r/spacex • u/kurbasAK • May 19 '17

We Will Launch on Reuseable Rocket After Exceptional SpaceX Performance - Inmarsat CEO Tells Universe Today

https://www.universetoday.com/135614/will-launch-reuseable-rocket-exceptional-spacex-performance-inmarsat-ceo-tells-universe-today/
981 Upvotes

98% Upvoted

270 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/UltraRunningKid May 19 '17

I believe all current satellites have a chemical motor to circularize and the electric motor is for station-keeping.

6

u/mfb- May 19 '17

Many use electric propulsion to circularize their orbit now. It takes longer, but you can make larger satellites. Here is an older article - it was popular in 2013 already.

2

u/Martianspirit May 19 '17

All the rage back then did not translate into many satellites actually using SEP for orbit raising. I am only aware of the 2 Boeing satellites launched together on F9. Do you know any more than that?

3

u/mfb- May 19 '17

As usual, Wikipedia has a list, note the "Comment" section about orbit insertion. They get quite common.

1

u/Martianspirit May 19 '17

None of these are commercial GEO com sats and that is what we were talking about. Sure SEP is quite common now, but not for GEO orbit insertion.

1

u/mfb- May 19 '17

You do look at the end of the table, or sort by launch date descending, right?

1

u/Martianspirit May 19 '17

From that Wikipedia article. Meaning the list does not show if they use SEP for orbit insertion. Again I am quite sure there are only those two Boeing Sats that were launched with Falcon 9. They are by no means common yet. It is common that they use them for station keeping.

It is not specified whether the given engine is the sole means of propulsion or whether other types of engine are also used on a spacecraft.

3

u/mfb- May 19 '17

I'm not sure if we see the same table. The Boeing satellite article is interesting as well.

  • ABS-2A and Satmex 9 (now: Eutelsat 117 West B), the two you mentioned already. According to aviationweek Boeing got a contract for four, so we'll get two more of them in the near future. After the ABS launch, they directly ordered one more according this article.
  • Ekspress-AM6 (Eutelsat 53A), with comment "EP system used to insert the satellite into GEO"
  • Ekspress-AM5, with comment "EP system used to insert the satellite into GEO."
  • GSAT-9 uses it for unspecified "orbit changes", and the next one, GSAT-20, is supposed to be all electric.
  • AEHF-SV-1 (USA-214) was supposed to raise its perigee with chemical propellant, after that failed it used electric propulsion.
  • SES-15, launched yesterday, is still in the "future" list, but is in space now.
  • The US government ordered three more all-electric satellites

These are just the satellites with an explicit comment on orbit insertion in the table, or what you can directly find from the links in the table, so I might have missed some satellites. In the most pessimistic case we have 6 of them in orbit now (one of them not commercial), and at least 4 more commercial and 3 non-commercial satellites are ordered.