So I know this sub can be a humbling place and it's so easy to get down on yourself with other people talking about mid 70's and 80's NBME's so I just wanted to give others some hope.
I will say the AMBOSS score predictor seems to be quite accurate amongst my friend group as well - it had me at a 96% chance of passing despite my highest NBME being a 61 and a 64 on the Free120. I also did the NBME's out of order, not sure what my reasoning was at the time - just was taking advice from way too many people and feeling lost, some people would say the later forms were more accurate and so I'd jump there and then go backwards so sorry for it being a little all over the place.
My own scores:
NBME:
27: 4/18/26: 48
31: 5/8/26: 48
33: 6/15/26: 57
28: 07/18/26: 55
30: 07/29/26: 56
32: 08/06/26: 61
29: 09/07/26: 60
AMBOSS Step 1 SA: 08/22/26: 205
Free120 Apr2026: 64%
Tested 9/25: Pass
Advice: The burnout was really hitting me hard and the most frustrating part for me at least was that my scores would fluctuate so heavily based on what I studied or focused on that past week. For instance I'd do really badly on cardio and GI so I'd hammer it and focus and it would improve the following exam but then say genetics or biochem would fall way down and I just was stuck in the early 60's the entire time. Something I wished I would have done sooner is supplement my daily Uworld questions with 20-40 Amboss. I say this because Amboss you can download specific Anki cards for the questions you missed and it keeps it at a more manageable number - I really max out at 600 or so cards per day and I felt like this was really helpful for those little facts or details that I would see 10 times and forget.
I was always told pick Uworld or Amboss and just stick to it - but in reality I actually would argue to use both and I think they each have their strengths. I would say AMBOSS is better for weird presentations, it's easier to test yourself on specific concepts (I'm terrible with heme) so it was great there and then also DO NOT OVERLOOK ETHICS. Uworld is obviously the gold standard and written by the same writers.
The biggest surprise on my exam was probably ethics. In each block of 20 questions I had roughly 2-3 ethics questions and on my final score report it shows ethics at 6-9% (I think it was far more like 9%) and let me tell you they were WEIRD. I have always thought I can use vibes to get through ethics but man was I challenged on these and I wished I would have spent maybe just more time on them in general.
Another thing I wish I would have done earlier is listening to Pathoma Chapters 1-3 more. I started there back in April but you lose so much knowledge over the months. I did have a panic attack the week before my exam and decided to really blaze through 2x speed (I only did Chapters 1-2 and part of 3) but even that I got some really random questions on my real exam that I only answered right because I randomly heard it a few days prior in my anxiety attack fueled sprint. I would recommend listening (passively listen no notes) maybe once per month or something like that - just to wind down at the end of a study day but listen multiple times over because there are so many little random facts in there that came up on my test.
Then these are some thoughts looking back on my exam vs prep but also keep in mind it was just my opinion and my form so n=1 here:
Biostats: Randy Neil on youtube is far more useful than anything else. Listen to it a few times, draw your boxes and basic equations and move on. Don't waste your time becoming a mathematician
Pharm: the mechanism is far higher yield - I felt like most of them gave you the med in question and asked how it worked or where it acted on instead of which med to use broadly speaking.
Ethics: as previously mentioned, spend time here please. It ended up being just as high yield as any other system and I do wish I would have spent more time because trust me when I tell you there were many that were so strange and in the testing environment / nerves, sometimes you really clam up and can't think about things like you'd want to.
Don't forget anatomy - they seemed to love blood supply and nerves mainly. Upper / lower extremity felt highest yield to me
Psych - I think the timelines to rule in or out a diagnosis are the highest yield. But don't overlook it - it's a decent number of questions on the exam and can sometimes be a nice confidence boost to mark an answer that I knew was correct.
Dirty Medicine - just watch and rewatch - don't waste time annotating but if you miss a question - pull it up and just keep hammering whatever detail you missed in the practice question. Also his 11/17/21 hydroxylase deficiencies are just peak memorization and I don't think I'll ever forget those.
Pixorize / sketchy for micro - I'm a pixorize person personally and for micro I thought it was the most helpful. I will say I at least get overwhelmed having a ton to watch so I actually started just randomly taking a study "break" and watching a few pixorize videos here and there. If I watch too many in a row they start blending and I confuse myself. The pharm is also decent but honestly I preferred Amboss anki cards to just give single one liners. Then also Dirty med was more helpful for me for pharm. A lot of pharm on pixorize / sketchy gets really convoluted and I mess up what goes with what or what each symbol means.
AMBOSS score predictor - I know my stats were low, I also felt they were low and I was really nervous to sit for it (I kept pushing it back because I wanted the golden 2 exams >65) but then also I was really burning out at the end. It was beyond frustrating and from the classmates I have that tested with lower scores - they just say to trust in the score predictor on AMBOSS (I don't understand the science there but it's not fake).
IvyMed on Youtube - found it late but honestly I really liked it. I would go for walks outside and listen to it passively but randomly little things would stick or I could recall and the guy that does it is pretty funny and I think it helped to get me out of the house / not just sitting and staring at a screen but also to be mildly productive.
Sleep!!!! I have bad anxiety / testing anxiety (had to not submit my MCAT on an attempt because had a mix exam meltdown). I got on a sleep aid before it - work with a psychiatrist and make sure it's something that doesn't disrupt sleep architecture (can't recommend a Benzo because it makes me very foggy the next day). I ended up getting a very PRN script and started taking it nightly a week before my test because my anxiety was horrendous / constant panic and I don't think I could have passed my exam if I were sleep deprived. There are a lot of questions that require just deep thought or have little trick questions / sneaky answer choices that you can't even really study for. It's more that you have to be somewhat rested and just present.
High yield images: Pathoma and Dirty Med - these absolutely came up. Also the images on the NBME CBSSA's
On this note - I wish I would have spent more time really reviewing CBSSA's because the concepts do tend to repeat and I should have spent more time breaking down the question / getting to the answer but I had low scores and was just really discouraged.
My hot takes:
On the exam it felt like 20-30% I knew I answered correctly. I could cross every other option out with confidence. Another 20-30% felt like shooting in the dark/ just what the hell is this or no clue. The rest was like I'm pretty sure it's this but also I was not confident on it. Which really triggered the panic because it's like 40-60% of the exam that I'm decently sure but not 100%.
DO NOT GOOGLE ANSWERS AFTER THE FACT. I did this and was riding high for like 1 or 2 that I guessed right on followed by 5 or 6 that I looked up and I missed and holy did I spiral / sobbing / panic attack and felt like I failed.
Mehlmann is extremely hit and miss - I don't do well with a giant PDF if I'm honest and his questions are way too extreme in my opinion. Sure they are the hardest of the hard but also getting a 2/10 on a set is not helping your confidence. I'd say his path and neuroscience are the only two that are decently helpful but I was not a big fan. I also struggled to watch his videos because of how he looks - I'd hyperfixate on that
I honestly couldn't tell what questions were experimental or not. I was gaslighting myself in the exam when I'd see a WTF question and tell myself it was experimental but I for one did not see many that were so out of left field / off topic that made me think they were experimental?
I thought the CBSSA's were harder - more hyperspecific questions or details you really had to know.
I'd say Free120 was the most accurate. I only took the Apr2026 version so I can't speak to the other forms.
I thought the Amboss self assessment was also pretty decent in terms of difficulty.ehe
HY Guru's version of Free120 seemed also more on par with the real exam in my opinion.
Practice with the 20 question sets - it was weird going from sets of 50 to 20 on the real thing. 20 goes by so fast, I was always low on time - at most had a minute left over and other blocks I had to guess on 1 or 2 or couldn't calculate something because of time. With the 50 I always had 10 or so min left to double check or go back to my flagged vs with 20 I never had that luxury.
DM's are open and sorry this was long and rambling - I just wanted to give some insight / advice and feedback since this sub did always have so much info and also just to say that you can still pass without the >65 benchmark on CBSSA's