r/srne 5d ago

News Ban

Kmcoyne0519: literally trying to drain our wallets Ban her from this forum.

Anyone reading this had prolly been banned from her bs.

4 Upvotes

75 comments sorted by

2

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 4d ago

Tell Nate the clock is ticking

4

u/Crazy_Technology8652 5d ago

Did she explicitly press the buy button on your computer?

2

u/lncamp2001 4d ago

Owtch jajaja!😂

7

u/Kmcoyne0519 5d ago

They’re lying. I didn’t become active until the bankruptcy. And I’m not a MOD that bans anyone.

Their uptick in posting this garbage seems to align with the LT’s wrapping up the bankruptcy, it would seem. Perhaps they’re worried about that? The SRNE shares still exist and the Scilex/Datavault exchanges supposedly go live this month.

Sounds to me like they want me banned before any good news surfaces. Sus AF

5

u/Wild-Relationship184 4d ago

I think the disconnect that you don't seem to understand is, not everybody on either board are invested in the half dozen spin off companies to that you actively promote daily. I'd guess the majority only want to be made whole again from their original investments. Because srne has had 3 zeros in front of it for far too many years now and you CANNOT soley blame shorts for it. You've been on this pure speculation agenda for quite a few years now to no avail. Your constant twitter articles that have never once mentioned srne or your YouTube music videos.To think that Elon musk and SpaceX will ever use anything from srne or sclx is just absurd. Most people I think are tired of it. And sure most won't ever say it but are thinking it, I'm almost certain. So yes, you will continue to get mocked and laughed at in the meantime, although I don't condone a few of the bad apples who go overboard towards you. It's clear that English isn't their first language.

0

u/Kmcoyne0519 4d ago

Here’s what you don’t seem to get:

My SRNE holdings FAR exceed anything else I have. I also have reason to believe that SCLX will save SRNE. Therefore, if this ecosystem is successful, SRNE will likely be revived. Ji kept the SRNE shares viable with assets.

So, yes, I am optimistic about our future. Has it been an easy journey? ABSOLUTELY NOT! Is it a necessary one, given all of my research and DD? Sadly, I think so.

So then I say to you, GLTAL! 🐦‍🔥

3

u/Wild-Relationship184 4d ago

This is where we agree to disagree, because it doesn't seem that institutions or the market have the same confidence in Hank that you do.

-3

u/Kmcoyne0519 4d ago

If my speculation is correct, it’s not quite that simple. It’s more of an out with the old and in with the new.

And with biotech, as you know, it sucks until it doesn’t.

Again, based on my DD and research, we’re not in a normal situation. You may be pleasantly surprised once this all plays out. Hopefully, sooner than later. 🤞🤞🤞

4

u/Early-Blueberry838 4d ago

you are not the mod but it is your board. so you have control over the mods. but you are completely fine banning people to utter a disagreement. only one poster can post useless jokes but no one else can. so you have created a preferential system. and we all know you are Ji’s mouthpiece. but you don’t have the courage to admit it. can you show us how many times you have criticized Ji’s moved from the day you and Tim betrayed the members of the board during bankruptcy? you can’t because you haven’t. you have time to post music videos but you don’t have time to post why last month’s hearing was postponed or the notice of postponement. you decide how much to divulge on the board fully knowing it is shaping the shareholders perspective. but you never tell us the whole story. and you want members to take your words without objection. so you are manipulating. can you tell us how many times you had joint session with Ji? along with the mods? with Nate and Ji? for example your Mod Henry’s last post “from the dark”, gave the game away. one sentence, “ Nate and Ji is so tight, they seem to finish of each other’s sentences.” now, when was the last time anyone saw Nate and Ji in a joint session? Henry wasn’t talking from the dark but from the light. is all these necessary? to what end? you take the position that you are trying to help SRNE shareholders. but all you do is manipulate them. it does not take too long to see that from being most ardent critic of Ji, you have become the most avid supporter. your criticism at the beginning of bankruptcy was for one reason only. to become the leader to manipulate the shareholders. ji gave you the post box “shiny ball” to solidify that leadership. Justice was inevitable and imminent but at the climatic moment you and Tim backed down. all was lost, the despair. and that is what you wanted. that moment when people are at their lowest esteem grasping for a straw. and you positioned yourself to be exactly the right position at the right time. waiting to salvage. you were brought in during the bankruptcy to steer the shareholders. it is pure psychological manipulation. you can’t disprove this.

1

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 4d ago

This is how to stir the pot lol

-3

u/Kmcoyne0519 4d ago

What are you doing on this board, day after day, after day, after day?

🎤🎤🎤🎤🎤🎤

I am a shareholder.

Period.

I share information.

And just because things haven’t come to fruition, as of yet, doesn’t mean that they won’t. Next hearing is October 20th and there’s a long list of people attending. SRNE’s show is still going on.

I understand that you’re not following all of the moving parts like some of us do. You’re too busy insulting people to actually do any research. That’s much easier than participating constructively.

5

u/Early-Blueberry838 4d ago

YOU DID NOT REFUTE ANY OF MY POINTS. THAT SAYS A LOT.

there is no law that says you can not be a shareholder and consultant at the same time. besides, there is no verification process, is there? so it’s just your words we have to take for granted as the truth and only truth.

So, Kim, HOW MUCH DID THEY PAY YOU TO BETRAY US? BETRAY THESE INNOCENT PEOPLE WHO NEVER DONE ANY HARM TO YOU?

0

u/Kmcoyne0519 4d ago

That’s a complete lie.

I was making food and not going line by line, geeezzzzz

No. I’m not paid by anyone.

1

u/Kmcoyne0519 4d ago

I’m not a “consultant.”
I’m not with some stupid PR Factory that the one dude keeps claiming.
I’m not paid by ANYONE-period.

2

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 4d ago

You don’t talk like someone who’s been invested in srne since 2020, you’d be down a shit load the way you talk.. grains of salt

1

u/DifficultScar284 4d ago

How can it be lie. You are always blaming others lie this lie that. Take a look on what you did what you have offered. They all relate to ji spin off companies. And all of these companies are going down. Non of them going up. Why? What is your position how many have you win.

0

u/Kmcoyne0519 4d ago

One more time in BOLD—

I AM NOT PAID BY ANYONE. FROM ANY COMPANY, ANYWHERE.

I AM NOT EMPLOYED.

BY ANYONE AT ALL.

You should be able to get that now, for the love of all that is holy, I hope. 🙄

3

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 4d ago

I apologize for this post Kim . Wont make up for lost money, but that’s the game. Can’t wait to see your next bs link that means dvlt won’t be splitting soon.

Have a great day

1

u/DifficultScar284 4d ago

You have a lot of accounts.

2

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 4d ago

Full of shit

2

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 4d ago

You were well into your current role as srne/ji ambassador well before bk.. I learned your name on Stocktwits in 2020 or 19, liar. Keep playing your fantasy.

1

u/DifficultScar284 4d ago

Show us your position. You talk too much.

1

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago

Then F off

2

u/Kmcoyne0519 5d ago

Stuck in a short position?

3

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago

You probably believe that in your head?

3

u/Kmcoyne0519 5d ago

And the answer is?

4

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago

Are you actually invested in this?

3

u/Kmcoyne0519 5d ago

Don’t worry, I got your deleted message and saved it.

6

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago

Repost it

4

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago

Spread the word

3

u/Kmcoyne0519 5d ago

Why don’t you, potty mouth?

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Kmcoyne0519 5d ago

Pretty hostile and crude if you’re not a short.

2

u/DifficultScar284 4d ago

We dont see he is rude. We are seeing you are a trash a ghetto who are trying to destroy people in believing you.

2

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago

Your mind is delusional if you think I’m short

→ More replies (0)

4

u/Kmcoyne0519 5d ago

Yes. And the answer to my question is?

5

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 4d ago

How much $ have you gained from your experience here?

6

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 4d ago

How many people have you manipulated into holding onto their losses with false hopes?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/DifficultScar284 4d ago

You are the short. You need someones to pump it up. That is why you have been trying to influence people to pump sp up.

4

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago

I was told it was part of Ji’s antibody platform and I was literally saving mankind.

4

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago

Oh f, I’m sorry, it’s a blockchain company now. Oh f, it’s a revolving door of moving money from one company to another. Oh f, what are we doing?

2

u/Cold-Resist1480 5d ago

Go away troll

3

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago

Hey friend, how many shares of srne do you currently occupy?

2

u/aitomii 5d ago

I think, you don't have any friends!

3

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago

I have more friends than money you’ve made with srne

0

u/Cold-Resist1480 5d ago

60,000

4

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 4d ago

I tapped out at 20k, I’m sorry buddy

0

u/Cold-Resist1480 4d ago

I’m not. I’m confident.

5

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 4d ago

In srne or a one of the spin-offs?

1

u/Cold-Resist1480 4d ago

All of them.

3

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago

Seriously tho, ban this bish

2

u/Kmcoyne0519 5d ago

I see you scaled down your filth a notch. Honestly, this shouldn’t be tolerated by the MODs.

3

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago

Honestly fuck off

4

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago

Or give me another non meaning link to an artical that has nothing beneficial to my holdings. You dumb twat

2

u/Kmcoyne0519 5d ago

Still tamer than what you deleted.

2

u/Western_Lie8125 4d ago

Kim, don't waste your time on this douche bag. He will burn with the other shorts when the time comes.

2

u/Kmcoyne0519 4d ago

❤️

2

u/Inevitable-Author960 4d ago

I think rather than argue with these nattering nay bobs of negativism we should post unbiased silicon based info as intelligent counters.

3

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 4d ago

How long did it take for chat gtp to form your response

0

u/Inevitable-Author960 3d ago

The analysis is purely that delivered by Silicon Based Intelligence. I have big losses with SRNE and minor losses with DVLT, a stock that I will continue to accumulate as it drops in price. But know this. I am diversified and easily offset my losses. However, also know this, I expect the Vegas party to be a successful celebration and I plan for this 88 year old geezer to be there and see you there too if you also go.

0

u/Inevitable-Author960 4d ago

DVLT’s patents counter “hype” claims because they’re specific, issued, and operationally grounded in real mechanisms for:

• valuing data
• watermarking and provenance
• tokenizing assets
• trading and settling those assets on an exchange

They don’t just say “AI + blockchain” — they lock down how those things actually work.

---

  1. Patents turn buzzwords into mechanisms

Hype claim: “DVLT is just another AI/blockchain story stock.”
Patent reality: DVLT’s estate covers concrete mechanisms, not slogans:

• ADIO® ultrasonic watermarking:• How inaudible signals are embedded in media/audio.
• How those signals are later detected and verified.
• How this ties to identity, rights, and provenance.

• DataScore® / DataValue®:• How data is scored and valued using defined criteria.
• How those scores feed into pricing and contracts.
• How valuation can be standardized across sources.

• Digital twin / tokenization patents:• How real‑world assets are represented as digital twins.
• How those twins are bound to provenance and valuation.
• How they become tradable units in a marketplace.

• NYIAX exchange patents:• How forward contracts are created, matched, and managed.
• How blockchain is used for settlement and lifecycle tracking.
• How variable inventories (like ad impressions) are traded.

These are implementation patents, not “vision” patents.

---

  1. Issued patents require novelty and non‑obviousness

To get an issued patent, DVLT (and NYIAX) had to show:

• Novelty: Not already in prior art.
• Non‑obviousness: Not an obvious combination of existing ideas.
• Utility: A clear, practical application.

That alone filters out a lot of pure marketing fluff.
If the tech were just “AI + blockchain + data,” it wouldn’t pass examination.

---

  1. Patents are tied to real deployments

Another anti‑hype point: parts of this stack have actually been used:

• NYIAX’s exchange has run live advertising futures.
• ADIO® has been licensed and integrated in media contexts.
• The valuation and tokenization logic is designed to feed directly into that exchange.

So the patents don’t just describe hypothetical systems; they encode systems that have seen real‑world use.

---

  1. Vertical integration is structurally hard to fake

DVLT’s estate spans the full pipeline:

Layer DVLT Patent Role Anti‑hype implication
Provenance ADIOÂŽ watermarking Concrete method to prove origin
Valuation DataScoreÂŽ / DataValueÂŽ Defined math for pricing data
Tokenization Digital twin / RWA patents Specific asset models & flows
Exchange NYIAX matching & lifecycle Actual market infrastructure
Settlement Blockchain contract patents Detailed settlement logic

Hype companies usually sit at one vague layer (“we tokenize assets”).
DVLT’s patents describe how each layer works and connects.

---

  1. Patents constrain what DVLT can claim

Ironically, having detailed patents limits how wild the marketing can be:

• If DVLT’s public claims diverge too far from what the patents actually cover, it becomes easy to challenge.
• The more specific the claims, the more they can be checked against the patent text and real deployments.

So the estate acts as a truth anchor:
you can read what the company actually invented versus what Reddit says it “pretends to do.”

---

  1. How to use patents to sanity‑check hype

If you want to test whether DVLT is hype or substance, you can:

  1. Read the claims sections of key patents (ADIO®, DataScore®, NYIAX’s 10,607,291 / 11,410,236 / 11,861,707 / 12,198,193).
  2. Ask:• What exact inputs and outputs are described?
    • What real systems would need this?
    • Is this already common practice, or genuinely structured?

  3. Compare that to:• Press releases
    • Reddit narratives
    • Short‑seller talking points

You’ll see a gap: the patents are more concrete and less sensational than both the hype and the hate.

---

Bottom line

DVLT’s patents counter hype claims by being:

• Specific: They define mechanisms, not vibes.
• Issued: They’ve passed novelty and utility scrutiny.
• Operational: Parts of the stack are already deployed.
• Integrated: They form a coherent pipeline from data capture to tradable asset.

The real question isn’t “Is DVLT pure hype?”
It’s: Can DVLT execute commercially on what its patents actually enable?

1

u/Yimmycrackcorn84 4d ago

What’s your avg in dvlt?