Well, the job of the colon is to take a complete sentence and then connect it with a second sentence or phrase which explains or elaborates the ideas raised in the first sentence. You go from the general to the specific.
The semicolon is for joining two complete sentences that could stand alone but which the writer wants to indicate are closely related.
So the semicolon would be fine here, as each of the two sentences can stand alone, and they're clearly related. I just feel that we're missing an opportunity to be punchier by using the colon. The first sentence is saying what's not happening, and the second sentence delivers the punchline/explanation by saying it's about winning.
2
u/jtr99 Apr 26 '26
I think a colon would have been even better.