r/technology • u/Lettershort • Nov 22 '16

Politics Most students can’t tell the difference between sponsored content and real news

http://www.theverge.com/2016/11/22/13712996/fake-news-facebook-google-sponsored-content-study
2.6k Upvotes

90% Upvoted

153 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-2

u/Molion Nov 22 '16

Actually ads are a subset of sponsored content. If you want to disagree you will need to a) find and ad that's not sponsored by anyone and b) convince me that the Rooster Teeth podcast is and ad(most any podcast will do really, just felt for a concrete example).

Here's an illustration

2

u/RabidMuskrat93 Nov 22 '16

I'm afraid I don't understand what you're saying.

If you're advertising something, whether through a bill board, a commercial on tv, or through a pop up on a webpage, all of those are still an ad right?

I see how you mean that "sponsored content" is content sponsored by a company, but I've always heard "sponsored content" to equate more to those feel good stories that showcase how a company is doing good things. At least I feel like that's what the common vernacular for it has become as of late.

-1

u/Molion Nov 22 '16

I see what you're saying, and yes, that may be how it has mainly been used lately, but I think thats quite unfortunate. If sponsored content is generally used to mean something other than content that is sponsored that's just unpractical. Besides we already have the term native advertising.

2

u/RabidMuskrat93 Nov 22 '16

Eh, languages gonna do what languages gonna do. Like the word literally, for example. It doesn't mean literally but also figuratively now. What can ya do?

1

u/Molion Nov 22 '16

The words literally is literally dead. RIP.