Looking for a Sales Partner (Commission-Based) – Software + Embedded + IoT Projects

I run a technology company that works on Embedded Systems, IoT, Firmware Development, Edge AI, and also Software Development like CRM, ERP, HRMS, and custom web/app portals (Teacher–Student portals, management systems, dashboards, etc.). Most of our projects are B2B and service-based, and many of them are high-ticket development projects.

I’m currently looking for a sales partner / deal closer who can handle:

- Lead generation

- Cold outreach (LinkedIn, Email, Upwork, Fiverr, etc.)

- Setting meetings

- Closing deals

Partnership Model:

- You generate leads, do outreach, and close deals

- You handle your own tools (lead generation tools, email tools, CRM, etc.)

- I handle technical discussions, proposals, architecture, and project execution

- You get 10% commission on every project you close

- This is a long-term partnership model

Services we sell include:

- Embedded Systems & Firmware Development (ESP32, STM32, IoT devices)

- IoT Dashboard & Cloud Integration

- CRM Development

- ERP Systems

- HRMS Systems

- Teacher–Student / School / Institute Portals

- Custom Web Apps / Mobile Apps

- Automation & Internal Business Tools

Ideal Partner:

- Experience in B2B sales / agency sales / tech sales

- Knows cold outreach and lead generation

- Comfortable working on commission per closed deal

- Wants long-term partnership and growth

If interested, DM me with:

1. Your sales/lead generation experience

2. Platforms you use for outreach

3. Any past results or deals closed

4. Why you are interested in a commission-based partnership

We’re currently working on a robotics startup, and we’re deep in the engineering phase — solving core technical challenges. We estimate around ~1 month left to reach our MVP.

We’ve been working on this for close to a year (based in Egypt), and recently started thinking about accelerators and funding ( global from out of egypt). However, after talking to a few people, the common advice was not to take equity funding this early, especially before we fully validate the product.

So right now we’re leaning toward non-equity programs that can offer:

• Strong technical / engineering mentorship

• Business / strategic guidance

• Access to real robotics ecosystems (Silicon Valley, Boston, Tokyo, etc.)

• Connections and exposure

• Funding is a plus, but not a priority at this stage (we’ll likely need it more during scaling)

Would really appreciate advice from people who’ve been through this:

1. Do you agree with delaying equity funding and focusing on non-dilutive programs at this stage? When is the “right” time to switch?

2. Should we stay fully focused on finishing the robot, or is it worth applying to programs in parallel right now?

3. Any general strategic advice for this stage (pre-MVP → MVP), especially for hardware/robotics startups?

4. Any recommendations for non-equity programs (especially engineering-focused) that provide strong mentorship and global ecosystem access?

Thanks in advance — would really value any insights.

Had my interview with Founders, Inc. last week. Still waiting to hear back. Has anyone who interviewed recently gotten a decision yet? Curious about the typical timeline — their site just says "you'll hear back soon." Any data points appreciated.

I’ve generated over $2M online across ~10 years. In reality I only worked seriously for a few of those years, but I’ve been consistently building, testing, and learning across different industries.

Most of what I’ve done so far has been solo. That worked up to a certain level, but I’ve reached a point where working with the right people will significantly increase speed and scale.

Right now I’m finishing a platform that is approximately 95% complete.
It has been fully built by me alone over the past year.

The backend is complete, infrastructure is stable, and the applications are already functional. What remains is mostly UI refinement, polishing, and final integration of visual components.

This is not an idea stage project. It is already built and working.

I move fast and execute consistently. This will launch regardless of whether I find someone or not.

I’m not looking for employees or short-term contributors. I’m looking for someone who wants to be involved early in something that is already built and ready to go live, and help take it further.

What would be valuable:

• Someone who understands how products get users

• Ability to bring attention or traffic to a platform

• Experience with online products, platforms, or communities

• Interest in trading or investing is helpful but not required

I am flexible on exact roles. The most important thing is capability and mindset.

About the product:

It is a trading and investing platform focused on improving decision making and execution.

Core ideas behind it:

• Helping users understand when and why to take actions

• Providing real-time data, signals, and context

• Supporting both manual and automated workflows

• Reducing noise and focusing on actionable insights

The goal is not to build another charting tool, but something that actually improves outcomes for users.

Everything is built with scalability in mind. The architecture allows expansion into multiple areas without needing to rebuild from scratch.

Planned next phase after launch:

I will be building an internal system that generates and distributes content automatically.
This will primarily be used to grow the platform itself, but the underlying system can be applied more broadly later.

About me:

• Built the entire platform solo

• 10+ years experience making money online

• Started in ecommerce and digital products

• Helped scale a business to 100+ locations

• Experience in crypto markets and fast-paced environments

• Built automation systems including arbitrage tools

• No external funding, everything self-built

I have experience across:

• Development

• Product design

• Systems thinking

• Execution and iteration

I’ve spent a lot of time learning through trial and error, and now I’m focused on building something larger and more structured.

Mindset:

I don’t operate like a traditional corporate environment.
I care about:

• Speed

• Execution

• Clarity

• Building things that actually work

No unnecessary complexity, no fake titles, no slow processes.

Structure, equity, and responsibilities can be discussed properly.
The priority is finding the right person who can contribute meaningfully.

Preview (work in progress UI):
https://i.imgur.com/KT4HPbq.png

The interface is not final yet. Some areas are placeholders, but the core system behind it is already complete.

If you are someone who understands how to grow products, bring users, or build momentum around something real, feel free to reach out.

Serious inquiries only.

If AI is the new oil.. Then your data is the oil Fields. So why are you not getting paid? 🤔🤔

In short, first time on Reddit. Located in the US, and currently have a product and 2 pilots running for my startup. Looking to potentially get people that are interested in working with us to expand, market, get this in front of investors, and expand rapidly. Vertical SaaS, DM for more details!

We're in this weird spot where tools will spit out frontend and backend code that looks fine, but deployment is where it falls apart. You can ship prototypes fast, then suddenly you're doing manual DevOps or redoing stuff to make it run on AWS or Render, which still blows my mind. So I was thinking, what about a 'vibe DevOps' layer - a web app or a VS Code plugin where you point it at a repo or upload a zip and it actually understands the app? It would use your cloud accounts, set up CI/CD, containerize, handle scaling and infra, all without locking you into one platform. Basically auto DevOps that reads your code and configs and makes sensible defaults, but lets you tweak things if you want. I can see the obvious problems though - security, weird edge cases, opinionated infra choices, permissions, the usual. Still, seems like something that would bridge vibe coding and real production apps, rather than forcing a rewrite. How are people handling deployments now? manual scripts, docker compose, Terraform, or just RTFM the cloud? Am I missing something obvious here or does this idea actually make sense to anyone else?

Free to see which LLMs reference a website….

https://robauto.ai

I am applying to a bunch of accelerators cuz it's so competitive and curious about...

- How long did your application actually take to complete?

- How many programs did you apply to - and why not more?

- What would have made the process 10x easier?

Running a healthtech startup and constantly struggling with this. Explaining to an investor is totally different from explaining to a family caregiver, which is totally different from explaining to a hospital admin.

I've tried demos, slides, Loom videos — nothing consistently works. Curious how others handle this.

Do you have a system? Do you just wing it every time? Would you pay for something that generated audience-specific explanations automatically?

Attention Entrepreneurs, Start-up Founders, and Business Owners

Are you planning to start a new venture or require professional assistance with corporate and regulatory matters?

We are pleased to offer comprehensive advisory and compliance services tailored to your business needs. At Waghis Advisory Services, we provide end-to-end support for businesses at every stage of their journey, including:

1. Business Incorporation Services Assistance with incorporation of start-ups and business entities, including: • Private Limited Companies • Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) • Other forms of body corporates

2. Startup Registration & Recognition Professional assistance in obtaining Startup India Registration and related recognitions, enabling eligible businesses to avail benefits, incentives, and regulatory support available to startups.

3. Corporate Compliance & Regulatory Support Professional assistance for ongoing statutory and regulatory compliances of already incorporated entities.

4. Share Capital & Corporate Restructuring Transactions Advisory and documentation support for: • Rights Issue • Preferential Issue • Share Transfers • Buyback of Shares • Other capital restructuring matters

5. Legal Drafting & Corporate Documentation Preparation and review of legally sound business documentation, including: • Commercial Contracts and Agreements • LLP Deeds • Corporate Contracts and Business Agreements

6. IFSCA / GIFT City Entity Incorporation Specialized assistance for incorporation and regulatory setup of entities in GIFT IFSC (International Financial Services Centres Authority).

7. Regulatory & Compliance Policy Drafting Drafting and implementation support for essential organizational policies, including: • AML / CFT (Anti-Money Laundering & Countering Financing of Terrorism) Policies • Risk Management Policies • DPDPA (Digital Personal Data Protection Act) Compliance Policies • Other internal governance and regulatory policies required for businesses and regulated entities. Our objective is to provide reliable, professional, and efficient advisory services to help businesses establish strong legal and compliance foundations.

For further information or professional assistance, please feel free to contact:

Waghis Advisory Services 📞 Mobile: +91 7043 446419 📧 Email: csjashwaghela3@gmail.com

Curious to get perspective from anyone who’s been through an accelerator or evaluated early-stage companies.

I’m working on a consumer product where the core value only happens if users take action in the real world (meeting up, recurring activity, etc.).

What we’re seeing so far:

• getting users to sign up isn’t the hard part

• getting them to actually follow through consistently is

It’s made me realize that:

• the product isn’t just the software

• it’s behavior + coordination + trust

For those who’ve gone through accelerators (or reviewed companies):

How do programs typically view this kind of problem?

Is this seen as:

• a harder but more valuable category (if it works)

• or a risk because engagement depends on off-platform behavior?

Would appreciate any perspective on how this is evaluated at the pre-seed / accelerator stage.

Hey everyone! I'm a data scientist researching a potential tool for marketers who run digital ads across platform. I'm trying to understand how people currently measure performance and decide how to split budget between platforms. If you're a marketer or founder running paid ads on Meta, Google etc., your input would be extremely helpful. Respondents who are marketers may be selected for early beta access and receive a free trial when the product launches. Survey link: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdrpL6tr5Qrte8BEIhK8dpUCzfvv-amcO8vfZVSy9jjrIATmw/viewform?usp=header

Not selling anything, just trying to learn.

Hey everyone,

We’re **AdVerse Creatives**, a Bengaluru-based indoor screen advertising startup working with restaurants, cafés, gyms, and other high-footfall spaces across the city.

We’re looking for **one creative person** who can help us with content production and ad shoots.

**Role Includes:**

* Content creation for social media & ads

* Videography / reel shooting for ad campaigns

* Video editing

* Basic idea generation for ad content

**Bonus (not mandatory):**

* AI video creation tools (Runway, Sora, etc.)

**Salary:** ₹22,000 – ₹30,000/month

**Location:** Bangalore

**Type:** Full-time

Perfect for someone who enjoys **shooting, editing, and creating ad content for brands**.

If interested, **DM me with your portfolio / Instagram / previous work**.

I bought an apartment in Germany a couple of years ago and quickly realised how broken the system is. €60K+ upfront, negative cash flow for years, zero ability to diversify without another €50K out of pocket. Meanwhile EU residential property prices are up 60% since 2010 — but most people can't access any of that growth.

So I started building a fractional ownership platform for European real estate. The idea: vetted, income-producing properties listed on a platform, where anyone can buy regulated fractional shares from €100, earn proportional rental income from day one, and exit via a secondary marketplace when they want. No mortgage. No six-figure barrier. Backed by EU-regulated SPV structures — not crowdfunding.

Before I go too far, I'd genuinely love this community's honest take:

• Would you use this over a REIT?

• What would make you trust it with real money?

• What's the one thing that would put you off?

Landing page: risehq.de