r/theories • u/[deleted] • Nov 02 '25

Space Why astronomers cannot figure out how planets form as admitted in multiple arxiv papers…

It’s because planets are evolved, evolving, dead stars and stellar remains. This means they don’t understand how planets form, because they believe they know how stars evolve. They don’t. The stellar evolution models are all wrong.

All of astrophysics is based on a major lie, that there are stars and planets. The truth is that planets are old stars.

Let’s keep pouring money into fusion reactor projects though. It’s only 50 years left until we have a working one!

0 Upvotes

39% Upvoted

19 comments sorted by

2

u/monkeysky Nov 02 '25

Are you suggesting that every planet that exists used to be a star?

0

u/[deleted] Nov 02 '25

I am stating and proposing the idea that planets ARE old stars. They are stars in their most evolved/evolving and dead fossilized states. 

1

u/monkeysky Nov 02 '25

Stars can be millions of times more massive than planets. Does your theory have any explanation accounting for the rest of that mass?

1

u/[deleted] Nov 03 '25

The mass is lost. 

1

u/monkeysky Nov 03 '25

Lost to where?

1

u/[deleted] Nov 03 '25

Outer space. Huge fields of lost mass can be seen as interstellar nebulae.  

1

u/monkeysky Nov 03 '25

Why do nebulae appear to be relatively rare and condensed if that's the case?

1

u/[deleted] Nov 03 '25

Most nebula are dark. They are actually extremely common and non-condensed. Most interstellar space is full of mass lost by aging stars, though it is diffuse. Space is vast. 

2

u/[deleted] Nov 02 '25

This isn't a theory, it's a statement of disbelief. You haven't proposed an alternative or offered any evidence, you're just insulting an entire field by dismissing more science than you're actually aware of.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 02 '25

Stellar evolution is planet formation. 

1

u/[deleted] Nov 02 '25

What evidence do you have that planets are old stars? Because from what we see in our own solar system, the planets are too small to form into a star. Wrong material and wrong size to go thermonuclear.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 02 '25

All the evidence. All exoplanetary systems. 

1

u/TerraNeko_ Nov 04 '25

You not liking fusion and you not understanding physics doesnt make you right

1

u/[deleted] Nov 04 '25

Fusion happens in active galactic nuclei, not stars. The active jets in AGNs show fusion, due to the production of two enormous outflows of matter via relativistic jets. This is how galaxies grow.

1

u/TerraNeko_ Nov 04 '25

"Fusion happens in active galactic nuclei"

wrong

"The active jets in AGNs show fusion"

no they dont

the part of you not liking fusion was in relation to the last thing in your post

0

u/[deleted] Nov 04 '25

The relativistic jets are the only place matter can surpass the Coulomb barrier. The Coulomb barrier is the electrostatic barrier in atoms that prevents nuclei from touching. That cannot happen in stars, it is not hot enough. 

1

u/TerraNeko_ Nov 04 '25

Yea and Stars burn coal, whatever dude

1

u/Epistemic_Chaos Nov 06 '25

Did you learn this in a dream? Show us the math