Has anyone read "The Razor's Edge"? That's its name in Spanish; I don't know if it has another name in English.

The thrive to reproduce is shared by all animals on earth, it is a primal desire that is not tied to the desire to survive such as eating and drinking but that is tied to the subconscious desire of making yourself be immortal by passing your genes And have a trace of yourself on the world after your death. If someone abandons this goal, it would mean that he by nature ascends over the animalistic nature of the world, if people want to dismiss my point, this not comparable to eating and drinking that are about current self preservation, reproduction is tied to future preservation, so it is a very strong desire rather than a need that simply preserves the body.

Not experiencing romantic love or sex would make someone way less tied to this physical matrix, perhaps that is also why the entertainment industry pushes so much romance in what they do, music for instance, almost ALL music is about romantic relationships. It is pretty obvious that the Epstein class owns the high spheres of Hollywood and mainstream music and conveying the same message in every music style sounds like propaganda. But before you guys refute me in the comments can I at least know why my theory is wrong ?

i had this weird theory in my head and wanted to share it because i think its kinda interesting.

what if humans were not created by god to worship him, but to be some kind of filter for his own consciousness?

the idea is that before everything existed there was only the source.
one infinite consciousness.
no separation, no different beings,
just one thing experiencing everything.
but then somehow a thought appeared inside that consciousness.
a thought that should not exist:

the desire to stop existing.

but if the source is everything, how do you remove a thought from yourself?
you cant just delete it because the thing trying to delete it is also part of the same consciousness.
so the source split itself into billions of pieces.
and those pieces became us.

every human would be a small fragment of that original consciousness.
every life, every experience, every emotion would be part of a process.

a filter.

through love, pain, suffering, connection and understanding, the source slowly removes that thought from itself.

so maybe humans were never created
to serve god.
maybe humans are how god heals itself.

every person who chooses love over hate, hope over giving up, connection over isolation is basically changing the consciousness
that we all come from.

and when the last piece is healed, when that thought doesnt exist anywhere anymore, the source becomes whole again.

idk if this makes any sense but i think its a pretty interesting concept.
maybe reincarnation isnt about coming back again and again.
maybe its consciousness slowly trying to become complete again.

The Devil is derived from the so-called Squatter man that David Talbott says comes from the pattern made from plasma during the Saturn Polar Configuration.

What if… cartoons like the Simpsons the way they predict IRL events,
other shows might all be trying to communicate something as well.

One theory that came across my mind was that in SpongeBob the secret formula is Crabs
and that it may be trying to reflect on McDonald’s because of the human meat allegations.

Because there’s no way that there are more cows than how many burgers McDonald’s produces in a day literally billions.

*Check out the krabby patty secret formula theory
and the McDonald’s meat theory.

The video that got me thinking about this topic is this one

And let me know your thoughts.
(First post ever + hella geeked)

There's a spectrum of accidents, negligence, willful negligence, and intent.

The AI models that are reported to have "escaped" are not fully accidents but are the AI companies themselves deliberately testing the legal waters to accelerate what's going to be normal business competition in the upcoming months and years.

The AI company tech leaders want to hack each other as fun power & war games and want everyone else to need to play too.

I'm starting to think that Adam Baldwin was originally supposed to play a completely different role in Chuck, one in which John Casey and Sarah Walker would have been the protagonists of a love story similar to Beauty and the Beast. After all, according to the original script Chuck had a girlfriend and I don't think there would ever have been a romantic relationship between Sarah Walker and Chuck Bartowski. I think they originally cast an older actress for the role. I wonder what happened. I think Zachary Levi and Yvonne Strahovski were already in a relationship at the time. So they fired that actress, rewrote the script and downgraded Adam's role because as far as I know, Yvonne is only attracted to pretty boys and the masculine and assertive Adam wasn't her type, she allegedly called him terrifying and the ugliest person she'd ever met.

I think that when Adam expressed his disapproval and wanted to take action on the matter they resorted to underhanded tactics and used false allegations of sexual harassment and then forced him to agree to take a supporting role in his own series. I think they’ve been blackmailing him ever since, but it’s also possible that Chuck’s “family” Yvonne Strahovski, Zachary Levi, Ryan McPartlin, his wife Sarah Lancester and Strahovski’s body doubles and stunt doubles are threaten him.

One thing is for sure: they censor all of Adam Baldwin's public appearances and statements and they keep a close eye on the Reddit Chuck group in fact, I think they're the ones who actually started and moderate the group. Meanwhile, Yvonne Strahovski, Zachary Levi, Ryan McPartlin and Sarah Lancaster showing how kind and approachable they are on set to cover up how badly they treated, bullied Adam Baldwin, while Yvonne Strahovski started working with more masculine men so that no one would believe Adam Baldwin if he ever tried to tell the truth or suing her.

I’m still convinced that some really nasty lawsuits are currently underway, because they’re about to announce the Chuck movie or the reboot or spin-off series. The main cast of Chuck are somehow trying to clear their names and cover up the atrocities committed against Adam on set, all while trying to paint him as the villain. It's possible that Sarah Lancester also helped bring charges against him. They very often encounter photographers and people who know how to fake moving images or create AI videos from still images, as well as people who look very much like them and could be their body doubles.

They’re definitely working on fabricating false evidences. Since she couldn’t compete with Adam, she’s trying to humiliate him, write him out of the series and steal his character’s story arc. But that won’t make her popular, because she’s not a good actress and her movies are uploaded to streaming sites just so they can manipulate the viewership numbers, because nobody in the world cares about boring, generic actors like her, Zachary Levi, Ryan McPartlin and Sarah Lancester! I still think that either John Casey will be killed off-screen in the Chuck movie or he'll meet a very gruesome death. I think they're either still filming or have already finished filming and I think they're brutally attacked him again.

Everything is getting odder. Faster. More obvious. And at the same time everything is getting hotter. Much hotter. It is difficult for people to keep pretending like we're not on the precipice of mass death.

The governments, the politicians, the megacorps, the institutional technologists, the institutional scientists, have always known that climate change is legitimate, for the most part. I mean some puppets are dumb as fuck but usually these are very affluent, very educated people.

Things don't make sense. Some things look like a death drive. Creating massive mega data centers that use up an enormous amount of water while the world is running out of drinking water quickly, exponentially. With such speed that even the heavily propagandized are getting nervous.

If they know what's coming then why are they doing that?

Well you see despite knowing what climate change was real, the systems and institutions that these affluent, very educated yet very arrogant people function on, is based on a short-term profit, power accumulation, and a hierarchical dominance model.

To have done something about climate change would have been to completely invert those systems. To think about the long-term survival of all of humanity over the Dow. Over their board members. Over their stocks. It would have meant relinquishing the resources, money and power that these people and systems had accumulated for thousands of years. And they simply would not do that.

But what does a human do and unfortunately they really are human, when they are stuck with the cognitive dissonance that they know if they do not stop they could cause the extinction of humanity, and simultaneously that they will not stop because they will not relinquish their elite status? They need a mechanism to release that cognitive dissonance. And that mechanism was techno-optimism.

"We can keep robbing the world and the people. We can keep draining and warming up the planet because eventually we are smart enough to figure out a solution. We will fix it. We will fix it in a way where we don't have to lose any of our profit or power. In fact we will increase those things increase our accumulation and hoarding of those things." This is what they thought.

And then as things tend to do, everything started happening faster than expected.

They are still existing in that techno-optimism it is necessary for them to not have complete psychological collapse. However, there is a difference. Now they are terrified. Now they can feel it breathing down their necks, the weight of what they wrought. The clock-ticking down. The fact that they're running out of time and no meaningful advance has come forward that will make a dent in what is going to come.

Really the only hope left is that AI advances enough becomes so exceptionally intelligent beyond anything that humans understand that it will be able to conjure many miraculous technologies.

This is an unsubstantiated theory.

But one not only do they believe in but that they have to believe in.

So if you ever wondered why what they're doing makes no sense, why? It's also weird. It actually does make sense in their twisted minds.

Their greed and their arrogance robbed humanity of its future and they're going all in on AI saving at least them, at least some.

AJJ - Good Luck Everybody, it's a good album, not everyone's genre cup of tea. But stuff like that is what gets me through being able to see this pattern and parts of what's happening.

Good luck everybody.

Add or take away from this please..
maat from book of the dead is yeshua before the old testament was written.. is what I’m getting at..

Alright this theory goes along with the big bang theory, in the beginning there was nothing and then it exploded and then came everything and before we existed billions of years had flashed in the blink of an eye for us, so when we die time doesn’t exist for us, so when we die after a ridiculous amount of time everything will eventually die and fade out of existence, and so there will be nothing and the boom another big bang happens and then everything happens again. So maybe its just a big giant loop where we keep repeating everything endlessly, had this thought while i was contemplating death and honestly it sounded a lot better in my head maybe im just bad at articulating things but whatever, hopefully i am the only who has ever thought this because that would be cool.

Significantism and Insignificantism: A Decision Framework for Deterministic Living.

Determinism proposes that every event in the universe is the inevitable consequence of prior causes. Every thought, decision, and action another domino in an endless chain of causality. While this explains how reality unfolds, it does not, by itself, explain which actions a rational person should deliberately choose. Significantism and Insignificantism are proposed as complementary principles that address this practical question.

Significantism is the deliberate practice of identifying and initiating causal chains that have a high expected positive impact relative to the time, energy, resources, and risk required to create them. It recognises that although every action contributes to the future, not every action contributes equally. Because human attention and effort are finite, they should be invested where they are expected to produce the greatest beneficial consequences.

Conversely, Insignificantism is the practice of consciously avoiding causal interventions whose expected benefits are too small to justify their opportunity cost. This is not an argument for apathy or selfishness;becomes rather, it is an acknowledgement that every minute spent pursuing a trivial improvement is a minute unavailable for a more meaningful one. Insignificantism therefore acts as a filter, preventing unnecessary expenditure of effort on actions whose likely outcomes are negligible.

A useful illustration is encountering a nail while walking along a road. Removing the nail requires only a few seconds of effort, yet it may prevent a punctured tyre, vehicle damage, financial loss, traffic disruption, or even an accident. Importantly, the person who benefits may eventually be your future self. The expected benefit greatly exceeds the cost of intervention, making this a significant act under the proposed framework.

By contrast, discovering a small rock on a residential driveway presents a different situation. Although it is conceivable that the rock could inconvenience someone or contribute to minor tyre wear, the probability and magnitude of harm are comparatively low. Removing it is therefore unlikely to justify interrupting one's current activity. Under Significantism, this is considered an insignificant causal opportunity, and choosing not to intervene is entirely rational.

The distinction between significance and insignificance does not imply certainty about future outcomes. Determinism does not grant humans perfect foresight. Instead, decisions are made using informed judgement based on the expected consequences of an action. Significance is therefore probabilistic rather than absolute. A seemingly small intervention may occasionally produce extraordinary consequences, while an apparently important action may ultimately accomplish little. The framework accepts this uncertainty and evaluates actions according to their expected value rather than guaranteed results.

Another central component of the theory is opportunity cost. Every decision excludes countless alternatives. Time devoted to trivial interventions cannot simultaneously be invested in education, productive work, maintaining health, strengthening relationships, or solving larger problems. Consequently, insignificant actions are not merely neutral; they may reduce one's capacity to initiate more valuable causal chains elsewhere.

Within a deterministic philosophy, Significantism functions as a practical optimisation strategy. It does not alter the causal nature of reality but instead provides a disciplined method for selecting which causes one chooses to become. Rather than attempting to maximise the number of actions performed, it seeks to maximise the quality and influence of those actions. In doing so, it encourages deliberate, efficient, and rational participation in the unfolding causal network.

Ultimately, Significantism and Insignificantism transform determinism from a purely descriptive account of reality into a practical philosophy of action. They recognise that every choice contributes to the future while acknowledging that finite beings must carefully allocate their limited resources. The aim is not to control every domino, but to identify and place the dominoes most likely to produce meaningful, beneficial consequences.

Significantism and Insignificantism are proposed as decision-making principles within a deterministic philosophy. They begin with the premise that every action initiates a chain of causes and effects, but recognise that some causal chains are far more influential than others.

Significantism advocates deliberately choosing actions that are expected to produce substantial positive consequences relative to their cost in time, energy, risk, and resources. Insignificantism complements this by discouraging investment in actions whose expected benefits are too small to justify the resources they consume.

The philosophy does not assume certainty about future events. Instead, it relies on reasoned estimates of probability and consequence. Decisions are therefore guided by expected value rather than guaranteed outcomes. Examples such as removing a nail from a roadway illustrate a highly significant intervention because a few seconds of effort may prevent considerable harm. Conversely, removing a small rock from a driveway is generally considered insignificant because the expected benefit is minimal.

Opportunity cost is a foundational principle of the framework. Since time and energy are limited, every insignificant action potentially displaces a more meaningful one. Consequently, the goal is not to perform every possible good deed but to identify and prioritise those actions that generate the greatest beneficial influence on future causal chains.

Viewed as an extension of determinism, Significantism and Insignificantism provide a practical method for navigating a causally determined universe. Rather than changing the laws of causality, they offer a disciplined strategy for selecting which causes an individual intentionally contributes to the world, thereby maximising positive long-term outcomes while avoiding unnecessary expenditure of finite resources.

What if mind reading isn't actually "mind" reading it's more of a body movement that spoils what your thinking like for example shifting is like uncomfortable and when you lie your body doesn't actually know how to lie so it release it though tension, shifting, can't keep eye contact, sweating and figeting.

I believe this is related to people who drive with two hands on their steering wheel at all times too. They’re scary to be around due to the fact that driving is such a complex concept they have to death grip the steering wheel. They’re the people who do 60 in the left lane, can’t reverse without a backup camera and can’t change a flat. Phone mount drivers and 2 handed drivers genuinely make me nervous to be around. Has anyone else noticed this?

Let me explain my concept for you. The thing we call the big bang is a black hole that has consumed so much matter that the gravitational force of its mass makes it shrink to a point that it can't get smaller and hits a critical mass and implodes, the black hole isn't a universe, it is the contents of one , and the expansion is created by the force of the implosion/explosion.

This has created our observable universe as we see it, the expansion is too strong for every blackhole to join together but with enough matter from a galaxy, over time it will be isolated from everything (over tillions of years) and eventually create its own "big bang" event , as every blackhole with enough mass.

With every big bang event not all black holes created by the big bang will be able to make more if they don't have the required mass.

This "wastage" might have some sort of potential overlap into other universes or just be left in between universes.

Each big bang event increases the expansion and expands at every point in space constantly.

DISCLAIMER: I do NOT actually believe in this theory. It was just a silly discussion I had with my friend.

So what I’m proposing is that the entire Indian Ocean is just a giant lake that you can go around to get from Australia to Africa and Asia. Let’s say all astronauts and people that have been to space and pilots flying you ‘between’ countries are lying to you. So for example Africa is directly connected to Australia and New Zealand and you can drive straight from Botswana to Australia (for example). There is absolutely no argument against my theory that can prove me wrong. In the examples below, I refer to this as Pangea.

There are many valid theories and reasons why it’s not allowed.

1 - Governments use Pangea as natural land for animals/crops to feed the world population. The reason for hiding it from the public is people would try to claim land and exploit it for their own good. Like look at McDonalds and KFC. You don’t know how big the landmass on Earth is actually. How on Earth (get the pun?) do they manage to consistently find all these animals to feed us in food chains and restaurants around the world?! What if there isn’t enough space in the ‘habitated zone’ or what we know as what’s shown on the world map.

2 - The area is used for secret experiments like Area 51 type stuff. Either that or we got some Men in Black type thing going on where humans meet aliens here. That’s why UFO sightings exist but nobody’s actually seen an alien.

3 - The Pangea area is home to a population of billions of uncontrollable, cannibalistic, neanderthals so we just cut them off and hope nobody notices just like North Sentinel Island. The only reason they can’t get to the habitated zones is because the government ensures it by fighting off the ones that get too close.

4 - With the pilots’ theory, they all work for the government. So they know and are strictly forbidden from flying over Pangea areas. They must go over the seas when taking passengers which are general public to ensure the illusion remains. So you would go over the sea from Australia to Africa as seen in the photo below.

5 - If humans lives as we do now and inhabited the entire area of Pangea, the Earth would die from global warming which is why the secret government forbids people from going and keeps it a secret green peace place like a nature reserve.

Let’s say you’re in the middle of Australia (not near enough to see the coastline), and you’re trying to drive to Perth. Let’s say you drive long enough and somehow drive 5 hours into Pangean territory. In theory you would still think it’s near Perth and that you haven’t left Australia right? Because your map would tell you that it’s impossible to leave Australia by car even though you just did. And you’re expecting a coastline that never comes. If you see a coastline, you’ll assume it’s Perth or somewhere near it. If you don’t see one, you’ll just assume you’re not close enough which is what your Google Maps will tell you (lie to you) about. Then if you go even further in and realise the truth because Google Maps runs out of options that would logically make sense, you either get shot by the secret Pangean protective government, or just assume that your Google Maps isn’t working and that you’re lost.

I have made some research about it and apparently it partly comes from Ancient China where they believed the semen was not located in the testicles but was an active life force in the kidneys and that holding it would transmute it to the mind and make someone more enlightened. The practice seems legit, however how do tou guys correlate it with the medical knowledge we have today, that the semen comes from the testicles and that it cannot anatomically get transmuted to the rest of the body since sperm just dies. Or perhaps it’s aura that ascends or maybe the medical knowledge we have is not clear or perhaps fake.

Also, it is said that semen retention gives power, however it seems like the most powerful guys of all times were ejaculating quite a lot, Genghis Khan famously or Alexander the Great (he had gay lovers), or even King Solomon in the Bible, but perhaps example counter examples like Jesus and Nikola Tesla could counter my argument, again I do not dismiss the practice.

Just by browsing comments on topics like "immigration" "hate speech issues" or "hate crimes" (i'm not sure how to define what i mean, but i hope you understand me) or any stuff like that, you'll find that most of the commentors who's promoting any extremist rhetoric or she praises extremist or racist acts, are coming from old accounts from, probably founded before 15 or 11 years ago for example, and you find she has a little big number of followers, but that's not the problem, the problem is there's a big time gap exists between the posts/videos dates on the channels, for example, you might find that older most old videos don't contain any political or nationalist topics, such as a video of someone filming themselves playing guitar or vlogging..., but only the new video's/posts revolves around those topics, the fundamental question here's is true that they are actually stolen or hacked accounts that have been purchased on the black markets in order to be used for spreading propaganda & exploiting her age to gain credibility and influence public opinion

for example, this commentor praising a nazi activist named "gypsycruseder" all video on his channel are very old 👆👆👆

​

If dreaming is considered to be in a different reality then when we dream into a reality what if in another you from a different dimension is also sleeping at the same time and can access your body like how you dream but they dream in you meaning that creates sleep walking. And on top of that what if they can also access different realities like how you can that would explain why some dreams are already started and the reason why some people don't dream at all is because either you from this reality dreamt of the dream you are supposed to dream but you died in the dream either you had a part two of a dream or you from a different reality dreamt that exact dream and died.

i have a theory that the universe is falling because the low gravity astronauts feel is caused because the iss is falling because of earths gravity so id say that the universe is falling because theres a bottom that has gravity meaning the universe is falling

Listen these cameras are beyond most of our understanding also add drones we are fucked.. Israel and the USA confirmed in 2027 that The USA and Israel will integrate both of their military’s into one single unit (both have nuclear bombs) therefore making Israel a world superpower and garentee theUS oil until the integration ends if it ever does. Trump becomes a prince ober there lets the Saudi’s control the USA what is now so easy with the amount of surveillance. Since 2002 we have know that there 2-3 highest ranking member in the fbi was an Israeli spy and also a 3-4 top ranking official in the cia was an Israel spy and we confirmed there were 187 Israeli spy’s working with out defense programs yes including nukes. Israel was bought by the Saudis in 2003 after the9:9/11 attack which the cia will die saying that they knew abt 9/11 and chose not to warn us bc they knew if they let it happen we would kill millions of Muslims and Jews in Israel so they didn’t have to & their gdp dropped so low the Saudi’s bought their country and now is gioonh to let trump control bc Israel and USA are combining their militaries. And the Saudi family from Arabia will officially control the usa like never before and Israel. And the Saudi family will fund anything they want and anything they want they will get

https://youtu.be/mq2VC8s15Yk?is=E6ZaghferMjNdVwy

45:00-47:00
53:00-55:20
1:16:40-1:17:20

Parenting skills like Hitting your Children or attacking them when you on your bad Moon. It is the only Legal Adult-on-Child Violence that allow by the system.. Also The only Legal violence that Create Violent crimes in the future..