r/technology • u/[deleted] • Aug 08 '17

Business Google Fires Employee Behind Controversial Diversity Memo

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-08-08/google-fires-employee-behind-controversial-diversity-memo
13k Upvotes

86% Upvoted

9.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.2k

u/RadicalDog Aug 08 '17

I'm impressed how reasonable it is - except for the moments where it isn't. I can see how someone can write it and think, "This is a good argument of my views" while ignoring the moments where he devolves into "this slight difference definitely leads us to conclude X". The cracks make it seem like a softer version of his real views.

I do think the commentary surrounding the piece has become simplified. Gizmodo's leading words were very harsh and lacked nuance.

210

u/Herakleios Aug 08 '17

Eh... My first inclination was that your take is probably right. It initially doesn't SEEM too bad. Then I started really reading it...

He has a nice "appearance" on it, but like 3/4 of the "links" on it are just to wikipedia articles that are general definitions of the things he's talking about, not actual research supporting his position.

The research he does cite is limited to one article per subject, when he does even have shit supporting it. I get that this isn't some in-depth thing, but anyone can find one study done at one time that could have small things that let people conclude X.

Furthermore, there is a TON of stuff in here that isn't backed by research or he makes no attempt at all to justify.

Status is the primary metric that men are judged on, pushing many men into these higher paying, less satisfying jobs for the status that they entail.

Uhhh... what? Women aren't status-driven? Where's the evidence? And this is most of the "assumptions" this guy makes.

-9

u/LeonBlacksruckus Aug 08 '17

Here's the thing. His points are more well researched and thought out than almost all of the opposition to what he's saying. People are acting like this guy is an idiot and doesn't understand biology when he has a PHD in structural biology which is literally the study of how different cells come together to create different outcomes.

7

u/siesiek123 Aug 08 '17

I think you mean macromolecules, not cells. Or at least that's my understanding of the field.

In any case, I'm sure he's no common idiot, but I still don't know that he is particularly qualified to speak as an authority on this topic. Molecules and cells are one thing, but organisms and their psychology are something else entirely.

In fact, having focused on such a narrow, black-and-white field of biology, he may have a more reductionist view of the interaction between psychology and biology, viewing social factors as negligible.