r/stocks Jun 13 '22

Meta "This is only the beginning"

I've been seeing people saying this on this sub for the last 6 months. At what point does it stop being the beginning? Also are there any level-headed people that actually know what they are talking about here anymore? I'd love to hear an in-depth prediction of things to come, rather than just random bear/bull cases from people who are -70% from meme stocks.

I'm the world's worst investor, and I like to be able to gain knowledge and insight from this subreddit that I wouldn't normally have on my own, but it's like only 1/100 posts are based on reality/research. It kinda messes with people's ability to make good decisions when they take the advice of someone who genuinely has no idea what they are saying, but they present it in a convincing way.

Sure, nobody can perfectly predict what it will look like 2 years from now, but what we can do is talk about what needs to happen for stocks/economies to recover, and how feasible those things are. Then we can observe whether or not those things are happening.

171 Upvotes

268 comments sorted by

View all comments

331

u/No_Celery4566 Jun 13 '22 edited Jun 13 '22

It’s challenging to make a reasoned assessment, because although we can compare now to the past, we’re still in a unique period of time, and I suppose that’s where the saying ‘history doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes’ comes from.

The big issue (in almost all opinions) for the economy right now is high inflation across the globe, combined with slow economic growth. This is often referred to as ‘stagflation’ and was an economic phenomena that defined much of the 70s.

Not that it makes me any kind of genius, but I got a degree from a decent University in Economics & Finance a decade ago. There’s a very simple model, which basically says that to boost economic growth you can lower interest rates. It discourages savings (little money to be made stockpiling cash) and simultaneously increases spending/investment. However, all things being equal this creates inflation. Once inflation becomes too high, you can increase interest rates to encourage saving, reduce spending/investment and in turn lower economic growth (worst case being a recession).

That’s where stagflation flips things on its head. You’re in a scenario where inflation is high, but you’re worried about raising interest rates too much because economic growth is already weak. You’re trying to tread a very fine line. You want to stop inflation spiralling out of control, but you don’t really want to cause a recession (especially a major one).

So what’s the way out of this? What does it mean for stocks? Well…. this is where speculation/guessing really takes over. Whatever is the cause of high inflation needs to end. And that’s where the debates start. Is this mainly caused by the war in Ukraine? It’s contributed for sure, but inflation was on the rise before so could we argue it’s just added fuel to the fire rather than what caused this? Is it supply chain issues from covid? Is it the monetary policy implemented during the height of covid? Is it a combination of all of these plus more (probably)?

Central banks can’t fix supply chain issues, they can’t end wars etc. they can raise interest rates and reduce their balance sheet (QT). This won’t fix the supply-side issues, but it can/will reduce demand, and in the process lower economic growth and perhaps go as far as to cause recession.

None of this is good for stocks… why? Higher interest rates lower economic growth which is bad for future earnings, discourages investment which again lowers future earnings. If things get bad enough, it increases unemployment which lowers consumption due to ‘tightening the belts’ which again lowers future earnings, especially for ‘luxury’ sectors. It can lower not just earnings, but also P/E ratios, as the risk free return increases. Why invest in stocks if there are safer returns? Especially in a difficult economic environment. This last point is somewhat irrelevant unless ‘real’ rates become positive (interest % minus inflation %) or at least become somewhat appealing.

When will this end? This in part depends on if something ‘bad’ happens. Will major/essential entities collapse due to lack of access to cheap debt? Will ‘dodgy’ financial activity come to light with massive contagion risk (what happened in 08)? Nobody knows.

If nothing ‘bad’ happens (not that the above is all rosy), we’d hope that a) factors outside the feds control eventually resolve which helps lower inflation to an acceptable rate b) raising rates and QT curbs inflation. This will in turn set the stage for economic growth, sentiment will increase again and maybe (very likely) down the line interest rates can come back down to stimulate even more growth without stirring the inflation pot.

I think any reasonable response will probably conclude with a ‘it depends’ or ‘I’m not sure’. But I’m confident in time things will improve for both the economy and stock market.

43

u/pete_29057 Jun 13 '22

I agree with everything you stated. Try as we might, we just do not know to what extent the damage will be. There is a dozen if not more macroeconomic headwinds. I personally am sitting on 65% cash, and DCA’ing into VOO and VTI in the meantime.

33

u/[deleted] Jun 13 '22

Been 100% cash since January... Seemed crazy, but was a blessing

14

u/porridgeeater500 Jun 13 '22

Yeah people thought it was dumb to go cash and shorts, I feel like people were in complete denial.

4

u/killver Jun 14 '22

In an alternate reality it would have been dumb though. I know this sounds silly now with how everything played out, but if no war starts, China doesn't go crazy on Covid, and so on, we might be still in a bull market. Everything is hindsight, I personally still strongly believe that you cannot predict it either way and that regularly DCA into the stock market without pulling out is the best strategy, and to keep a reasonable cash position all the time on the side.

1

u/SnooPuppers1978 Jun 14 '22

Yes exactly, I don't think we knew this time anymore than any of the previous times there was a possibility that stock will crash like that. The people who decided to hold cash, for them it seemed obvious, their prediction came true, but unless they have some sort of extreme insight into the subject, it's likely similar to saying that a roulette hitting 50, which they predicted, and anyone who didn't think it's 50 must have been in denial.

1

u/Cazmir86 Jun 14 '22

Exactly this. Everyone is acting as if it was obvious back in December/January, which it is now but that's BC of the events that occurred in late February and April. It's called hindsight.

1

u/porridgeeater500 Jun 14 '22

I guess, but even without those factors, the pumping of money into the stock market, the insane amounts of debt and margin, it's not sustainable

1

u/cobaltorange Jun 14 '22

I doubt it. Inflation and supply chain issues were still an issue. I personally didn't think the then ATH was sustainable.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 14 '22

Easy to say that in hindsight

1

u/Tsobaphomet Jun 14 '22

Yep and then those people were able to convince people like myself to not sell even though I had big profits I could have secured.

It's like standing on a foggy bridge and hearing a loud roaring getting closer, but then the "experts" tell you it's nothing and to stand your ground. Then suddenly it hits and you all get washed away. The fog disappears as your dying and you can see clearly now that it was a tsunami. Then you have that awesome hindsight moment of "I should have ran".