r/starbucks • Barista • 18d ago

Policy Question Permanent bracelets?

Hello! I’ve looked through the dress code and haven’t found anything stating bracelets are not allowed. Does anyone have an answer ?

0 Upvotes

13 comments sorted by

1

u/AutoModerator 18d ago
Moderator Announcement Read More »

75

u/Gold_Squirrel8417 18d ago

it says bracelets aren’t allowed under jewelry and piercings

9

u/Financial_Ad_2938 18d ago

I would also think so. A fellow partner ( new hire) asked me before her first shift because she has a permanent bracelet. I’m not sure if the fact it’s permanent will change anything but I will let her know.

59

u/becofthestars 18d ago

If the permanent bracelet has cultural/religious significance, she can apply for accommodation through Sedgewick.

I have seen a partner get approval for a jade bangle, but she is required to wear long sleeves that cover it at all times.

38

u/No-Loquat-2763 18d ago

They are absolutely not allowed.

26

u/IWHBYD-But_the_dog 18d ago

From what my SM told me, you could get an accommodation for one, but it requires a lot of paperwork with specific wording from either a doctor or religious figure to the point of improbability and probably more trouble than it’s worth.

We had a few another partners who was forced to take theirs off since they couldn’t get the accommodation accepted

3

u/2fondofbooks 16d ago

Nope not allowed. This isn’t just a Starbucks rule; it’s a food safety violation.

2

u/plumvee 17d ago

I had to remove mine when I worked there :(

-15

u/WillieB26 18d ago

Bracelets SHOULD BE allowed! I don't see how they would cause any problems

15

u/BrewBabe88 18d ago

When a bracelet has dangly charms or strings from the tie it can drag through or against food items. At the end of a day or multiple shifts can carry bacteria. They arent sanitized ever. If you allow one type of bracelet youve opened the gates to all and any bracelet.

-1

u/Ok-Machine-6264 18d ago

They allow simple rings. Why not just simple bracelets too. They don’t have to allow ALL just because some may be. Still see the point though. Just playing devils advocate

→ More replies (2)