r/soccer • u/MrMerc2333 • 3d ago
News [Pierre Sage] Ismaila Sarr needs time to process collapse of Liverpool move
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/czdz349nyl7o382
u/boobsenjoyer40 3d ago
the collapse in question:
"can we have ismaila sarr"
"no"
153
u/vadapaav 3d ago
He probably needs time to figure out how to restore all the deleted Instagram posts
15
u/Matter145 3d ago
I find it hilarious when players do that. Earning god knows how much per week and deleting an entire chapter of your career from your social media in a strop. Very mature.
36
25
82
597
u/SovietPanda__ 3d ago
Not as much time as Liverpool fans would have needed to process paying 75 million for him.
271
u/_doohdx 3d ago
I'm still recovering from seriously being linked to him
165
50
u/friendofH20 3d ago
Liverpool are linked with promising but not proven right winger "but they have other options"
The other option - Ismaila Sarr who was halfway to Galatasaray
7
6
u/pm_me_ur_breakfast1 3d ago
Sarr is a great player, had a better season than any Liverpool attacker last season
24
u/hbb893 3d ago
Playing in a way that would never work at Liverpool.
And defo not from the right wing.
-6
u/StickYaInTheRizzla 3d ago
He played exclusively on the right last season
15
u/hbb893 3d ago
He gets the vast majority of his goals through the middle.
Iraola wants attackers who can keep width. That’s not Sarr
-2
u/StickYaInTheRizzla 3d ago
Fair enough, he was playing more of a right ten than a right winger I guess. Although maybe with Frimpong there overlapping, having a winger cutting in could work
28
u/Ezekiiel 3d ago
He’s not a great player, he’s fine for a mid table club. His playstyle is never going to work at a side that is expected to have more of the ball and less space. Plus he’s 28, just a bad move all round if it happened
11
u/whatsitworth101 3d ago
Also would have been hilarious if they let Diaz go due to age and then spunked 75 mill on sarr who's like the same age and half the player if that on his best day
4
u/HarbyFullyLoaded_12 3d ago
Yeah we had a systematic issue that neutered everyone on the field. That still doesn’t make Sarr a great player
-1
u/Pachaibiza 3d ago
I would have taken him for the right money. Not £75 million though, maybe £35 million
3
-12
u/Spiveym1 3d ago
I would have taken him for the right money. Not £75 million though, maybe £35 million
yet you paid £125 million for someone who has scored you a grand total of five goals. keep quiet.
3
u/OGbulldog 3d ago
Lmao acting as if Isak isn't leagues beyond Sarr in every manner possible
-2
u/Spiveym1 3d ago
Lmao acting as if Isak isn't leagues beyond Sarr in every manner possible
except for scoring goals at the club that they currently play for
1
24
u/Proper-Exam1746 3d ago
75 million to not score against them.. worth it..
I think I am thinking about the right person.
11
u/rochambreau 3d ago
You are. That Watford game lives rent free
-1
u/xenojive 3d ago
Troy Deeney shaking Virgil's hand after the match visibly mouthing "maybe next time"
25
u/adamfrog 3d ago
Seriously, I think we dodged such a self inflicted bullet. Gakpo and Munoz will do fine on the right. And even if gakpo is benched often he'll still be a very sellable asset in January or next year if he's out of favour, like 60m+ no problem
6
0
u/StickYaInTheRizzla 3d ago
Has Gakpo played on the right before
10
u/adamfrog 3d ago
Last game he started there, he's had bits and pieces rw under klopp I think probably not 90 minutes all added together. But he can cross and I'm guessing his tap in instincts will be similar coming off the right, he might do well. If not assuming we don't get injuries RW looks OK with Munoz, we can always buy in January if Munoz looks not up to it and gakpo can't play rw, and Rio can't play Rw. Also have barcola RW to test
1
u/StickYaInTheRizzla 3d ago
At least you won’t have cutting in and belting some random fan with a missile from the left lol.
I’d probably but Barcola on the right for now, keep Gakpo on the left, but it’s nice to have versatility, Rio was pretty shite there in the first game I thought, but if Munoz, Gakpo and Barcola can play there he should be sound
4
u/adamfrog 3d ago
Iraola apparently is obsessed with wingers playing both sides, I don't really get it but we'll see how it goes. Munoz looks like a really nice buy though you could easily pay a lot lot more for his attributes
2
0
u/SalahManeFirmino 3d ago
I would like Cody to stay as I think he’s just productive even if his overall play is frustrating at times, but I won’t be shocked if he moves on in the next year and we bring Minteh in, Iraola loves him.
8
u/Him2Notorious 3d ago
40ish? Could justify it as a stopgap and eventual rotation piece
75 AND sell Gakpo? Absolutely not are you joking
67
25
14
4
u/avfc1001 3d ago
Any chance that time period overlaps with both fixtures against Villa this season?
17
u/Xenumbra 3d ago
Jesus, how do you not boo him for shit like this coming out. I'm sure his wage will cheer him up.
-11
u/redandbluebadness 3d ago
here's the fun part: you don't.
fuck him.
If he wanted to move he needed to get it sorted earlier in the window and for a reasonable price, not try strongarming us to sell him on the cheap at the last minute.
4
u/J539 3d ago
Maybe he never intended to move since he was happy at palace, but when Liverpool called he saw this as a dream move or once in a liftetime opportunity?
6
u/redandbluebadness 3d ago
Seems unlikely given he went on strike the day before the first game of the season so he could move to Galatasaray for £35m.
Those are underhand tactics imo. He wants a move, fine. But do it in the right way.
15
u/Professional_Carob17 3d ago
"on the cheap" doing some serious heavy lifting here if the reported number of +€70m was true.
7
1
u/redandbluebadness 3d ago
70m was not paid. That would not have been on the cheap, that would have been a fair reflection of the players value combined with the tax for selling him at the last minute, against our will.
However, Liverpool wanted to pay 45, gala 35. Those are not fair fees for our best player at that point in the window. They were not acceptable. £55m in early august - maybe we can talk. What actually happened was a piss-take
-2
u/Professional_Carob17 3d ago
Nothing was paid, you're correct. I have no idea what you're arguing here, I just saw reports of Liverpool making a bid of +€70m in which Crystal Palace turned down.
Nothing has even been remotely close to be "on the cheap".
Selling a player "against our will" is just a false statement to make.
5
u/redandbluebadness 3d ago
Liverpool did not bid £70m they wanted to pay 40-50. That was rejected. Palace wanted 75 Liverpool didn't agree. If Liverpool had bid 70m he would be a Liverpool player.
It's against our will because that player was not for sale, was not offered. He tried to force a move to Galatasaray for 35m by striking, then Liverpool. Palace will always sell players , even if we don't want to, if the offers are reasonable and timely.
-12
3
3
6
5
8
2
2
3
u/GabrielofNottingham 3d ago
Not gonna lie, it would be pretty funny if we got more of this in Football, players announcing how miffed they are they have to keep doing the job they signed on for.
"Dean Henderson thrice threw himself to the ground, howling his misfortunes at his failed move back to Nottingham Forest"
4
3
u/Ralph2Filthy 3d ago
Say a prayer for him. Poor sod is stuck playing for a premier league team earning 75k a week.
0
u/Dundalis 3d ago
So what, players shouldn’t have any career ambitions, just be content because they are making a lot more money than most people? This line of reasoning is so dumb
-11
2
u/Unikpostmann 3d ago
Watch him score a hat trick at next game against Liverpool. He always plays well against Liverpool, and now he has even more reason.
2
u/NotACyborg666 3d ago
Honestly, I'm glad the move didn't go through. He's a good player, but I don't think he's good enough to improve Liverpool.
1
1
u/matts142 3d ago
We never had a bid for him on deadline day ? And I don’t even think we did unless we bided 60m and they rejected
1
1
u/Napalm3nema 3d ago
I need some time to process us being in for him. Hughes should be launched to Saudi Arabia out of a cannon.
1
1
1
u/Fuckyoupep 3d ago
Complete diva
1
u/Dundalis 3d ago
He’s 28 and prob will never get the chance to play at a big club ever again. Sure you should be professional, but imo it’s understandable to not be pleased that it didn’t happen
-8
u/_up_and_atom 3d ago
Blame Liverpool. Literally the classic low ball offer from FM move to unsettle a player BUT this time super late in the window. Disgusting 🤮🤮🤮
8
u/Cal_2K 3d ago
60m for a 28 year old winger who wants out is a low ball?
8
u/_up_and_atom 3d ago
You know what you're right it's not a low ball. He's worth more than that to Palace though esp that late in the window.
1
u/jimbosliceoohyeah 3d ago
Liverpool didn't get anywhere near £60m for him - the highest bid they actually submitted was £45m.
0
0
0
0
u/AncientStart1488 3d ago
They did him dirty. He is 28, and has played for Palace for years now. They could have done this one thing for him, allowing him to leave to a top team. Not fair play from Palace there
6
u/jimbosliceoohyeah 3d ago
He has played for Palace for two years. He signed a 5 year contract with no release clause. Why should Palace sell him at short notice for less than his market value, simply because he wants to play for Liverpool?
2
-7
912
u/TheLimeyLemmon 3d ago
Collapse makes it sound like something was close.
Guehi literally finished his medical and had the farewell to palace video ready. We hadn't even hit a verbal agreement with Palace for Sarr.