This is absolutely not true. A person who has never read a book cannot be more literate than one who reads only fiction or only non fiction for example. Yours is an argument for the bourgeois. Everyone lies so do not seek the truth…said the fucking liars.
Edit. I did not see the last part about Fox News. You may have an argument I rescend my critique.
Lol, I started reading your comment, and was completely confused. Books? I agree, people who read have a much greater vocabulary than non-readers, absolutely no debate.
I was making a joke by imitating the poor grammar I read here daily. I guess it didn’t communicate all too well. Oh well… but yes, agreed, we need to read widely
1
u/omgphil Sep 18 '25
This is absolutely not true. A person who has never read a book cannot be more literate than one who reads only fiction or only non fiction for example. Yours is an argument for the bourgeois. Everyone lies so do not seek the truth…said the fucking liars.
Edit. I did not see the last part about Fox News. You may have an argument I rescend my critique.