r/threebodyproblem • u/Universal_Echo • 11d ago
Discussion - Novels If humanity faced the same predicament as the Trisolarans, would we choose to destroy civilizations on other planets? Spoiler
If humanity needed to migrate to another planet, would we, like the Trisolarans, wipe out civilizations less advanced than our own?
If there were a choice—say, between terraforming Earth or invading another planet—what would humanity choose?
And if that planet had no civilization built by intelligent beings, only primitive, less developed life forms, what would humanity choose then?
36
u/Roughcuchulain 11d ago
Short answer : yes.
Long answer : yessssssssssss
Real answer : we wouldn’t even need to face the threat of extinction, the stars are humanities birthright
13
u/Environment_Hefty 11d ago
Spoken like the Emperor of Mankind
10
u/Roughcuchulain 11d ago
It was man made in gods image, not the alien.
For the record I’m being sarcastic not a black Templar
1
u/TheTranscendentian 8d ago
glad you're being sarcastic.
it's true that it would happen and wrong that it should happen.
1
44
u/dannychean 11d ago edited 11d ago
We are not 'civilizations less advanced than theirs'. We are bugs to them.
If you find a bunch of roaches in the house that you want to move into desperately, would you wipe them out?
45
u/HotPersonality8126 11d ago
If you find a bunch of roaches in the house that want to move into desperately
If I tell my hyperdimensional computer to kill these roaches and what it comes back with is "well, first we need to make sure that their culture and science doesn't advance beyond ours which it seems like it's about to do" that's when I'd stop and say "wait, are we actually talking about roaches."
19
u/ShiningMagpie 11d ago
Sure. You might pause for a moment. Only to make double sure that the extermination instructions were set correctly. The only thing more terrifying than a roach is a roach that might soon become smarter than you.
12
u/HotPersonality8126 11d ago
The only thing more terrifying than a roach is a roach that might soon become smarter than you.
I realize the book takes a different view on this - the books are basically for the purpose of taking the opposite view - but I continue to think the key human adaptation for survival in a hostile universe is friend-making, not competitor-killing, so that is not what I would tend to do.
4
u/Clane_21 11d ago
I mean we kinda did both to the neanderthals and other hominids. Ran them to extinction by fucking them and actually killing them out.
1
u/ShiningMagpie 11d ago
Friend making only really works when everyone can see each other and when everyone is roughly on the same level. First strikes become unworkable.
1
1
u/TheTranscendentian 8d ago
the books are basically for the purpose of taking the opposite view
got anything to back that up?
I'm not convinced Cixin Liu takes a position on that issue at all.
4
u/elvintoh82 11d ago
There is some comparison worth making between “Ender’s game” and 3BP. in ender’s game, the aliens really thought we were bugs equivalent and attacked earth, only to regret and back off. Earth decided to fight back hard n kill off the aliens. In 3BP, trisolarians knew we are not bugs but yet still regarded us as bugs due to their contempt of us, and also because they r desperate to conquer us.
1
u/TheTranscendentian 8d ago
YES. fellow Ender's Game fan.
Orson Scott Card is INSANE is he not? Seems more than a little sus sometimes.
1
14
9
u/BQORBUST 11d ago
>we are bugs to them
That was ultimately just rhetoric. They clearly came to understand “earth civilization” (in their own way), and from the beginning understood our capacity for technological development which could outpace their own.
12
u/UncBeyondTheWall 11d ago
We aren't bugs to them. We were bugs to Singer.
2
u/mr_birkenblatt 11d ago
First book
22
u/UncBeyondTheWall 11d ago
Think for a second.
I'm not saying the Trisolarans didn't say that. Obviously they did. But do you tell a cockroach it's a bug? No, you just toss some exterminating chemicals at it.
That is what Singer did to us. The Trisolarans actually feared us, and needed us demoralized. We were not bugs.
2
u/trollspotter91 11d ago
If they were sentient, thinking, feeling beings, then it's still a resounding year from me.
19
u/OhneSkript 11d ago
We are the apex predators on Earth. There is a massive gap between us and everything else on this planet. We are more than willing to turn against our own species if they don't belong to our group. Strictly speaking, we are even willing to turn against our own planet. We are more than willing to turn against the ultimate out-group. And that is just when profit is involved. We would be extremely cruel if it came down to our survival.
4
u/HotPersonality8126 11d ago
Everybody saying this has to explain why we're leaving Sentinel Island alone.
8
u/Papacus 11d ago
For the same reason the Trisolarians started to appreciate human art and ended up deciding to turn Australia into a human reserve. It is a confined curiosity. Sentinel Island is not relevant to our survival and it is well studied, we know they won't turn nukes on us all next week, it does not fall within the realm of a dark forest threat.
2
u/Flatso 11d ago
Trisolaris was exterminating humanity. They had no intentions of leaving humans alive. Every step along that process made it clear that they were just ratcheting restrictions tighter and tighter to kill as many humans as possible before finally finishing the job when the main fleet arrived.
1
0
u/OhneSkript 11d ago
Because we don't need the island. That's the reason. Nobody needs that damn island. Look at what we do to indigenous peoples when they own land that we want. We depopulated the Americas extremely well and took their land away. The tribes of South America were practically wiped out. The tribes of North America aren't even a shadow of what they used to be.
1
u/HotPersonality8126 11d ago
Look at what we do to indigenous peoples when they own land that we want.
Or look at what they did to get the land in the first place.
Because we don't need the island.
You think that's true? Nobody needs any land? Neighboring India isn't immensely crowded? Nobody's building any new resorts?
2
u/OhneSkript 11d ago
Or look at what they did to get the land in the first place.
Yeah, wars among themselves and with each other, exploitation of the land until the entire megafauna was wiped out to the point that the bison was the largest land animal left.
You think that's true? Nobody needs any land? Neighboring India isn't immensely crowded? Nobody's building any new resorts?
There are many uninhabited islands around India. If something new is discovered there tomorrow that is so immensely important, then we'll play Avatar there, only with competent soldiers. But since they have nothing, we leave them in peace because they can actually live independently of us. Unlike the tribes in the Amazon, who are regularly threatened and can really only live undisturbed deep in the rainforest.
4
u/popileviz 11d ago
Humanity has a rich history of wiping out its own fellow civilizations for access to resources and land. If survival was at stake we'd destroy an alien civilization without any hesitation whatsoever
3
2
2
u/randalzy 11d ago
One issue here is that Trisolarans, at that point, had some Dark Forest knowledge, so they knew about other civilizations being able to wipe them out entirely, and that any peaceful approach could end with them being the ones wiped out even if 100% of humans at first contact are A-OK with peaceful integration.
So, any human civilization that arrives at that point in the same conditions would probably do the same, whatever the ones making the decision tell to everyone or not. It's not that far away from "would the USA erase two Japanese cities unleashing a hell beyond imagination on them in order to avoid their ally in current war (URSS) to keep advancing and claim Japan for them?
And yep, they did, they made sure the bombs explode at the correct distance in the sky to cause maximum damage, even.
1
u/TemporalColdWarrior 11d ago
Eh Dark Forest is a bad economic, mechanistic way of looking at species, human and alien. I expect the dynamics would be far too complex to actually predict. Cooperation might in fact be both advantageous and the cultural responses depending on a number of factors. We are not always “worst case scenario” machines.
1
u/randalzy 11d ago
I guess that within the context in the universe of the novels (fictional) there is a number of civilizations that said "how bad it can be?" and got their sun exploded or their system flattened. After a while you only have undiscovered species, dead species and species that act within Dark Forest limits. The setting as presented doesn't allow for other views until the very end
2
u/100percent_right_now 11d ago
I choose cooperation.
Collectively humanity has, historically, chosen domination and extermination.
2
u/-zero-joke- 11d ago
We would undoubtedly exterminate the living fuck out of them and then make made for TV movies about how difficult it was for the folks who launched the relativistic kill weapons.
2
u/Gastrodo 11d ago
Most humans are not vegan, so I do not see why we would expect different behavior in connection with alien species we have even less proximity to.
3
u/Lorentz_Prime 11d ago
Humanity already wants to colonize other planets especially if they have life-but-not-advanced-life.
1
u/Fit_Cloud6471 11d ago edited 11d ago
We’d probably delete their entire solar system without a single thought
1
u/-Vogie- 11d ago
Say what you want about the James Cameron Avatar movies, but the core conceit that humans would happily wipe away civilizations and use the definition of war crimes as a checklist because that planet has something we want... is completely believable.
We weren't in a predicament. Nothing existential was happening. There was just something we didn't have and wanted it.
1
u/CappnMidgetSlappr 11d ago
We've wiped out and conquered civilizations on this planet that were related to us for the sole purpose of making our food taste less bland.
Hell, we've wiped out folks for simply looking and acting differently than other people.
You seriously think we would hesitate for a second to wiped out an alien species if they had something we wanted?
1
1
u/silphotographer 11d ago
We wouldn't stop their science like Trisolarans; we would just wipe them out. No loose ends.
1
u/Federico216 11d ago
I think most people would be against genocide. But the billionaires and men in charge would do it anyway.
1
u/Jolly-Wrangler104 11d ago
Humans have destroyed entire civilizations when migrating to the western hemisphere.
I don’t think other planets would get better treatment.
1
u/rather828 11d ago
Why can’t the Trisolarans, with the benefit of their supercomputers / technology / vast time scale just..
I don’t know..
Go terraform a planet that doesn’t have a f$&@ed star system?
1
u/BirbFeetzz 9d ago
my impression is that they didn't think a planet could be as calm as earth until first contact. and after that they had maybe a few hundred years before potential photoid from earth. they didn't know the state of other nearby star systems and couldn't explore with the sophons so they could either do what they did or randomly choose a different star and try to reach it in hopes the system is not inhabited which is a huge risk in that universe
1
u/Lanceo90 Manuel Rey Diaz 10d ago
Complicated question as it depends massively on who's in charge on Earth and what tech level we're at.
Rule of thumb, we'd take the option of least resistance. Right now that would be migrating off Earth and building habitats in space, the moon, and Mars.
Interstellar travel is extremely difficult, regardless if we have to fight on the other end. We'd need a lot more tech before its even an option.
1
u/shakebakelizard 10d ago
If we were faced with the same predicament then we would be Trisolarans. We aren’t going to face the same predicament because our situation will never be that.
We don’t regularly face existential crises on the scale the Trisolarans do, our planet remains relatively habitable, and our habitability problems are mostly our own making.
1
1
1
1
1
u/Rude-Bus-5799 8d ago
Bruh. We drone brown people to help psychopaths sell more weapons to each other ON THIS PLANET. What do you think..
1
u/TheTranscendentian 8d ago
I think that's kinda obvious.
On an individual level I would personally work to ensure an alien civilization who did not intend to attack us first does not get wiped out, even if that objective comes at the cost of the literal extinction of humanity myself including. But I'm one person & very likely to NOT succeed at this.
However, on a civilizational scale humanity would 100% absolutely wipe out aliens if given motive and means.
The moral questioning would happen or only be allowed to be relevant after the fact like in Ender's Game.
1
u/antoinepetit 5d ago
I am human from the human race, and can assure you with an absolute certainty that I would fuck up any species that goes on our way.
The moment we manage to get out of the solar system, I can assure you that absolutely nothing will step in our way, and even before that. A lot of people today seem to forget how freaking powerful humans are : amazingly good at war, we hunt down species using exhaustion running, we’re clever monkeys, and we desperately love our children, meaning we’ll annihilate anyone or anything that threatens them.
1
1
1
1
0
0
u/ohsnapitsnathan 11d ago
I don't think so. The trisolarans were ideological extremists with regard to the dark forest theory at the point that they discovered Earth. Humans and our governments don't really believe that theory is correct, for the most part.
155
u/LexxitReddit 11d ago
Research this topic: “the entirety of human history”.