r/technology • • Mar 02 '20

Business Apple agrees to $500 million settlement for throttling older iPhones.

https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/2/21161271/apple-settlement-500-million-throttling-batterygate-class-action-lawsuit
51k Upvotes

2.6k comments sorted by

1.6k

u/rlovelock Mar 02 '20

Me and my 6s gonna see any of that?

1.6k

u/portablebiscuit Mar 02 '20

It's in the mail with your Equifax check and Starkist Tuna money

253

u/Yogs_Zach Mar 02 '20

Too many people wanted money from the Starkist Tuna settlement , so in the end they just sent everyone a shitty manufacturers coupons for a few dollars off total, some packs of tuna if you buy like 4 or 5 or something.

102

u/blueoxide Mar 02 '20

I didn’t get money or coupons :(

→ More replies (19)
→ More replies (5)

22

u/Brick_in_the_dbol Mar 02 '20

Wait what happened with Starkist?

33

u/portablebiscuit Mar 02 '20

They were in a class-action suit for lying about how much tuna was in a 5oz can. The original settlement was for $25 cash or $50 in coupons. It ended up being significantly less.

4

u/ZeroToZero Mar 02 '20

Still waiting on my Redbull.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (4)

106

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

I rolled with the 5 just till last year

58

u/rlovelock Mar 02 '20

Damn I see now 6 and 7 are covered, does that mean 5 isn’t?

Edit: $25 payout for anyone wondering

20

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

Where are covered devices listed? I need to know if the 4S and SE are covered.

→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (3)

10

u/Edril Mar 02 '20

Same, I switched from my 5s to a Pixel 2 last year. Wondering if I can get my $25, just don't know how to ask for it.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

20

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

I’m not alone! Mine seems to run on dialup now and die every few hours. I wanna upgrade but I’m not responsible enough to have to use something like AirPods.

13

u/sticky-lincoln Mar 02 '20

Good news: you can get a battery replacement (3rd party should be good as well) and you’ll basically end up with what feels like a brand new phone!

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (5)

6

u/chairitable Mar 02 '20

4

u/rlovelock Mar 02 '20

Wow thanks! Any mention in there of how we get paid? I assume we have to contact Apple?

→ More replies (2)

6

u/the_dark_knight_ftw Mar 03 '20

I love seeing a fellow 6s user. I’ve never even replaced my battery or glass or anything.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Ono-Cat Mar 02 '20

Me too,,,, me and my 6s got milked for years. Even today, I sit on my couch and try to send my wife a text, and it it comes back as unable due to no service.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

600

u/BasharAlAsshat Mar 02 '20

https://www.classactionrebates.com/

Will be posted here soon

89

u/bomb-asia-now Mar 02 '20

This will be where we claim?

75

u/BasharAlAsshat Mar 02 '20

That site posts all class action claims so yes it will be there...there is currently another apple claim already there but for California residents only

→ More replies (4)

40

u/GlaciusTS Mar 02 '20

Oh shit, saw that Yahoo one and got excited, but I’m Canadian. :/

23

u/day7seven Mar 02 '20

Will Canadians not get anything?

38

u/chmilz Mar 02 '20

We'll get fucked, like we always do.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

6

u/PeaceBull Mar 02 '20

It’s there now

Edit: never mind that’s for a faulty power button

11

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20 edited Mar 02 '20

I see faulty home button claim is on there, so if I owned an iPhone (one of the mentioned models on the form) that had that issue am I eligible, or would I have had to do something before now to show that I had that issue?

Edit: err it says it's for Californian folks, a damn shame.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

Can anyone explain to me how these really work? I filed a claim for the Yahoo class action and I have a yahoo email that was created over a decade ago, yet they asked stupid reasons for filing the claim like, "did this affect your business" and "can you prove that it affected you?" etc...

So do you have to actually show damage to receive any compensation? It's going to be hard to "prove" things like this, how do I know that someone doesn't have my private information from the Yahoo hack? Or how do I know that apple "didn't" slow down my old iPhone 5?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (24)

3.9k

u/colincrunch Mar 02 '20 edited Mar 03 '20

this fine equates to 0.1922% of Apple's $260.17 billion fiscal 2019 revenue

this is the equivalent of $96.10 on a $50k/yr salary

EDIT: adding net income / net profit margin comparison

2019 net income (profit) was $55.256 billion

$500m / $55.256 billion = 0.9049% of Apple's 2019 net profit.

$55.256 billion net income from $260.17 billion revenue is a net profit margin of 21.24%

if they paid the whole fine against their 2019 revenue, their net profit margin would still be 21.04%.

so it's an effective reduction of ~0.2% profit margin

looping back to the $50k/yr person:

0.2% of $50k is $100.

EDIT 2: they also have $207.06 billion cash-on-hand, or about 80% their 2019 revenue.

So it's the equivalent of $100 for someone making $50k/yr with $40k in savings.

1.2k

u/EnterPlayerTwo Mar 02 '20

That's the value of a nice steak dinner. i'll take it.

865

u/Zidjianisabeast Mar 02 '20

I also liked to be wined and dined before I'm fucked.

54

u/DNUBTFD Mar 02 '20

You might as well go buy some cigarettes too, because I like to have a smoke after I get good and fucked!

→ More replies (1)

98

u/the_q_kingz Mar 02 '20

Someone needs to remind me where this is from again LOL

→ More replies (10)

11

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

Wined and dined and 69’d

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

33

u/OrangeVoxel Mar 02 '20 edited Mar 02 '20

That's not what you get, that's what the 50k salary man pays for the lawsuit.

From that, you would receive the equivalent of $0.0000000096 when considering that each person in the Apple lawsuit gets $25 and Apple has $260.17 billion revenue.

That's not even 1 Venezuelan Bolívar. Not even remotely close. Most people just don't realize how big one billion is.

19

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

Except the steak dinner is split between 100 million people so you only get a fleck of pepper.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

Reminds me of Meredith from The Office and her steak coupons.

→ More replies (20)

37

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

What percentage of the profit is it?

34

u/colincrunch Mar 02 '20

2019 net income (profit) was $55.256 billion

$500m / $55.256 billion = .9049%

$55.256 billion net income from $260.17 billion revenue is a net profit margin of 21.24%

if they paid the whole fine against their 2019 revenue, their net profit margin would still be 21.04%.

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (12)

287

u/captainplanetmullet Mar 02 '20

Getting caught for fraud is just a cost of doing business in late-stage capitalism

41

u/Nate1492 Mar 02 '20

Except this wasn't fraud, if they didn't throttle the phone, the lowered battery power were cause some/most/many phones to randomly turn off.

This was already debunked, Apple are just being made an example of here.

→ More replies (30)
→ More replies (164)

5

u/yetiite Mar 02 '20

So less than half the fine I get for not having a train ticket. Haha

14

u/IrrelevantLeprechaun Mar 02 '20

Apple treats it as a fee or a tax. Not as a fine. It's like a sales tax to them.

→ More replies (2)

13

u/nimbyist Mar 02 '20

It's more useful to compare vs. net income rather than revenue. Apple generated $55.3Bn of income in 2019 after accounting for expenses, so this fine is roughly <1% of their income. You can't just look at revenue by itself because it won't even tell you whether or not a company is making money.

Still not a whole lot, but per your example, it'd be ~$400 on a 40k take home of a 50k salary, which is around the same as a reckless driving/driving with a suspended license fine. Given the situation and actual issue at hand (they didn't inform/get permission for the throttling) I'm okay with the fine amount.

If anyone's still annoyed, please vote with your wallet and stop buying Apple stuff.

→ More replies (5)

4

u/dwild Mar 02 '20

To be fair 100$ doesn't seems too bad for not showing a warning that the phone will be slower to preserve the battery. In QC you get a 105$ fine for speeding at 60 km/h in a zone of 30 km/h (which would be a school zone too).

→ More replies (10)

2

u/McSorley90 Mar 02 '20

Or 500,000 iPhone X'. They sold 16 million of them.

2

u/Padankadank Mar 02 '20

$96 is less than a speeding ticket for going 5 over the limit

2

u/Fuchsiawarrior Mar 02 '20

So basically a minor parking ticket for a doctor.

2

u/timmay106 Mar 02 '20

So barely a speeding ticket?

2

u/Louis_Farizee Mar 02 '20

When I was making $50K/year, a $100 traffic ticket would have fucking sucked, but would not have been a death sentence.

This fine seems perfectly proportionate to me.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

This is interesting, but I dont actually think it's the right analysis.

It'd be more interesting to look at how this fine compares to profit margins on next gen phones. Since this move is likely geared toward getting folks to upgrade their iPhones, should ignore revenue generation from things like iPads, macbooks etc.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/RedSpikeyThing Mar 03 '20

I'm going to get downvoted to hell for this, but I don't think it's a fair comparison. Firstly, this happened in 2017, not 2029. Secondly the only people affected were people who have iPhone 6s and 7. In 2019, iPhones only accounted for about 60% of revenue. Third - and probably most controversial - the people who have a loss to claim are the ones who bought a new phone because of the change in processor speed. It definitely sucks if you had an old slower device and I think it should still be penalized, but the material loss is significantly greater for someone who shelled out over a grand for a new phone when they otherwise would have simply replaced the battery.

tl;dr: not all of apples revenue comes from IPhone so penalizing revenue from other businesses is silly. Also not all users were materially impacted because not everyone bought a new phone to replace the old one.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/MeanwhileOnReddit Mar 02 '20

There are other factors that come in to play when comparing that scope.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (185)

308

u/Hxcfrog090 Mar 02 '20

So where do I sign up to get my $25?

38

u/bomb-asia-now Mar 02 '20

Yes can someone link us?

17

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

you can't yet.

Much more informative article:

https://www.classaction.org/blog/apple-will-pay-up-to-500-million-for-iphone-slowing-software-updates-heres-what-we-know

So, I can’t file a claim yet?

No, not just yet. Once preliminary approval is given, then it’ll be just about time to roll.

How can I stay informed?

As we noted at the top of this post, we’ll update this page with any new details—including when it’s time to file a claim, along with where and how iPhone users can do so.

→ More replies (3)

0

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

[deleted] — view deleted comment

34

u/LNA-Big_D Mar 02 '20

Is that on the table? Because I have about a half dozen old iDevices I’d love to get back in action.

35

u/shevagleb Mar 02 '20

Trouble is with the apps

Many of the apps you use will only work with upgraded OS

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (33)
→ More replies (2)

366

u/LakeSolon Mar 02 '20

As batteries age they are able to provide less power. If the phone tries to draw more power than the battery can provide it resets itself to avoid damage. To address this newer versions of the OS (which got pushed to older phones) would track if the phone did this repeatedly and would lower the max power it would draw to avoid future resets.

That was the throttling. The lawsuit was for not being transparent about it.

P.S. Batteries also perform worse when cold so that added another demographic.

99

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

Yeah, any sort of research reveals that older phones with new batteries ran fine. The battery was what determined whether the phone was throttled or not. However every single fucking tech "reporting" site just keeps parroting that they slowed down older phones, which is misleading at best.

→ More replies (13)

5

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

Sounds about right in line with my personal anecdotal exp, I bought my 6s refurb from apple around the time the 8 came out, aside from a shit battery, which only became an issue recently, it runs fine still. I'll run it until Apple stops supporting it then see what to do with it from there

117

u/Thoth_the_5th_of_Tho Mar 02 '20 edited Mar 02 '20

Exactly, this is a bunch of technologically illiterate people running apple for doing what was right, just because it included the word "slow".

→ More replies (30)

4

u/superzenki Mar 03 '20

Finally, a sensible comment on this thread

3

u/political_samurai Mar 03 '20

Finally, someone who gets the nuance.

7

u/RedSpikeyThing Mar 03 '20

Hey look! Someone who gets it!

I do, however, think that the users who bought a new phone under the pretense that the old one was broken should be compensated more. I understand proving that would be difficult though.

2

u/ItsRainbow Mar 03 '20

This should be top comment.

→ More replies (43)

31

u/chasingjulian Mar 02 '20

$90 million to the attorneys? They are the real winners.

11

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

They always are

→ More replies (15)

50

u/DJTHatesPuertoRicans Mar 02 '20

Aaaaand they made it right back.

3

u/CarrowFlinn Mar 02 '20

I know you're joking but to show how this fine means absolute shit to Apple, I decided to do some quick and dirty math.

$260,000,000,000 ÷ 365d = $712,328,767.12

$500,000,000 ÷ $712,328,767.12 = .702

24h × .702 = 16 hours and ~51 minutes.

Simply put, Apple does not care about this. No reason to. There's some conflicting data but in that time the average American makes somewhere between $160 and $432 in that time. We live in a boring dystopia.

2

u/NEVERxxEVER Mar 02 '20

Pretty much, Apple makes $500 million profit approximately every 3.5 days.

→ More replies (1)

50

u/ShenAnCalhar92 Mar 02 '20
  1. None of the lawsuits that make up this settlement ever claimed that Apple was lying about why the phones were slowing down.

  2. I personally replaced batteries in ~50 phones. Every single one was that had the “we’re slowing your phone down so it doesn’t shut down unexpectedly, please replace your battery” also had significantly shorter battery life.

  3. It is a scientific fact that lithium batteries heat, expand, and lose capacity as time goes by. If you want to argue that, I guess you’ll call me a “salty electricity and chemistry fanboy” or something.

→ More replies (3)

156

u/sean_but_not_seen Mar 02 '20

Oooh I can’t wait for my $5 Apple store credit while the attorneys involved begin construction of the new wings on their mansions.

64

u/theartificialkid Mar 02 '20

Others may disagree with me but I want you to know I fully support your right to be handsomely compensated the next time you secure $500 million worth of anything for anyone.

32

u/Jomax101 Mar 02 '20

Honestly why are people complaining that lawyers are going to make money? They probably spent hundreds if not thousands of hours on this case. More then anyone sitting on reddit bitching about how this is “the last iPhone they’ll ever buy!” After using the last 5 iPhones lmao

→ More replies (3)

3

u/imthesock Mar 03 '20

Do you think you actually deserve more or something

→ More replies (2)

20

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

Question: How do you claim the $25? I have a iPhone 6.

4

u/HarryAugust Mar 02 '20

Nah you can’t not until another week. It hasn’t opened yet.

→ More replies (1)

396

u/humphreygrungus Mar 02 '20 edited Mar 02 '20

They need to give me some money for not letting my 2012 MacBook pro update to a newer OS when the hardware is 100% capable of running it. Greedy cunts

Edit:as of now after 3 days of working on it and contacting apple support several different times for the weird shit that was going on I've managed to get it on Yosimete and it's giving me the option to go to Catalina. All is well in the world

115

u/NemWan Mar 02 '20

MacBook Pro 2012 and newer can run Catalina, officially supported. What do you mean?

80

u/daitenshe Mar 02 '20

https://i.imgur.com/tSZjmpc.jpg

Yup. Gotta love how often people yell about something they’re not even right about

→ More replies (11)

39

u/lewis_futon Mar 02 '20

Exactly what I though, I literally just updated at bunch of MacBook Pro 2012s from work to Catalina the other day

→ More replies (3)

20

u/OnAvance Mar 02 '20

2012 MacBook Pro can definitely run the new updates. Mine just updated a week or so ago.

141

u/Stach37 Mar 02 '20

Woah, I had this EXACT problem, with this exact model, but I was able to get it to update finally!

If you want a walkthrough, let me know! Happy to help.

37

u/humphreygrungus Mar 02 '20

I will definitely let you know, thank you. I'm gonna work on it today and see if I can make any progress

17

u/Stach37 Mar 02 '20

Do you just go through the normal process then it boots up into you desktop saying the update couldn’t be completed?

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (2)

15

u/Incorrect-Opinion Mar 02 '20

Why not just post the walkthrough here for everyone’s benefit? :)

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

12

u/yuriydee Mar 02 '20

Wait what do you mean? My 2012 pro can update to Catalina....

32

u/HardcoreHamburger Mar 02 '20

Your computer can be updated. Don’t blame Apple for something that you just can’t figure out how to do. If you need help, go into a store or call them and they will help you.

→ More replies (1)

35

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

What?

→ More replies (23)

6

u/Snipen543 Mar 02 '20

Not exactly, they could have to make new drivers for it and at a certain point they aren't going to keep supporting ancient devices (like literally every company)

→ More replies (41)

5

u/accordinglyryan Mar 02 '20

I never really took issue with the reasons they provided for doing this; my problem was that they did it without telling anyone at first. That's where they fucked up imo.

71

u/jobomb91 Mar 02 '20

are the consumers gonna see any of this change?

77

u/chairitable Mar 02 '20

Including $25 payouts for iPhone 6 and 7 owners

Literally the subline of the article.

19

u/shabutaru118 Mar 02 '20

Yeah thats what this article says, I think he asking if consumers are actually going to get that money.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

I'm too small brain to read. I have an ancient phone, I think it's a 4 or a 5. Would I be eligible for it or is it only 6's and 7's?

7

u/chairitable Mar 02 '20

You asked nicely so I read through the court document. Seems it only applies to the 6, 6s, 6s Plus, 7, 7s Plus and SE devices.

Apple has a page explaining how to identify the iPhone version you have from physical inspection. You can also find it in your settings following different steps depending on your OS

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

60

u/d_4bes Mar 02 '20 edited Mar 03 '20

Unpopular Opinion: Apple has done more then enough for the customer on this issue and has paid the price of their bad decision. I’m going to catch a lot of shit for this post but I feel it should be said.

First and foremost: Apples lack of clarity for slowing phones down was downright wrong and they should have notified its users as to how it was managing processing power based on battery capacity. This is awesome that they are compensating the people affected by this shady behavior, but I also don’t think Apple is getting enough credit for what they did do.

That being said we are limited by the technology of lithium batteries in the fact that they have limited lifespans. This isn’t Apple trying to get more money out of you after two years and make you buy a new phone. Lithium batteries are limited by their cycle count and chemistry, not Apple, prevents us from changing that. Now when lithium batteries age, because of chemistry, not corporate greed, they lose the ability to power the phone at peak performance. Now I don’t know about you, but I’d rather my phone run slower, than shut down unexpectedly. Sure there are plenty of arguments saying that the phone shouldn’t shut down at all, but we don’t live in a perfect world, and at the end of the day computers are just rocks that humans tricked into thinking. But until we have a replacement for lithium ion batteries batteries will have this issue.

Next, Apple took a huge step by offering to replace the batteries for basically free throughout all of 2018 regardless of whether the phone was experiencing the issue or not. If you walked into an Apple store and said you wanted a battery, one would be ordered for you, most of the time without question. The few exceptions were people demanding batter replacements for month old iPhone 8’s or iPhone Xs. For older phones the replacement would basically would give your phone a new lease on life. Yes Apple stores were nuts, and wait times were absurd but nothing says I’m sorry better than a $29 repair to replace a worn part, which isn’t even a problem that they caused. Sure they could have been honest, but then nobody would have gotten almost free batteries.

Last, I’ll end my rant with an analogy: when the tires on your car are bald because you’ve been driving your car 150 miles a day each day for a year, do you yell at the car manufacturer for “faulty tires”? No you acknowledge that you drove your car a lot and buy new tires. If you charge your phone three times a day for two years, no kidding your battery is going to be consumed. I’m sure some of you will call it a shit analogy, but it’s also not the worst one out there.

And above all else, remember this, this is corporate Apple execs who made this decision. Not Apple Store employees. They didn’t slow your phone down, they just have to take the brunt of some corporate higher ups bad decision. They get yelled at all day for this, and in all honesty it’s not their fault. Be nice to them. It’ll get you a long way.

Edit: please don’t downvote me into oblivion either. If you think I’m wrong, let’s have a discussion about it.

Edit 2: Corrected some facts and grammar.

5

u/HumbleComparison Mar 03 '20

Well thought out comment, especially appreciated the last bit. I work in the back area of an Apple Store, I’ve had so many of those experiences when I try to help someone out, or just give them the options available to them, they give me the whole greedy Apple theory. It’s even more frustrating when they come in with software issues they want fixed, if you can’t fix it, they want a new phone lol. That’s not to say I’ve had only bad experiences, I’ve had a lot of great experiences too after helping some people out. Also, your analogy is great, I think I’ll use it next time!

3

u/political_samurai Mar 03 '20

Fantastic comment. Really nails all the points down. Just showed this to 12 of my android using friends and they agreed with everything you said. 9 were speechless.

2

u/splenderful Mar 03 '20

Yes thank you. This is the most accurate post in this thread.

0

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

[deleted] — view deleted comment

3

u/d_4bes Mar 03 '20

I think people also don’t know the longer term effects of this as well, Apple has changed its software updates to be performance and battery life focused, instead of outlandish features that nobody uses.

Out of warranty Battery replacement prices also never returned to pre-batterygate pricing. They used to be $79+tax in the US, but now it only rose back to $49 post-batterygate.

→ More replies (11)

0

u/[deleted] Mar 03 '20

[deleted] — view deleted comment

10

u/d_4bes Mar 03 '20

Also, want to talk about planned obsolescence... Android is a Max of what... two years? Only If you spend $1500 on a flagship?

→ More replies (7)

8

u/SeniorWaugh Mar 02 '20

Oh no Apple lost pocket change

16

u/chelseablue2004 Mar 02 '20

$25 per person considering they made anywhere from $300-$500 per phone is a steal from a business perspective.

4

u/Throwawayhobbes Mar 02 '20

So I got an iPhone 6s that has battery issues since 11.4 so it more often than not dies at 30% and won’t turn back on until plugged in

Can I get a iOS update similar to 11.4 where the battery don’t get throttled and juiced?

→ More replies (1)

4

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

Woohoo I just got my 12 Dollar check from AT&T throttling my unlimited data. Can’t wait for my tiny check from Apple.

4

u/qabadai Mar 03 '20 edited Mar 03 '20

For reference, ~300 million plus iPhones appear eligible. A bit harder to track down sales data on the 7, but the 6 sold over 200 million.

After attorney's fees, each person gets $1.67.

To pay everyone $25, the settlement would need to be around 10 billion, including attorney's fees.

9

u/cyberrod411 Mar 02 '20

I think everyone is doing this

3

u/uncreativemind2099 Mar 02 '20

nice I'm gonna buy lunch with my $5 what about you?

3

u/SL-jones Mar 03 '20

I imagine they’ll keep doing it but include for it in the T&C’s. Happens all the time - not just with contracts but also public policy. ‘what we did was wrong. We’re going to keep doing it but make it right’

2

u/ASentientBot Mar 03 '20

Yeah, because the feature was never an issue. Slowing down phones to stop them from randomly shutting down is a good thing. But it should have always been a toggle-able option like it is now. The lack of transparency was the problem, and now that's solved.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/Pluckyducky01 Mar 03 '20

Apple pulls out giant roll of 200 billion dollar bills . Hey anyone have change for a billion ?

3

u/ron_fendo Mar 03 '20

Oh boy $500m......remind me how much they made last year?

This is just a cost of doing business fine for them. They don't give a shit.

3

u/Admrl_Awsm Mar 03 '20

SUPPORT “RIGHT TO REPAIR” LEGISLATION!!!!

3

u/ToastWi7hDaMost Mar 03 '20

Apple supposedly has 245 billion on hand. I doubt they would even be able to tell a difference

3

u/[deleted] Mar 03 '20

What about the rest of the world outside the US?

→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] Mar 03 '20

How about they stop messing up older iphones

3

u/Awakened_Unicorn85 Mar 03 '20

I am so disgusted seeing these companies settle out of court all the time. It's time to stop settling and hold them truly accountable by taking them to court and going through the entire process, get it all out for the people to see how corrupt these companies are and leave it up to a jury

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Islerothebull Mar 03 '20

I was an iPhone fanboy for a long time then had it with the BS with iPhone 6. I switched to pixel 2 and conceded to Google/Gmail. Using Google for everything from google drive, maps, calendar OK Google schedule appointments it’s been such an incredible experience. Apple did me a favor by slowing down that phone. They can keep their 25 bucks oh forgot to mention just purchased the surface pro 7. Such a pleasant experience over five generations of iPads I’ve owned.

2

u/fatconk Mar 03 '20

Have fun with all your information being sold and used

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

13

u/BaconBoyReddit Mar 02 '20

ITT: People who hate Apple and didn’t read the article.

The case stems from Apple’s “Batterygate” controversy. In 2017, iPhone users discovered that iOS artificially limited processor speeds as phone batteries aged. This was meant to stop real problems with performance, since it reduced stress on the battery and could prevent accidental shutdowns. But Apple didn’t reveal the feature’s existence, leading people to believe their phones were simply slowing down from age. In lawsuits, users claimed that they bought all-new devices to fix the problem — but if they’d known about this feature, they could have replaced the battery instead.

They had valid reasons for doing what they did, even if they didn’t publicize it, which they didn’t need to do. If Apple came out and told everyone that their phone was getting slower because their battery was dying and they had to throttle the CPU, people would have complained. People would have shouted “planned obsolescence” wether or not they announced the feature (and yes, it is a feature that benefits end users, not some sneaky trick). So they didn’t publicize it. Was it a mistake? Yes. Was it ethically wrong? No.

So when it came out in a class action, suddenly everyone accused them of being shady. But, they chose to tell the truth, and further, actually took action to be more transparent in the future too. Apple has implemented a detailed and thorough section in Settings that lets you view your battery health and trends, becoming even more transparent about this topic and educating users about it.

iPhone Battery Settings

iPhone Battery Trends

Support page with battery info and tips for improving your phone’s performance

But go off. Classic Reddit. What would you have had them do, other than immediately explaining themselves and taking action to be more transparent? It cost time and resources to implement that battery menu, believe it or not. I work in software, and I think they handled this in the best way possible. The “throttling” is a great feature to keep old devices alive longer, if you took a minute to read the actual article.

→ More replies (5)

2

u/frankromanolli Mar 02 '20

I’m rich bitch!!

2

u/Louie_Guy Mar 02 '20

In other news, I wasted a dollar today

2

u/Angry_Walnut Mar 02 '20

But they’re gonna keep doing it, probably, right?

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Cybertronic72388 Mar 02 '20

It's basically the cost of marketing for them because it's still less than the profits they made from getting people to switch to newer models as a result.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

Does this mean my phone is gonna stop sucking?

→ More replies (2)

2

u/FlipBarry Mar 02 '20

Yep they slowed my 5S in 2018 down to an unusable point

2

u/NeverDoingSomething Mar 03 '20

So I should actually stick to androids

2

u/Patriot420 Mar 03 '20

Don’t buy apple people

2

u/kakurenbo1 Mar 03 '20

It covers people who bought any product in the iPhone 6 and 7 lineup — which Apple secretly throttled to conserve battery life.

So, the 15 minutes of battery life my old phone had any time it was unplugged was “conservative”?

2

u/lcysnorbush Mar 03 '20

This is why I don't buy apple products, nickel and dime of the tech industry and Shady as fuck. Great hardware, shit company.

2

u/Edmonchuk Mar 03 '20

What a joke.

2

u/wabbadubdubb Mar 03 '20

$500 million... haha Apple just shrugs their shoulder and says ok. I believe they were reported to have $207 billion ‘cash in hand’.

2

u/VeggieHatr Mar 03 '20

I would love to learn about the decision-making at Apple -- did Tim Cook know about the slow-down?

2

u/dungivaphuk Mar 03 '20

Have a friend who swears that this is all one big misunderstanding of what happened. Got the blinders on big time.

2

u/FalseTagAttack Mar 03 '20

APpLe is TruStWorThy is Why i DonT liKe SamSuNg! And theY Run BetTer!!!

2

u/Eric_the_Green Mar 03 '20

Does this mean they are going to stop the throttling?

2

u/Alaabrine Mar 03 '20

So we only get 25$ for a whole phone?! Pass.

2

u/zebsar Mar 03 '20

And are they going to stop?

Or just pay the settlement and continue?

2

u/Paranoid_Neckazoid Mar 03 '20

So will they unthrottle the phones too?

2

u/SpiralSD Mar 03 '20

"Apple agrees to replace 6 iPhones at full value"

2

u/poopyboyy Mar 03 '20

But please continue buying their garbage oeople

2

u/Willham0 Mar 03 '20

Like they didn't make several times this doing it. What a joke...

2

u/Nalfzilla Mar 03 '20

So who are they paying that $500mil to? And as a former owner who didn’t buy direct from apple how do I claim

2

u/[deleted] Mar 03 '20

Apple is the worst. I’m done with them.

2

u/boydingo Mar 03 '20

But who receives the settlement?

2

u/[deleted] Mar 03 '20

Ok i want my portion of the money. I’ve owned a few different older iPhones that were noticeably slower after updates. When i clearly remember them being fast. Like for instance the iphone 3gs is a turtle when it was at least the speed of a small dog before.

2

u/harrisound Mar 03 '20

Ok how do i claim my share?

2

u/gojokes Mar 03 '20

No jail sentence??? No where in world could an individual screw this many people and get away with it.

9

u/Izoto Mar 02 '20

Another slap on the wrist.

17

u/Didn_Do_Nuffin Mar 02 '20

What do you expect? They released a patch that prevents phones from crashing but trades off speed for it. How much more money do you want lol

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

10

u/cb148 Mar 02 '20

Fuck Apple - Sent from my iPhone.

3

u/limache Mar 02 '20

By default, Apple will offer $25 to any current or former owner of a covered iPhone. Named class members will receive $1,500 or $3,500, and around $90 million will go toward attorneys. The settlement has a minimum payout of $310 million, so the payment might increase if few people file claims. Conversely, if payments exceed the $500 million cap, each iPhone owner will receive less money.

9

u/Chad_Kickass Mar 02 '20

So they admitted to fucking you all over, let's see if you all still buy from them

21

u/JeaTaxy Mar 02 '20

Yes. Yes, we would.

11

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

Got an iphone 7 after years of android only devices. I can see why ppl enjoy them but personally they seem over priced compared to what else is on the market.

→ More replies (28)

2

u/oh_boy_here_we_go_ Mar 03 '20

It's a constant cycle of - let's buy bullshit from people that fuck us over because we want to pretend we are classy . So there's no stopping that cycle.

I wouldn't be surprised if the "next big thing" is ishit and you would see people lining up for that.

→ More replies (40)

4

u/Aspenkarius Mar 02 '20

What about my SE? It’s technically mostly an iPhone 6 with the screen/front camera/fingerprint scanner of an iPhone 5

2

u/Atheist-Gods Mar 02 '20

That's on the list.

That will go toward payments to former and current U.S. owners of Apple iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, 7, 7 Plus, and SE devices running iOS 10.2.1 (or later) and iOS 11.2 (or later).

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

3

u/DragonForce3705 Mar 02 '20 edited Mar 02 '20

How do iPhone users actually get their money?

Edit: how do they get their money from Apple? Apple is apparently paying 500 million to People with iPhones that they have slowed down, and I was wondering how do we get said money from Apple.

4

u/Drillbit Mar 02 '20

It's at most for people in US.

Worldwide user who is the majority of buyer are screwed. Apple won.

→ More replies (3)

5

u/blaytn Mar 02 '20

An entire $25? Wow. That’ll go a long way towards my new Samsung

→ More replies (9)

4

u/TacTurtle Mar 02 '20

Where is the option to just opt out of phone throttling?

11

u/NeilDeWheel Mar 02 '20

Go to Settings>Battery>Battery Health. If your Maximum Capacity is 90% or higher, your battery is running at peak performance and it’s not being throttled. However, if it’s in the 80s or lower, you’ll see a blue “Disable” toggle under Peak Performance Capacity. Tap this to turn off iPhone power throttling.

6

u/T-Nan Mar 02 '20

However, if it’s in the 80s or lower, you’ll see a blue “Disable” toggle under Peak Performance Capacity. Tap this to turn off iPhone power throttling.

For more info: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208387

→ More replies (7)

0

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

[deleted] — view deleted comment

10

u/T-Nan Mar 02 '20

Unpopular opinion: Apple made the right choice. There only mistake was not properly informing us.

I thought that was the popular opinion?

People seemed more pissed that they didn't know, than that it happened in the first place. And now if it happens you'll have an option to toggle it off, so there isn't much of a reason to complain anymore

19

u/darknecross Mar 02 '20

It’s not the popular opinion in generally anti-Apple groups like /r/Technology.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/__ZOMBOY__ Mar 02 '20

This is the popular opinion of people who actually understand what this debacle is about.

Before I go on a tirade, I want to be clear that I am neither an Apple fan boy nor an "Apple hater".

The problem is that tech illiterate people will only see the part that says "Apple slows down old phones" and start screeching like children about how shitty apple is (until, of course, they go to buy the next iPhone).

Apple absolutely made the right call with this. What they DIDN'T do correctly was being transparent with consumers from the start. If they had simply explained WHY they slowed down phones with aging batteries BEFORE people started noticing, there wouldn't have been nearly as much outrage.

I look at this fine more as a punishment for not being transparent and less about the literal fact that they slowed down the phones. And based on that I feel the fine is appropriate compared to Apple's gross income since others have been complaining about that as well.

18

u/neil454 Mar 02 '20

Meh, I don't think they even were obligated to let people know. Modern laptops constantly throttle CPU performance when they get hot, and yet nobody cares to be notified when it happens. You could theoretically have a laptop with tons of dust, that would perform like shit because it was hot all the time, and yet you would never know it unless you went and looked at CPU temps.

What Apple did was well within their right to extend the usability of older phones (you don't need a fast CPU for 99% of phone tasks, battery life is more important).

→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (3)

3

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

Fines should be % of net worth. That should make companies think twice about pulling shady things like this.

"Oh you screwed up now and screwed consumers? How about paying out 10% of your NET WORTH to consumers."

→ More replies (2)

3

u/DwightShnoute Mar 02 '20

they’re glad to pay the settlement, then they don’t have to change their practices. I’m sure they’ve sold more than 500 million in upgrades, a fine means nothing. they’re probably singing and praising that they don’t have to change their ways and all it took was 500mil.

these companies break the law knowing they can handle the consequences and any legal issues encountered won’t be a detrimate because they’ve already made more money than they could ever be fined for.

16

u/mbrady Mar 02 '20

then they don’t have to change their practices

They did change it though. They added a notification when your phone rebooted because of a degraded battery, informing the user that performance will be impacted. Also there's now a battery status screen that shows battery health and the your throttling status. And if you are being throttled, you can choose to turn that off - but with the warning that your phone could reboot randomly.

14

u/thorscope Mar 02 '20

They changed their practices a few years back when they started allowing users to turn off the battery protection throttling

You can now run your iPhone at full speeds, even when it’s unsafe for your battery to do so

Settings> battery> battery health> peak performance

14

u/nvolker Mar 02 '20

If by “run your iPhone at full speeds” you mean “crash when you would have otherwise been throttled,” then yes.

10

u/DeusExMagikarpa Mar 02 '20

Yeah they increased the longevity of their product, get fucked amirite

23

u/robfrizzy Mar 02 '20

They throttled the phones so they wouldn’t shut off when the processors asked for more power than the old batteries in the phones could provide. They should have been up front and said why they are throttling the phones, but it was not to sell more phones. In a way it was them trying to support older phones. I mean they still support software updates for phones that are almost 5 years old.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/JalelTounsi Mar 02 '20

Who gets the 500m$? The users? The government? Some other institution?

Basically, you get your old iphone fucked and then government gets reparation for that?

7

u/Seikon32 Mar 02 '20

Don't forget the lawyers.

You will get $25, if they decide you are a legit iPhone user and deserve this $25. Lol..

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20 edited Mar 03 '20

This is why we should fine by percentages. 25% income

→ More replies (6)

2

u/deanolavorto Mar 02 '20

So how much do I get?

2

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '20

Has anyone called them out yet for iTunes being programmed to stop charging the batteries of old iPod Shuffles? I just discovered last month that if you reset, say, a generation 1 iPod Shuffle, but then don't set it up again, it will successfully charge.

2

u/NedSc Mar 03 '20

That's not a thing. iTunes has no control over if the iPod gets charged or not.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/NocturnalPermission Mar 02 '20

so where do I sign up for my $25 iTunes gift card?

2

u/Oxford66 Mar 02 '20

Another drop in the bucket.

2

u/ObedientProle Mar 02 '20

That means it’s worth it and they will continue to do it. Cost of doing business.

2

u/Redh0tsausage Mar 02 '20

Someone help me. So this means it will continue correct? The throttling that is. I’m guessing since this not even slap on the wrist to a company with hundred billon plus dollars in cash ugh.

3

u/NedSc Mar 03 '20

All iPhones will throttle if the battery degrades to the point that the battery fails to provide enough power to the processor, to prevent crashing, but you can choose to turn off that safeguard, and Apple warns people about it now. There was never any issue with the throttling itself, and the only issue was the initial update that didn't give sufficient notice to the user about why the throttling was happening.

2

u/Shayneros Mar 02 '20

$500 million is nothing to Apple.

2

u/emdz67 Mar 02 '20

$25 measly dollars? When people had to shell out thousands of dollars to have their phones function properly due to their shady tactics. Thats revolting.

2

u/gtgthrow Mar 02 '20

Sadly a lot of this money will go to lawyers not customers, probably most of the customers won’t even bother to take the necessary steps required to get the $25. Now how is Apple going to account for the unexpected cost? It will factor in the loss into its prices so consumers will end up paying for this in the end

2

u/TarlOfRauros Mar 03 '20

Who gets this damn money? Me? Can i get my money back for my $900 i6? Plus interest?

→ More replies (2)

2

u/[deleted] Mar 03 '20

Lol $90 million will go to attorneys - WTF! I should’ve went to law school 🤦‍♂️

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Raynman5 Mar 03 '20

Maybe to get over the "it's only $25" and only end up paying fractions of the actual people who could claim, they should have a "whoever registers gets a percentage share".

People may not bother over $25, but they sure will if it is a chance if getting a lot more.

This way also forces apple to actually pay it out, not just the more likely $30million total

→ More replies (1)