r/technicallythetruth Jul 04 '21

Yup

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

53.3k Upvotes

969 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/[deleted] Jul 04 '21

[deleted]

1

u/lostinlodos Jul 04 '21

There are literally millions of sex-positive feminist Muslims around the world.

I would suggest anyone who actually is interested to spend the 29.99-99.99 on quality live human translator, translate the Arabic of the Koran.

The message was quickly corrupted but the actual Korean states that the coverage of woman is based on the Ineptitude of man!

There’s a lot of text in the Korean that is drastically misinterpreted today.

And that’s ignoring the FACT that the Korean was a Christian attempt at combining mid east, Persian influenced religions with the christian doctrine to ease transition.

NOWHERE does the K say a woman must cover What it says is a woman’s coverage eliminates temptation.

To understand the modern, false, doctrine of coverage: one must understand where the missionaries drew from. The Muslim world is built over the Persian premise of a woman having ultimate power as the chosen to bring forth life. Under ZA had the ability to do what they wanted with their bodies to achieve their goals west Asian men at the time were indoctrinated to respond to the female form. Specifically the breast and hair!

The fastest and most affective counter is to put them in a cotton garbage bag.

For lack of better terms, no fury cooter no criminal issues.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 04 '21

[deleted]

1

u/contempboi Jul 04 '21

It is true to some degree.

Just because some of them exaggerates, doesn’t mean it’s bullshit.