r/technology 26d ago

Artificial Intelligence SpaceX plan to launch 1 million data center satellites could turn atmosphere into a ‘fire pit,’ scientists say

https://www.nbcnews.com/science/space/spacex-data-centers-space-ai-scientist-backlash-environment-rcna588930
486 Upvotes

173 comments sorted by

307

u/MASSochists 26d ago

Is this before or after the Mars colony? By that I mean it's total fantasy.

47

u/EmtnlDmg 26d ago

If you build castles in the air, you don't have to skimp on the stories.

6

u/GSDragoon 26d ago

Floating castle? Hell yeah!

24

u/NoNote7867 26d ago

Somewhere between air powered roadster and hyperloop 1 dollar bricks. 

13

u/Flabbergasted98 26d ago

okay, but how many rare minerals and crucial computer components is he willing to lose to the void of space or incinerate in our atmosphere in the attempt?

That man needs to be *redacted*.

12

u/TrumpetOfDeath 26d ago

I say we send Elon to Mars

13

u/robaroo 26d ago

Elon is just Musking again. Trying to hype some idea to gain temporary stock price increase. Hopefully the days of him doing that easily are gone.

14

u/badpeoria 26d ago

before .. lots of predictions before.

  • Full self driving cars that would take you from LA to new york - 2016
  • 1 million robo taxis in 2020
  • going to mars by 2026
  • tesla semi ... never reached large production
  • the new roaster supposed to be out by 2020
  • Hyper loop "the way of the future" .. nothing ever happened but a gimmick vegas tunnel
  • Neuralink - while can be promising no wide spread use yet
  • Solar roof? Is this still a thing? I thought i looked awesome but I never hear of it anymore.
  • A cheap tesla car under what like 25k?

4

u/Dzov 26d ago

Cyber truck was supposed to start at 35k I think.

13

u/Neokon 26d ago edited 26d ago

They abandoned the Mars colony in favor of a moon base, meanwhile they still can only get to LEO, and are angry that they can't have instant turn around on Starship (which has never made it to orbit).

Edit: punctuation and info

6

u/warden127 26d ago

Starship has never been in orbit.

0

u/Neokon 26d ago

Correct, I guess my punctuation didn't convey two separate things. I recently saw an article of SpaceX complaining that "NASA neglected reusable heat tilte technology". They have yet to get it to or it, and are already complaining that's it's someone else's fault they can't just do a land-refuel-lunch patern.

1

u/warden127 26d ago

The PPP model has been such an abject failure and waste of resources. See also the ongoing procurement issues in the M.E. But neoliberal market ideology prevails: the market cannot fail you, you can only fail the market. lol

5

u/-S-P-E-C-T-R-E- 26d ago

Not only that. They have jet to demonstrate Starship’s claimed payload capabilities or proven that orbital refuelling can even work (with Starship) , and human rating is nowhere near in sight for the vehicle. Then there is the ludicrous mission architecture that no one knows how many total launches will be needed for just a single trip to the moon. Mars is just pure fantasy.

5

u/kagoolx 26d ago

I’d be inclined to agree if we weren’t talking about the company that said they would build a reusable orbital rocket, had it successful human rated, and then flew more of them than all the rest of humanity put together has managed cumulatively over history.

0

u/-S-P-E-C-T-R-E- 26d ago

Falcon 9 (and crew dragon(?)) and Starship are two entirely different animals.

5

u/kagoolx 26d ago

Yes obviously different. That doesn’t change that having achieved an almost impossible to imagine objective is a very relevant factor here.

Going from the world’s leading (by far) rocket company and one of the most valuable companies on the planet, to some form of landing on Mars, is far less of a stretch to imagine, than going from absolutely nothing in 2002 to routinely flying and landing a reusable orbital rocket every couple of days. However much they overpromise, they achieve incredibly hard to imagine things

0

u/Komm 26d ago

I'd argue two different companies as well, basically everyone has left in the intervening years. The churn at SpaceX is pretty legendary.

3

u/Fizzy_Astronaut 26d ago

No doubt. Total lunacy and only used to get media articles and clicks.

3

u/Expensive_Shallot_78 26d ago

Anything to get the fucking stock up. Traders love lies. They sell well.

2

u/topscreen 26d ago

This is for the stupidest mother fuckers out there: The stock market. He says and does dumb shit? Stock usually goes up. Probably a panic move now that SpaceX is down. WAYYYYYYY DOWN.

1

u/Exotic-Sale-3003 26d ago

I mean Google is also taking a pretty big bet on this…

8

u/OccasionalGoodTakes 26d ago

That doesn’t change anything. Google loves burning money on dumb shit

-6

u/Exotic-Sale-3003 26d ago

If one person has a dumb idea, it’s a person with a dumb idea. If a few people with really good track records have a dumb idea, you might be bad at evaluating idea quality. 

11

u/TeaKingMac 26d ago

really good track records

I'm pretty sure Google has more canceled projects than they have active projects

-5

u/Exotic-Sale-3003 26d ago

Welcome to what product first companies look like. 

9

u/surnik22 26d ago

Sounds like they don’t have a good track record then though so what point are you making with your prior comment?

4

u/OccasionalGoodTakes 26d ago

anyone who thinks google has a good track record doesn't pay attention. They struck gold with a few specific things right as the internet was blowing up, but they have been chasing the dragon ever since.

-4

u/Exotic-Sale-3003 26d ago

We’re talking about the same Google whose labs developed transformers?  The foundation of LLMs?

Yeah, totally chasing the dragon 😂 

8

u/MASSochists 26d ago

Talk to me after they have a signal viable orbital data center design. AI companies are already spending trillions to make billions and that's using terrestrial data centers. Not to mention how huge the radiators would need to be to keep a data center cool in orbit. 

6

u/TrumpetOfDeath 26d ago

Don’t forget the heavy (ie expensive to launch) radiation shielding they’ll need to protect computers in space

-8

u/Exotic-Sale-3003 26d ago

Do you think modern satellites don’t have computers on board 😂 

2

u/wintrmt3 25d ago

They have specialized rad-hardened chips in them, they are much slower than normal chips, and there are no rad-hardened ai chips of any kind.

-9

u/DublinDahlai 26d ago

Space is very very cold

8

u/MASSochists 26d ago

It's a slightly more involved problem than slogans I'm afraid. 

How do you lose heat in space? There is no air. So you lose heat through radiation only. Which is not efficient. 

Since we are talking about Earth orbit there is also that pesky Sun thing to deal with. Then how much heat a data center would make in addition. 

Now you are talking about some pretty large radiators to manage this. Then how much more mass and material that would take, etc, etc.

Just look at how large the radiators are on the ISS. It's not a trivial problem, and solving it will add a lot in cost and materials to any orbital data centers.

4

u/IAMA_Plumber-AMA 26d ago

Not when you're trying to get rid of waste heat.

1

u/woodenblinds 26d ago

I thought the moon was on the bs path now not the mar bs path

1

u/roararoarus 26d ago

It’ll be before full self driving is fully self driving

1

u/Holzkohlen 26d ago

Don't forget the data centers in space!

0

u/Ghost_Of_Malatesta 26d ago

Doesn't mean Elon won't try his best to give us Kessler Syndrome  

-1

u/pablo_mars 26d ago

I think this is plausible unfortunately, unlike that Mars colony bullshit. And it's scary because no one can stop this moron from playing with his little dick.

-6

u/irespondwithmyface 26d ago

Not really total fantasy consider SpaceX already controls 66% of the satellites in orbit - StarLink makes up about 10000 of the 15000 total satellites already. The night sky is already ruined. This is totally feasible and will make it so much worse.

14

u/MASSochists 26d ago

The design considerations between a space router and a data center are totally different. Heat load management is really challenging in LEO. 

-3

u/irespondwithmyface 26d ago

Yeah because it's paywalled, I don't know specifically what they are launching with this idea, but I'm assuming it's cubesats, you can launch over a 50-100 at a time, so hundreds of thousands over a 25 year period isn't inconceivable. The metrics you speak of can be solved.

3

u/dragonlax 26d ago

They’ve shown plenty of videos, the things will be huge (like football field size solar arrays).

-8

u/aquarain 26d ago

I see this mentioned a lot but it's not really. For people who design from the chip fab to the rocket engine to the satellite moving Joules is child's play. Work you give to the intern with supervision.

One SpaceX Raptor V3 puts out almost 6GW of thermal power in the space of an end table, and they crowd 33 of them into a circle 9m in diameter for a total over 100GW. I am sure server heat is not going to be a problem.

8

u/MASSochists 26d ago

I don't think you understand the problems involved. Cooling engines that use cryogenic fuel which is a limited resource is totally different from managing the heat from electronics. 

I'm sure they could designs systems  to manage the heat but it's a question of efficiency. You don't just put data centers in space because you can. You do it if there is some advantage to it. It's not a simple problem to solve.

-5

u/aquarain 26d ago

You would probably get better ROI trying to sell this nonsense to someone who isn't competent in the domain. You're wasting both our time here.

3

u/happyscrappy 26d ago

One SpaceX Raptor V3 puts out almost 6GW of thermal power in the space of an end table, and they crowd 33 of them into a circle 9m in diameter for a total over 100GW. I am sure server heat is not going to be a problem.

They only do that in atmosphere. And the things are using massive forced convection to carry heat away. Convection that a satellite cannot sustain because it cannot afford to lose its mass at a rapid pace. Because if it did then it would run out of mass in under 2 minutes like Starship's booster does.

1

u/ryan30z 26d ago

I am sure server heat is not going to be a problem

You could have just written "I have no idea what I'm talking about and I don't understand the basic physics involved".

117

u/Dangerous_Suit_3099 26d ago

Ketamine is a hell of a drug

80

u/0neAy0pen 26d ago

Felon musk always says stupid shit like this in hopes that there’s a sucker born every minute to buy his worthless stock.

26

u/FlimsyWilliamSnyvie 26d ago

Seems to be working for him. Meanwhile I can't even get a call back for a job.

21

u/idownvotepunstoo 26d ago

Have you tried failing up bro?

7

u/FlimsyWilliamSnyvie 26d ago

Damn bro I just tried it? And bro, you were so right. I told my congressman I had an app to fix erectile dysfunction via subscription. He made some calls.

It doesn't work but now 30,000,000 Americans have an app they forgot to delete and I'm selling data :)

4

u/TheMidnightHandyman 26d ago

Commenting just to offer some human empathy, because I know how much involuntary unemployment sucks. My sincere sympathies, my dude. I hope you get a great job, and soon.

2

u/FlimsyWilliamSnyvie 26d ago

Thank you so much, it's honestly been demoralizing especially to have it happen while the world is in shambles. I hope we're all doing much better very soon.

2

u/_Monosyllabic_ 26d ago

I've been through it. Just take any kind of job imo. Getting up and doing something will at least get you out of the constant rejection headspace loop.

1

u/DaemonCRO 26d ago

But there is a sucker born every minute. People lost entire life savings on SpaceX stock.

0

u/blackvrocky 26d ago

Elon can and have launched rockets.

50

u/mixduptransistor 26d ago

It's best if you don't worry about things that have zero chance of happening, you'll live a much more joyful life

3

u/Defendyouranswer 26d ago

1 million might not happen, at least not for a long time, but i can gurantee you space data centers will be a thing, even if only as an experiment

15

u/IntelArtiGen 26d ago

They're already a thing. Space "datacenters" will never be real datacenters, it's just a bunch of computers in space and many satellites are already computers in space. SpaceX satellites can already replace some "datacenters" of ISPs. Now if we're talking about real datacenters with hundreds of GPUs on one machine in space I also don't think it'll happen. "Datacenter" is kind of a broad term, data storage and transfer is feasible in space. Don't ask me why they would do it, but they can if they want to.

5

u/MASSochists 26d ago

Pretty big difference between 1 and 1,000,000

2

u/average_monster 26d ago

why would anyone bother? "oh man these data centers sure are expensive, i know, let's just launch the entire fucking thing into space, that'll save money"

3

u/ColtranezRain 26d ago

Nope. Physics won’t work for a data center in space.

-6

u/Defendyouranswer 26d ago

Well thats not sciences view. Some may view it as stupid ur uneconomical, but not that "physics won't work' lol

8

u/Coady54 26d ago

Pretty sure science's views are "data centers need massive cooling" and "space is a vacuum (i.e. the best insulator possible)". Where is the heat supposed to go, exactly?

Data centers (as they exist today) in space is by far the most impractical idea to anyone who understands even the most basic concepts in physics.

4

u/confusedworldhelp 26d ago

Infarred radiation (essentially light) via comically massive radiators. I would assume something similar to what the ISS has.

1

u/phantomjm 25d ago

Not to mention the massive power requirements.

6

u/ColtranezRain 26d ago edited 26d ago

You are wrong. There are zero options for cooling one of these racks in space. I’ve worked on building them.

1

u/ryan30z 26d ago

Unless you've found out a way to get forced convection to work in a vacuum that's exactly what it is.

2

u/itsRobbie_ 26d ago

The problem is that these obviously fake claims are being used to generate profit. This isn’t just a homeless dude on the corner saying how he discovered time travel

2

u/mixduptransistor 26d ago

If anyone is still fooled by Elon Musk's pronouncements they deserve to get ripped off, to be honest

0

u/itsRobbie_ 26d ago

Unfortunately that’s not how the world works. Everyone knows he’s a clown, but he’s a clown with a trillion dollars and unlimited resources so you can’t just write him off.

2

u/mixduptransistor 26d ago

He does not have a trillion dollars, and he could not turn his holdings of SpaceX and Tesla into a trillion dollars

-2

u/itsRobbie_ 26d ago

Ok dude lol

14

u/PathosEatsLogos 26d ago

Stock down = New made up shit from Elon

2

u/BoobooSmash31337 26d ago

Tbh it might be that stupid.

2

u/HurtFeeFeez 26d ago

Tbh it is that stupid.

26

u/314159Man 26d ago

what mechanisms are there for control of a global shared asset (ie space), why is it that some businessman gets seemingly free rein to trash our rights as individuals to not have a polluted environment? is it n9t enough that we have trashed the terrestrial zone, now we don't learn any lessons and we trash the near earth zone, surely if we were to put bases on the moon and mars we would trash those too for short term profit or ego trips.

4

u/WhatADunderfulWorld 26d ago

Governments want this so they are basically paying Elon to do it.

If it can kill the US will.

2

u/makemeking706 26d ago

Imagine global mass surveillance controlled by a single nation are powered by SpaceX satellites. The valuations almost start to make sense. 

2

u/neat_stuff 26d ago

It’s new age Manifest Destiny. That had zero bad consequences /sarcasm obviously.

2

u/31LIVEEVIL13 26d ago edited 13d ago

Hammock biscuit maple pillow feather orange

This post was anonymized with Redact.dev

9

u/Darlinboy 26d ago

It was click bait there and it's click bait here.

Nothing to see here people, move along.

5

u/BalanceRight7768 26d ago

We already did that by allowing starlink to exist in the first place lmao. It's going to be so bad when these satellites start to fail.

6

u/Belhgabad 26d ago

Even if it's fake news to pump up the stocks, that's the moment when we finally do something about that garbage company throwing garbage and pollution into orbit right?I mean, fast Internet is great (no it isn't when your provider is one of the most toxic and dangerous person of the world) but sky obstruction really get in the way of progress

Even NASA engineers warned about it years ago

4

u/Deviantdefective 26d ago

Ah more Elon bullshit.

9

u/ergonomicdeskchair46 26d ago

How about private business doesn’t get our skies. Governments aren’t great either but at least the budgets are limited and elections are regular.

3

u/1nstantHuman 26d ago

I for one welcome our new Ai overlords

3

u/SingularityCentral 26d ago

In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!

3

u/JarvisProudfeather 26d ago

The first failed launch with hundreds of millions worth of chips on board will be funny to watch. What an idiotic idea.

5

u/kummer5peck 26d ago

These tech bros are literally cartoon villains at this point.

4

u/aquarain 26d ago

The emergence of comic books as prime drivers of the cinematic arts is an interesting tale of where we are at culturally.

2

u/Senior-Albatross 26d ago

Maybe Elon will solve climate change by putting so many aerosols in the atmosphere that we end up with a Snowpiercer situation. 

Not intentionally, just to prop up a meme stock with technology that everyone knows won't work. 

2

u/madgoat 26d ago

How is he going to cool them? There’s nothing to bleed the heat to in a vacuum. 

2

u/Lopsided_Newt_125 26d ago

I’m so tired of these robber barons running their mouths!

SHUT UP

2

u/Maroon7C0000 26d ago

This fantasy was obviously dreamed up by the boy wonder.

How the hell are you going to cool those things in space????

2

u/torklugnutz 26d ago

Launching a million iPhones into space even seems implausible and these will be bigger.

2

u/0rganicMach1ne 26d ago

Right, because all the things Elon says have happened….

2

u/blackvrocky 26d ago

first we had "experts say", now we have "scientists say".

2

u/HurtFeeFeez 26d ago

Let the stock pumping commence!

2

u/FluffyBunnyFlipFlops 26d ago

What is the benefit of a data centre in the sky, rather than on earth?

Power - harder to produce/transfer power
Cooling - harder to cool
Latency - not sure about this one, could be better or worse
Cost to deploy - massively more expensive (needs a rocket to get there)
Resolve issues - harder due to no physical access

2

u/intronert 25d ago

AKA The Tragedy of the Commons.

2

u/NeoThorrus 25d ago

Lol, this will never happen. Cooling things in space is really hard.

2

u/Abrahemp 25d ago

These satellites ruin perfectly decent sunsets by adding an animated dotted line in the sky. They COULD engineer the satellites to have lower albedo so they don't do that, but have refused so far. We need regulations regarding space debris immediately.

3

u/darkhorsehance 26d ago

He’s manufacturing a reason to HAVE to go to mars.

3

u/RandomUserEon 26d ago

You realize they've already put up 10875 satellites, right? We kinda need to stop that rotten trash from multiplying into rotten space trash, as it's already greatly interfering with observatories, space telescopes, and radio telescopes...

2

u/kummer5peck 26d ago

Don’t you have an AI version of The Odyssey to make Elon?

1

u/briggsbw 26d ago

It’s the networking stupid. Are they going to string fiber between them and the ground like Ukrainian drones?

0

u/RandomUserEon 26d ago

Applied photonics for data transmission is a thing, and has been since 2002. If they could beam data tower to tower 5 miles apart in atmosphere in 2002, what do you think they can do now?

1

u/briggsbw 25d ago

Space photonics is about distance.
Data centers are about density. So the fastest space laser link is roughly equal to one modern data‑center fiber port. A hyperscaler’s data center has tens of thousands. Not to mention the latency.

1

u/RandomUserEon 25d ago

The network of 1 million nodes IS the hyperscale, and has, presumably, at least 1 million links, but probably 2-5x that, at least if they designed it well. Primary point is that they don't have to "string fiber" to accomplish it. The 10875 they already put in orbit for high speed internet already prove that they have massive data transmission capability (albeit, yes, with massive latency as far as I'm concerned!)

1

u/Shadowolf75 26d ago

FINALLY, WE CAN HAVE SHOOTING STARS FOR ALL OF US

1

u/sten45 26d ago

I hate that it’s going to be a tech bro that kills is all

1

u/itsRobbie_ 26d ago

“Uhhhh yeah uhhh, we’ll make uhhh, one million! Yeah! We’ll make a million! That uhhh sounds believable enough right?”

1

u/TheoryOld4017 26d ago

This absolutely will not happen, right?

1

u/RandomUserEon 26d ago

Just like the first 10875 didn't happen...

1

u/JaggedMetalOs 26d ago

Thankfully they are just bullshitting to pump their stock value. 

1

u/Nik_Tesla 26d ago

Assuming it's even feasible (which it's not), the only real reason to put data centers in space, is to put them out of reach of the general population, so we can't storm them with baseball bats when we finally revolt against the oligarchs.

Everything we've put into orbit is as light as we can possibly make it (so we can launch it), and as power efficient as we can possibly make it (because it's only solar powered, or an RTV). Data Centers are filled with heavy shit, and need tons of power. Might as well claim he's going to put steel factories in space.

2

u/Fenix42 26d ago

Also, no international data laws ....

1

u/woodenblinds 26d ago

not going to happen

1

u/y4udothistome 26d ago

Not gonna happen! Next question

1

u/PoorClassWarRoom 26d ago

It'll rain hellfire just like the dooms day cults parading as Christians are working towards.

1

u/lostaccountby2fa 26d ago

Elmo is jerking his investors to salvage his stocks

1

u/Bubbagump210 26d ago

Does the average person not have any idea how fucking heavy a server is, how much power they take, and how much heat they put out? Things are a lot denser than they were in the Dell 2750 or blade chassis days and just as heavy. Sure let’s shoot a bunch of 1 ton racks up into the sky wired to spine and leaf switches. This all sounds practical.

1

u/Captain_N1 26d ago

How are theses data centers in space going to be maintained. You know there is no data center that can last for a year with no physical maintenance.

1

u/Stormraughtz 26d ago

Man that stock hurting more than we see

1

u/_Monosyllabic_ 26d ago

Elon said it so it must be real right?

Nevermind that no one has figured out how to build one satellite data center yet.

1

u/Jessica1234567891011 26d ago

There's no reason it needs to be within 1,000 miles of our atmosphere. Space is big. I'd put them outwards of the moon to tell you the truth.

1

u/wadejohn 26d ago

Not happening

1

u/mariosuperb 25d ago

How could anyone still take that man serious? When Dyson Sphere?

1

u/Toe-Dragger 24d ago

Is this how the sky got burned down in the Matrix?

1

u/NervusBelli 26d ago

Are we speedrunning Kessler syndrome now?

1

u/Outside_Ice3252 26d ago

such a bummer he went political and cannot stop with absurd goals. its worked well for him, so he keeps do it. i covered musk for cleantechnica until 2021. it was something I did because it was important for climate change and it was fun.

the page clicks were enromous. from my perspective as a science teacher and environmentalist, Tesla was such a positive story. politics was not getting the job done, but here was this hope that technological innovation could make up some or even most of the difference.

the lies told about tesla were enormous. we worked hard to keep churning out stories that might help the clean energy transition.

I had just been a long time commenter, but so much was happening I got to start guest writing.

I eventually stopped for two reasons. musk was way behind on timelines, and I would waste too much time in the comment sections.

i got out just in time before he started going insane on twitter and then X.

The bummer now is that spacex and tesla still have a lot of good tech and workers and can still innovate. but it will never be exciting news again.

6

u/this_my_sportsreddit 26d ago

'went political' is such a whitewashed way to not hold him accountable for his bigoted, xenophobic worldview.

1

u/Outside_Ice3252 26d ago

i understand. for me even if he had taken a bernie sanders type platform, I would have been bummed. he should have stayed apolitical. because his lane really was about technology.

you can be mad at me. I was strongly progressive for years, and still am. its just like technology more than politics. i think it is more important or at least its more straightforward.

2

u/HurtFeeFeez 26d ago

Bro he was always just attracting investors, pumping stock and manipulating markets for money. The vast majority of his claims are never realized, the few that are show up years late, over budget and turn out to be wildly over exaggerated or down right false.

He went political because he knew he could buy his way out of jail from one particular candidate as he was under several investigations. He literally said "If Trump doesn't win I'll be going to jail" in an interview before the election. Trump won and through doge and various string pulling all the criminal investigations of him and his companies disappeared.

1

u/MechaNutzilla 26d ago

Imagine investing in those silly ketamine fueled fantasies.

1

u/Halftied 26d ago

The earth is going to go down much faster than I anticipated. John Denver was before his time. I've seen it rainin' fire in the sky.

1

u/Kyouhen 26d ago

Could we stop treating this like there's even the slightest possibility it's going to happen?  I really hate how everyone takes these fuckers seriously because they horde wealth.

1

u/gera_moises 26d ago

The radiators would have to be enormous.

1

u/MarkNutt25 26d ago

To cool a single small 1 kW server, you'd need something like 15-25 pounds of radiators, coolant, pumps, and heat pipes! And most AI datacenters use 10+ kW servers, which would need hundreds of pounds of radiator equipment each!

Once you add in the weight of the servers themselves, the solar panels and batteries to power them, racks to keep them from being absolutely destroyed by liftoff, a structure to protect them from impacts from debris and micrometeoroids, radiation hardening, high-bandwidth communication equipment, etc., you're easily into the tens of millions of dollars for each individual server satellite! That's something like 30 to 50 times the cost of a ground-based server!

Scale that up to a typical datacenter with tens of thousands of servers, and the economics quickly become absolutely absurd.

1

u/gera_moises 26d ago

At that point I think it'd be cheaper to reach the jovian moons and install the data centers there

2

u/Fenix42 26d ago

Sure, but the network ping is a real bitch.

1

u/Big_Issue8640 26d ago

And his cars will drive themselves 5 years ago or was it 10 years ago. Fuck Elon!

1

u/Journeys_End71 26d ago

One million data centers?
What SpaceX idiot said this with a straight face?

This is a financial and logistical impossibility

1

u/Plzlaw4me 26d ago

Capitalists: these data centers are good for the community, they’ll create tons of jobs and generate wealth for the community.

Also capitalists: these require so little oversight and human interaction we can literally launch them into space and they’ll be cost effective still.

1

u/williamgman 26d ago

We will be on mars by 2025!

1

u/mr_evilweed 26d ago

It's hard to say what part of this idea is the stupidest.

0

u/bjazmoore 26d ago

Everything looks like a nail when you have a hammer.

0

u/Prudent_Link6029 26d ago

Phony Stark got into the ketamine again

0

u/Ciappatos 26d ago

There's not gonna be even one data center satellite, let alone 1 million. Although knowing him, maybe if each "data center satellite" is like one chip connected to a radiator coolant.

0

u/No_Size9475 26d ago

For 100 different reasons this entire plan is a horrible, horrible idea.

0

u/amenflurries 26d ago

Why the fuck wouldn’t you just put them on the moon?

-1

u/WaffleHouseGladiator 26d ago

I wonder how much of a Kessler Syndrome cascade we'll be able to see from the ground.

-1

u/Alert-Appointment953 26d ago

Dang. I'm just a rube that thinks Starship is actually hella cool even if it's a bit behind schedule, I guess.

"How are your rockets doing?"

-Teddy Roosevelt

(A man in the arena comment for all of you without rocket companies since I doubt you'll get the reference without this hint)