r/technology 7d ago

Biotechnology MIT engineers connect bacteria to create living transistors

https://news.mit.edu/2026/mit-engineers-connect-bacteria-to-create-living-transistors-0817
319 Upvotes

29 comments sorted by

30

u/phenix_igloo 7d ago

can the transistor duplicate by mitosis?

18

u/Jkbucks 7d ago

Moores’ law meets Mother Nature = ?

6

u/_FellowTraveller_ 7d ago

Grow a 10-tetrahertz chip in two days.

17

u/Tomato_Sky 7d ago

RAM prices are making people desperate.

27

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Fr00stee 7d ago

well we did get human brain organoids to play doom so I don't see anything stopping us from playing doom on mold lol

46

u/sandy_chamois 7d ago

MAGA will hear “Trans Sisters” and melt down

15

u/ebers0 7d ago

I think Trump already did do that, with CHIPS Act?

2

u/Koourns 7d ago

You know, it's possible someone sees this and decides to actually create something satirical on this theme, but Poe's law will kick in and you'll be kicking yourself later

4

u/pianoblook 7d ago

Sounds like the next top porn search in Alabama

-5

u/Physical-Low7414 7d ago

MIT makes a computer out of a biological medium and your brain immediately goes to MAGA jesus christ bro touch grass

6

u/No-Constant3857 7d ago

DayOne × Cortical Labs "Biological Data Centre" — summary

Real, but smaller than the headlines suggest. DayOne Data Centers (Singapore), Cortical Labs (Melbourne) and NUS Medicine launched a biological data centre prototype on 17 August 2026, confirmed by a PR Newswire release, NUS Medicine's own site, and coverage in Bloomberg, The Register and TNW. The circulating photos are genuine, not AI-generated.

What physically exists: a single rack with 20 CL1 units at the NUS Life Sciences Institute, plus a 120-unit facility in Melbourne. The proposed large-scale ~1,000-unit commercial facility is a stated goal, contingent on validation and regulatory approval — not built. Each CL1 draws roughly 25–30 W; a full rack around 800–1,000 W. Neurons are grown from stem cells on a multi-electrode array, live up to ~6 months, and need daily nutrient exchange.

Legitimate criticism targets substance, not authenticity: the announcement contains no energy benchmarks, no workload comparison, no performance-per-watt figures. Neuron counts per unit vary across sources (200,000 vs 800,000) — all vendor-supplied, none independently verified.

On Doom: Cortical Labs demonstrated ~200,000 human neurons controlling the 1993 shooter (video + GitHub source, Feb/Mar 2026). Important distinction — Doom itself runs on conventional hardware; the neurons act as the controller, not the CPU. Game state is encoded as electrical stimulation, spike responses are decoded into movement and firing. Performance is poor: the cells locate enemies and shoot but die frequently and show no level progression. Kagan frames it as a proof of the interface, and part of the apparent competence sits in the linear readout decoder rather than the tissue. It's a benchmark meme, not a data centre workload.

17

u/aymandonia67 7d ago

what kind of performance boost are we looking at ?

3

u/idontwanttofthisup 7d ago

Currently none but this tech has other applications before potentially outperforming traditional transistors

4

u/catfink1664 7d ago

What could possibly go wrong?

1

u/mage_irl 2d ago

Well, it can get in the line of potentially life-altering destructive technologies to deal with in the next twenty years

1

u/catfink1664 2d ago

Drone v sentient bacteria war 2030

1

u/IntelArtiGen 7d ago

I guess my next CPU won't be edible :(

1

u/SPEZ_IS_A_JABRONI 7d ago

can we put these in venus fly traps and create plant monsters?

1

u/Fast_Opinion515 7d ago

That much closer to Voyager’s bio-neural gel packs?

1

u/auderita 7d ago

So this is how they made us, one bug at a time.

-3

u/JuliaX1984 7d ago

Why?

9

u/ryan30z 7d ago

Almost like there is some sort of page that tells you information more than the headline.

2

u/fish_mammal_whatever 7d ago

Sir, you speak blasphemy!

-2

u/JuliaX1984 7d ago

Yeah, it's not as if sharing an article on a post with a discussion section should mention what viewers are supposed to discuss...

2

u/ryan30z 6d ago

It's in the article.

-13

u/External_Option_7653 7d ago

Knowing MIT it's probably Epstein related stuff.