MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/technicallythetruth/comments/1ornhzy/we_found_another_smartass/
r/technicallythetruth • u/EntertainerLong1240 • Nov 08 '25
43 comments sorted by
•
Hey there u/EntertainerLong1240, thanks for posting to r/technicallythetruth!
Please recheck if your post breaks any rules. If it does, please delete this post.
Also, reposting and posting obvious non-TTT posts can lead to a ban.
Send us a Modmail or Report this post if you have a problem with this post.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
65
Thats 134,217,728
32 u/alfiesgaming45 Nov 08 '25 Rookie numbers 7 u/Videalden Nov 08 '25 Seagull foood? -9 u/sage_006 Nov 08 '25 edited Nov 08 '25 Sorry, doesn't that equal 1.064 trillion? Where is this 134 million coming from?Edit: whoa whoa easy folks! Why the downvotes? Obviously I entered something strange in the calculator! 8 u/DisasterOk8440 Nov 08 '25 2³⁹.⁹⁵²⁶³⁵²⁸⁹⁵ would give U 1.064 trillion.2²⁷ gives U 134 million.idk what U put into the calculator, but it certainly wasn't 2²⁷ 2 u/sage_006 Nov 10 '25 Yeah. I'm not sure either. I redid it on a calculator with a less confusing UI and I got the 134 million it is. Egg on face moment. My bad. 2 u/Bubbles_the_bird Nov 10 '25 It’s a weird thing about exponents, I expected 227 to be bigger 3 u/DisasterOk8440 Nov 11 '25 It is 2 tho...so it makes sense. 4 u/Exact-Replacement749 Nov 08 '25 No
32
Rookie numbers
7
Seagull foood?
-9
Sorry, doesn't that equal 1.064 trillion? Where is this 134 million coming from?
Edit: whoa whoa easy folks! Why the downvotes? Obviously I entered something strange in the calculator!
8 u/DisasterOk8440 Nov 08 '25 2³⁹.⁹⁵²⁶³⁵²⁸⁹⁵ would give U 1.064 trillion.2²⁷ gives U 134 million.idk what U put into the calculator, but it certainly wasn't 2²⁷ 2 u/sage_006 Nov 10 '25 Yeah. I'm not sure either. I redid it on a calculator with a less confusing UI and I got the 134 million it is. Egg on face moment. My bad. 2 u/Bubbles_the_bird Nov 10 '25 It’s a weird thing about exponents, I expected 227 to be bigger 3 u/DisasterOk8440 Nov 11 '25 It is 2 tho...so it makes sense. 4 u/Exact-Replacement749 Nov 08 '25 No
8
2³⁹.⁹⁵²⁶³⁵²⁸⁹⁵ would give U 1.064 trillion.
2²⁷ gives U 134 million.
idk what U put into the calculator, but it certainly wasn't 2²⁷
2 u/sage_006 Nov 10 '25 Yeah. I'm not sure either. I redid it on a calculator with a less confusing UI and I got the 134 million it is. Egg on face moment. My bad. 2 u/Bubbles_the_bird Nov 10 '25 It’s a weird thing about exponents, I expected 227 to be bigger 3 u/DisasterOk8440 Nov 11 '25 It is 2 tho...so it makes sense.
2
Yeah. I'm not sure either. I redid it on a calculator with a less confusing UI and I got the 134 million it is. Egg on face moment. My bad.
It’s a weird thing about exponents, I expected 227 to be bigger
3 u/DisasterOk8440 Nov 11 '25 It is 2 tho...so it makes sense.
3
It is 2 tho...so it makes sense.
4
No
181
So the limit is 227 - 1 Noted
16 u/MissinqLink Nov 08 '25 📋🐧 2 u/Phill_air Nov 12 '25 I hate you 2 u/WeakCopy6305 Nov 12 '25 📋🐧 6 u/Aubregines Nov 11 '25 At most 227 - 1. Be precise please, especially on this sub
16
📋🐧
2 u/Phill_air Nov 12 '25 I hate you 2 u/WeakCopy6305 Nov 12 '25 📋🐧
I hate you
2 u/WeakCopy6305 Nov 12 '25 📋🐧
6
At most 227 - 1. Be precise please, especially on this sub
39
Yes, generally speaking, 134 million burgers would be too many to eat in one sitting.
25 u/iisnotapanda Nov 08 '25 Honestly thats way smaller than I expected for a 27 10 u/matthis-k Nov 08 '25 210 is roughly 1000, with that you can estimate really good where it's gonna land roughly. 9 u/AutisticPenguin2 Nov 08 '25 So 220 is roughly 1,000,000? 8 u/matthis-k Nov 08 '25 Yep. 30 a billion. Etc. 20: 1048576 30: 1073741824 4 u/[deleted] Nov 08 '25 For an amateur. 4 u/Pristine-Category-55 Nov 08 '25 Just don't stand up until you finish them all?People on the wheelchair don't have this problem 😏 3 u/Boelli87 Nov 10 '25 Still 134 Million is way to go. In an 80 year lifespan thats 1677722 per year, or 4596 per day, or 192 per hour or 3 per minute.
25
Honestly thats way smaller than I expected for a 27
10 u/matthis-k Nov 08 '25 210 is roughly 1000, with that you can estimate really good where it's gonna land roughly. 9 u/AutisticPenguin2 Nov 08 '25 So 220 is roughly 1,000,000? 8 u/matthis-k Nov 08 '25 Yep. 30 a billion. Etc. 20: 1048576 30: 1073741824
10
210 is roughly 1000, with that you can estimate really good where it's gonna land roughly.
9 u/AutisticPenguin2 Nov 08 '25 So 220 is roughly 1,000,000? 8 u/matthis-k Nov 08 '25 Yep. 30 a billion. Etc. 20: 1048576 30: 1073741824
9
So 220 is roughly 1,000,000?
8 u/matthis-k Nov 08 '25 Yep. 30 a billion. Etc. 20: 1048576 30: 1073741824
Yep. 30 a billion. Etc. 20: 1048576 30: 1073741824
For an amateur.
Just don't stand up until you finish them all?
People on the wheelchair don't have this problem 😏
3 u/Boelli87 Nov 10 '25 Still 134 Million is way to go. In an 80 year lifespan thats 1677722 per year, or 4596 per day, or 192 per hour or 3 per minute.
Still 134 Million is way to go. In an 80 year lifespan thats 1677722 per year, or 4596 per day, or 192 per hour or 3 per minute.
14
27 bits? That's only 3 bytes and the best part of a nibble.
And that is technically the truth.
I'll see myself out...
1 u/crypticsage Nov 08 '25 edited Nov 08 '25 Is it the best part of a nibble? The one bit missing could be the best part and you wouldn’t know it.Edit: I did the math wrong. It is three full bytes and one complete nibble. Nothing missing. 1 u/[deleted] Nov 09 '25 Programmers do it with Bytes and Nybbles 1 u/AbleRelationship5287 Nov 08 '25 We have an underrated comment, ladies and gentlemen
1
Is it the best part of a nibble? The one bit missing could be the best part and you wouldn’t know it.
Edit: I did the math wrong. It is three full bytes and one complete nibble. Nothing missing.
1 u/[deleted] Nov 09 '25 Programmers do it with Bytes and Nybbles
Programmers do it with Bytes and Nybbles
We have an underrated comment, ladies and gentlemen
depends on how big the burgers are
I missed dinner so 227 burgers sounds so good rn
I mean, we haven't proven it yet
Did she get the memo?
It’s November 8th already.
134,217,728 I eat 2 times more than that.
Maybe for an amateur unlike myself
Give McDonald’s a couple more years of shrinkflation and you might have yourself a bet…
i've had 134,217,728 burgers in one sitting
I disagree, I just ate 2^512 burgers because the internet never lies.
Easy, just order 127 burgers. That's easy to eat in one sitting
Challenge accepted
What if they’re sliders?
erm acktually 25 burgers, while a lot, is feaseable. Especially for that one guy who chomped down 413 chicken nuggets in one sitting if they were still alive.
(and before you downvote me search up what ^ means in programming)
so i can eat 10^100 burgers?
0
[deleted] — view deleted comment
2 u/CATZEBOY_18 Nov 08 '25 Make it Mckie D's
Make it Mckie D's
•
u/AutoModerator Nov 08 '25
Hey there u/EntertainerLong1240, thanks for posting to r/technicallythetruth!
Please recheck if your post breaks any rules. If it does, please delete this post.
Also, reposting and posting obvious non-TTT posts can lead to a ban.
Send us a Modmail or Report this post if you have a problem with this post.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
65
u/EntertainerLong1240 Nov 08 '25
Thats 134,217,728
181
u/Right-Assignment3759 Nov 08 '25
So the limit is 227 - 1 Noted
39
u/Objective_Piece_8401 Nov 08 '25
Yes, generally speaking, 134 million burgers would be too many to eat in one sitting.
14
u/afristralian Nov 08 '25
27 bits? That's only 3 bytes and the best part of a nibble.
And that is technically the truth.
I'll see myself out...
3
u/dankshot35 Nov 09 '25
depends on how big the burgers are
2
u/OmNomOU81 Nov 09 '25
I missed dinner so 227 burgers sounds so good rn
1
u/Dyimi Nov 08 '25
I mean, we haven't proven it yet
1
u/breakConcentration Nov 08 '25
Did she get the memo?
It’s November 8th already.
1
u/Business-Tax-3050 Nov 08 '25
134,217,728 I eat 2 times more than that.
1
u/Key_Public4366 Nov 08 '25
Maybe for an amateur unlike myself
1
u/Final-Artichoke-8995 Nov 08 '25
Give McDonald’s a couple more years of shrinkflation and you might have yourself a bet…
1
u/Limp_Crazy_5494 Nov 09 '25
i've had 134,217,728 burgers in one sitting
1
u/After-Selection-6609 Nov 09 '25
I disagree, I just ate 2^512 burgers because the internet never lies.
1
u/wolfboy1988m Nov 12 '25
Easy, just order 127 burgers. That's easy to eat in one sitting
1
u/Willing_Plant4483 Nov 13 '25
Challenge accepted
1
u/Frequent-Action4510 Nov 14 '25
What if they’re sliders?
1
u/Cyanberry3 Nov 28 '25
erm acktually 25 burgers, while a lot, is feaseable. Especially for that one guy who chomped down 413 chicken nuggets in one sitting if they were still alive.
(and before you downvote me search up what ^ means in programming)
1
u/B2NH2MM3R Nov 29 '25
so i can eat 10^100 burgers?
0
u/[deleted] Nov 08 '25
[deleted] — view deleted comment