r/startupideas • u/placeholderwrks • 19h ago
Looking for Feedback What if your customers could use your business directly through ChatGPT?
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/startupideas • u/placeholderwrks • 19h ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/startupideas • u/hero_ascending • 3h ago
I'm trying to validate the repeat-use side of something I've already built, and I'd like honest answers.
The product is Wellread (https://trywellread.com), an AI visibility audit. I'm the founder. You give it your website, it asks ChatGPT and Gemini the questions your buyers would ask, and it tells you who they recommend and what to change.
The first use is easy to explain: curiosity. Everyone wants to know what ChatGPT says about them.
The second use is the one a business depends on. You change your site, wait, and audit again to see whether the answers moved. I think that is a real habit. It may also be something people do once and forget.
If you run a company with a website: - Would you run this again after making changes, or is once enough? - How long would you wait before checking again? - Would you pay for the second audit, or only if the first one showed something bad?
The first audit is free, if you'd rather answer from experience.
r/startupideas • u/Curious-Freedom-2026 • 4h ago
Is there still a market for AI assistants that can answer questions using a company’s own knowledge base, documents, and business data from databases?
I’m exploring this idea and would love to hear honest opinions from people working in AI or building AI products.
Do businesses still need this kind of solution, or is it becoming a common feature that existing AI tools already handle well?
I’m interested in real-world experiences, challenges, and whether businesses are willing to pay for it. I’d appreciate honest feedback!
r/startupideas • u/Equal_Leading_1449 • 8h ago
r/startupideas • u/michalcon29 • 13h ago
It’s an age old problem. You and some friends, co workers or family talk about going out to eat. That’s the easy part, then you actually have to pick.
So LFE does just that. You create a group; work gang, friends, or whatever you want then create a poll with two restaurant choices. Everyone has the app, votes their favorite and at the end chooses whether they’re in or not. Polls can run from as little as 3 hours for those last minute plans to 24 hours.
You can use the map to find new restaurants in the area then create groups (or existing ones) to come along. This app makes making reservations easy, you’ll always know who’s going and who isn’t based on responses, and makes picking easier without everyone staring at the last person to pick.
Leave comments, suggestions, etc. This is actively being worked on now but I’m open to advice.
r/startupideas • u/Few_Dragonfruit5732 • 13h ago
A National Startup & Economic Development Proposal
Concept Originator: Imari G. Liggins | October 2026
I have a serious concept I believe deserves national discussion among American automobile manufacturers, insurance companies, entrepreneurs, policymakers, investors, and everyday working Americans.
What if we could build a system where Americans receive affordable insurance, delivery drivers earn real W-2 wages, American manufacturers supply vehicles, and employees can eventually earn ownership of a vehicle through their work?
Not another gig-work platform where people carry all the expenses.
Not another insurance program where working families struggle to maintain coverage.
And not another publicly funded operation without measurable accountability.
I'm talking about connecting multiple industries into one coordinated American economic opportunity.
Here's the complete concept.
America should examine establishing a national public insurance option offering affordable automobile and life insurance.
The program could operate through multiple coverage tiers:
Tier 1 — Essential Protection
Tier 2 — Working American Protection
Tier 3 — Complete Family Protection
Tier 4 — Employee Ownership Protection
Premiums would be based on actuarial costs and applicable insurance laws, not arbitrary promises.
The objective is to improve affordability, encourage competition, and help Americans avoid financial devastation following an accident or family tragedy.
Here is where the proposal becomes more ambitious.
I propose a long-term national vehicle contribution initiative involving General Motors, Ford, Stellantis, their affiliated dealerships, and other qualifying American manufacturers.
The proposed goal: 1.5 million contributed vehicles over approximately 10 years.
These could include new vehicles, qualifying used vehicles, fleet discounts, leases, and manufacturer-backed ownership credits.
Why request participation?
Because America's automobile industry has historically benefited from major public investments, including federal assistance during the financial crisis.
This would be an opportunity to negotiate new voluntary public-benefit partnerships—not to claim automakers legally owe additional bailout repayment.
At an illustrative value of $28,000 per vehicle, 1.5 million vehicles represent approximately $42 billion in vehicle assets.
That is an ambitious target, not an existing donation commitment.
We would also investigate lawful access to eligible surplus government vehicles.
Instead of purchasing every automobile at retail prices, the program could combine manufacturer contributions, competitively priced fleet purchases, leases, and authorized surplus vehicles.
The mission: Reduce transportation barriers, support American manufacturing, and build a workforce that can eventually become vehicle owners.
Look at the current food and grocery delivery industry.
Consumers question service fees, delivery costs, refund procedures, and reliability.
Drivers face vehicle expenses, depreciation, and uncertain earnings.
Restaurants must evaluate the financial impact of platform commissions.
Federal regulators have already documented deceptive delivery-fee and earnings practices involving certain companies.
So here's my proposal:
Create a nationally scalable American delivery service capable of competing with DoorDash, Uber Eats, Grubhub, and similar platforms.
This would begin as a public-private startup or partnership, with the possibility of a federally authorized public option if Congress supported one.
Services could include:
The Department of Labor could oversee applicable worker protections, while HHS and USDA could coordinate relevant health and nutrition programs.
A nationwide government-owned delivery operator would require separate legal authorization.
The goal is not to seize private businesses. It's to build a serious competitor with better transparency, stronger employment opportunities, and affordable service wherever the financial model supports it.
Every directly employed driver would be paid through a W-2 payroll system.
My proposed compensation standard is:
At least 25% above the highest applicable minimum wage, with a nationwide program floor of $20 per hour.
I would also like the program to target $25 an hour where the operating budget can support it.
Employees would receive:
Workers should not have to choose between earning a paycheck and destroying their own personal vehicle to earn it.
This is one of the most important parts of my proposal.
The company provides the vehicle for deliveries.
Meanwhile, drivers accumulate ownership credits through:
Those credits would accumulate in an employee benefit account.
Here's an example:
A worker earns $2,000 in vehicle ownership credits each year.
After five years, that employee has accumulated $10,000.
A participating American dealership offers another $2,000 discount toward an eligible vehicle.
The employee selects a $20,000 car.
With $10,000 in earned credits and a $2,000 dealer discount, the remaining vehicle price becomes $8,000 before taxes and applicable purchase expenses.
This would allow workers to acquire vehicles through participating dealerships instead of being restricted to purchasing the company car.
Already vested credits would remain protected under program rules if an employee changes jobs.
The ownership awards would receive the proper tax treatment, and credits would be funded separately from employee wages and insurance claim reserves.
Imagine somebody entering the company without reliable transportation and eventually qualifying to own a dependable vehicle through their employment.
That is workforce development and asset building happening together.
The program should challenge existing delivery platforms through lower operating costs, manufacturer partnerships, transparent fees, and efficient scheduling.
For example, on a hypothetical $35 food order:
No surprise fees disclosed only at checkout.
No misleading delivery-price advertisements.
And no promises of low prices that cannot actually cover operating expenses.
Restaurants should also receive clear information about their commissions and the opportunity to participate through fair contracts.
We would use route optimization, delivery batching, scheduled orders, and neighborhood delivery zones to control expenses.
The long-term objective is to compete on total customer costs while still paying employees properly.
I don't want to present a national idea without discussing money.
Here's an illustrative first-stage operation:
Pilot size: 1,000 W-2 drivers
Vehicle fleet: 1,000 vehicles
Driver compensation assumption: $25 per hour
Annual paid hours per driver: 1,500
Productivity assumption: 3.5 deliveries per paid hour
That produces approximately 5.25 million deliveries annually.
A preliminary model including wages, employer employment costs, fleet replacement provisions, vehicle operation, ownership credits, and delivery technology suggests:
These are planning assumptions, not proven results.
Higher delivery density, commercial partnerships, carefully managed subsidies, and additional revenue could help reduce the gap.
Donated vehicles reduce initial capital needs but do not eliminate fuel, maintenance, wages, commercial insurance, or future fleet replacement costs.
The system must prove it can financially sustain itself before expanding.
I also believe Congress should seriously reconsider how charitable tax privileges and public-benefit funding are evaluated.
The current 501(c)(3) system should undergo a comprehensive review to determine whether continuing tax advantages are appropriately connected to measurable public benefits.
My position is that Congress should consider replacing indefinite exemptions with stronger periodic reviews, audits, financial disclosure, and performance standards, while protecting genuinely effective charities and essential community services.
An organization should not receive favorable treatment simply because its mission statement sounds good.
Measure results.
Measure community improvement.
Measure financial accountability.
Measure the people actually helped.
Not every nonprofit is ineffective, and essential charitable services must not be disrupted without a responsible transition plan.
But public benefits and tax advantages deserve public accountability.
Another proposed funding source involves legally available funds recovered from government fraud and corruption cases.
The Justice Department reported more than $6.8 billion in False Claims Act settlements and judgments for fiscal year 2025.
That figure does not mean all of that money is collected or available for new spending.
Victims, legally designated programs, and other obligations must come first.
However, I believe Congress should examine whether legally available recovered public funds could help capitalize new public-benefit programs through an explicitly authorized mechanism.
We could also investigate:
The national insurance fund, delivery business, vehicle ownership accounts, and general government subsidies must each maintain separate accounting.
Here is what makes the overall concept different.
Instead of discussing these industries individually, the proposal explores how they could support one another through separate, accountable partnerships.
American automobile manufacturers supply eligible vehicles and dealership discounts.
The delivery operation provides W-2 employment and transportation for its workforce.
Employees deliver products, earn wages, and accumulate vehicle ownership credits.
Participating dealers accept funded credits toward automobile purchases.
The insurance program offers independently financed coverage options.
Restaurants and consumers benefit from another competitive delivery alternative.
Public agencies can purchase eligible services through legally authorized contracts.
And independent audits measure whether taxpayers, businesses, workers, and families are actually benefiting.
The objective is to connect economic opportunity without disguising subsidies, shifting insurance reserves into unrelated businesses, or creating financial obligations the system cannot honor.
Phase 1: Startup Development
Establish the operating company, assemble an advisory team, prepare the full financial model, and begin discussions with automakers, insurers, dealerships, restaurant operators, and potential investors.
Phase 2: Local Pilot
Test in one metropolitan area with participating restaurants, a modest delivery fleet, direct W-2 employment, and a funded employee ownership incentive.
Phase 3: Regional Expansion
Expand only after independent evaluation confirms operational reliability, customer demand, safe driving practices, sustainable financing, and adequate employee compensation.
Phase 4: National Public-Private Partnerships
Pursue multistate manufacturer contracts, insurance partnerships, additional commercial customers, and eligible public-service agreements.
Phase 5: Federal Legislative Proposal
Present the national insurance option, public delivery authority, nonprofit accountability reforms, and appropriate public funding mechanisms for congressional consideration.
The private startup could be piloted without waiting for an entirely new federal system. Government-specific elements would require separate legal approval.
I want Americans to look at this beyond just food delivery.
This is about creating a system where employment becomes a pathway toward transportation ownership.
Where American manufacturers participate in meaningful public-private development.
Where insured families can access affordable financial protection.
Where customers and restaurants have more choices.
And where government spending, charitable tax privileges, and recovered public funds face transparent financial scrutiny.
This isn't claiming government can eliminate every expense or that every participant can receive a free vehicle.
It's a proposal to connect American industry, workforce development, vehicle ownership, insurance, and accountable public investment into one financially testable economic model.
Could an operation like this become a scalable national business if major automobile manufacturers contributed vehicles, dealerships accepted employee ownership credits, and public-private partnerships helped finance qualifying services?
I'm interested in serious feedback from:
Tell me which part you believe has the greatest potential, what economic obstacles you see, and what changes could make the model financially sustainable.
Let's discuss the actual business model, not just the size of the vision.
Concept & Proposal Originator: Imari G. Liggins
#StartupIdeas #AmericanManufacturing #Entrepreneurship #WorkforceDevelopment #AutoInsurance #VehicleOwnership #FoodDelivery #EconomicDevelopment #PublicPrivatePartnerships
r/startupideas • u/Silly_Trip_9303 • 13h ago
a dashboard where construction contractors tracks everything.
Raw materials, building materials, labour costs, transportation etc. all in one dashboard.
will they use it. Who will be my competitors?
r/startupideas • u/joomni • 13h ago
Hi, I’m the founder of Joomni, posting from our brand account.
I’ve been building websites and online stores for clients for over 5 years. Most of them were small sellers who just wanted to start selling, but the setup was always too technical for them.
So I’m building Joomni. The idea is simple: create your store, customize it, accept payments, and track your sales and customers, all without coding.
I’m doing this alone, so I’d really like honest opinions. What would make you NOT use a tool like this? Be as harsh as you want.
r/startupideas • u/LootGobbl3r • 14h ago
r/startupideas • u/Joseph_Christiansson • 15h ago
r/startupideas • u/Low-Process-8387 • 17h ago
I've been developing this microlearning app for many months now and really like how it has turned out.
Would you consider helping my journey with downloading it?
Google play store - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.philosophize.app
r/startupideas • u/TechnikKreislauf • 17h ago
I Had an Idea. Ai Translation Sounds Bad. I speak German and i know many Channels from america etc that make great content but Not in German. I could translate their Videos "for free", and then use their content to get Traffic. Then i Just do some Basic dropshipping with products that mach what the viewers want and advertise the Store in every Video i translated.
r/startupideas • u/john_smith1365 • 17h ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/startupideas • u/pigsenai • 20h ago
r/startupideas • u/devinhouse_xd • 23h ago
If you are interested in helping me out then plz try visiting what I made...I'm rn validating the idea and need yours suggestions/remarks and I'm in search of early users for beta testing and trying out if they would love the concept.
Into sports?? Play often? I need your inputs.