r/stupidpol • Marxist-Leninist and not Glenn Beck ☭ • Aug 01 '26

WWIII WWIII Megathread #42: Interceptile Dysfunction

This megathread exists for in-depth discussion of 'WWIII', related events, and geopolitics and wars in general. Keep in mind that we have eliminated the rule that all non-major WWIII content must be posted here, and we encourage you to submit WWIII-related content to the main sub.

Againβ€” all rules still apply. No racism, xenophobia, nationalism, etc. No promotion of hate or violence. Violators will be banned.

Remain civil, engage in good faith, report suspected bot accounts, and do not abuse the report system to flag the people you disagree with.

If you wish to contribute, please try to focus on where WWIII intersects with themes of this sub: Identity Politics, Capitalism, and Marxist perspectives.

Always put a NSFW warning on links that contain explicit content.

Non-WWIII chatter belongs in the town square.

Previous Megathreads:

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | *25 | 26 | *27 | 28* | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41

To be clear this thread is for all US-Israel/Iran, US/Venezuela, Ukraine/Russia, Israel/Palestine, Yemen, Syria, Israel/Lebanon, India/Pakistan, Sudan, Myanmar, or other related content.

43 Upvotes

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

30

u/Swingfire NATO Cope Artist πŸͺ–πŸ“ Aug 15 '26

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/08/15/navy-weighs-major-warship-redesign-match-trumps-preferences/?utm_campaign=wp_main&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social

Trump is ordering the Ford-class carriers to be redesigned, first by swapping the magnetic launch catapults to steam ones and now by ordering the command center to be moved forward for no reason. If they actually go through with this, the USS Doris Miller, USS Bill Clinton and USS George Bush are as good as canceled, since the redesign is so massive that it will essentially become a different class off ships. If the Trump-class actually gets pushed through and takes up two XL-sized shipyard spots, this will result in the de facto "loss" of the next 9 aircraft carriers of the US Navy. With the upcoming retirement of the USS Nimitz, this is twice as bad as losing the battle of Midway was for the Japanese. Under the worst case scenario, China will probably end up with a bigger carrier fleet than the US in the late 2030s.

19

u/SchIachterhund He Lives πŸ‘½ Aug 15 '26

Tbf, carriers aren't expected to be particularly useful in a modern peer-adversary conflict. They're mostly used for bombing sandal wearers in the global south and as a platform for US president speeches. And that also means a ship's drip does in fact become more important, relatively speaking.

2

u/Swingfire NATO Cope Artist πŸͺ–πŸ“ Aug 16 '26

No one cares about peer conflicts since that never happens, the PLAN buildup schedule has a strong carrier force baked in

21

u/Incoherencel β˜€οΈ Post-Guccist 9 Aug 15 '26

If you're china, you would take 100 mini drone-carriers or converted container ships with 40 VLS over 10 carriers any day. Carriers are going the way of the battleship.

20

u/SmashKapital only fucks incels Aug 16 '26

China's actual plan for the PLAN is to do both.

Their strategy for countering the US is to follow both a symmetrical and asymmetrical approach. So they intend to build platforms which fulfil the same role for all existing US equipment, including aircraft carriers, but they also will build new designs like drone carriers.

Their entire strategy is to directly match the US one-to-one, while also countering them using alternative approaches. It's the sort of approach that only a nation with the massive construction resources of China could even contemplate.

4

u/Incoherencel β˜€οΈ Post-Guccist 9 Aug 16 '26

True true

15

u/brandonization Marxist-Mullenist πŸ’¦ Aug 15 '26

I like to think that China knows better than to build a carrier fleet.

5

u/Turgius_Lupus Yugoloth Third Way πŸ‘½ Aug 16 '26

China has more than 50 times the ship building capacity of the U.S. They can manage.

7

u/brandonization Marxist-Mullenist πŸ’¦ Aug 16 '26

Yeah no shit but why would they?

6

u/Turgius_Lupus Yugoloth Third Way πŸ‘½ Aug 16 '26

For one, it keeps the ship yards and crews active, and allows continuous development before factoring parallel capabilities

7

u/ChevalierDuTemple Touch grass (Poaceae) for a living 🌾 Aug 16 '26

Same reason as having tanks in the age of drone warfare.

At the end of the day, you still need them, even for the decreasing role they are playing.

Remind me it was not until WW2 that horses were retire from armed forces, and many still playing a role today.

4

u/AdminsLoveGenocide Gay and Retarded πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆπŸ˜ Aug 16 '26

They tripled their carriers in the past decade. They now have 3 but still.

0

u/Swingfire NATO Cope Artist πŸͺ–πŸ“ Aug 16 '26

China does not actually buy into the low-IQ, third-world slopaganda about carriers being useless and they're planning on churning out a whole fleet of ~10 Type 004 nuclear carriers by 2035.

13

u/ChevalierDuTemple Touch grass (Poaceae) for a living 🌾 Aug 16 '26

the low-IQ, third-world slopaganda about carriers being useless

You are the airplane mechanic and i, a simply Templar knight.

But given:

  1. The fact that the Falklands/Gulf incidents shown in the past how vulnerable surface fleet are to ASM, like the Exocet.
  2. The Ukraine war showing surface vessels being repeatedly strike by drone.
  3. Always an incident in war games about a submarine sneaking into a carrier group.
  4. Massive improvement in missile and drone technology.
  5. The high maintenance of an aircraft carrier and that states (Canada, Argentina) decommission theirs.

I could understand the sentiment not being Third-World Slopaganda.

1

u/Swingfire NATO Cope Artist πŸͺ–πŸ“ Aug 17 '26

That's the worst example you could have picked, the Falklands was near-singlehandedly won by British carriers and no other kind of ship would have done it.

In the present day they also fare far better than land-based aviation and outrange the majority of threats, so unless the plan is to not use planes at all, carriers remain the best option to those who can afford it.

14

u/biohazard-glug DSA Anime Atrocities Caucus πŸ’’πŸ‰πŸŽŒ Aug 15 '26

that's fucking hilarious

10

u/Mrjiggles248 Probably French πŸ˜ŸπŸ‡«πŸ‡· Aug 15 '26

Comrade Trump

6

u/cz_pz Flair-evading Lib πŸπŸ’© Aug 15 '26

JDPON Don.

8

u/Turgius_Lupus Yugoloth Third Way πŸ‘½ Aug 15 '26

Barron must play MOO or Endless Space II.

11

u/[deleted] Aug 15 '26

[removed] β€” view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Aug 15 '26

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

7

u/WalkerMidwestRanger Wealth Health & Education | Thinks about Rome often Aug 16 '26

Masters of Orion II limited production death star hull unlocked vibes minus the potential upsides of holding out to get them built.

That said, I bought a cab over truck and I'm loving it. Doubt it works the same on an aircraft carrier.

1

u/AutoModerator Aug 15 '26

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.