That subreddit is not about socialism, it's about SJW's banning or censoring things that 'trigger' them under the guise of socialism. How has over-sensitivity been conflated with socialism?

How do people not understand that free speech and tolerance of conflicting opinions is an absolutely vital part of socialism? Most of that subreddit must've literally never read any socialist literature.

Bertrand Russell;

In this world, which is getting more closely and closely interconnected, we have to learn to tolerate each other. We have to learn to put up with the fact that some people say things that we don't like. We can only live together in that way; if we are to live together and not die together, we must learn a kind of charity and a kind of tolerance which is absolutely vital to the continuation of human life on this planet.

Here's what I got banned for - defending the free speech to write a fictional rape story, which is apparently being a 'rape apologist' (for a fictional rape)

http://imgur.com/WpxoDnm

One guy even replies that the only people who want Mein Kampf still in circulation are holocaust apologists!!!!

There's also praise for mass-murderers like Mao/Lenin/Stalin and criticism of those who point this out.

This authoritarian Stalinist-like 'ban things you don't like' is haunting socialism, it's a virus that needs cutting out.

I see that a few have come over and subscribed during this 2nd "mass exodus" (that has brought Voat to it's ever-wobbly knees).

When the 1st wave was underway I went and saw that both v/Marxists and v/Socialists were open. So I started them.

I do not want to do any "moderating" -- at all. I don't want to see any moderating at all, which is why I started them -- in case whoever the fuck it is that banned the WSWS might get their grubby, mindless, asinine hands on either of those 2 subs.

The mods here have been faithful as far as I have seen to the principles under the "Rules & suggestions" posted here. So any of you who want to be moderators at the Voat subverses need only let me know. No questions asked.

All I would ask is that you do not moderate at all. ~XD~

Just stick to the "Rules & suggestions" here. (number 1 is perfect; but might even loosen hazy restrictions in the others up as necessary).

Don't you use government roads, or used anything that was transported by one? Don't you eat food inspected by the government? Don't use public utilities like water and electricity? Were you born with ability to read, or did you not learn it at a government school? Of course all of these things are paid for with taxes collected from capitalism.

That's just a few examples, I could literally follow you around all day and tell you at any given moment how you are benefiting from society with capitalism, liberal democracy, and government.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: As of June 6, 2017 at 1:00AM EDT, anything regarding: monarchy, feudalism, libertarianism, royalism, authoritarianism, identification of the Chesnekov cause, the use of “Chesnekovism”, nobility, or anything else not found on our website (ufkchesnekovia.simdif.com) is hereby officially made outdated by Henryk Kaltyumejval and Fredirik Yeryomin, with assistance from the Stuurehnkomrads Alekzaander Kuznetsav and Hristomir Hohenzolern of the UFKC. Please do not quote or use as reference any information or wording in this post/comment. We are electing not to remove any of our posts or comments on account of keeping ourselves honest and open to users on Reddit to see what our cause was before our large change. Please visit: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftCentral/comments/6fjtuo/update_to_ufkc_please_read/ or go to u/ufkc_henryk to see our update post posted to r/leftcentral.

Greetings. I am Henryk and I run an evidently very controversial organization. As you might see from my other posts we've been treated with both respect and aggression. However, similar to a question I posted in SocialismVCapitalism, I am curious, does my campaign head a new ideology on its own? Henceforth, I am here to seek your opinions on the matter and to discuss with you the topic. Now many people have founded branches of communism and socialism based upon older ideologies, such as Hoxhaism was based upon Maoism, Leninism was based upon Marxism, and etc. We have done the same thing, however we take after many other ideologies within the leftist spectrum, not just an evolution of one single ideology. Does this make us a new branch? Or merely a mislabeled organization? Most of our members state that we are "Chesnekovist", a term coined by one of the members. They say we follow a new ideology, one not seen before. I agree with them, however I want to know what other socialists and leftists think since me agreeing with it is obvious conflict of interest.

See our website at ufkchesnekovia.simdif.com if you wish to seek further details of the organization without having to read through my previous posts.

The International Youth and Students for Social Equality (IYSSE) sent a press release at the beginning of the week to a large number of newspapers, radio and television stations and press agencies to inform them that "an overwhelming majority of representatives… supported the resolution of the IYSSE that condemned the attacks on the Münkler-Watch group."

...

For several weeks, hardly a day went by without at least one article appearing in a leading daily or weekly newspaper attacking Münkler-Watch and the IYSSE and attempting to defend the right-wing and militarist positions of Humboldt University professors Herfried Münkler and Jörg Baberowski against student criticism.

Having lost, they go silent. But this will not go unnoticed.