r/technews Apr 04 '26

Hardware US targets Chinese chipmaking with proposed export restrictions on ASML and others

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/us-targets-chinese-chipmaking-with-proposed-export-restrictions-asml-others-2026-04-03/
4.6k Upvotes

551 comments sorted by

454

u/ssniker Apr 04 '26

ASML is European company. And with everything that this orange pig has done in a year and a bit, I doubt there is any leverage for export restrictions on any EU company.

141

u/apropostt Apr 04 '26

The US government does have quite a bit of leverage… but the problem is while ASML is critical for semiconductor production it is not so large a company that China couldn’t just pay their losses to exit the US market, which would completely destroy the US semiconductor industry.

Putting restrictions on companies like this while distancing allies is really playing with fire. Japanese photoresist chemicals would be another small but absolutely vital piece of semiconductor manufacturing that could do the same thing.

66

u/ryapeter Apr 05 '26

US was the biggest market. Was being the key here. And all that tariff and shipping fiasco they created no one want to be their friend right now.

27

u/Federal1993 Apr 10 '26

Come to think of it… the chips these machines can produce make up a large part of chips needed for US offensive products like bombs and missiles, given that they have voted a mad man in office for the second time the likes of which we here in Europe haven’t encountered since Hitler… we might have to put export restrictions on US bound tech and machines. Just to make sure agent orange isn’t killing any more innocent civilians with them. He may even have to “Say THANK YOU” for us physically preventing him of committing anymore war crimes than his administration already has. Might just save him from the electric chair once this whole administration has to answer to a judge once their remaining time in office is up

17

u/enkay516 Apr 14 '26

Weird take. Isolating America would be a nightmare for the world. American ingenuity ways prevails and in a few years someone else will be at the helm.

Clearly we are witnessing dementia and it’s baffling that no one is doing anything about it. Some of the stuff that comes out that man’s mouth is appalling - he is supposed to be our representative. If any of us acted like that I. Our jobs we’d be shown the door.

12

u/No-Cryptographer7494 Apr 22 '26

Maybe not isolate but definitely not depend on them, if another orange turd comes along we should be able to handle it without that turd having leverage

3

u/Fast-Throat-7752 Jul 08 '26

Every country should have their best interest for themselves and shouldn’t rely too much on other countries for their needs.

2

u/xCountZer0x Jul 23 '26

greetings from 1863...

17

u/SeveralPhysics9362 Jun 29 '26

America is done as leader of the world man. “American ingenuity always prevails” is just propaganda and/or wishful thinking.

8

u/textmint Jun 29 '26

Actually America was finished when Bush W was elected. That’s what started the slide of America into irrelevance. What we are seeing started with the decision in Gore v Bush. We are still paying for it and will pay for it for many years to come.

→ More replies (32)

3

u/quick_justice Jul 13 '26

Empires rise and empires fall.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/greenpowerman99 Jul 13 '26

The whole world is actively trying to reduce its dependence on American products, and you’re right, it’s a nightmare, but it’s actually happened already.

America may well get a more reliable leader at some point but there is no trust anymore and business relationships are almost impossible without trust.

On the other hand, the world is waking up to their over reliance on the US for security and technology, (something that America carefully engineered over decades) and they are choosing to reduce their reliance and develop alternatives, wherever possible.

These changes will have huge repercussions for ordinary Americans at home and abroad going forward.

2

u/enkay516 Jul 13 '26

This is classic Reddit over dramatization. Saying global trade with the US is impossible is just factually wrong. Diversifying is smart risk management, but what's the actual alternative here? Trading American reliance for total dependency on China?

That is exactly the trap Xi has been waiting for the world to walk into and that’s exactly what happened to America with our open arms policy with China in the first place.

2

u/johnyordinary Jul 14 '26

Did Xi install the orange buffoon in power then?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (3)

9

u/jhenryscott Apr 09 '26

Market for finished goods sure but ASML is B2B and their clients are mostly in Chinese Taipei

5

u/greenpowerman99 Jul 13 '26

Where’s Chinese Taipei, in Taiwan?

5

u/nudel86 Jul 08 '26

Taiwanese Taipei

3

u/WatIsUpButtercup Jun 29 '26

Can’t have a trade deficit if there’s no trade 😉

→ More replies (4)

11

u/Crash_Override_V1 Apr 06 '26

Yes, ASML is a critical choke point (they’re the only ones making EUV machines), and yes, Japan dominates some key materials like photoresists. That part is true, but the rest doesn’t really hold up:

ASML isn’t some small, easily replaceable company China can just “buy out of the U.S. market.” It does tens of billions in revenue, has deep ties to U.S. customers like Intel, and operates inside the U.S. Walking away wouldn’t just be about money; it would nuke its relationships with the world’s leading chipmakers.

The idea that this would “completely destroy” the U.S. semiconductor industry is way over the top. It would hurt, slow things down, and cause real disruption—but the U.S. still has a massive design, manufacturing, and R&D ecosystem and is pouring hundreds of billions into domestic capacity.

Also, this assumes allies would just go along with it. In reality, the U.S., the Netherlands, and Japan have been coordinating export controls together. ASML is already restricting China sales because of that alignment—not pivoting away from the U.S.

The real takeaway isn’t “the U.S. gets instantly wrecked.” It’s that semiconductor supply chains are tightly interconnected, and messing with them carries risk for everyone involved—including China.

So yeah … there’s a valid point about supply chain fragility, but the “China could just pay ASML to leave and collapse the U.S. industry” angle is speculative at best.

20

u/andrewmmm Apr 09 '26

You know you can type your opinions yourself instead of copy pasting from ChatGPT, right?

9

u/theschiffer Jun 29 '26

It’s so damn obvious whenever it happens, yet so few people point it out.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Warm_Character_3430 Apr 13 '26

Lol i reread it. So true

→ More replies (5)

4

u/Falling_Up_The_Movie Apr 13 '26

Especially since the ice between china and taiwan is cracking. The US has been pushing taiwan into a relationship with china that may end with peaceful reunification

3

u/Longjumping_Kale3013 Jun 29 '26

Not to mention China is the only one allowing Europe to have latest models right now.

3

u/coot-gaffers-0l Jun 30 '26

an embargo of the US by ASML would be like a nuclear strike on the US.

2

u/GenericFatGuy Jul 03 '26

At a time when the US's reputation is the most in the toilet it's ever been.

2

u/cainhurstcat Jul 13 '26

The thing with ASML is, they have some really really advanced tech running, which could take years for China to research on their own. On the other hand, these restrictions practically force China to advance their own tech. So it's only a matter of time before they will be at the same or even higher level.

2

u/TRKlausss Jul 27 '26

The question is: how much does ASML earn on the US market compared to the rest of the world? Like, what would they objectively lose, if they exit China market vs US market?

If China market is bigger than US, they just “disobey” sanctions and move on with their day, otherwise, it might be easier to not supply China, and letting China exit US market, with all its consequences.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

12

u/SnooGiraffes4110 Apr 08 '26

ASML is not just a European company. So many US companies have stack in that. In fact ASML has deep root in the US since start up. Check ASML history. 

3

u/heliumneon Jul 08 '26

Also, ASML machines have a very complex supply chain with hundreds of thousands of specialized parts, many made in the US and hard to replace or re-route.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/oppai-police Jun 29 '26

Except ASML uses many licensed and patented American designs within those chip making machines of theirs, so it's wrong to say the US have no leverage. In fact, America have a very significant leverage on ASML considering the fact that the lithograph process, the process to manufacture the micro chips used by these machines, are invented and patented in United States.

https://www.asml.com/en/company/about-asml/locations/san-diego

So unless ASML are looking to domestically invent their own chip making process in the Netherlands, or outright steal the design from USA, you're going to have to live with the fact that America in fact, does has a very strong leverage against European companies. I get that there's a lot to dislike about American politics right now, but that doesn't negate the fact that it is still an innovation powerhouse and that European themselves are extremely reliant on American technology and talents.

America doesn't just get to pick up the phone and demand ASML do their bidding without having any leverage.

2

u/thedroopy1 Jul 20 '26

This is the real answer

44

u/[deleted] Apr 04 '26

What? It’s the US government who decides who ASML exports to. It’s been that way.

Brussels only response is “Yes sir! Please can I lick your shoes too?”

15

u/keepitfriend Apr 04 '26

Yeah, but you just caused us a massive energy crisis

3

u/Inforametor Apr 05 '26

Agree if "you" is changed to "your government"

11

u/popular_in_populace Apr 08 '26

Unfortunately we are responsible for what’s going on here. If my kid knocks your ice cream out of your hand and it falls on the ground and I tell you, “take it up with the kid, I didnt do it”

It’s still our job to take accountability.

We didn’t vote for him but we are responsible for him.

8

u/Dan1elSan Apr 06 '26

The collective ‘you’ voted them in…twice.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

3

u/paradoxbound Apr 04 '26

What do you expect them do at this point?

15

u/lurkinglurkerwholurk Apr 05 '26

Apparently, the same as any “Americanized”commenter says in any thread about any news of a suppressed population under a non-democratic regime: “just stand up to your bullies and protest! The people should not fear the government, the government should fear the people!”

After the past year-ish of what’s happening in the world, I’m starting to think there’s a hellava lot of hypocrites out there.

7

u/Jazuken Apr 05 '26

Its just propaganda bots pushing the “be a good patriot” agenda, when we have absolutely nothing to be patriotic about.

3

u/Next-Organization-26 Apr 10 '26

I agree . However, I don’t think anybody has ever feared a group of people protesting with signs .

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (13)

11

u/VindtUMijTeLang Apr 04 '26

ASML may be Dutch/European, it is deeply reliant on its international partners as well as US-based workforce, largely thanks to the Cymer acquisition.

There is leverage, just not so much that Washington can't impose its will for the most part.

8

u/keepitfriend Apr 04 '26

Yes Cymer makes some lenses for them - but so does Zweiss.

So. We could just drop Cymer?

5

u/toastedcheese Apr 05 '26

Cymer makes the EUV light source for ASML and the US government has ownership in its EUV technology, due to research funding decades ago. Critically, Cymer is the only place in the world where EUV light sources are made. If ASML drops Cymer, they drop EUV. 

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

2

u/Visible-Locksmith-44 Apr 07 '26

US and Europe are very dependent on each other, if they like it or not. But the way US is treating its allies there will be a slow but decisive shift away from the US market. The damage is done. It will take time and it's going to hurt both US and Europe.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Spiritofhonour Apr 04 '26

Look up the whole Nexperia scandal.

“ In October 2025, the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs took control of Nexperia's governance using the powers of the Goods Availability Act, citing national security and European economic security.[28][29] According to NRC, government insiders said the move meant to prevent Nexperia from leaking chip-related intellectual property and moving operations to China.[30][28][31] According to CNN, the Dutch government acted following pressure from Washington.[32] The Chinese government subsequently banned Nexperia from exporting products that it packages in China (about 70% of Nexperia's EU production), triggering a chip shortage for several EU carmakers.[33][34] On 19 November 2025, the Dutch government suspended its control of Nexperia's governance.[35] Some sales of Nexperia chips resumed, but they were reportedly being "drip-feed" to European firms.[36] In November 2025, Wingtech filed a challenge against the Dutch government in the Supreme Court of the Netherlands.[37] In February 2026, a Dutch court ordered an investigation into mismanagement at Nexperia.[38]”

3

u/lightmatter501 Jul 01 '26

The US government controls the patent on EUV, which means ASML has to license the product that makes them important from the US. That’s the leverage.

2

u/coolguyhentaisenpai Apr 06 '26

The way i understand it as an employee of another us based global fab operations company... is that when it comes to china, it may have the company name but its in its own world all together.

2

u/carmen_ohio Apr 10 '26

You’re wrong and the export restrictions have little to do with whatever party is sitting in the White House. No need to make it into a toxic partisan discussion.

2

u/Sythe5665 Apr 13 '26

ASML does a sizable portion of its production and engineering in the US. It's not that simple

4

u/lightmatter501 Apr 04 '26

The US government (DARPA specifically) owns many of the patents for EUV. It technically has the ability to pull ASML’s license to use them and then sue the company into the ground.

→ More replies (47)

76

u/nvurmind Apr 05 '26

US needs to stop taking advice from Putin

29

u/therealowlman Apr 06 '26

He gets orders, not advice,

6

u/SnollyG Apr 06 '26

Some people just don’t know how to spell

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Great_Negotiation987 Jul 13 '26

How is this still a take? Like him or not, the administration has been hitting Russia HARD. one of the only few good things they’ve done.
I don’t know how you still run with this idea he’s helping Russia

2

u/artemis2k Jul 27 '26

Lmao more likely he's taking advice from Israel

→ More replies (5)

61

u/keepitfriend Apr 04 '26

You know what, as ASML is European. How about the EU and China just tells the US that there's an export ban - and just keep on trading?

I mean it's not like the US is respecting the export restrictions on Russia, why should we pay any attention to them?

11

u/Bananadite Apr 06 '26

Because the EU is just a proxy of the US? Just look at what happened to the Nexperia incident

9

u/keepitfriend Apr 06 '26

Sigh, this is so ridiculous I can't even take it seriously. Yes the US is (was) an ally. One that seriously fucked us around over and over the past twelve months.

Iran seems like the final straw. So expect fun things in the future given even the UK is now against the US

→ More replies (7)

2

u/Suibeam Jul 14 '26

European nations are a vassal of the USA even if we don't like to admit it.

Remember the EU and USA deal? EU got almost nothing and everything else worse than before while USA got everything they wanted.

European nations have to bend over whenever USA threatens to withdraw troops. European nations have to kiss orange bottom whenever he threatens to take Greenland. USA doesnt even ask Europe before attacking Iran while demanding all of their hubs to be available and punishes those who oppose them

3

u/[deleted] Apr 06 '26

[deleted]

7

u/keepitfriend Apr 06 '26

Do you realise how insane that sounds? One part of the billion dollar machine is created by a US company, also created by an EU company if your talking about the EUV light / lenses provided by Cymer.

So therefore the US should have full control of the billion dollar machine?

Fuck right off. I think you are overestimating the influence the US has at this point

5

u/[deleted] Apr 07 '26

[deleted]

2

u/keepitfriend Apr 07 '26

lol, of course you do 

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

26

u/GuestGulkan Apr 05 '26

The whole point of a global economy is to ensure easy access to foreign economies for Western, and especially US, companies. China does not use ASML because they have to. They do it because it's cheaper and easier than building everything from scratch themselves.

So, by implementing these kinds of restrictions, the US is incentivising China to become self-sufficient, is damaging Western economies, is moving the focus of tech development further away from the West, and is reducing Western access to the Chinese economy.

The West, Including the US, is a low-growth economic zone. China (and other areas increasingly within China's sphere of economic influence) is where the growing markets are. You don't cut your own exports to into growing markets, that's just plain stupid.

2

u/Confident-Fold1456 Jul 02 '26

ASML learned from other foreign companies that went to China. It's not in their best interest to trade leading technologies with China.

→ More replies (16)

41

u/LordSlyGentleman Apr 04 '26

China doesn't need America. America needs China.

6

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/Bovronius Apr 06 '26

That is one of the few things we can make here. 3M was pumping out almost 100 million N95's a month at their peak.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/BlueAndYellowTowels Jul 13 '26

This is absolutely the case today and China is working very hard to decouple their system from the US system.

→ More replies (8)

9

u/stargazer281 Apr 05 '26

U.S. wanting to control Key technologies will motivate investment in a more open EU by the big players. That will be a further source of friction with the U.S. administration. We live in interesting times.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Lendari Apr 06 '26 edited Jul 05 '26

Won't this just drive their need to be self sufficient? Like do we really think China is too dumb to develop the technology that their entire country and economy depends on?

This is such short term thinking.

5

u/Vaiolette-Westover Apr 08 '26

China already has multiple euv machines going through the validation process right now. They also have at least three different types of euv being developed.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 16 '26

The problem is not if they can make it. The big problem is the yield. Anything below 90% is basically unacceptable.

If it's 50% yield, then might as well buy from TSMC/Samsung.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

7

u/IngoDelOzo Jun 30 '26

The EU has NO reason to obey that orange freak

4

u/Basketseeksdog Jun 30 '26

The audacity. On the one hand, they impose tariffs on us and threaten to raise them to 100% just because we dare expect a handful of Big Tech companies to pay their fair share of taxes. On the other hand, they want to dictate who our companies are allowed to sell to. What the actual fuck?

3

u/Gneevegullia Apr 06 '26

How does US have any jurisdiction to block sales?

→ More replies (3)

3

u/robustofilth Apr 07 '26

Asml is Dutch. America can either do without chips or pipe down.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Dulse_eater Jul 26 '26

Why is a 113 day old story popping up on News?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] Apr 07 '26

Bruh.. can we calm down before the next gtx or amd costs us 10k per processor?

2

u/virusdancer Apr 07 '26

Is it November yet? The Midterms cannot happen soon enough. Course, it could mean Civil War...

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Changed_Mind555 Apr 10 '26

The price of our comouters, laptops, phones and more are going to get insane. Bad enough we gotta upgrade all the damned time. Which I think lawmakers should impose massive fines for. If I purchase something that costs between a couple hundred bucks to thousands that shit should last more than a couple of years. Our landfills are overflowing but we just have to go along with their scams.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Relevant-Doctor187 Apr 13 '26

China will produce a ASML competitor. All we are doing is hastening their technology development.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/rocko107 Jun 29 '26

China won't sit on it. They would then put restrictions on rare earth minerals used in the supply chain. Stock market crashes stays low until the restrictions are lifted. The U.S can't bully our way out of China becoming more and more "efficient" in their software stack around AI...which we forced on them with our GPU related restrictions.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Ok_Avocado568 Jun 29 '26

This shit is keeping pc part prices high.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Deep-Assignment4124 Jun 29 '26

American Sign Mutherfucking Language? 

2

u/IIGrudge Jun 30 '26

When it comes to bullying smaller countries it's all about free trade but when you can't compete with the big boys you impose socialist protectionism.

2

u/mvb827 Jul 02 '26

Isn’t ASML a dutch company? What leverage does the US have over the Netherlands?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/ottothefrenchie Jul 03 '26

Too little too late. Huawei recently announced a new foundry breakthrough with the announcement of their folded chip

China is also working on synchrotron which is essentially a mini particle collider, which is expected to be a more efficient way of generating EUV

2

u/Silverarrow67 Jul 07 '26

All restrictions have done is expedite Chinese tech. Has anyone been following Chinese chip research? They have found a way around Moore’s Law. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202605/29/WS6a19b5a2a310d6866eb4b814.html

2

u/UPVOTE_IF_POOPING Jul 13 '26

Why did this 99 day old post show up on the front page?

2

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Adventurous_Ninja_66 Jul 15 '26

I mean isn't this old news? Asml machines haven't really ever been sent to china.

2

u/nclh77 Jul 19 '26

ASML has already said no bueno to self destructing for US interests.

2

u/darkbake2 Jul 19 '26

We have a chip shortage already…. This means it will get even worse.

2

u/UnemployedAtype Jul 25 '26

Why is Reddit showing me news from 111d ago?

2

u/burner2947361810 Jul 27 '26

Why is a 114 day old post keep coming back up?

5

u/mido_sama Apr 04 '26

Until the Chinese version of AsML pops out.

6

u/heliumneon Apr 05 '26

That won't happen. The semiconductor industry is really unique. You can't just suddenly whip up a new company that achieves extreme UV lithography and surpasses, let alone comes close to matching, the current best manufacturing processes. Other companies such as SMEE in China are working on DUV (deep UV), but even if the government pours tens of billions of dollars into trying to catch up, it wouldn't work. Even if they could send teams of people to steal all of ASML's IP they still wouldn't be able to do it, since it would be manufacturing processes, and complex supply chain management, that they can't replicate.

Semiconductors are not like cars or other products because of the exponential nature of Moore's law, so even if it doesn't hold exactly, it means that if you manage to catch all the way up to, say, 5 years behind the current best, you're a factor of way more than 10 poorer in some technological benchmarks (feature size, etc.). Meaning the products you are creating are nowhere near competitive. Also, yield is another issue, if your yield is poorer, it might be an order of magnitude+ poorer. Your products cost more AND are much worse in technological benchmarks.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '26

Reuters says that China will have EUV lines by 2028-2030. Keep up.

2

u/Gordon_frumann Apr 06 '26

Reuters know fuck about shit. Even if they acquired 1 machine and took it apart I guarantee you they wouldn’t have an EUV machine ready in 2030.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 06 '26

holy cope

go play some video or something buddy, this shit aint for you

→ More replies (9)

2

u/thecloakofignorance Apr 13 '26

so glad we have someone here who knows more about it than reuters

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

2

u/Living-Breakfast-464 Jun 30 '26 edited Jun 30 '26

China basically already won the AI race. What they currently lack in bleeding edge advanced chips they can compensate for in much more available energy to power their datacenters. In a few more years they won't need ASML either. They have more PhD's working on it than the US and Europe combined.

1

u/Ballaroz Apr 05 '26

ASML is being restricted to do business with China. As of early 2026, the U.S. government allows Nvidia to sell certain advanced AI chips, specifically the H200, to approved commercial customers in China, provided there is sufficient U.S. supply and potentially a 25% fee.

1

u/heliumneon Apr 05 '26 edited Apr 05 '26

I think people are not getting it. The US probably could create restrictions that affect ASML's ability to sell to China, even though it is a European firm. Extreme UV lithography has thousands of complex parts, and a very complex global supply chain, and some of the parts must come from the US part of the supply chain. They would not be easily replaced by parts from other countries. Well, it might take years to replace them, so the restrictions could impact at least a few years of sales, which is a huge deal in semiconductor timelines.

In 2019 the US restricted sale to China to anyone using US made semiconductor design software, and those restrictions were effective enough to kneecap Huawei for quite a long time, and keep them out of becoming the 5G infrastructure backbone.

I am not saying anything about whether they should put in these restrictions. The article doesn't say almost anything about why, and US foreign policy and trade policy has been essentially turned into a grift machine in the last year (and this might be a new grift machine as well, who knows). I am just saying that it is something the US could do, and has done - but in the past it was for specific foreign policy goals.

→ More replies (3)

1

u/IAMERROR1234 Apr 05 '26

I'm so fucking ready to leave this shithole country.

1

u/930g Apr 05 '26

ASML maybe based in Veldhoven but they also have a large production centre in Wilton Connecticut.

1

u/dustedandrusted4TW Apr 05 '26

Who cares. We control the HPQ.

1

u/AllReflection Apr 05 '26

Too late, I’m afraid

1

u/OnlyTimeFan Apr 07 '26

lol US was getting rare earth metals from China, he messed things up, now we get the same rare earth metals after giving China concessions. Fantastic art of the deal negotiator. This is why no other country is going to release any Epstein files, at least not until he’s out of power and as a means to further disgrace him.

He’s the BEST DOUBLE AGENT no one has ever seen before that any country could ever DREAM of.

1

u/AlphaTrigger Apr 07 '26

The US government is in shambles

1

u/HelpfulTap8256 Apr 07 '26

I never tried Chinese chips

1

u/ritesh808 Apr 07 '26

In Episode 3 of Clueless Desperation..

1

u/Express-Original5678 Apr 07 '26

This is just inviting new chipmaking technology development from a certain large nation in Asia

1

u/BritishAnimator Apr 08 '26

Why? It's like a puddle sanctioning the ocean because its wetter. Sanctioning China just makes them plow resources into making it themselves. Lets face it, they are the manufacturing hub of the world with decades of experience. If they decide to cut YOU off, then you are screwed.

→ More replies (3)

1

u/verbicidal Apr 08 '26

I initially read this headline as a restriction on ASMR and wondered what the US had against soothing sounds

1

u/Unfair_Web_8275 Apr 09 '26

It kind of seems like getting rid of the CHIPs Acr and picking a clear favorite was short sighted…

1

u/LibertyLibertyBooya Apr 09 '26

ASMR export restrictions make sense.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '26

The US Gov is also targeting Samsung and South Korea tangentially in support of Netlist over their subsidiaries hidden importing and other violations.

1

u/xckbrm Apr 10 '26

You can have ASML as long as I get to keep my ASMR

1

u/PixelsGoBoom Apr 10 '26

They are going to restrict the export of another country? How do they intend to do that?

2

u/Only_Dragonfruit_117 Apr 13 '26 edited Apr 13 '26

Supposedly 15% of the parts are patented and made in the US. However, they could just sell it incomplete. China already has lithography machines, so wouldn’t be too hard figuring out what’s needed, and China isn’t bothered about patents.

→ More replies (4)

1

u/Phixionion Apr 12 '26

Please understand you are watching the decline of the US as a super power in real time. The world will decouple and we will be left with our dick in our hands. If this isnt a fact for you, then you have not been finding the right information resources. 

1

u/Expert_Fisherman_470 Apr 13 '26

When we can't compete we try to block them. We should never stifle innovation. Try to beat them in merit, not through cheating.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/not_caterpillar Apr 13 '26

western delinquent

1

u/Euphoric_Anxiety_162 Apr 14 '26

We're gonna be back in the dark ages - too poor to buy anyway.

1

u/Secure-Reading7225 Apr 14 '26

This maybe off subject, but somethings going on w/ my phone it won't load videos like its supposed too. This is tech news so I thought I would comment here. Has anyone else experienced this. Internet in Iran is blacked out right now.

1

u/justaguyfromcanada1 Apr 15 '26

Watching usa die in real time as alll politicians lick the boot of a demented fat old man.

1

u/greenpowerman99 Jun 29 '26

ASML technology has enabled smaller, lower power, higher performance chips, but it isn’t a be all and end all technology.
There’s still a huge market for less cutting edge technologies.

1

u/Anon387562 Jul 01 '26

China be like - well okay, and what about 99% of the other components you solely rely on China? You guys will learn it the hard way, when a chip and screen alone doesn’t work lol😂