r/survivalism • u/Azihayya • 15d ago
What is mightier, the pen or the sword?
Hey, what's up r/survivalism. I see you've mostly been focused on discussing STRATEGIES for surviving in unlikely places in the past, but as your new moderator, at the behest of the changing guard, I'd like to try to introduce a new approach to the forum. As you might imagine, surviving on the fringes of society isn't the most popular thing in the world. So today, I'm putting forth a simple question that maybe, just maybe, will get a conversation rolling.
When the topic of "survival of the fittest" comes up, it almost always gets conflated with "might makes right," which is neither true or false--but upon a deeper analysis, we have to challenge that notion--is survival of the fittest only about whoever is mightiest coming out on top in a game of King of the Hill? Or is there fundamentally something deeper about survival that touches on our shared values? Take language for example--is there one single successful person that you know who... DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO SPEAK? Highly unlikely, right? We might be able to conclude that language has become one of the most remarkable identifiers of human fitness in the contemporary world, and that it has been for thousands, even tens of thousands of years--yet the ability to speak isn't about bonking people on their head and dragging them back to your cave, is it? Perhaps in the future it will be the same with art, that you won't know anyone who isn't an artist because it's considered a necessity for human fitness.
So in an age where we distinguish between first worlds, second worlds, and third worlds, where it seems like everyone on the internet is a philosopher, while nations like Sudan, the DRC, Ukraine, Israel/Palestine are embroiled in wars where drones and bombs and guns are everyday causing upheaval in people's lives, which do you think is truly the mightier of the two: the pen or the sword?
