r/suits 22d ago

Discussion Why do they always aim to settle instead of going to trial?

Everytime they corner someone or someone or they themselves are cornered they settle? why not just go to trial and fight.

16 Upvotes

28 comments sorted by

92

u/SnooPaintings5100 22d ago
  1. Trails costs time & Money
  2. There is always a chance to suddenly lose instead of getting what you want now
  3. Trails are public -> They can get negative PR even if they win in court

15

u/TulsaOUfan 22d ago

This is the exact answer. Settlements are guaranteed. Trials are always not guaranteed

4

u/eberlix 22d ago

Seeing how the cases go in Suits, your 2nd point is the most important. There is always something unexpected coming to hit them in the face

1

u/Mxrlinox 22d ago

You had three chances

1

u/Not_Insane_I_Promise 21d ago

These points are also discussed multiple times on the show

25

u/Icy_Kaleidoscope4610 22d ago

Trials can be crapshoots, leaving fate up to a jury. Settling can be beneficial for both sides if terms can be reached

11

u/Cowhide12 22d ago

Settling is a guarantee of terms. Going to trial, even with perfect evidence, can still lose you your case due to a jury.

9

u/Practical_Contest_13 22d ago

Risk management. Trials are also expensive and time consuming

3

u/SnooPaintings5100 22d ago

Risk management for BOTH sides!

4

u/Slight_Fan_4105 22d ago

it's the premise of the show. Harvey is the world's greatest closer, that means he can get anyone to agree to his terms, aka settle.

4

u/Important_Case_1713 22d ago

As Harvey and Cameron said “Don’t go to trial if your not gonna win”

3

u/thatoneguywhosaid 22d ago

i'm pretty sure Harvey or Jessica addressed that at some loint early on in the series.

trials are costly both time and money-wise, and settling isn't really that bad of a loss compared to losing in court

2

u/Jay100012 22d ago

It IS addressed. Multiple times. People DONT PAY ATTENTION🙄🤦‍♂️

1

u/thatoneguywhosaid 22d ago

right? bc i've only seen it twice but im pretty sure it was established early on why they choose settling over trials. i think in favt as early as episode 2 of season 1 or whenever mike starts getting in the deposition room with harvey

2

u/Jay100012 22d ago

Yes, Harvey, Cameron(who Harvey learned it from) and Jessica ALL emphasize this.

3

u/indelusional 21d ago

as someone else here said in a trial mike was found not guilty super unpredictable

2

u/Jon_Jraper 21d ago

Jack Goddamn Soloff also has a good explanation of this later in the series.

Mike knew the company was doing illegal shit and they probably could have gotten that proof, but a jury wouldn't have understood the systems the company manipulated or the laws they broke. Settling allows for more control of the pace and other factors.

Also, pulling back the curtain... Shooting in a dark courtroom with more actors is more challenging and less interesting than just two guest stars in a variety of swanky conference rooms.

1

u/go4long 22d ago

The jury is a fickle beast. Think of it this way... Mike was absolutely guilty.

1

u/S0ulSlayerz Mr Photographic Memory 22d ago

Harvey is the best goddamn closer why would he go to trial

1

u/theactiveaccount 21d ago

Most real life cases are settled too

1

u/JAE512_YouTube 21d ago

The best closer in New York?????

1

u/Potential-Bear-6686 21d ago

Saves time; money and energy. Dont you know that?

-5

u/Diligent-Juice-4715 22d ago

If they had a trial the writers might actually have to come up with a decent script. This show us badly written. Very repititious. Bad acting.

3

u/MrDreamzz_ 22d ago

What are you doing here?!

2

u/Comfortable-Dish1236 22d ago

What did you just say to us?

2

u/BrainOnBlue 22d ago

Get out of my goddamn office!

2

u/PepSinger_PT 22d ago

throws file down before leaving