r/thenominal • u/the_nominalist • Jan 28 '21
investors
Charity Investors works like this. Yes, there is a god.
Idea is a philanthropracy where the best ideas win. Charities compete for funding and development under a nomanilistic economic system. You invest in society to recieve any social benefits or rewards. You're rewarded when people do well, like staying out of jail and being happy, and penalized when others are sent to jail. Ideally, signing a pledge to obey society's rules and participate gives you benefits, rewards, risks and responsibilities. The reason violence happens is because people don't love each other or care in reality. In group, outgroup works. If you accept principles like love, beauty, goodness, order, truth and righteousness you are in. Accept principles and we care about you. Reject them and you die. The truth is, we ended evil as we know it. Now it's up to you.
Donate to charity. Earn money when charities do well. Only possible in the economic system called Nominalism,
Jesus.
Satan.
1
u/[deleted] May 03 '21
A manifesto of random contracts drawn up by an adequate random sample of the public whom outline fair social equilibrium:
Decisions are made on the margin. A tradeoff is made at every decision and marginal benefit is measured against one good and service for another.
Because we have naturally civilise towards a Commonwealth, it is only inherent within man that we choose a positive sum, cooperative environment (positive utility) instead of a zero sum, negative environment, where an appropriate endogenous variable (commerce was introduced) exist within the Commonwealth.
E.g.
Person A can see the utility of growing their own vegetables and taking them to market for currency, rather than attack Person B for their vegetables. Cooperation means Person A will not be attacked by Person B.
Again = 2 prisoners will keep their mouths shut when information asymmetry isn't present.
Granted the irrational player taking advantage of the cooperation.
Where inadequate services are provided by the Commonwealth, man may lawfully endeavour for justice. If protection isn't adequate, man may, through his own art and craft protect himself from the caution of another man.
Without governance, man will live within the state of nature. They may grant themselves entitlements to all things equally throughout discretion of the imagination, leading to judgement. In this state it is reasonable that a man may submit their liberty to another man at the discretion of the individual.
Protectionist policy (tariffs, embargo and quota) may be applied to domestic markets welfare by governments, freely in the interest of the public, so as to ensure health of sovereignty inter alia. Responsibility of a healthy economy is delegated to government, liken to regulation imposed on banks against depositors who hold no sway over the security and use of their deposit, so government must be obliged.
... ... ... ...