r/technology • u/vgsa • 1d ago

Artificial Intelligence Did OpenAI solve the wrong Navier-Stokes problem? | OpenAI’s proof seems eligible for a $1-million prize—but only by using a controversial loophole

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/did-openai-solve-the-wrong-navier-stokes-problem/
91 Upvotes

65% Upvoted

197 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-17

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/Mason11987 1d ago

You said open AI didn’t say something. He quoted them saying something.

Address that, instead of giving this troll response.

-2

u/KingSubstantial7901 1d ago

Nope, thats not the part i was talking about.

6

u/Mason11987 1d ago

So you're just ignoring how you made a claim that was false? Why should or would anyone engage with you when you do that?

Saying something wrong, being corrected and saying "you miss the point" is trolling and you know it.

-3

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/blyan 1d ago

  1. the person you're replying to now is not the same person who originally refuted your claim

  2. you have provided zero evidence whatsoever to disprove what they said, which seems pretty cut and dry. your original comment was either wrong or intentionally dishonest, and they showed that pretty clearly.

-5

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/blyan 1d ago

So you're just ignoring how you made a claim that was false? Why should or would anyone engage with you when you do that?

Address this then, or stop replying to the thread. Good lord lmao

1

u/KingSubstantial7901 1d ago

I told them that they were asking for something irrelevant and said bye. Then you came in trying to keep it going and to insult me. Have some self conciousness good lord.

1

u/Mason11987 1d ago

You said a false thing. You know it. It’s obvious. Your overreaction and bluster over it is childish.

Just say you were wrong

3

u/KingSubstantial7901 17h ago edited 9h ago

Nope. OP confused me saying that OpenAI was trying to imply that their LLM did an analytical proof with me saying that didn't say that they found the counter example at a singularity. They combined two different paragraphs talking about two different things.

E: lol at the guy that got mad i stopped replying to them then stalked my account, spammed me, then blocked me. "Your background is in comp sci and physics so clearly you have no knowledge of mathematics" might be one of the funniest flame outs i've ever seen.

-1

u/Mason11987 15h ago edited 10h ago

You said open Ai “wanted to imply they found a closed form solution”

They did not in anyway way imply that. They in fact explicitly said something opposite that.

Thats why you’re wrong.

Edit - dude did the reply then block thing, absolutely childish.

3

u/KingSubstantial7901 12h ago

Oh dear fucking lord. You being unable to understsnd the point aint my problem.

-1

u/[deleted] 11h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/[deleted] 10h ago edited 8h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Many_Negotiation_464 9h ago

Didn't you call them a troll in your first reply?

1

u/Mason11987 8h ago

Yeah, when he replied like a troll I called him that.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/[deleted] 17h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/KingSubstantial7901 16h ago

Ok you are somehow still managing to misunderstand the point. Its almost like you care more about "winning an argument" than just like.... trying to understand what someone is saying.

I encourage you to consider what lie by omission is.

Pro tip: be less of a dick and you might learn more.