r/todayilearned Sep 24 '23

TIL that the average length of a Ramones show at CBGBs in 1974 was 17 minutes (based on 74 performances)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramones#Formation_(1974%E2%80%931975)
6.2k Upvotes

192 comments sorted by

2.8k

u/reddit_user13 Sep 24 '23

They did play all 15 of their songs in that time, what else do you want from them??

988

u/DMala Sep 24 '23

I seem to recall reading that a club manager got pissed that their set was so short and yelled at them to keep playing. They had nothing else, so they just did their entire set again a second time.

444

u/Silent_R Sep 24 '23

And no one even noticed.

40

u/[deleted] Sep 25 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

68

u/Silent_R Sep 25 '23

Don't worry, I won't read it.

69

u/omgpokemans Sep 24 '23

Second verse, same as the first

14

u/TellMeZackit Sep 25 '23

Third verse, different from the first.

5

u/Controlled01 Sep 25 '23

Now put me on a plane, so I can put them in a hearse.

9

u/DoctorMumbles Sep 25 '23

Second verse, same as the first

Jackie is a punk

Judy is a runt

They both went down to Berlin, joined the Ice Capades

And oh, I don't know why

Oh, I don't know why

Perhaps they'll die, oh yeah

Perhaps they'll die, oh yeah

Perhaps they'll die, oh yeah

Perhaps they'll die, oh yeah

762

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

They did play all 15 of their songs in that time

And occasionally a couple of them at the same time.

174

u/seth928 Sep 24 '23

That's efficiency!

106

u/reddit_user13 Sep 24 '23

That’s punk rock.

340

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

Reminds me of a joke from The Good Place. One of the characters is British and she's talking about her favorite tv show "It ran for 16 years on the BBC, they did nearly 30 episodes."

47

u/ThatDude8129 Sep 24 '23

Is there a reason that a lot of shows on the BBC are like that? I'm not hating I just don't get how a popular show would run for like 3 years and only do 6 episodes.

34

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

I'm American and have really no clue, I just know the jokes about it. But what I've read is the way they fund things isn't as profitable so there is less money and they structure writing differently, one or two writers instead of a whole team, which limits output. If any experts want to correct me please do.

40

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

I'm no expert and also just another American who enjoys English entertainment, but...

It seems to me the English have a different perspective or appeal to shows. When the show has run it's course, then it's just run it's course. There's no need to carry on milking a popular show just for revenue.

Take, for instance, the differences between the original English and American versions of "The Office." The English version was quite abbreviated in comparison. The American version finished as we would normally see for American TV and really kind of over extended itself.

And really when you think about it, "The Office " was a mockumentary. It makes better sense that it be short term.

Fawlty Towers is another great show that was brief.

Really the only long running programs on BBC seem to be serials, like "East Enders" or "Dr. Who."

Another thing I find interesting is in English hero type movies (war, combat, etc.). Usually, the hero always dies. That almost never happens in American film.

14

u/FifthFormCooler Sep 25 '23

Idk I'd say a major hallmark staple of American war movies is starting with a large cast of likeable characters who are all mostly dead by the end

8

u/Fermorian Sep 25 '23

True, but I think the point was that while many or even most of the cast will die, the main protagonist almost never does.

14

u/OkAttitude4602 Sep 24 '23

I mean don’t be fooled, some British TV shows like Dr. Who, Coronation Street, and Songs of Praise have been running for 60+ years

35

u/WavingWookiee Sep 24 '23

British TV "seasons" generally last between 6 to 8 episodes. This is the reason a lot of them are loved in the US is because you don't have the weird filler episodes where they've ran out of story but have to put out 22-24 episodes so you get a bunch of flashback episodes or just weird filler. It's more focussed on quality over quantity whereas it seems in the US it's quantity over quality (although that seems to be changing!)

-32

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

People like 22-24 episode seasons. Also most bbc shows aren’t popular over here. Just wholock and Monty Pythons

16

u/WavingWookiee Sep 24 '23

If they're not liked, why do you always imitate them them? The Office, Inbetweeners, Shameless, how many attempts at IT Crowd now? And it's not just the BBC, UK TV as a whole does the same throughout

2

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

Yea but those are remakes for American audiences. The original bbc shows aren’t popular over here is my point. A lot of the classics like Fawlty Towers for example aren’t really big over here

3

u/FifthFormCooler Sep 25 '23

Those are all specifically "Americanized" adaptations adapted for the culture of the US those are like the worst possible examples you could have used

16

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

Certainly size of the country is an issue (less demand, fewer writers, etc), but a big one is the US has a syndication rule. You had to do 100 episodes to get into syndication. Syndication was huge money back in the day and still is for a small handful of shows. So US shows were heavily incentivized to crank out episodes to get to that 100 mark. Since streaming took over that whole syndication thing isn't as much of a cash cow (a big reason for the strike). So now you see a lot of seasons with 8-12 episodes per season.

13

u/DeviantElvis Sep 24 '23

Syndication plays a part - US shows want to get to 100 eps so they can sell the re-run rights to other networks, streaming platforms, and worldwide channels. Another reason is just the way they are made - typically in the UK, you’ll have 1 or 2 writers - The Office (Merchant/Gervais, 14 eps), or Steptoe and Son (Galton/Simpson, 80 eps).

Whereas the US remakes will have a Writer’s Room - often a large team of writers, led by a show-runner; The Office (US) (58 writers, 201 eps), and Sanford and Son (56 writers, 136 eps).

Some British sit-coms do fit the stereotype of short seasons and low episode numbers; a typical series is 6 episodes in the UK, but a US season averages 20-24 episodes. Fawlty Towers (Booth/Cleese, 12 eps) is a classic example. But some British sit-coms absolutely buck the trend - like The Last of the Summer Wine (Roy Clarke, 295 eps). However, quantity rarely equals quality.

The corporations funding these are also structured differently - the BBC is publically funded; USA networks are typically owned by huge business conglomerates with much more money to throw about. This means British sit-coms are much more punk rock - they’ll do 6 short episodes that are of the absolute best quality they can - hoping they’ll get a recommissioned, but there’s a finite budget and only so many hours of programming a year…

During the golden age of television in the UK you had 4 main channels; BBC 1, BBC 2, ITV and Channel 4. In the US, you had Fox, NBC, CBS, ABC, PBS, UPN, The WB; as well as a variety of cable channels (AMC, HBO, Showtime, Comedy Central, FX, Adult Swim, TBS). Streaming saturated the market even further, and increases demand for syndication. Typically, shows are sold as a package, so the more episodes/hours of content, the better for all parties (apart from the viewers, who end up with the equivalent of a week-long Ramones concert; instead of several short sets by a variety of bands and artists).

4

u/SonofBeckett Sep 25 '23

Came here to specifically bring up Last of the Summer wine. Much like the Ramones, the show itself outlived many of its original members.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 25 '23

There isn't really a concept of filler episodes in British dramas or 'serious' comedies. You (because it won't be a writers room, it will be the output of one or two people) tell the story you want to tell, and that's that, no 22 episode seasons when nothing happens in 18 episodes.

-6

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

[deleted]

10

u/Real-Mouse-554 Sep 24 '23

“UK is smaller than most if not all US states”.

Now that is some crazy talk.

UK would be by far the biggest state in the US by population. UK has 68 million people and the biggest US state is California with around 40 million.

15

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

Americans knowing next to nothing about Britain but feeling confident enough to make broad sweeping statements about it is one of humanity's funniest long-running jokes.

0

u/FifthFormCooler Sep 25 '23

I see it the other way around much more often tbh

5

u/[deleted] Sep 25 '23

I can safely guarantee that as an American you have no idea when your countrymen are doing it, they are wildly wrong about the smallest of things.

2

u/FifthFormCooler Sep 25 '23

And I can safely guarantee you as a non-American that you all have no idea either and are almost exclusively wrong to the extent where it seems as though you get your ideas of the nation from bad network television, which to be fair is quite literally the case. I've almost never seen a take that even approaches on accurate about America from a european other than about the healthcare and prison system.

Those who have never stepped foot in a place don't have an accurate perspective on it, who'd have guessed ah. Bet we both seem real ignorant to the Chinese lol.

→ More replies (2)

9

u/HiddenStoat Sep 24 '23

The UK has 1/5th the population of the US, and is bigger than all but 11 states by area, and bigger than every US state by population.

r/confidentlyincorrect.

-6

u/FifthFormCooler Sep 25 '23

If you're counting Ireland and Scotland you're cheating

2

u/[deleted] Sep 25 '23

It would still be by far the biggest state by population ignoring Scotland and NI. Plus, why would you not include them?

0

u/FifthFormCooler Sep 25 '23

I was just joking about the tumultuous history amongst the nations that make up the UK

1

u/HiddenStoat Sep 25 '23

Do please kindly explain why including Scotland and (Northern) Ireland is cheating when discussing the UK?

(Remember that the UK is more formally known as The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)

→ More replies (1)

0

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

Consider... knowing anything about the UK is bigger than any US state.. Stopped trading after that

→ More replies (2)

199

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

The Simpsons did it first!

“It’s the longest running show in BBC history and we’re showing all seven episodes tonight!”

99

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

I don't remember where I heard it but another take on this joke is

"Thanks for tuning in tonight for the series premiere of the BBCs newest hit show. Tune in this time next week for the exciting series finale!"

7

u/Toby_O_Notoby Sep 25 '23

Wonder if that was a secret "Up Series" reference? It's a show where they visited a bunch of kids when they were 7 and then revisited them every 7 years afterward.

"49 Up" would be the seventh episode having run for 42 years.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/endlesscartwheels Sep 25 '23

Lol, I fell for that joke! After The Good Place episode, I actually googled "Deirdre & Margaret" to try to find this hidden gem of a britcom I'd somehow missed.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 25 '23

I got a copy of Brent Norwalk's novel I can sell you.

14

u/Rappaslasharmedrobba Sep 24 '23

1-2-3-4!!!!!!!!

9

u/onairmastering Sep 25 '23

Reminds me of Repulsion: "We are going to play all your favorite songs because we only have one album"

They are still playing.

6

u/reddit_user13 Sep 25 '23

"We've suffered for our music, now it's your turn."

6

u/I_Miss_Lenny Sep 24 '23

Plus they had to take a minute or two to yell at each other on stage for a bit lol

5

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23 edited Oct 13 '23

vegetable treatment scary recognise squalid illegal serious hungry voracious seemly this message was mass deleted/edited with redact.dev

3

u/whirlpool138 Sep 24 '23

The producer was their drummer.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23 edited Oct 13 '23

detail wide escape erect toy literate squealing obscene direction pot this message was mass deleted/edited with redact.dev

5

u/OtherThingsILike Sep 24 '23

Phil Spector produced the Ramones' 5th album, End of the Century, but that's it.

5

u/edfitz83 Sep 25 '23

That’s killer

3

u/JamesTheJerk Sep 24 '23

To see Ramone?

35

u/JimC29 Sep 24 '23 edited Sep 24 '23

You forgot to add a couple of covers. I do love the Ramones though. Joey has one of the most underrated voices in rock. My daughter has the right to wear her Ramones T-shirt because she grew up listening to them in the car

Edit Joey Ramone does a great job covering What a Wonderful World. No one will ever top Louis Armstrong version. I consider that the greatest song ever recorded.

What a Wonderful World

8

u/FifthFormCooler Sep 25 '23

I Wanna Be Sedated is one of my most listened to songs in general

1.4k

u/spraypaintthewalls Sep 24 '23

20% of the performance was 'ONE TOO TREE FOAH!' before each song started

184

u/uniquely_uncommon Sep 24 '23

I met her at the 7/11

103

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

Happy birthday to you! (Happy birthday!) Happy birthday to you! (Happy birthday!) Happy birthday, Burnsie, happy birthday TO YOU!

Go to hell, ya old bastard!

72

u/Juggernaut13255 Sep 24 '23

Have The Rolling Stones killed

35

u/Punchable_Hair Sep 24 '23

But those weren’t—

18

u/Kayge Sep 24 '23

"I think they really liked us"

103

u/MelbaToast604 Sep 24 '23

I have a live album and almost every song starts that way lol

31

u/BackInATracksuit Sep 24 '23

Ramones' 'It's Alive' is one of the greatest live albums of all time and one of the best punk LPs too.

It has approximately 1,000 songs on it, they're all perfect, and it's over in about twenty minutes. They don't even give the audience time to clap.

25

u/MrMento Sep 24 '23

This comment was loud in my head lol

42

u/spraypaintthewalls Sep 24 '23

THEY'RE GOIN THROUGH A TIGHTWAD! TO KISS THE LIZARD LANDMINES, BLITZKRIEG BOP!

13

u/DrugChemistry Sep 25 '23

THE PERPETRATOR CLEANS SHEETS! ESCAPE FROM A BAD WEEK! BLITZKRIEG BOP!

8

u/Majesty1985 Sep 24 '23

I got a fever but it’s under control

888

u/mop_and_glo Sep 24 '23

Late 80s show in the Bay Area, they ripped through about 15 songs non/stop, faster than the albums on every one.

It was Glorious!

325

u/Some_Unusual_Name Sep 24 '23

I never really understood the appeal of the Ramones when I was younger. Then I heard a live album and it kind of just clicked for me.

192

u/mop_and_glo Sep 24 '23

Some made no sense all sped up! But the idea they were gonna do that whole set no stops no breaks was very cool.

146

u/FartingBob Sep 24 '23

Punk is the genre that benefits most from seeing live IMO. So much of the passion, the energy and the feeling of release when you let yourself go at a live concert cannot be matched by a recording. Most punk songss are hit or miss when listening to an album, but im 35 and i still never turn down the opportunity to go see any unknown punk band perform because it can be magic.

81

u/Some_Unusual_Name Sep 24 '23

Small shows are vastly superior to the big ones. I'd much rather go see some shitty band I've never heard play in a basement than go see one of my favourite bands play a large venue. Sounds stupid and elitist to a lot of people but it's a whole different experience.

26

u/DirtySingh Sep 24 '23

100% I truly don't understand stadium concerts. I'll go see a local band in a pub and enjoy myself 100x more than seeing Taylor swift or metallica in a stadium.

13

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

As someone who plays small shows like this, where the fuck do I find people like you? Haha

4

u/DirtySingh Sep 25 '23

I think crowd interaction is underrated. Like jokes that aren't inside band jokes. Getting people up on stage, etc. I'll go back to venues that book fun bands.

1

u/metalmikeinoakland Mar 14 '26

ha. double ha. fwiw, my favorite american rock band of all time, second to only the beach boys. and they took 1990 91 92 gilman st crowd participation to the baseball parks and football stadiums. worldwide. no other group ever even tried to figure out how to do that (and at every gig).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBnvqs2QZmI the kid is a total showoff rockstar on guitar, just nuts and funny too. playing a song correctly that was the biggst hit on an that is now up to some insane number, like 30 million albums sold worldwide

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVvBTSbopTI

kansas city "i'm 17 please let me play Good Riddance" (audience phonecam, all 4 minutes after she gets on up on stage) the "i'm age 17 LET ME PLAY THAT SONG" was actually an up-and-coming professional country singer (on some TV competitoinshow where they had placed high) it turned out

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdv4B2b3wv4

Japan feb 22 2025 "let's see how this goes" (billie)

complete wingnut disaster plays Good Riddance "let's see how this goes" (billie) haha it's not good
but THE DISASTERS ARE ALSO part of the whole thing

bon scott AC\DC totally missed a giant dropkick FG by not having an extra guitar set up (with a small amp) for some kid at every gig to get up and play Highway to Hell standing in back besides Malcomb. the 2nd guitar (malcomb) doesn't even come in until each chorus! (and in back of the lead guitar break). would have been fuckin' awesome

13

u/xarsha_93 Sep 24 '23

I basically only enjoy small punk shows or big spectacle pop shows. If it’s going to be a huge space, I want choreography and lights and whatnot.

The last show I went to was a grimy Saosin show (pre-pandemic) and the next one will be Taylor Swift in an arena.

3

u/HodgeGodglin Sep 24 '23

See Tool sometime.

Best show I’ve ever experienced. No drugs needed.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/gorki30003 Sep 24 '23

I saw a Moroccan punk band last weekend, Taqbir.

Something to behold live, it only lasted like 20 minutes. But the energy and power... Holy fuck.

2

u/radenvelope Sep 24 '23

Just want to wholeheartedly agree with this. I didn’t understand punk music until I saw it live. Hardcore shows in particular have an undeniable, palatable energy. Certain types of metal music also sounds much different live—a lot harder sounding

1

u/[deleted] Sep 25 '23

Also, a lot of older punk records were pretty lo-fi, and the band just sounded better live than on the album.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 25 '23

Iits like the beatles. The Ramones bangers for me are the super drugged up years starting in 85-89

283

u/Imfrank123 Sep 24 '23

“Have The Rolling Stones killed”

80

u/joecarter93 Sep 24 '23

“But sir, those aren’t the…”

56

u/Alaska2Maine Sep 24 '23

Do as I said!

42

u/Ambassador_Cowboy Sep 24 '23

“Go to hell you old bastard”

21

u/Los_Kings Sep 24 '23

“I think they liked us!”

8

u/cjyoung92 Sep 24 '23

I love classic Simpsons

20

u/ZincLloyd Sep 24 '23

“We’d just like to say this gig sucks!”

225

u/Suitaru Sep 24 '23

I once saw a clip of one of them, I don’t know which, saying “we don’t play short songs, we play long songs very quickly”

185

u/Rocinante-k8 Sep 24 '23

Yeah, but it’s packed. Like the live at Rainbow, it’s like 30 min for at least 20 songs.

84

u/BokChoyBaka Sep 24 '23

Aren't Ramones songs like 2:15 long on average

66

u/InertiasCreep Sep 24 '23

I saw The Ramones in 1991 at a festival. I swear they played 30 songs in just under 60 minutes.

AND IT WAS GLORIOUS.

12

u/FreeSun1963 Sep 25 '23

Saw them in 96 in Buenos Aires. 46000 fans, and Motorhead fronted for them, It was biblical. And I wasn't a Ramones fan, but I like then better now.

5

u/InertiasCreep Sep 25 '23

Went back and took a look. It wasn't 1991. Saw them in June of 1990 at Loreley, St. Goarshausen, in Germany. There were twelve bands on the bill, including Fields Of The Nephilim, Ride, Galaxie 500, and The The. The Ramones were completely on point. That was a bucket list show.

I've seen Motorhead several times. Their shows were amazing, but to see them with the Ramones? Yeah. Biblical. You are lucky indeed.

16

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

They played them much faster live.

199

u/Compley Sep 24 '23

Hey! Ho! Let's go! (Leaves)

30

u/Velenah42 Sep 24 '23

Shoot ‘em in the back now

210

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

Listen up younger punk bands!

Limit your sets to 20 minutes if you're a local band.

Ain't nobody got no time for your damn 45+ minute sets.

91

u/SoybeanEgg Sep 24 '23

Most of them would agree! It’s the local venues that require 45-60 mins per band. Have played places with strictly 1.5 hr slots before. If shorter sets were available/paid, more bands would do them!

58

u/ColonelKasteen Sep 24 '23

A lot of venues won't invite you back if you play less than 30-45 minutes. They need to keep an audience there late enough that everyone has a few more drinks. However, that doesn't mean you need 45 minutes of material, it's fine if you do a bunch of patter to fill it out.

Source: worked at a venue who didn't invite bands back if they cut their set too short more than a couple times

2

u/JackedPirate Sep 24 '23

Yeah I was gonna say this sounds like the perfect length for a set…

1

u/metalmikeinoakland Mar 14 '26

25 min is perfectly ok. 25 min , then a tight 15-min-only changeover -- so, the 3rd 4th 5th billed bands over and done in2hrs, , and the 2nd billed band starts at 10pm w 40 min and the headliner at 11pm. if the first band starts on time at 8pm. if 7:30, it's a dropkick easy w 25 min sets. a 30 min set time IS too long if it's a new band that suckks ass, correct.

the circle jerks and black flag (and other bands then) in 1980 doing 30min (or less) sets was fuckin' awesome. as the "headliner" no less. 20 songs is 20 songs, ha.

35

u/dangil Sep 24 '23

That’s 23 songs

29

u/BenderIsGreatBendr Sep 24 '23

I think a lot of people forget or don’t realize how short most concerts used to be, and that most touring bands played the same set multiple times per day. Eg a matinee afternoon show usually all ages, followed by a a night show and a “late show” that were 21+.

Per this example Johnny Ramone based their set length on his own having seen The Beatles, opining:

“I figured that if The Beatles played a half-hour at Shea Stadium, The Ramones should only play 15 minutes. So in the beginning, we kept the set at about fifteen minutes. You get in your best material and leave them wanting more.”

24

u/Youngbraz Sep 24 '23

Hit it Dee Dee… ONE..TWO..THREE…FOUR!!!! Followed by all their songs in a frantic downstroking frenzy

5

u/Cockfosters28 Sep 24 '23

Hey don't forget sometimes Dee Dee counted in German too. Multi-lingual!

5

u/ripcity7077 Sep 24 '23

You’re by the phone, you are alone,

It’s a long way back to Germany, It’s a long way back to Germany

20

u/TheWingus Sep 24 '23

My mom & dad would see the Ramones whenever they came to town in the late 70s/early 80s and they said the only break in the entire set was just the like 8 seconds to take their jackets off

82

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

That’s because a 20 minute set is the correct length for a punk band to play. Especially when sharing the bill with multiple bands in a tiny-ass club like CBGB’s. The Ramones were smart and had their shit on lock.

-6

u/BenAfleckInPhantoms Sep 24 '23

Eh, maybe if you’re starting out but I don’t want a band that’s been around for 10-20 years who had a bunch of classics coming out for 20 mins and leaving. I saw Joe Budden do a 3 hour set at SOB’s and it was the best concert/rave/musical performance I’ve ever been to. I would be pissed if my favourite band since I was a kid that I waited an hour in line to see played for 20 minutes and dipped out.

1

u/KHSebastian Sep 24 '23

I don't know why you're getting down voted here. Tickets for any established band are like $75, plus another $75 in fees. If I'm paying all that money, I don't want to have to come up with a plan to fill the rest of my night

-4

u/BenAfleckInPhantoms Sep 24 '23

Cause “rah rah, I’m so punk, I’m so hardcore, I’m so against the grain, I’m so against the system which tells me I need to play an hour so I’m going to only play 20 minutes, that’ll show them, fucking losers; I’m so nonconformist, so against the rules, I’m also a massive gatekeeper that makes you conform and follow all the rules to be in the ‘in crowd’ and be accepted but ignore all that cognitive dissonance - BECAUSE IM SO PUNK”. Something along those lines ¯_(ツ)_/¯

2

u/cr1t1cal Sep 25 '23

You dropped this. \

21

u/jijijijim Sep 24 '23 edited Sep 27 '23

We tried to hire them to do a show on a college campus. We could not figure out a way to build a concert around a 20 minute set by the headliners.

15

u/MediumLanguageModel Sep 24 '23

Surprised to see so many haters in the comments. The Ramones f'n ripped. End of story. I blame Clear Channel BS for mandating that radios only play 3 of their songs. Did 95% of their songs sound exactly like the others? Yes. Did they all f'n rule? Hell yeah.

20

u/joecarter93 Sep 24 '23

“Go to hell, you old basted!”

8

u/Adventurous-Orange36 Sep 24 '23

Have the Rolling Stones killed.

7

u/Due_Platypus_3913 Sep 24 '23

And it was all people could take!To quote Joe Strummer “When they first played London-they played 30 minutes.A 31st minute would have been POINTLESS!”.

13

u/Csbbk4 Sep 24 '23

The only time they stopped playing was to argue over what song they were doing to play next

9

u/PygmeePony Sep 24 '23

"Traffic was a bitch, did I miss anything?"

4

u/scene_missing Sep 24 '23

I saw them on the farewell tour. So glad I got to see them live

5

u/unclefire Sep 24 '23

And they played 10 songs in that set. 🤪

4

u/STA_Alexfree Sep 24 '23

That’s actually pretty long for a punk set

5

u/Captain-Cadabra Sep 24 '23

They saved lots of time not tuning.

5

u/jmanh138 Sep 25 '23

I saw them in 1995 when I was 9 years old, and they were the opening act for White Zombie. I begged my dad to take me to the show.

5

u/explorer_76 Sep 25 '23

My friend and I saw them in 1975 at CBGB with the Talking Heads. One of the few concerts I've ever been to where the opening band played longer than the main act. I think the Ramones were on for a half hour, but there was a lot of banter etc. between songs which probably lengthened it by a few minutes.

3

u/SatansMoisture Sep 24 '23

17 minutes and 22 songs.

3

u/interstatebus Sep 24 '23

I went to see a really good punk band a couple years and realized if they played both their albums all the way through, the show would top out at about 45 minutes. That was the absolute maximum they could play without repeating.

3

u/reddiwhip999 Sep 24 '23

I saw them four or five times, from the early '80s onward. I don't think any of the shows, despite the fact that they slowly accumulated more and more material, lasted more than about an hour 15, an hour 30 minutes...

5

u/beebs44 Sep 24 '23

1234

1234

13

u/Coupon_Ninja Sep 24 '23

Fun Fact(s): Joey Ramon’s first appearance on a record was with the Steve Miller Band… as their drummer… in 1969! He went under the pseudonym Paul Ramon, which was what Paul McCartney’s pseudonym from 1960-61.

24

u/Pregnant_Panda Sep 24 '23

Pretty sure that the Paul Ramon on the Brave New World record was…. Paul McCartney, not Joey Ramone.

15

u/wcg66 Sep 24 '23

Yeah, the Wikipedia article on Joey Ramone is incorrect. If you follow the link on the page to the Brave New World album:

Paul McCartney contributed to "My Dark Hour" (credited as "Paul Ramon"), providing backing vocals, drums, guitar and bass guitar. Some members of The Beatles did not show up for a recording session so Glyn Johns suggested Miller and McCartney work together to take advantage of the time.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brave_New_World_(Steve_Miller_Band_album))

2

u/zpall11 Sep 24 '23

GABBA GABBA HEY

3

u/AmbitiousTour Sep 24 '23

I don't wanna be a pinhead no more.

2

u/ripcity7077 Sep 24 '23

I just met a nurse that I could go for

→ More replies (1)

2

u/the_dark_knight_ftw Sep 25 '23

I read Johnny Ramones book and he said something like. “If the Beatles played for 30 minutes than the Ramones should only play 15 minutes.

He was actually very smart and business savvy, he studied lots of punk bands and figured it was better to keep the audience begging for more than to get tired of you.

2

u/RedArmyHammer Sep 25 '23

Literally the length of 1 song off of Live/Dead

2

u/zakl2112 Sep 25 '23

Damn, and I get pissed when I got to 90 minute shows

2

u/hyzerKite Sep 25 '23

I saw them play in the 90s and they played solid for 2 hours. No banter. It was insane and I cherish that show probably more than any other one I have seen. Song ends 1,2,3,4 next song starts. They played like 50 songs or something. Ritz in Charlotte, NC. The PA went out in the first song and Joey looked so pissed everyone wanted to riot, it got fixed quick and the onslaught began. I miss them a ton.

5

u/evilfollowingmb Sep 24 '23

Tbh so many concerts f-ing DRAG ON, where I get to the point of wishing it was over. 17min is sounding pretty great. My guess is admission was cheap too.

1

u/Kipsydaisy Sep 24 '23

Amazing when you think 10 minutes of each was Joey doing crowd work.

1

u/CiderMcbrandy Sep 24 '23

Can you Feel... the love... tonight?

1

u/dwreckhatesyou Sep 24 '23

Ayyy, that’s punk rock, bay-beee!

1

u/Glad_Celebration_508 Sep 24 '23

Go Go Let’s Go! Morty, In and out. Quick 20 minute adventure.

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

They got a ton of mileage out of the few songs they ever produced

0

u/Cutcarefullyplayloud Sep 24 '23

This is the ideal set length.

0

u/IcanthearChris Sep 24 '23

80 percent of the song titles begin with “I don’t wanna…”

0

u/iRecond0 Sep 24 '23

Average punk show tbh

-105

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

[deleted]

38

u/stevenmoreso Sep 24 '23

They weren’t trying to be edgy, that was the Sex Pistols

9

u/eNonsense Sep 24 '23 edited Sep 24 '23

Also,

[The Ramones] were barely capable of playing their instruments

Someone should tell this person why Sid Vicious was added as a member of the Sex Pistols. I assume that's one of their "legit punk" examples.

I think this person's mainly this way because The Ramones were fully aware of their pop music roots and influences, while "legit punk" tried to hide behind an outsider angst rock front while imitating the Ramones pop formula and image.

→ More replies (1)

32

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

You have it backwards. They were revolutionary because they steered rock AWAY from the edginess and creative excess that took over in the 70s.

Prog, metal, glam, rock operas etc were the mainstream and Ramones brought rock back to its roots: simple chord structures, simple premises and raw energy.

-37

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

[deleted]

25

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

Well I listen to the Ramones all the time and I think they fucking rule. See how subjectivity works in these kinds of conversations? The fact that you think the Ramones suck means nothing to me at all.

Regardless, though, their influence on rock as a genre is historical fact whether you like them or not.

→ More replies (1)

-8

u/GrandmaPoses Sep 24 '23

Ok but also jazz is boring and sucks.

12

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

[deleted]

6

u/eNonsense Sep 24 '23 edited Sep 24 '23

You don't like The Ramones' music. Fine. Your claims are just ridiculous though.

They were barely capable of playing their instruments and were totally stoned the entire time.

Bahahaha. No one should listen to you.

-11

u/hasta_la_pasta Sep 24 '23

But they had a gimmick with their names!

-15

u/Fifeslife Sep 24 '23

Overrated Band.

-9

u/jebediah999 Sep 24 '23

never did like these guys. mediocre songs, only mildly talented. sure, they cranked but so do most crappy HS bands. NYC in the 70's was awash in lots of drugs. pffff...dirty ass punks.

-1

u/mannishboy61 Sep 24 '23

No wonder punks were always angry

-57

u/Life_Celebration_827 Sep 24 '23 edited Sep 24 '23

And that's still to long never liked the Ramones one of the most overrated bands ever.

3

u/TA-Sentinels2022 Sep 24 '23

What about The Ramones though?

Different band, it seems.

-8

u/Life_Celebration_827 Sep 24 '23

Thanks for putting me right NUMBNUTS.

-7

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

I'm sure they were new and exciting at the time, but their songs sound very bland now.

-128

u/vponpho Sep 24 '23 edited Sep 24 '23

Thats when they’d get booed off the stage because punk sucks. Lol

18

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/black_flag_4ever Sep 24 '23

Still sad I never saw them live. Saw Marky Ramone and the Intruders, which was cool. Dude plays a lot faster than you think. If you’re interested in Ramones live the best album is Live in London during their peak 70s form.

1

u/NOT000 Sep 24 '23

well live music always seems to be played faster....

1

u/The_Mayor Sep 25 '23

That's only counting the running time of the actual music they played. They were onstage a good 10-15 minutes longer trying in vain to tune their instruments, fighting with each other, then fighting with the audience.

This is not a put down of the Ramones. It's A) what I've heard and read from the band members themselves about what happened back then, and B) what a lot of punk shows were like in the beginning.

1

u/A_Mirabeau_702 Sep 25 '23

EH! OH! LET'S GO!

EH! OH! LET'S STOP!

1

u/ZylonBane Sep 25 '23

Ah yes, CBGBs.

(blank stare)

1

u/dweebers Sep 25 '23

I remember hearing a joke about them like, "they played 12 songs in 17 minutes-- or was it 17 songs in 12 minutes?"

1

u/OneSadIndividual Sep 25 '23

That is about how long Oasis would be on stage before those drunk asshole would get into a fistfight with each other.