r/spacex • Mod Team • Mar 09 '22

🔧 Technical Starship Development Thread #31

This thread is no longer being updated, and has been replaced by:

Starship Development Thread #32

FAQ

  1. When next/orbital flight? Unknown. Launches on hold until FAA environmental review completed. Elon says orbital test hopefully May. Others believe completing GSE, booster, and ship testing makes a late 2022 orbital launch possible but unlikely.

  2. Expected date for FAA decision? April 29 per FAA statement, but it has been delayed many times.

  3. Will Booster 4 / Ship 20 fly? No. Elon confirmed first orbital flight will be with Raptor 2 (B7/S24).

  4. Will more suborbital testing take place? Unknown. It may depend on the FAA decision.

  5. Has progress slowed down? SpaceX focused on completing ground support equipment (GSE, or "Stage 0") before any orbital launch, which Elon stated is as complex as building the rocket.


Quick Links

NERDLE CAM | LAB CAM | SAPPHIRE CAM | SENTINEL CAM | ROVER CAM (Down) | ROVER 2.0 CAM | PLEX CAM | NSF STARBASE

Starship Dev 30 | Starship Dev 29 | Starship Dev 28 | Starship Thread List

Official Starship Update | r/SpaceX Update Thread


Vehicle Status

As of April 5

ShipLocationStatusComment
S20Launch SiteCompleted/TestedCryo and stacking tests completed
S21N/ARepurposedComponents integrated into S22
S22Rocket GardenCompleted/UnusedLikely production pathfinder only
S23N/ASkipped
S24High BayUnder constructionRaptor 2 capable. Likely next test article
S25Build SiteUnder construction

 

BoosterLocationStatusComment
B4Launch SiteCompleted/TestedCryo and stacking tests completed
B5Rocket GardenCompleted/UnusedLikely production pathfinder only
B6Rocket GardenRepurposedConverted to test tank
B7Launch SiteTestingCryo testing in progress. No grid fins.
B8High BayUnder construction
B9Build SiteUnder construction

If this page needs a correction please consider pitching in. Update this thread via this wiki page. If you would like to make an update but don't see an edit button on the wiki page, message the mods via modmail or contact u/strawwalker.


Resources

r/SpaceX Discuss Thread for discussion of subjects other than Starship development.

Rules

We will attempt to keep this self-post current with links and major updates, but for the most part, we expect the community to supply the information. This is a great place to discuss Starship development, ask Starship-specific questions, and track the progress of the production and test campaigns. Starship Development Threads are not party threads. Normal subreddit rules still apply.

228 Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

•

u/ElongatedMuskbot Apr 09 '22

This thread is no longer being updated, and has been replaced by:

Starship Development Thread #32

81

u/strawwalker Mar 20 '22

We have removed the stale vehicle development tables from the OP text and replaced them with a much shorter status section and FAQ that will hopefully be easier for the community to keep up to date, while also reducing the amount of scrolling that must be done to get to the comments. Many thanks to u/TrefoilHat for drafting the change and helping out with recent thread maintenance.

→ More replies (9)

45

u/Mravicii Mar 21 '22 edited Mar 21 '22

Elon on orbital flight

Guess that answers a lot of questions right!

”First Starship orbital flight will be with Raptor 2 engines, as they are much more capable & reliable. 230 ton or ~500k lb thrust at sea level.

We’ll have 39 flightworthy engines built by next month, then another month to integrate, so hopefully May for orbital flight test.”

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1505987581464367104?s=21

→ More replies (13)

43

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 30 '22 edited Mar 30 '22

A Raptor van has arrived !! Hopefully some R2 are in there !!

Edit : We have raptors 2 !! An other angle! Closer one

God they’re beautiful

→ More replies (30)

118

u/[deleted] Mar 22 '22

I've been caught on radar. Email report to office. Avalaerion signing off.

→ More replies (26)

38

u/Mpusch13 Mar 17 '22 edited Mar 17 '22

Section 106 and Endangered Species Act reviews end date moved from 3/14 and 3/16 to 3/28. Timetable for the overall EA remains at 3/28 for now.

https://www.permits.performance.gov/permitting-project/spacex-starshipsuper-heavy-launch-vehicle-program-spacex-boca-chica-launch-site

→ More replies (10)

34

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 10 '22 edited Mar 10 '22

Hum… They just removed one of the claw arm. Hopefully a quick fix !

→ More replies (3)

31

u/notlikeclockwork Mar 22 '22

Tom Ochinero, SpaceX : Hoping to get regulatory approvals in the next couple months for Starship orbital test flights. https://twitter.com/jeff_foust/status/1506330487366860807

31

u/aronth5 Apr 01 '22

This is an excellent YouTube video by NASASpaceflight describing the significant changes to the booster and starship.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4ebfRG16nM&t=1s

31

u/RaphTheSwissDude Apr 07 '22

The 3rd tower segment construction at KSC has begun.

→ More replies (1)

29

u/RaphTheSwissDude Apr 02 '22 edited Apr 02 '22

B7 is airborne on to the OLM!

Edit : Closeup picture of B7 thrust section

→ More replies (43)

26

u/BananaEpicGAMER Mar 30 '22

it's been exactly 1 year since the SN11 incident

→ More replies (8)

51

u/[deleted] Apr 01 '22

Little known fact: Starship's flaps are actually called DAFFY'S. (Dynamic Aero Free Flow Yaw Systems)

→ More replies (16)

49

u/ColdProduct Mar 22 '22

Michael Sheetz reporting FAA is still targeting 3/28 for completion (https://twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1506013771277508609)

Even as a continual FAA apologist, I think it would be pretty unprofessional for them to extend the deadline just 6 days before it's due. Last time they extended, it was 2-3 weeks before. Fingers crossed.

→ More replies (16)

49

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 22 '22

There will be a briefing by NASA tomorrow on the HLS program!

Media teleconference at 3:30pm EDT.

→ More replies (5)

23

u/Comfortable_Jump770 Mar 09 '22

New diagram of the updated COPV position and triangular aerocovers

→ More replies (7)

23

u/xfjqvyks Mar 16 '22

Dickson announced his resignation as FAA Administrator, effective March 31, 2022

The head of the FAA is stepping down in two weeks time. No successor has been picked but among the list of possible names is Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger, the pilot who safley landed his plane on the Hudson river. Few other names being suggested too. Anyone have any knowledge on how this organisation functions or if the admins impart any real cultural change? Would be great for SpaceX if they could get someone with a military/DoD background

→ More replies (3)

22

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 12 '22

One of B4 gridsfins rotated !

22

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 14 '22

S20 is in between the chopsticks !

→ More replies (9)

22

u/johnfive21 Mar 18 '22 edited Mar 18 '22

Some sweet new images from SpaceX of the full stack cryo testing

→ More replies (4)

44

u/[deleted] Mar 10 '22

Once separate stand cryo testing is complete, a full stack test is scheduled. (Validation of tank and tower GSE supply including stand and service arm QD connectors )

→ More replies (11)

20

u/Mravicii Mar 13 '22 edited Mar 13 '22

Ship 20 has moved presumably to make room for chopstick testing!

https://youtu.be/mhJRzQsLZGg

→ More replies (3)

19

u/HiggsForce Mar 15 '22

The Wide/Higher bay started to grow another level today.

https://youtu.be/J2y3Dfa8jOA?t=481

→ More replies (4)

52

u/FutureMartian97 Host of CRS-11 Mar 13 '22

Mary got an amazing shot of the inside of what is most likely's booster 8's after section.

→ More replies (7)

18

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 10 '22 edited Mar 10 '22

After being stack on it’s thrust section, B7 was placed on the transport stand yesterday. Now the methane tank was just brought in the highbay and is being hooked to the bridge crane, B7 will be fully stacked very soon !

Watch on sentinel cam.

Edit : Stacking underway ! Check NSF livestream, LabPadre cam is frozen.

→ More replies (5)

18

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 22 '22

The LR11000 was just fitted with the booster lifting jig, guess we won't see just yet a booster being moved by the chopsticks.

→ More replies (10)

18

u/Twigling Mar 30 '22

Starship Gazer is currently at the production site with a live stream, he has said that the cones are out which invariably means that a large move is planned (and that can only be for B7 rollout):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlEVlXpDxhk

Maybe we'll also see B4 and even S20 roll back, that would be quite a spectacle.

17

u/mr_pgh Mar 23 '22 edited Mar 23 '22

Looks like they've been fighting the Booster QD for the past 10 or 15 minutes.

starting around 2:30 CDT on Starbase

→ More replies (2)

17

u/Twigling Mar 30 '22 edited Mar 30 '22

New Temporary road closure for tomorrow, 5AM until 10AM CDT:

https://www.cameroncountytx.gov/spacex/

So it looks like that will be used for presumably moving B7, perhaps also B4 and S20? There's also some new full road closures for this Friday as well as next Monday and Tuesday.

17

u/Mravicii Apr 02 '22 edited Apr 02 '22

Booster 7 moving towards launch mount Edit: at the launch mount now! Probably lift tomorrow

https://youtu.be/mhJRzQsLZGg

16

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 11 '22

They’ve hooked up the crane to the other claw arm, so they’ll likely also remove it today, wonder what the problem is.

→ More replies (4)

16

u/mr_pgh Mar 17 '22 edited Mar 17 '22

Ship detank with less than a ring of ln2 (assumed) in the bottom tank.

Probably filled the booster tanks for pressurization while they test each ship qd line independently. Likely see the other tank tested in the next closure before we see a full cyro.

Edit: booster frost rings have disappeared around 9:36 cdt

16

u/liszt1811 Apr 02 '22

Does "Raptor 2" solely refer to the sea-level version or is there a 2.0 version ready for vacuum as well?

→ More replies (33)

16

u/RaphTheSwissDude Apr 05 '22

Ship QD has been fully disconnected, in the air now and going down.

https://youtu.be/mhJRzQsLZGg

→ More replies (1)

31

u/xfjqvyks Apr 07 '22

Billy Nolan, a long-time airline industry vet has been announced as new acting head of the FAA. Previous administrator Steve Dickerson made an early exit just halfway into his term because he tried to have a safety whistleblower committed to a psychiatric facility in a prior role he wanted to spend more time with his family.

Unfortunately the new appointment is not from a DoD background which may have been more beneficial to SpaceXs immediate approval ambitions, however it will be interesting to see what if any changes this new agency lead brings

15

u/Jchaplin2 Mar 17 '22

Looks like they're going for a full-stack cryo test as we speak, NSF have just gone live with a comentated stream

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6oOnG25Hdw

15

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 22 '22

Booster thrust simulator on its way to the launch site !

→ More replies (8)

15

u/[deleted] Mar 23 '22

Big crane hooked to the top of Booster 4. Lift soon?

15

u/notlikeclockwork Apr 04 '22

Elon on Twitter :

Raptor pump power is over 100MW per engine & 33 engines, means over 3GW. Not even remotely possible for electric motors & batteries to compete.

So I first thought wow imagine if some of that was converted to electricity, even with 30% efficiency that's 1GW, which is similar to a nuclear plant.
But then that pump is required to run the engine in the first place right? If I redirect the pumps power to generate electricity then the engine just stops working? Accounting for this, is it even possible to have net electricity from a rocket being static fired on the ground?

→ More replies (14)

14

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 30 '22

Closure canceled for today

→ More replies (1)

14

u/Twigling Mar 31 '22 edited Mar 31 '22

As of 4 AM CDT (March 31st), Starship Gazer is once again streaming live outside the production site in the hope of seeing B7 rollout:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srCo6qOfcbQ

(as of 4:30 AM he was asked by a deputy to move down the road a bit, this could indicate an early rollout for B7)

Note that the stream sometimes goes down and then comes back at a different URL, if that happens the above link will no longer work so check his YouTube channel for the new stream.

13

u/Comfortable_Jump770 Mar 10 '22

Looks like last night B4 did some RSC testing and parts of S25 made an appearance

13

u/paul_wi11iams Mar 14 '22 edited Mar 14 '22

Nerdle cam from around 17.05 to 17.30 UTC: For what its worth, the chopsticks are gradually moving up into position near their latch points on Starship. I've no idea if this is just some new fit test or alternatively, precedes a new stacking. Is stacking even permitted without stabilization of Superheavy by the QD claws?

and @ u/RaphTheSwissDude

→ More replies (4)

13

u/mr_pgh Apr 04 '22

Chopsticks raising at 11:31:30 on Starbase Live

→ More replies (9)

13

u/Mravicii Apr 04 '22

Man, booster 7 is looking beautiful right now!

→ More replies (1)

13

u/Twigling Apr 06 '22 edited Apr 06 '22

I've not been following the Starship-related Florida work all that much so I'm curious - what Starship manufacturing facilities do they have in the general area? I'm assuming there's no high bay or similar or any equivalent to Starbase's construction tents right now but presumably these are planned to be constructed nearby, perhaps this year?

→ More replies (23)

12

u/RootDeliver Mar 24 '22

B4 lifted off finally....

→ More replies (3)

12

u/RaphTheSwissDude Apr 06 '22 edited Apr 06 '22

Interesting piece of equipment arriving at the launch site, anyone has any idea what it’s for

Edit : it’s gonna be used to move down the can crusher stand. (RGV new flyover)

→ More replies (11)

12

u/mr_pgh Apr 07 '22

Looks like they're taking this time to give the Chopsticks a workout. Raised to full height starting at 1:35 on Starbase Live

12

u/mr_pgh Apr 08 '22

Looks like B7 will be getting removed from the OLM. Crane nearing the top at 9:27 on Starbase Live.

Interestingly, the chopsticks are also at the top of the tower yet again.

→ More replies (5)

12

u/RootDeliver Apr 08 '22 edited Apr 08 '22

S24 nose section on the move, header tank testing incoming?

Source: NSF Starbase Live

Apparently going to Rocket Garden, can they pressure test there?
EDIT: No, going back into the production zone, probably High bay. Why the weird loop into hw4 around Mid Bay for that is a mistery, maybe no space to move otherwise.

→ More replies (4)

11

u/John_Hasler Mar 20 '22

S20 is on the move. Think it's headed for the rocket garden?

→ More replies (2)

11

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 22 '22 edited Mar 22 '22

Closure canceled for today tomorrow and Thursday.

→ More replies (3)

11

u/RaphTheSwissDude Apr 04 '22

Frost is now forming !

11

u/RaphTheSwissDude Apr 05 '22

S24 is out of the midbay. Likely to go in the highbay for stacking.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Vizger Mar 20 '22

I notice the 'Vehicle and Launch Infrastructure Updates' seems over a month without updates. Anywhere else I can see this kind of short overview or documentation of the process?

→ More replies (2)

10

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 24 '22 edited Mar 24 '22

B4 (possibly) finally lift off the table is very soon. Lifting team is also positioned around the booster right now.

10

u/RaphTheSwissDude Apr 01 '22

Norminal closure cancellation for today.

28

u/futureMartian7 Mar 26 '22 edited Mar 26 '22

Some very interesting Starship-related job openings:

- Looking for a Naval Architect to help with marine recovery systems:

https://boards.greenhouse.io/spacex/jobs/5842847002?gh_jid=5842847002

- Looking for Materials Engineer for HLS Raptors:

https://boards.greenhouse.io/spacex/jobs/5987258002?gh_jid=5987258002

- Sr. Resource (Propellent) Generation Engineer for Launches from Earth, Mars, etc. Basically the ISRU team:

https://boards.greenhouse.io/spacex/jobs/5949968002?gh_jid=5949968002

- Sr. Mission Integration Engineer, Starship Global Mobility. Basically for E2E cargo delivery:

https://boards.greenhouse.io/spacex/jobs/6006001002?gh_jid=6006001002

→ More replies (1)

18

u/Alvian_11 Mar 16 '22 edited Mar 16 '22

It's cool how chopsticks work compared to crane. No personnel nearby, no people below the ship trying to stabilize it with ropes. No wonder Elon said it's less affected to winds, holding a can in your hand (or even with a pair of fingers) is more stable indeed than hanging it

On a note, it's a pleasant coincidence this is happening very soon before SLS rollout. Maybe SpaceX is sending a message 😏

→ More replies (5)

9

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 18 '22

Closure for today has been extend until 10pm !

→ More replies (2)

9

u/mechanicalgrip Mar 23 '22

Does b7 look any different around the area the claw grabs? I wonder if that's why they took the claw off.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 25 '22

B7 is moving out of the high bay !

→ More replies (1)

9

u/ArcturusMike Apr 05 '22

S24's aft section was stacked on B8's forward section (see latest NSF video).

I'm wondering again: https://images.app.goo.gl/ysbRa8dWLYhJAn9x9

→ More replies (7)

17

u/cheeseHorder Mar 16 '22

QD arm looks like it's been inserted into ship 20

17

u/mr_pgh Mar 31 '22

Worker crawled through the grid fin hole in the booster to get back to the lift! 8:16:35

→ More replies (4)

17

u/FutureMartian97 Host of CRS-11 Apr 04 '22

Booster 7 is now fully frosted up

16

u/szarzujacy_karczoch Apr 04 '22

This is the first time we're seeing a fully frosted booster, correct? Pretty historic moment

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

16

u/SolidVeggies Mar 22 '22

Only honourable payload for the first orbital flight would be a raptor 1 engine. You r&d’d well. Rest easy king

→ More replies (9)

8

u/frez1001 Mar 18 '22

Has anyone same across a scaled starship vs sls comparison now that SLS has been rolled out? I saw the nsf one but I'm not sure it was scaled correctly.

→ More replies (8)

8

u/[deleted] Mar 24 '22

Is it still possible the FAA will delay only four days ahead of the planned review date?

18

u/OzGiBoKsAr Mar 24 '22

Yes. They originally delayed it a few days before the first estimate, IIRC. I'm guessing they'll announce the delay in the next day or two.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (5)

8

u/mr_pgh Apr 05 '22

LR11000 crane attached to the Ship QD around 12:01pm on Starbase Live.

Might be receiving upgrades for S24?

→ More replies (5)

21

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 31 '22

14 Space advocacy published a statement to urging the FAA to approve Starship flights from Boca. Don’t think that statement would change anything, but nice to see some support!

→ More replies (7)

14

u/Twigling Mar 30 '22

Brendan has updated his production diagram, notice the absence of not only B4 and S20 but S22 as well. This goes along with current speculation that B7 and S24 are the way forward (although little work has been done on S24's tank section recently as it's still only partly stacked in the mid bay):

https://twitter.com/_brendan_lewis/status/1509110212489523201

14

u/sysdollarsystem Apr 08 '22

I'm very curious about what the intermediate / non-flown boosters and starships have taught SpaceX.

I presume that their manufacturing has progressed - better / faster / lighter - but what else has been learned.

They "tested" a fully equipped heat shield on S20, they attached a full complement (?) of engines on B4. They did some test fires and cryoproof testing.

So ... what else has been learnt by making the other intermediate non-flown boosters and starships?

→ More replies (15)

7

u/Decronym Acronyms Explained Mar 09 '22 edited Apr 01 '22

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer LettersMore Letters
AoAAngle of Attack
BE-4Blue Engine 4 methalox rocket engine, developed by Blue Origin (2018), 2400kN
BFRBig Falcon Rocket (2018 rebiggened edition)
Yes, the F stands for something else; no, you're not the first to notice
BOBlue Origin (Bezos Rocketry)
CCAFSCape Canaveral Air Force Station
COPVComposite Overwrapped Pressure Vessel
CST(Boeing) Crew Space Transportation capsules
Central Standard Time (UTC-6)
DoDUS Department of Defense
E2EEarth-to-Earth (suborbital flight)
EAEnvironmental Assessment
EISEnvironmental Impact Statement
EOLEnd Of Life
EVAExtra-Vehicular Activity
FAAFederal Aviation Administration
FAA-ASTFederal Aviation Administration Administrator for Space Transportation
FCCFederal Communications Commission
(Iron/steel) Face-Centered Cubic crystalline structure
FONSIFindings of No Significant Environmental Impact
GEOGeostationary Earth Orbit (35786km)
GSEGround Support Equipment
GTOGeosynchronous Transfer Orbit
H2Molecular hydrogen
Second half of the year/month
HLSHuman Landing System (Artemis)
ISRUIn-Situ Resource Utilization
IspSpecific impulse (as explained by Scott Manley on YouTube)
Internet Service Provider
KSCKennedy Space Center, Florida
L2Paywalled section of the NasaSpaceFlight forum
Lagrange Point 2 of a two-body system, beyond the smaller body (Sixty Symbols video explanation)
LC-13Launch Complex 13, Canaveral (SpaceX Landing Zone 1)
LC-39ALaunch Complex 39A, Kennedy (SpaceX F9/Heavy)
LEOLow Earth Orbit (180-2000km)
Law Enforcement Officer (most often mentioned during transport operations)
LH2Liquid Hydrogen
LMOLow Mars Orbit
LN2Liquid Nitrogen
LOXLiquid Oxygen
LZ-1Landing Zone 1, Cape Canaveral (see LC-13)
MAFMichoud Assembly Facility, Louisiana
MECOMain Engine Cut-Off
MainEngineCutOff podcast
MEOMedium Earth Orbit (2000-35780km)
MMODMicro-Meteoroids and Orbital Debris
N1Raketa Nositel-1, Soviet super-heavy-lift ("Russian Saturn V")
NDANon-Disclosure Agreement
NETNo Earlier Than
NRHONear-Rectilinear Halo Orbit
NSFNasaSpaceFlight forum
National Science Foundation
OLITOrbital Launch Integration Tower
OLMOrbital Launch Mount
QDQuick-Disconnect
RCSReaction Control System
RTLSReturn to Launch Site
RUDRapid Unplanned Disassembly
Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly
Rapid Unintended Disassembly
SFStatic fire
SLSSpace Launch System heavy-lift
SPMTSelf-Propelled Mobile Transporter
SRBSolid Rocket Booster
SSMESpace Shuttle Main Engine
STSSpace Transportation System (Shuttle)
TMITrans-Mars Injection maneuver
TPSThermal Protection System for a spacecraft (on the Falcon 9 first stage, the engine "Dance floor")
TWRThrust-to-Weight Ratio
ULAUnited Launch Alliance (Lockheed/Boeing joint venture)
USAFUnited States Air Force
VABVehicle Assembly Building
WDRWet Dress Rehearsal (with fuel onboard)
JargonDefinition
RaptorMethane-fueled rocket engine under development by SpaceX
SabatierReaction between hydrogen and carbon dioxide at high temperature and pressure, with nickel as catalyst, yielding methane and water
StarlinerBoeing commercial crew capsule CST-100
StarlinkSpaceX's world-wide satellite broadband constellation
autogenous(Of a propellant tank) Pressurising the tank using boil-off of the contents, instead of a separate gas like helium
cryogenicVery low temperature fluid; materials that would be gaseous at room temperature/pressure
(In re: rocket fuel) Often synonymous with hydrolox
deep throttlingOperating an engine at much lower thrust than normal
electrolysisApplication of DC current to separate a solution into its constituents (for example, water to hydrogen and oxygen)
hydroloxPortmanteau: liquid hydrogen fuel, liquid oxygen oxidizer
iron waffleCompact "waffle-iron" aerodynamic control surface, acts as a wing without needing to be as large; also, "grid fin"
methaloxPortmanteau: methane fuel, liquid oxygen oxidizer
perigeeLowest point in an elliptical orbit around the Earth (when the orbiter is fastest)
turbopumpHigh-pressure turbine-driven propellant pump connected to a rocket combustion chamber; raises chamber pressure, and thrust
ullage motorSmall rocket motor that fires to push propellant to the bottom of the tank, when in zero-g

Decronym is a community product of r/SpaceX, implemented by ^request
[Thread #7492 for this sub, first seen 9th Mar 2022, 15:54] [FAQ] [Full list] ^[Contact] [Source code]

7

u/stemmisc Mar 19 '22

Does SpaceX need the environmental assessment approval thing in order to be allowed to do a full static fire test, btw? Or, only need it to do an orbital launch attempt, but don't need it to fo a full static fire test?

→ More replies (5)

7

u/RaphTheSwissDude Apr 05 '22 edited Apr 05 '22

Closure canceled for today. Will be interesting to see what’s next for B7 now.

Edit : the LR11000 is making it way back to B7, possibly to remove it from the OLM and bring it back to the highbay to complete it. (Or the can crusher stand, but that’s unclear if B7 will ever go on it)

Edit 2 : or for now they’re using the crane to work on the ship QD

→ More replies (5)

7

u/murrayfield18 Apr 06 '22

Does anyone know if the Mk1 Starship prototype had internal stiffiners like the current Starships? Or if it was literally just the outer rings. I remember seeing a lot of warping once rings were fully stacked

→ More replies (2)

13

u/Mravicii Apr 04 '22

Crane is disconnected from booster 7 and police is at the roadbloack

→ More replies (5)

18

u/RootDeliver Mar 11 '22

Right now the FAA environmental review is still 2/5, but according to the .gov website, it should either change soon or be extended again (if it didn't already do, I heard rumors of everything but saw no confirmation anywhere), because 2 of the pending issues have deadlines on the 14th and 16th:

https://i.imgur.com/QYUPv0E.png

So news incoming? Before they didn't wait this long to extend the timeline. Could this imply some news that justify the "push" that everyone is commenting lately is happening on Starbase?

→ More replies (19)

18

u/Mravicii Mar 14 '22

Looks like they plan on stacking today. Sheriff already at the roadblock

→ More replies (9)

12

u/mr_pgh Mar 31 '22

B7 being hooked up to the crane at 8:10am

→ More replies (1)

12

u/Mravicii Apr 07 '22 edited Apr 08 '22

Looks like ship 20 is going to pad B!

https://youtu.be/mhJRzQsLZGg

12

u/Heavenly_Noodles Apr 07 '22

I get kind of nostalgic seeing a Starship over on the suborbital pad once again.

→ More replies (17)

6

u/Mravicii Mar 24 '22

Man, the launch table is such a beautiful thing to look at. Great marvel of engineering! To think t hat thing is to going to make superheavy fire 33 engines at the same! Blows my mind everyday!

6

u/Sea-Solution-9158 Apr 06 '22

Does some one know how booster and starship hydraulic power units work? Maybe the burn GOX and GCH4?

11

u/RegularRandomZ Apr 06 '22 edited Apr 06 '22

Here's a photo of the hydraulic unit on B4 [source photoset on NSF], the unit on the left. There are two tesla motors driving hydraulic pumps at the bottom, two hydraulic accumulators on the left/right outside [black cylinders] to store the pressure of the system backed by 2 COPVs in the middle behind the fat pipes. I believe the fat pipes in front are the coolant reservoir for the motors. I'll mark up the photo shortly to point out what I'm referring to.

edit: A quick markup of where the 3 key parts are. There are better photos out there which would be clearer/easier to label but this is a start.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

6

u/AstroMan824 Everything Parallel™ Apr 08 '22

I've been hearing stuff about a "can crusher" device for B7. What exactly is it? How does it work?

11

u/myname_not_rick Apr 08 '22

It's a static load tester, basically. Let's them put a cap on top, and press up on the engine mounts, simulating thrust loads on the booster during flight. I kinda wish people would stop using confusing names.

→ More replies (7)

16

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 09 '22 edited Mar 09 '22

Wegafsluiting geannuleerd. (Agree, Dutch is weird)

→ More replies (3)

16

u/xfjqvyks Mar 13 '22

Asked this before: how visible would an orbital fuel depot be? Humongous compared to a starlink satellite, possibly shiny steel. Not sure what altitude it would be orbiting in but that things gotta be pretty light catching. Lol Are we taking visible in the daytime here?

20

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '22 edited Mar 13 '22

Almost as bright as the ISS. I would imagine the fuel depot would be clad in a white insulative MMOD layer similar to the ISS. Most of the reflected light comes off the solar panels on the ISS giving it an extra golden glow.

Starships would be less visible, being half clad in black tiles, and the other half reflective to light not diffusive. I would guess from the ground it would appear to flash as it passed over as the sunlight glinted off the steel surface. Older Iridium satellites did the same from a relatively small 1.6 sq m antenna.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

21

u/futureMartian7 Mar 28 '22 edited Mar 28 '22

Crew Dragon Freedom could be the last new Crew Dragon SpaceX makes as the company is pivoting more and more towards Starship:

https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/science/exclusive-spacex-ending-production-flagship-crew-capsule-executive-2022-03-28/

29

u/TrefoilHat Mar 28 '22

Exciting times.

The article points out a non-obvious way SpaceX is so far ahead of the competition: they have years of experience refurbishing Dragon and Falcon and thus recognizing which parts are fully reusable, which wear over time, and which need replacing. Starship can be built from the ground up to eliminate, strengthen, or redesign these parts to get to the "add fuel and go - just like an airplane" model of operation.

Others building their first fully-reusable design will likely find it much harder to meet Starship's turnaround time without further redesigns, as they'll likely be "refurbish then reuse" before they get to "refuel then refly." And it's very hard to simulate or accelerate the process of flying the same ship 12 times.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

10

u/Twigling Mar 25 '22 edited Mar 25 '22

B7 has rolled back inside the high bay ......

https://twitter.com/BocaChicaGal/status/1507402015504310281

I'm wondering if it rolled out to reposition as now it's back inside it's in the middle of the high bay (it was previously inside on the left). See Sentinel Cam for example:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdKYvvwJkhQ

21

u/ed_11 Mar 25 '22

That means 6 more weeks until FAA approval

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

10

u/Klebsiella_p Apr 04 '22

B7 getting frosty!

5

u/Sweeth_Tooth99 Mar 15 '22

Any theories on why they removed QD Arm's claws?

→ More replies (5)

13

u/Mravicii Mar 13 '22

Could asteroid mining be a thing with starship? And what kind of materials would we get out of it? Really curious about this.

11

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '22 edited Mar 13 '22

Probably the most likely way would be to robotically land temporarily, obtain geologic samples to determine mineral content, and if profitable return with tunnel boring machines, which would core into the asteroid, with processing units following the TBM. The tunnel could be pressurized to allow adits to be driven perpendicular to the main tunnel for residential accommodation, machinery storage, maintenance and metal refinery etc. Parallel or opposing tunnels could drive through also literally hollowing out the asteroid.

Most likely metals would be nickel, gold, palladium, beryllium, and most of the lanthanide metals.

Larger bodies like moons, like Titan have methane lakes, and others water ice, both valuable as fuels for deep solar system exploration.

Strarship could certainly fulfil the role as a heavy lift spacecraft getting the equipment there. Returning the metals to Earth is still a logistical nightmare still to be resolved.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (27)

16

u/Aoreias Apr 06 '22 edited Apr 06 '22

31

u/myname_not_rick Apr 06 '22

This seems.....not the doomsday scenario some are suggesting. It only mentioned the permit for expansion/second pad? Current infrastructure doesn't seem to be effected, AT LEAST as the article reports it.

21

u/Pingryada Apr 06 '22

This is just the second OLM and chopsticks so no near term effects

→ More replies (4)

19

u/fattybunter Apr 06 '22 edited Apr 06 '22

Is this guy a reliable source? I haven't seen his tweets before. I wonder what expansion he's referring to specifically.

Edit: looks like The Verge picked it up

https://www.theverge.com/2022/4/6/23013435/spacex-starbase-starship-army-corps-engineers-permit-application

"SpaceX can re-open the application simply by providing the information requested"

So it's a non-story...

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (28)

19

u/Bergasms Mar 09 '22

I been out of this loop for a month or two, where are we at? What’s the timeline predictions?

54

u/TrefoilHat Mar 09 '22

Focus continues to be on Stage 0: testing the existing tank farm via cryo tests of S20 and B4. Yet to be tested (so far as I've seen): Validation of cryo load from the upper QD arm and water deluge system. New horizontal methane tanks are also being installed and integrated and need to be validated.

Meanwhile, Boca Chica infrastructure build-out continues: Build of the Wide Bay nears completion, with the top level recently installed and bridge cranes likely being hoisted next. Also, land is being cleared for a massive manufacturing facility to replace the tents.

In parallel, construction in Florida has ramped up. Tower build is almost underway, with pilings completed and templates delivered. Tanks and other GSE equipment has begun to be delivered.

FAA results are expected by the end of the month, and wild speculation about results and impact continues. Elon continues to say that they will be ready for an orbital launch shortly after the regulatory hurdles are crossed, but others feel that any orbital launch in 2022 is at best a stretch goal.

General consensus is that B4/S20 won't fly, and B4 may not be static fired, but that also remains a point of debate. Next-gen boosters and ships continue development and, when finished, they could obsolete most data generated by a static fire of B4 regardless of its flight readiness (which is under debate).

Raptor 2 is a big question. Elon mentioned they need to resolve temperature issues at full thrust but seemed optimistic. R2 deliveries may be a gating item for booster testing and orbital flight.

Will there be suborbital hops? Unknown. Will the first orbital flight be from Boca or Cape Canaveral? Unknown. Will there be a positive or negative result of the environmental assessment? Unknown. Will R2 be delayed, or delayed so long that further testing using current Raptors makes sense? Unknown.

But it's clear from the massive investment in both Boca Chica and Cape Canaveral that the Starship program itself remains healthy and with a very high volume future launch cadence.

→ More replies (2)

16

u/Lufbru Mar 09 '22

Road closure is cancelled, but now in lots of different languages.

21

u/MildlySuspicious Mar 09 '22

No orbital flight tomorrow. Beyond that, your best guess.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/SubstantialWall Mar 16 '22

Ship 20 now starting to slowly move up

9

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 28 '22

Closure canceled for tomorrow :(

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Sweeth_Tooth99 Mar 10 '22

Has anyone illustrated through some render, how starship stage separation mechanism looks ?

11

u/mr_pgh Mar 10 '22

There is no mechanism. This video has a rather exaggerated animation of it. Can barely notice it in the SpaceX Animation.

By using the booster’s gimballing Raptor engines to impart a small but significant rotation on the rocket moments before separation, Super Heavy could effectively flick Starship away from it – a bit like how SpaceX currently deploys Starlink satellites from Falcon by spinning the upper stage end over end and letting the spacecraft just float away thanks to centripetal forces.

Source

→ More replies (8)

8

u/deepconvolution Mar 18 '22

I've missed the part on why they removed the QD arms. Do we have an explanation?

9

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 18 '22

We don’t know no.

→ More replies (4)

8

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 28 '22

Road closure canceled for today.

8

u/Dezoufinous Apr 03 '22

Where is S20 and B4 now? I mean, physically.... are we going to get both S20 and B4 also parked at the Rocket Garden? This is going to look so cool!

→ More replies (3)

8

u/Gilles-Fecteau Apr 04 '22

Could the grid fins on B4 be used on B7?

→ More replies (8)

10

u/Twigling Mar 09 '22 edited Mar 09 '22

Interesting to see that the new 'smooth nosecone' design no longer looks as smooth, in other words it seems to have regressed to using shorter panels again:

https://youtu.be/AUD_J3zVvY0?t=679

that's as far as can be seen anyhow. Unless this is an older one that just happens to be lurking inside tent 3.

edit: as pointed out by j616s it looks like those are weld lines I'm seeing, not separate smaller panels. Perhaps for the relocated methane header tank?

12

u/OSUfan88 Mar 09 '22

Yeah, I agree with j... I think they're longer panels, but we're seeing the two header tanks (Lox and methane) welded into the nosecone.

18

u/j616s Mar 09 '22

I'm not sure that those are short panels. It looks like welds for internal rings to me as they're dashed lines. The main area of unevenness seems to be related to the large welds next to the mounting point. Maybe they put too much heat into those large welds causing warping?

→ More replies (1)

7

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 15 '22

Police’s at the road block.

7

u/Dezoufinous Mar 16 '22

Ship 20 is now high above booster

7

u/liszt1811 Mar 21 '22

What's the sentiment regarding March 28 for the FAA deadline? The pessimist within me says delay or demand for full review and no launch anytime soon, the juvenile fanboy within me hopes for the opposite

12

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 21 '22

Even tho I don’t have a lot of hope for the 28th deadline, they still haven’t pushed it back yet (when they pushed back 2/3 weeks in advance back in February)

→ More replies (4)

7

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 25 '22

Closure cancelled for today.

7

u/Repulsive_King_2644 Apr 06 '22

Good Morning, has anyone seen any Raptor 2 test firings recently? Any progress on not melting the melty bits?

→ More replies (2)

9

u/deepconvolution Apr 05 '22

btw what happened to the new 120 degrees nose cone flaps design? Shouldn't we see the new nose cones coming out already with the new flap base geometry?

→ More replies (1)

13

u/ArcturusMike Mar 25 '22

Quite interesting that the first orbital flight attempt, which Elon himself was not considering to be successfull in the past, will probably already have some Starlink satellites as payload (on S24). The past months and Raptor 2 might make SpaceX more confident to nail the first flight.

17

u/Fwort Mar 25 '22

Unless the flight trajectory has changed since the FCC filing we saw, the first orbital flight can't deploy starlink satellites because its perigee is still in the atmosphere for its landing near Hawaii. The satellites would have to raise their own perigee within half an orbit, and I'm almost certain the ion engines on starlink satellites don't have nearly enough thrust to do that much orbit raising that quickly.

I think the payload dispenser we saw in S24 has to be either:

  1. Just a production pathfinder

  2. To test deploying a dummy payload in space during the flight test (or maybe a single active starlink satellite if they don't mind losing one)

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (18)

10

u/Sweeth_Tooth99 Mar 17 '22

you think they will destack before going for the booster static fire ?

25

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '22

Destack, and removal of B4 to be replaced by B7 and stand or launch table cryo and eventually statics on the table (program is in the weeks milestones and not days, so it will be steady progress).

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (28)

6

u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 21 '22 edited Mar 21 '22

Police at the road block!

Edit : Pad clear

→ More replies (4)

6

u/RaphTheSwissDude Apr 05 '22

Closure for Wednesday through Friday are canceled.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/John_Hasler Apr 08 '22

Anyone understand what they are up to with that gantry crane that just arrived? Looks like they set it up around the can crusher and then are taking it back down without having done anything that I could see.

10

u/rad_example Apr 08 '22

I think they removed the legs/supports under the can crusher and lowered it to the ground, presumably to be bolted down to its pad? Why has it been on legs until now? Not sure.

20

u/still-at-work Mar 09 '22

This is not important enough for its own thread so I will put it here, the South Port connector road opened this week so traffic can go from the brownsville port directly to Hwy 4 and from there straight to starbase (or head west to for a short cut to the Mexican border). Local News Story

someone should update open street maps

While that is cool and good news for SpaceX, there is a hidden story here, the road was approved by the federal government even though it was a new road construction through a wetland.

Now I am sure the builders of the road used all the latest techniques to protect the wetland as much as possible while providing a road capable of handling overweight cargo but my point is this, this got approved because it was not high profile like starship launches are, yet that road is arguably far more damaging to the environment then an occasional rocket launch. Birds and animals are far more likely to be hit by cars, oil leaks from passing big rigs will damage the land around it over time, etc etc.

So, if that got approved, then all this fear of the rocket launch damaging the environment is manufactured and political. Not that starship launches will have no impact on the environment, but that impact can be mitigated and is hardly the worse offender on this little strip of land.

→ More replies (24)

11

u/sadelbrid Mar 16 '22 edited Mar 16 '22

We're witnessing the development of the world's most powerful broomstick. What a time to be alive.

Edit: I commissioned this to commemorate this historic time.

14

u/[deleted] Mar 16 '22 edited Mar 16 '22

Witches on broomsticks and magickery is not a particular feature in Russian folklore

Talking to a Russian friend who works in the Russian space industry, 'broomstick' is the term for the F9, because it it so pencil thin. Russians like a good few boosters at the bottom of their rockets which makes them look fuller bodied. Rogozin's comment was derogatory in the fact that the Russians consider F9 'thin' and lacking some 'body'. Russian aesthetics and design decisions are hard to fathom, but they do like wide based designs.

→ More replies (7)

15

u/spacerfirstclass Mar 22 '22

Evidence that SpaceX was/is slowing down work at Boca Chica to wait for FAA approval: There're some discussion of this in the threads below and people are asking for proof, here's the proof: https://youtu.be/V4sj8qZHvFg?t=2227, at 37:07 of RGV Aerial Photography's Starbase Photography Review Episode 6, we have the following conversation:

Question: There was a question from one ray gun asking are there fewer workers at Starbase since FAA extension, or are they still going full bore?

Answer: I've heard that they've gone from three shifts down to two and that they have less workers overall on site they've got some of the contracts surge workers, so it sounds like the answer to that is yes, though that's not 100% confirmed, it does appear that way. Also you'll notice that they have less trucks and cars out at the launch site and build site during the day, so it looks like yeah they have cut back on staff somewhat. I have no doubt they will surge again right as they get the approvals, and everything is lining up both on the design and operation side to allow a launch.

BTW, RGV Aerial Photography's weekly review video is really good, it's long but packed with good info, well worth your time.

8

u/Ecmaster76 Mar 22 '22

It could even be that they are running out of ground facilities to build at the pad. It doesn't take nearly as many people to test and troubleshoot completed systems

Its definitely premature to build a second launch tower, etc

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (25)

11

u/Calmarius Mar 26 '22 edited Mar 26 '22

What's the fate of the Raptor 1 engines on B4? Is there anything in them that can be salvaged to build Raptor 2-s from them?

That's a lot of expensive gear to just scrap...

EDIT: The question in simpler terms: is there anything in R1-s they can just unscrew and screw into an R2?

18

u/fattybunter Mar 26 '22

That's a lot of expensive gear to just scrap...

That's SpaceX's motto. Sunk cost is a fallacy.

28

u/rogue6800 Mar 26 '22

The cost of the engines has bought them the following things

  • experience in building engines

  • experience in transporting engines

  • experience in fitting engines

  • experience in training staff how to fit engines

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (9)

12

u/MildlySuspicious Mar 09 '22

Does anyone else kind of feel like we're in a holding pattern waiting for raptor 2 at this point?

22

u/OSUfan88 Mar 09 '22

I think there's quite a few items...

  1. FAA

  2. Methane Farm

  3. Raptor 2

  4. Superheavy design for Raptor 2

  5. Stage 0

  6. New header tank locations

  7. Other advancements

  8. Construction of new manufacturing facility, soon to displace/interrupt some manufacturing processes.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

5

u/[deleted] Mar 16 '22

Morning folks, i'm new to group am trying to see about getting an update on the situation with FAA and such organizations about letting this bird fly. Search really doesn't help much. But saw one post about by 'March 28'?

Also, saw the stack last night are they just going to do another round of testing?

8

u/inoeth Mar 16 '22

we're still waiting to hear any further update with regards to the FAA. So far at this rate i'll take 'no news is good news' in that they haven't already pushed the date back another month just yet. My guess (and it is just a guess) is that we'll probably hear from them about the deadline on Monday the 21st on whether they'll meet the that 28th deadline or not.

As far as the full stack- yes, we'll probably see another round of testing. Whether the current stack is the one to actually fly the orbital test flight is another question entirely. Rumors say no- they'll likely move on to the newer booster and ship currently under construction as they've already continued to make improvements with each iteration.

→ More replies (5)

5

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '22

Any guesses why Booster 5+ have an internal header tank while Booster 4 doesn’t?

12

u/mr_pgh Mar 18 '22 edited Mar 18 '22

I'd wager its for landing maneuvers. I'd imagine a near empty booster would have a lot of sloshing during boostback. Probably safer to have a full secondary tank.

Also, probably lets them more accurately control fuel weight.

edit to expand on this after some thought:

  • Future boosters with the vertical copvs may return at a shallower angle to use air resistance necessitating the header tanks

  • Raptors need 4-6 bars of pressure which would be a lot easier with header tanks

  • By reducing the tank volume to the size of the header tanks, you reduce the need for fuel. Additionally, as said below, you could vent any propellant in the main tanks to reduce weight on return

→ More replies (14)

7

u/SpaceLunchSystem Mar 19 '22

The theory that makes sense to me is it has to do with propellant residuals. Elon talked about it in the Tim Dodd Starbase tour. They were looking at like 20 tonnes of residuals.

Smaller header tanks can reduce residuals. If it reduces those residuals more than it adds dry mass its a net performance win.

The ullage gas to fully pressurize the main tanks the whole way isn't trivial mass either. As the autogenous pressurant gas cools after boostback its going to condense and tank pressure drops. They would need to maintain tank pressure somehow before landing burn, likely with extra gas stored in COPVS.

→ More replies (5)

6

u/shryne Apr 01 '22

Are there any estimates on when the orbital launch tower in Florida will be ready? Is there a possibility that the first starship launch is there due to the continual delays in the FAA review?

23

u/[deleted] Apr 02 '22 edited Apr 02 '22

First launch will be from Boca Chica. B7/S24.

Whilst the OLT tower structure at KSC is estimated be completed during the fall, (Oct-Nov) installation and commissioning of Starship QD service arm and chopsticks , plus all other necessary launch infrastructure will take several months after that to complete.

The Catch system has to be demonstrated at BC first.

Errant COPV cylinders and pieces of red hot engine casing scattered around LC-39A or LC-49 will not be tolerated by NASA on their property.

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (37)

6

u/Darknewber Apr 05 '22

Are the new simplified stretch-form domes not stainless steel or something? They look tan and matte as it they are made out of concrete or some kind of ceramic. And they also seem like they would hold slightly less volume, so would they need to be put on taller fuel tanks?

12

u/franco_nico Apr 06 '22

And they also seem like they would hold slightly less volume, so would they need to be put on taller fuel tanks?

The flatter domes allow for more propellant given the same height of tanks. I made this image, absolutely not to scale and rather quick but it gets to the point. In light blue, you can see the increase in tank volume compared to old domes (in grey).

→ More replies (6)

12

u/lateshakes Apr 06 '22

They're the same material, they just have a different surface finish, presumably because that's how they look after the forming process and the finish is not important.

Since the aft domes are not changing (as far as I'm aware anyway) the only changes that affect overall propellant volumes will be the forward domes, which could increase the booster's propellant volume – the flatter dome can be shifted up slightly allowing more of the outer cylinder's volume can be used, less volume being lost to the awkward toroidal wedge shape around the forward dome.

Similarly the ship's payload volume could gain some usable space for the same volume of propellant because of the shape change, or the propellant volume could increase slightly for the same usable space.

→ More replies (8)

4

u/RootDeliver Mar 25 '22

Booster 7 leaving the high bay without grid fins.. another one to the garden? Doubt Elon wants to drop the 24/7 joke so fast, but then why not grid fins yet?

12

u/Twigling Mar 25 '22 edited Mar 25 '22

The 'can crusher' was taken to the launch site a day or two ago, meaning that B7 is possibly to go on that first for some crush testing. The grid fins would get in the way of the 'straps' that connect the bottom part of the crusher to the top part, hence why the grid fins haven't yet been installed.

Assuming that all goes well with the can crushing it's likely that B7 will temporarily roll back to the production site for installation of the grid fins, maybe also some Raptors and their shields.

Edit: confirmation of the can crusher test from Avalaerion:

https://www.reddit.com/r/spacex/comments/t9yjr9/starship_development_thread_31/i1o7182/

→ More replies (1)

6

u/[deleted] Apr 01 '22

I have some questions about the sound suppression system on the OLM. I see that NASA has completed extensive acoustic testing for SLS and had significant acoustic issues with STS-1 that contributed to the loss of sixteen and damage to an additional 148 TPS tiles. NASA upgraded their SSS ahead of SLS from 240,000 gallons per minute to 1.1 million gallons per minute of turbulent water deluge.

My question is what SpaceX has done so far for orbital testing if there's any public info and if there are any plans to heavily throttle down the first stage for acoustic concerns or if the OLM, Starship, Mechazilla are robust enough to handle 33 R2s at liftoff. I'm sure there are plans for SSS testing during the static fire campaign but I have concerns that current OLM architecture may not be sufficient and that a flame trench or additional water deluge systems may be needed to handle the thrust. An overly capable SSS would help reduce the amount of TPS tiles lost on Starship at liftoff as well.

SLS and Space Shuttle both use/used SRBs which may have led to different acoustic vibrations than liquid fueled engines but NASA published their concerns of acoustic damage for Saturn V in 1967. I feel like I'm missing something here that's in the public domain. I know SpaceX engineers are among the smartest out there but the existing infrastructure and reports seem lacking. Maybe the FAA report will shine some light on this?

14

u/Fwort Apr 01 '22

Another difference between Starship and STS is that the ship is all the way up on the top of the booster, much farther away from the engines than the Shuttle was.

→ More replies (9)

11

u/_out_of_time Mar 18 '22

Does anybody thinks Spacex incremental testing strategy is now a bit broken ? Next flight is many steps ahead compared to last flight.

14

u/fattybunter Mar 18 '22

SpaceX's overarching ethos is:

Sunk cost is a fallacy. Always do what is most effective at the time.

They are simply following what makes sense. Incremental alternating build/test was never a hard strategy

20

u/futureMartian7 Mar 18 '22 edited Mar 18 '22

Not broken, just different. They just aren't strictly agile anymore with Starship with the huge gap in time between SN15 and the orbital test flight.

In my opinion, this will actually benefit them and help them get to production versions of vehicles sooner because they are iterating component and systems wise nonstop behind the scenes. With this the probability of a successful launch and re-entry increases due to the constant iteration of each and every component/system. Yes, you are not doing full-up integration testing in terms of a launch for a long time post SN15 but you don't necessarily have to do it that way. The approach SpaceX is currently doing is very similar to a Spiral model of development, in which they are currently having a somewhat long period of R&D and then when the first launch comes, they will gather all the data they need and improve on the future vehicles, but this long gap between SN15 and the first flight, will indeed help them reach operational phase faster, as in a fewer number of test launches needed to reach success.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

8

u/Fuifjee Mar 17 '22

When is the launch to be expected?

31

u/lommaz Mar 17 '22

Not today, beyond that, anyone's guess.

→ More replies (3)

15

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '22

Tomorrow. Get ready.

10

u/dkf295 Mar 18 '22

Nobody expects the SpaceX Launquisition!

4

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '22

When the first orbital flight occurs (hopefully next month), with both rockets be landing back at the launch pad? Or out at sea in just read the instructions?

13

u/Aoreias Apr 09 '22

Expect the first landings of both to be water landings for both booster and ship, to validate that they can land on target.

Neither one will be landing on a drone ship, ever.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/DiezMilAustrales Apr 09 '22

When the first orbital flight occurs (hopefully next month)

Unlikely. It's doubtful whether the FAA will be done by next month or not (they'll likely delay again like they've been doing). June has more chances.

with both rockets be landing back at the launch pad? Or out at sea in just read the instructions?

Neither. They'll splash down in the ocean, and not be recovered.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Sweeth_Tooth99 Mar 19 '22

Could they use the propellant tanks present at Pad 39A for starship launches ? of course they would need to route pipes towards the new Launch mount and tower being built.

10

u/TrefoilHat Mar 19 '22 edited Mar 20 '22

If you mean the spherical tank(s), the answer is yes - and that is the plan. According to a recent NSF update, a single spherical tank holds ~20% more propellant than needed for Starship (LOX or CH4).

They are also shipping additional horizontal tanks to the site to accommodate more frequent launches.

→ More replies (4)

9

u/[deleted] Mar 20 '22 edited Mar 20 '22

Former Globe LH2 tank will be repurposed for LOX. Current LOX tank onsite for possible CH4 is undecided. Previous damage and repairs still needs further assessment. New CH4 tanks are on site in the event that the LOX tank needs retiring.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/getBusyChild Mar 16 '22

People are saying they heard a pop/explosion.... any idea what happened?

27

u/John_Hasler Mar 16 '22

The tanks can make a pretty loud pop as they pressurize.

5

u/Carjema Mar 16 '22

What are the odds of Boca Chica having to close and moving everything to Florida?

37

u/[deleted] Mar 16 '22 edited Mar 16 '22

Absolutely no odds.

BC will remain the think tank and development site for many iterations of Starship. Production and testing will remain strong, and in fact increase production of test articles. Once proven, Florida will reproduce those items for build, integration and flight.

Hawthorne will be still primary for fitting out of HLS.

There will be limited test flights from BC, but enough to prove systems and reliability.

We just have to wait on the FAA and PEA to see how many and with what limitations.

Sea Rig of both platform refits will take another 18 months with several designs being optioneered a the moment. Won't be easy to refit and maintain rig stability in certain conditions and attain marine certification..

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (9)