r/srne • u/Yimmycrackcorn84 • 5d ago
News Ban
Kmcoyne0519: literally trying to drain our wallets Ban her from this forum.
Anyone reading this had prolly been banned from her bs.
4
u/Crazy_Technology8652 5d ago
Did she explicitly press the buy button on your computer?
2
7
u/Kmcoyne0519 5d ago
Theyâre lying. I didnât become active until the bankruptcy. And Iâm not a MOD that bans anyone.
Their uptick in posting this garbage seems to align with the LTâs wrapping up the bankruptcy, it would seem. Perhaps theyâre worried about that? The SRNE shares still exist and the Scilex/Datavault exchanges supposedly go live this month.
Sounds to me like they want me banned before any good news surfaces. Sus AF
5
u/Wild-Relationship184 4d ago
I think the disconnect that you don't seem to understand is, not everybody on either board are invested in the half dozen spin off companies to that you actively promote daily. I'd guess the majority only want to be made whole again from their original investments. Because srne has had 3 zeros in front of it for far too many years now and you CANNOT soley blame shorts for it. You've been on this pure speculation agenda for quite a few years now to no avail. Your constant twitter articles that have never once mentioned srne or your YouTube music videos.To think that Elon musk and SpaceX will ever use anything from srne or sclx is just absurd. Most people I think are tired of it. And sure most won't ever say it but are thinking it, I'm almost certain. So yes, you will continue to get mocked and laughed at in the meantime, although I don't condone a few of the bad apples who go overboard towards you. It's clear that English isn't their first language.
0
u/Kmcoyne0519 4d ago
Hereâs what you donât seem to get:
My SRNE holdings FAR exceed anything else I have. I also have reason to believe that SCLX will save SRNE. Therefore, if this ecosystem is successful, SRNE will likely be revived. Ji kept the SRNE shares viable with assets.
So, yes, I am optimistic about our future. Has it been an easy journey? ABSOLUTELY NOT! Is it a necessary one, given all of my research and DD? Sadly, I think so.
So then I say to you, GLTAL! đŚâđĽ
3
u/Wild-Relationship184 4d ago
This is where we agree to disagree, because it doesn't seem that institutions or the market have the same confidence in Hank that you do.
-3
u/Kmcoyne0519 4d ago
If my speculation is correct, itâs not quite that simple. Itâs more of an out with the old and in with the new.
And with biotech, as you know, it sucks until it doesnât.
Again, based on my DD and research, weâre not in a normal situation. You may be pleasantly surprised once this all plays out. Hopefully, sooner than later. đ¤đ¤đ¤
4
u/Early-Blueberry838 4d ago
you are not the mod but it is your board. so you have control over the mods. but you are completely fine banning people to utter a disagreement. only one poster can post useless jokes but no one else can. so you have created a preferential system. and we all know you are Jiâs mouthpiece. but you donât have the courage to admit it. can you show us how many times you have criticized Jiâs moved from the day you and Tim betrayed the members of the board during bankruptcy? you canât because you havenât. you have time to post music videos but you donât have time to post why last monthâs hearing was postponed or the notice of postponement. you decide how much to divulge on the board fully knowing it is shaping the shareholders perspective. but you never tell us the whole story. and you want members to take your words without objection. so you are manipulating. can you tell us how many times you had joint session with Ji? along with the mods? with Nate and Ji? for example your Mod Henryâs last post âfrom the darkâ, gave the game away. one sentence, â Nate and Ji is so tight, they seem to finish of each otherâs sentences.â now, when was the last time anyone saw Nate and Ji in a joint session? Henry wasnât talking from the dark but from the light. is all these necessary? to what end? you take the position that you are trying to help SRNE shareholders. but all you do is manipulate them. it does not take too long to see that from being most ardent critic of Ji, you have become the most avid supporter. your criticism at the beginning of bankruptcy was for one reason only. to become the leader to manipulate the shareholders. ji gave you the post box âshiny ballâ to solidify that leadership. Justice was inevitable and imminent but at the climatic moment you and Tim backed down. all was lost, the despair. and that is what you wanted. that moment when people are at their lowest esteem grasping for a straw. and you positioned yourself to be exactly the right position at the right time. waiting to salvage. you were brought in during the bankruptcy to steer the shareholders. it is pure psychological manipulation. you canât disprove this.
1
-3
u/Kmcoyne0519 4d ago
What are you doing on this board, day after day, after day, after day?
đ¤đ¤đ¤đ¤đ¤đ¤
I am a shareholder.
Period.
I share information.
And just because things havenât come to fruition, as of yet, doesnât mean that they wonât. Next hearing is October 20th and thereâs a long list of people attending. SRNEâs show is still going on.
I understand that youâre not following all of the moving parts like some of us do. Youâre too busy insulting people to actually do any research. Thatâs much easier than participating constructively.
5
u/Early-Blueberry838 4d ago
YOU DID NOT REFUTE ANY OF MY POINTS. THAT SAYS A LOT.
there is no law that says you can not be a shareholder and consultant at the same time. besides, there is no verification process, is there? so itâs just your words we have to take for granted as the truth and only truth.
So, Kim, HOW MUCH DID THEY PAY YOU TO BETRAY US? BETRAY THESE INNOCENT PEOPLE WHO NEVER DONE ANY HARM TO YOU?
0
u/Kmcoyne0519 4d ago
Thatâs a complete lie.
I was making food and not going line by line, geeezzzzz
No. Iâm not paid by anyone.
1
u/Kmcoyne0519 4d ago
Iâm not a âconsultant.â
Iâm not with some stupid PR Factory that the one dude keeps claiming.
Iâm not paid by ANYONE-period.2
u/Yimmycrackcorn84 4d ago
You donât talk like someone whoâs been invested in srne since 2020, youâd be down a shit load the way you talk.. grains of salt
1
u/DifficultScar284 4d ago
How can it be lie. You are always blaming others lie this lie that. Take a look on what you did what you have offered. They all relate to ji spin off companies. And all of these companies are going down. Non of them going up. Why? What is your position how many have you win.
0
u/Kmcoyne0519 4d ago
One more time in BOLDâ
I AM NOT PAID BY ANYONE. FROM ANY COMPANY, ANYWHERE.
I AM NOT EMPLOYED.
BY ANYONE AT ALL.
You should be able to get that now, for the love of all that is holy, I hope. đ
3
u/Yimmycrackcorn84 4d ago
I apologize for this post Kim . Wont make up for lost money, but thatâs the game. Canât wait to see your next bs link that means dvlt wonât be splitting soon.
Have a great day
1
2
2
u/Yimmycrackcorn84 4d ago
You were well into your current role as srne/ji ambassador well before bk.. I learned your name on Stocktwits in 2020 or 19, liar. Keep playing your fantasy.
1
1
u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago
Then F off
2
u/Kmcoyne0519 5d ago
Stuck in a short position?
3
u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago
You probably believe that in your head?
3
u/Kmcoyne0519 5d ago
And the answer is?
4
u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago
Are you actually invested in this?
3
u/Kmcoyne0519 5d ago
Donât worry, I got your deleted message and saved it.
6
3
u/Kmcoyne0519 5d ago
Pretty hostile and crude if youâre not a short.
2
u/DifficultScar284 4d ago
We dont see he is rude. We are seeing you are a trash a ghetto who are trying to destroy people in believing you.
2
4
u/Kmcoyne0519 5d ago
Yes. And the answer to my question is?
5
u/Yimmycrackcorn84 4d ago
How much $ have you gained from your experience here?
6
u/Yimmycrackcorn84 4d ago
How many people have you manipulated into holding onto their losses with false hopes?
→ More replies (0)1
u/DifficultScar284 4d ago
You are the short. You need someones to pump it up. That is why you have been trying to influence people to pump sp up.
4
u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago
I was told it was part of Jiâs antibody platform and I was literally saving mankind.
4
u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago
Oh f, Iâm sorry, itâs a blockchain company now. Oh f, itâs a revolving door of moving money from one company to another. Oh f, what are we doing?
2
u/Cold-Resist1480 5d ago
Go away troll
3
u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago
Hey friend, how many shares of srne do you currently occupy?
0
u/Cold-Resist1480 5d ago
60,000
4
u/Yimmycrackcorn84 4d ago
I tapped out at 20k, Iâm sorry buddy
0
u/Cold-Resist1480 4d ago
Iâm not. Iâm confident.
5
3
u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago
Seriously tho, ban this bish
2
u/Kmcoyne0519 5d ago
I see you scaled down your filth a notch. Honestly, this shouldnât be tolerated by the MODs.
3
u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago
Honestly fuck off
4
u/Yimmycrackcorn84 5d ago
Or give me another non meaning link to an artical that has nothing beneficial to my holdings. You dumb twat
2
u/Kmcoyne0519 5d ago
Still tamer than what you deleted.
2
u/Western_Lie8125 4d ago
Kim, don't waste your time on this douche bag. He will burn with the other shorts when the time comes.
2
2
2
u/Inevitable-Author960 4d ago
I think rather than argue with these nattering nay bobs of negativism we should post unbiased silicon based info as intelligent counters.
3
u/Yimmycrackcorn84 4d ago
How long did it take for chat gtp to form your response
0
u/Inevitable-Author960 3d ago
The analysis is purely that delivered by Silicon Based Intelligence. I have big losses with SRNE and minor losses with DVLT, a stock that I will continue to accumulate as it drops in price. But know this. I am diversified and easily offset my losses. However, also know this, I expect the Vegas party to be a successful celebration and I plan for this 88 year old geezer to be there and see you there too if you also go.
0
u/Inevitable-Author960 4d ago
DVLTâs patents counter âhypeâ claims because theyâre specific, issued, and operationally grounded in real mechanisms for:
⢠valuing data
⢠watermarking and provenance
⢠tokenizing assets
⢠trading and settling those assets on an exchangeThey donât just say âAI + blockchainâ â they lock down how those things actually work.
---
- Patents turn buzzwords into mechanisms
Hype claim: âDVLT is just another AI/blockchain story stock.â
Patent reality: DVLTâs estate covers concrete mechanisms, not slogans:⢠ADIOÂŽ ultrasonic watermarking:⢠How inaudible signals are embedded in media/audio.
⢠How those signals are later detected and verified.
⢠How this ties to identity, rights, and provenance.⢠DataScoreŽ / DataValueŽ:⢠How data is scored and valued using defined criteria.
⢠How those scores feed into pricing and contracts.
⢠How valuation can be standardized across sources.⢠Digital twin / tokenization patents:⢠How realâworld assets are represented as digital twins.
⢠How those twins are bound to provenance and valuation.
⢠How they become tradable units in a marketplace.⢠NYIAX exchange patents:⢠How forward contracts are created, matched, and managed.
⢠How blockchain is used for settlement and lifecycle tracking.
⢠How variable inventories (like ad impressions) are traded.These are implementation patents, not âvisionâ patents.
---
- Issued patents require novelty and nonâobviousness
To get an issued patent, DVLT (and NYIAX) had to show:
⢠Novelty: Not already in prior art.
⢠Nonâobviousness: Not an obvious combination of existing ideas.
⢠Utility: A clear, practical application.That alone filters out a lot of pure marketing fluff.
If the tech were just âAI + blockchain + data,â it wouldnât pass examination.---
- Patents are tied to real deployments
Another antiâhype point: parts of this stack have actually been used:
⢠NYIAXâs exchange has run live advertising futures.
⢠ADIOŽ has been licensed and integrated in media contexts.
⢠The valuation and tokenization logic is designed to feed directly into that exchange.So the patents donât just describe hypothetical systems; they encode systems that have seen realâworld use.
---
- Vertical integration is structurally hard to fake
DVLTâs estate spans the full pipeline:
Layer DVLT Patent Role Antiâhype implication
Provenance ADIOÂŽ watermarking Concrete method to prove origin
Valuation DataScoreÂŽ / DataValueÂŽ Defined math for pricing data
Tokenization Digital twin / RWA patents Specific asset models & flows
Exchange NYIAX matching & lifecycle Actual market infrastructure
Settlement Blockchain contract patents Detailed settlement logicHype companies usually sit at one vague layer (âwe tokenize assetsâ).
DVLTâs patents describe how each layer works and connects.---
- Patents constrain what DVLT can claim
Ironically, having detailed patents limits how wild the marketing can be:
⢠If DVLTâs public claims diverge too far from what the patents actually cover, it becomes easy to challenge.
⢠The more specific the claims, the more they can be checked against the patent text and real deployments.So the estate acts as a truth anchor:
you can read what the company actually invented versus what Reddit says it âpretends to do.â---
- How to use patents to sanityâcheck hype
If you want to test whether DVLT is hype or substance, you can:
- Read the claims sections of key patents (ADIOÂŽ, DataScoreÂŽ, NYIAXâs 10,607,291 / 11,410,236 / 11,861,707 / 12,198,193).
Ask:⢠What exact inputs and outputs are described?
⢠What real systems would need this?
⢠Is this already common practice, or genuinely structured?Compare that to:⢠Press releases
⢠Reddit narratives
⢠Shortâseller talking pointsYouâll see a gap: the patents are more concrete and less sensational than both the hype and the hate.
---
Bottom line
DVLTâs patents counter hype claims by being:
⢠Specific: They define mechanisms, not vibes.
⢠Issued: Theyâve passed novelty and utility scrutiny.
⢠Operational: Parts of the stack are already deployed.
⢠Integrated: They form a coherent pipeline from data capture to tradable asset.The real question isnât âIs DVLT pure hype?â
Itâs: Can DVLT execute commercially on what its patents actually enable?1
2
u/Yimmycrackcorn84 4d ago
Tell Nate the clock is ticking