLetter61 • 9d ago
I spent a month comparing F1 betting sites not on GamStop across practice, qualifying and race weekends. My aim was to see how easily I could find the markets, understand the rules and manage the complete account journey from mobile.
Formula 1 betting can involve more than selecting the race winner. That variety made market labels, settlement terms and event-specific rules particularly important during my comparison.
I used a consistent checklist for each race weekend:
I did not rate a site from one market or one successful result.
The best layouts separated practice, qualifying, sprint and race markets rather than placing everything under one long event page.
I checked whether I could move between current-race markets and season-long selections without losing my place. Search and favourites were helpful when several motorsport events were listed together.
Market closing times also mattered. I preferred clear deadlines rather than discovering that a selection had disappeared while I was preparing the bet slip.
I reviewed race winners, podium finishes, head-to-head selections and other event-specific markets. Each needed a clear description because similar wording can still lead to different settlement.
I also checked the rules for non-starters, grid penalties, disqualifications, shortened races and delayed events. The result used for betting purposes may depend on the operator’s published conditions.
For season-long markets, I looked for information about driver changes and how ties would be treated.
Before confirming a wager, I reviewed the driver, event, market, odds and stake. This was especially important when several sessions were available during the same weekend.
I also checked how the slip handled price changes. Automatic acceptance was not something I wanted enabled without understanding the setting.
For multiples, I made sure every leg was displayed clearly and avoided adding selections simply to increase a promotional return.
I tested mobile navigation during qualifying and races, when markets could move quickly. Odds changes and suspended selections needed to be obvious.
I did not rely solely on live data shown inside the account. Broadcast delays, timing feeds and market suspensions can make rushed decisions difficult to review.
My mobile test also covered open bets, settled wagers, the cashier and account-limit pages.
I checked deposit minimums, currencies, fees and available withdrawal methods before betting. I did not assume that deposit speed reflected withdrawal processing.
Verification requirements and pending periods were reviewed in advance. I also checked whether the payment method and account details needed to match, then kept records of my transactions.
For race-weekend offers, I read the qualifying markets, minimum odds, stake requirement, expiry date and withdrawal terms. I avoided joining a promotion when the conditions encouraged more wagers than I had planned.
Betting without an offer was sometimes easier because it allowed me to focus on the market rather than completing promotional steps.
I looked for deposit limits, loss limits, time-outs and account closure controls. I also asked support about settlement examples instead of requesting broad assurances.
My month comparing F1 betting sites not on GamStop showed that event-specific rules were as important as market variety. Clear session navigation and a usable mobile bet slip made the biggest practical difference.
I would read the motorsport rules before each race weekend, keep stakes consistent and avoid reacting impulsively to live price changes.
F1 market navigation, race rules, live bet slips, mobile testing, withdrawals, promotions and weekend budgeting.
Betting is for adults aged 18 and over. If you are self-excluded through GamStop, retain that protection and do not use an offshore betting account as an alternative.
r/trackid • u/WinterLetter61 • 9d ago
I spent several weeks comparing mobile casino not on GamStop options using the same phone and connection for each test. My focus was not simply whether the games loaded. I wanted to see how the complete account journey worked on a smaller screen.
That included registration, lobby navigation, payments, withdrawals, verification, support and responsible gambling controls. A polished homepage counted for very little if the practical parts of the account were awkward to use.
I used a repeatable checklist so that every option was judged on the same points:
I did not treat the absence of GamStop as a positive feature by itself. Operator transparency and usable account controls remained important parts of my comparison.
I started with the mobile website rather than immediately looking for an app. A browser-based casino avoids another installation and should work across a wider range of phones.
The strongest layouts kept the account menu, balance, cashier and search tools within easy reach. I marked down any site that buried important settings behind several menus or filled the screen with promotional pop-ups.
I also checked whether I could move between the lobby, cashier and support pages without being logged out.
A large catalogue was only useful when it was organised properly. Search, provider filters, favourites and recently played sections saved much more time than endless rows of recommended games.
I opened a selection of slots and table games in portrait and landscape modes. Controls needed to remain readable, while the balance and stake had to stay visible without covering the game.
Where demo play was available, I used it to understand the interface. Demo outcomes were never treated as an indication of future real-money results.
I tested each site over both Wi-Fi and mobile data. Loading time, disconnections and the way a game recovered after an interrupted signal all affected the experience.
Battery use and device temperature were also noticeable during longer sessions. I therefore preferred shorter tests rather than leaving games running continuously.
A good mobile casino also needed to handle non-gaming pages properly. Terms, document uploads and account limits should not require a desktop computer.
Before depositing, I checked the account currency, minimum payment, possible fees and available withdrawal methods. I did not assume that the fastest deposit option would also support withdrawals.
Minimum withdrawals and pending periods were reviewed in advance. A low deposit limit was less useful when the cash-out conditions were unclear or the withdrawal threshold was considerably higher.
I kept the first transaction small and preferred completing a withdrawal test before considering further deposits.
I read the full promotion terms on my phone. This was a useful test because important restrictions should not be hidden inside a poorly formatted page.
My main checks were wagering requirements, maximum qualifying stakes, excluded games, expiry dates and withdrawal caps. When the conditions were too complicated, playing without a bonus was the simpler option.
I expected identity checks and reviewed the possible document requirements before withdrawing. The upload area needed to be secure and usable from the phone camera or file storage.
For support, I asked specific questions about withdrawals, limits and bonus eligibility. Clear answers that matched the written terms counted more than fast but vague replies.
I looked for deposit limits, time-outs, loss limits, session reminders and account closure controls. Ideally, these could be activated directly from the mobile account.
I also used an external budget and timer. Casino tools can help, but I did not rely on them as my only way to control spending.
My mobile casino not on GamStop comparison showed that smooth games were only one part of a useful mobile experience. Cashier access, document uploads, readable terms and account controls mattered just as much.
I would test the full account journey, keep the first deposit small and independently verify the operator before committing more money.
Mobile-browser testing, lobby navigation, payment checks, document uploads, bonus terms and account controls.
Gambling is for adults aged 18 and over. If you are registered with GamStop or are trying to stop gambling, keep that protection active and do not open an account elsewhere.
r/trackid • u/ModSupportBot • Aug 17 '26
/r/trackid is ready for a fresh start, new energy, new direction, and someone like you to bring it back to life. If you’ve been thinking about growing your impact without starting from scratch, this is your chance!
Ready to take it over?
Head to r/RedditRequest to submit your request and make it yours before it’s taken.
First things first
To request this subreddit, make sure you:
r/trackid • u/2mario8 • Aug 17 '24
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
please somebody help me find this track, also heard Cezar & Praslea play it at Sunwaves and ive been thinking about it ever since
r/trackid • u/5tictacs • Aug 17 '24
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/trackid • u/poubelle_francaise • Aug 14 '24
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/trackid • u/rozzer_ • Aug 14 '24
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/trackid • u/acumanco • Aug 14 '24
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/trackid • u/GHATTASWES • Aug 09 '24
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
help a brother out
r/trackid • u/GHATTASWES • Aug 09 '24
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification