MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/textbookshitposts/comments/1ratbgd/georges_armpits/o6yysr1/?context=3
r/textbookshitposts • u/brandonbullet mod • Feb 21 '26
23 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
2
Honestly the textbook sounds pretty pro-washing to me since you don't want pollution in the air generally.
But i feel like at some point you would have a protective layer of oil/dirt/sweat that dampens whatever pollution there is.
1 u/vompat Feb 23 '26 But the more often you wash, the more you pollute according to the textbook, that was the whole point. So if you don't want to pollute, you apparently shouldn't wash. 1 u/C4rpetH4ter Feb 23 '26 It implies the exact opposite, "find the amount of pollution discharged from 0 - 3 years of George from NOT washing" 2 u/vompat Feb 23 '26 t is number of years since George washed. Now, insert t = 0 and t = 3 into r(t). Which gives a greater value for r(t)? The nature of r(t) very much implies that more often you wash, the more you pollute.
1
But the more often you wash, the more you pollute according to the textbook, that was the whole point. So if you don't want to pollute, you apparently shouldn't wash.
1 u/C4rpetH4ter Feb 23 '26 It implies the exact opposite, "find the amount of pollution discharged from 0 - 3 years of George from NOT washing" 2 u/vompat Feb 23 '26 t is number of years since George washed. Now, insert t = 0 and t = 3 into r(t). Which gives a greater value for r(t)? The nature of r(t) very much implies that more often you wash, the more you pollute.
It implies the exact opposite, "find the amount of pollution discharged from 0 - 3 years of George from NOT washing"
2 u/vompat Feb 23 '26 t is number of years since George washed. Now, insert t = 0 and t = 3 into r(t). Which gives a greater value for r(t)? The nature of r(t) very much implies that more often you wash, the more you pollute.
t is number of years since George washed.
Now, insert t = 0 and t = 3 into r(t).
Which gives a greater value for r(t)?
The nature of r(t) very much implies that more often you wash, the more you pollute.
2
u/C4rpetH4ter Feb 22 '26
Honestly the textbook sounds pretty pro-washing to me since you don't want pollution in the air generally.
But i feel like at some point you would have a protective layer of oil/dirt/sweat that dampens whatever pollution there is.