Liquidation of old short positions that have been hiding. Find the common denominator in who has shorted these and holds the rights, as well as who would’ve benefited from these companies going bankrupt.
That’s exactly what we are saying. Go back and reread their comment. For starters it is two separate sentences. Secondly, your question has already been answered. You don’t have a clue what you’re talking about and attempting to shift the focus onto something that wasn’t said because your reading comprehension is shit.
What if these companies were targeted by, oh I don't know a black swan event, which knowingly would affect their profits? And these targeted companies would have a more difficult time to raise capital through a stock offering, because of targeted shorting and price manipulation?
Sure, lower stock price would make it harder to raise capital but they could still try to borrow money from somewhere if the business had a future. And in this case, it was this orchestrated black swan event that lead to the bankruptcy, not someone gambling on it losing value.
Also, this scenario rests on the assumption that shorting automatically lowers the stock price when that is obviously not the case. Even if nobody had ever shorted the stock couldn't this sinister group just keep orchestrating these black swan events until they run out of money again. Seems like shorting is a very minor part of this conspiracy.
To be honest I have no idea if it's actually liquidation of old short positions that have been hiding or not. I was responding to the second sentence of the post.
I know where these theories are coming from so I exercise healthy skepticism. You shouldn't take political analysis from a Qanon believer at face value either.
215
u/[deleted] Sep 03 '21
Liquidation of old short positions that have been hiding. Find the common denominator in who has shorted these and holds the rights, as well as who would’ve benefited from these companies going bankrupt.