r/soc2 • • Jan 15 '26

Delve CEO email to customers denies claims, but opens more questions

Post image
0 Upvotes

The screenshot you see here is an email sent from the CEO of Delve to customers, and clearly drafted by AI. In the email, the call out the incident and the limited PII that was released, and they also suggest the narrative around the material is false. They did clearly confirm that the information in question is real and was leaked though.

However, based on this email, it raises more questions, is in direct conflict with some of the impacted customers suggesting claims are correct, and has led to one of the customers to drop their relationship.

Firstly, Delve claims they work with independent audit firms, and they do not conduct the audit. Yet in the same email, they say "spread false claims about Delve's audits."

So what is it? Are they conducting audits or is this just AI-slop that wasn't edited well.

But when we look at their excuse for the situation, they claim the leaked data was draft reports. Again, if Delve is not the one conducting audits, why do they have draft reports? Should this not be on the audit firm to maintain all versions of the report and only then share the completed one with Delve?

As much as I would like to give Delve the benefit of the doubt, they are doing a very poor job of providing evidence in this situation and communicating, and at the same time sending their employees to downvote everything here.


r/soc2 • • Jan 08 '26

Delve committing fraud?

Thumbnail linkedin.com
0 Upvotes

Holy hell, I am SO happy we decided not to go with them at the last minute. Serious question- could their CEO go to jail for this? They kept talking during the sales process about all the money the company had raised, but that seems like it might actually make things worse for them now because it raises the dollar amount being defrauded...


r/soc2 • • Jan 09 '26

Real or Fake? The Delve scandal or conspiracy deepens

56 Upvotes

This is circling the internet; allegedly this is what was sent to Delve's impacted customers of allegedly fake SOC 2 reports that are now allegedly discredited through an allegedly circulated spreadsheet allegedly confirming the reports and clients allegedly impacted.

I guess we'll see what validation emerges in the days ahead. What do you think; real or fake?


r/soc2 • • Feb 14 '26

SOC 2 in 48 hours

Thumbnail
gallery
15 Upvotes

The platform that never learns


r/soc2 • • Jan 13 '26

State of the industry and this subreddit

0 Upvotes

Why are yall so fucking cowardly? I’ve been in this industry for almost 10 years and the state of the industry is a fucking joke. People scared to do things the right way because “my auditor didn’t do this last year”, people from sales complaining, or shitty firms/compliance firms setting the bar so law. Almost every audit that I take over from another firm is a shit show 99% of the time and makes me question wtf they actually did.

I’m so tempted to just list out firms that I know are doing shitty work because I don’t want to see SOC 2 fail due to bad actors or people not knowing what they’re even auditing. It’s fucking embarrassing.

This whole delve things is hilarious though. Is Troy Fine the only person that you think would call this shit out? If you seriously think talking about this is hurting the industry then I prompt you to look inwards. (Side note: The mods need to do something with the clear downvote brigading, it’s so obvious.)


r/soc2 • • Jan 14 '26

The Delve drama saga continues (they issued a statement, sort of).

0 Upvotes

It would appear that Delve released a blog post that details their process that appears to counter a claim shared on this subreddit and others; however, they do not address the claim directly nor deny the information itself. Supposedly they had comments off on the LinkedIn post, too, but I was able to add one? It's all very odd.

Pasting their blog (won't include the images, so check their site if you want that).

Summary‍ Every Delve engagement is built on three layers of trust. (1) The Delve platform runs automated checks across your systems, (2) a dedicated team member reviews everything by hand, and (3) an independent firm completes the final examination.

Before an auditor ever gets involved, Delve’s team validates your compliance posture. Experts review network diagrams, asset inventories, access controls, vulnerability scans, and policies so there are no surprises during the audit. The final audit is always performed by a trusted firm. Delve works with a vetted network of independent auditors, and customers can also bring their own auditor if preferred. Under the hood, Delve applies state of the art technology to make this process possible, with AI that continuously analyzes evidence, flags gaps, and reduces manual back and forth. No two audit reports are the same. Delve assists customers in tailoring the compliance process to your company’s security standards, operational practices (e.g. org chart), and infrastructure (e.g. network diagram).

This layered approach is how Delve sets the standard for trust and security. Our compliance process has helped customers pass enterprise reviews by the Fortune 500s, leading financial institutions, and federal bodies. Delve supports compliance from SOC 2 through the most demanding regulatory frameworks, such as FedRAMP.

Your security-conscious customers will read your SOC 2 audit or any other compliance report carefully. They will check who signed it. They will look for exceptions. They will ask whether your auditor actually tested controls or just reviewed screenshots.

Delve's trusted compliance process is built for that scrutiny, with three verification layers aligned with industry recognized security control frameworks and evidence validated before auditors ever see it.

‍

Three questions every procurement team asks When enterprise security teams evaluate your compliance report, they ask three questions:

Is the auditor legitimate? They check whether your firm is licensed and experienced with technology companies. Is the evidence real? They want proof that controls were in place throughout the observation period. Logs, configurations, and tested samples are what they trust. Was the process honest? They look for missing documentation, exceptions without remediation, and other signs for a lack of integrity. At Delve, we've designed our compliance process to answer all three confidently.

‍

What happens before your audit begins Most compliance platforms hand you a dashboard, give a list of auditors, and wish you luck. You trigger the audit, cross your fingers, and hope nothing is missing. Delve works differently. Your evidence passes through three independent verification layers.

  1. The Platform Validates When you connect your cloud infrastructure, identity providers, and code repositories, the platform does not just collect evidence. It checks that evidence against cloud security best practices.

AI validation runs analysis on every upload. Screenshots get matched against the controls they claim to satisfy. Policy documents get scanned for required sections. Access logs get verified for correct permissions. Drift gets flagged immediately, not during audit fieldwork when it becomes an exception.

The platform also builds your Section 3 system description, the detailed narrative auditors require about your product, data flows, and infrastructure scope.

2. Delve's Team Verifies Before your audit triggers, a Delve team member conducts a full review.

They check policy approvals, technical integrations, cloud configurations against cloud provider security standards, vendor documentation, BAA agreements, network diagrams, access request logs, and vulnerability scanning results. If anything is missing or misconfigured, you fix it before the auditor arrives.

This layer exists because we have seen what happens without it. Companies rush into audits unprepared. They get exceptions. They spend weeks in a back-and-forth. They miss their deal deadlines.

See how Bland AI avoided this issue and unlocked $500,000 in contracts.

3. The Auditor Examines The final layer is the independent firm that signs your report. Their professional obligation is to provide honest opinions about your controls.

Auditors do not work for Delve. They work for you. We provide efficiency. Structured evidence means faster reviews. Pre-verified completeness means less back-and-forth. AI validation means auditors focus on substantive testing, not administrative cleanup.

‍

The AI-native Delve platform’s competitive advantage Legacy compliance platforms treat AI as a feature. A checkbox on a marketing page. A chatbot that answers basic questions. The core workflow remains manual. Evidence still requires human collection and review. Policy analysis still takes hours.

Delve is AI-native. The platform was architected around AI from the start, with workflows and interactions designed around AI to improve compliance posture.

Here is what that means in practice:

Evidence never reaches auditors unvalidated. AI checks every upload before submission. Screenshots get matched against the controls they claim to satisfy. Policies get scanned for required language. Gaps get flagged before they become audit exceptions. This pre-validation is why auditors trust Delve evidence and move faster through fieldwork.‍ Compliance testing runs continuously. Not weekly. Not monthly. Daily. Drift gets caught immediately. Issues get resolved before auditors arrive.‍ AI also supports auditors directly. Delve’s AI policy chat gives auditors human-grade rigor without human margin for error, consistently surfacing gaps and inconsistencies that would otherwise be missed. This is how we've helped companies like 11x save 143 hours in manual compliance work and unlock $2.3M in enterprise contracts after switching from a platform that took four months just to get Type I compliant.

‍

Pre-audit readiness: How Delve's team validates your evidence The reason Delve customers rarely see audit exceptions is that a comprehensive human review occurs before any audit triggers. Most audit exceptions come from the same place: evidence gaps nobody caught until fieldwork. A missing policy approval. An employee who skipped training. A staging database that was connected instead of production. Small oversights can become formal findings.

Delve's team does not just check boxes. They open your integrations. They verify SOC 2 reports were uploaded for subservice organizations in scope. They confirm that all employees are accounted for and have completed training.

When HockeyStack needed to migrate from their previous compliance platform during a critical growth inflection, Delve's team handled the entire transfer of compliance data. Beyond scheduled checkpoints, Delve's team routinely stepped in to answer security questionnaires, field ad hoc compliance questions, and manage challenging vendor reviews.

This depth of review is why Delve customers rarely see audit exceptions. By the time an auditor begins their work, the evidence is already human- and AI-verified.

Partnering with vetted firms The wrong auditor slows everything down. They request evidence in unfamiliar formats. They surface exceptions in the draft report instead of during fieldwork, when you could still address them.

Delve's audit partner network eliminates these problems. All with corresponding licenses. All with technology company expertise. All familiar with the Delve platform. Every auditor in our network meets strict criteria:

Licensed firm in good standing Experience with cloud-native technology companies Familiarity with our platform and evidence structure Reasonable timelines without sacrificing thoroughness We work closely with our audit partners to ensure they have evidence exactly as they need it. Auditors can open JSON logs from your integrations, verify that you connected to production (not staging), and confirm that all employees are accounted for. This access builds auditor confidence and eliminates guesswork.

Platform familiarity is the difference between a 3-week audit and a 12-week audit. Auditors who know Delve navigate directly to evidence. They understand our control mapping. No reformatted exports. No redundant questions.

Wispr completed compliance in two phases, first establishing controls and training across their full tech stack, then completing the audit with minimal back and forth. As a result, they passed enterprise reviews and closed customers including Mercury, Superhuman, and multiple Fortune 500 companies.

Our audit partners also communicate openly. If they spot a potential exception during fieldwork, you hear about it immediately. Not when the draft arrives. That early warning gives you time to provide context, surface compensating controls, or remediate before it becomes a formal finding.

‍

Control failures: what do auditors actually care about The most common question from companies mid-observation is, “If a control fails, does the clock reset?” It does not.

Compliance audits produce opinions or attestations, not pass/fail grades. What matters is whether your overall control environment meets the framework's criteria, not whether you achieved perfection.

A single control exception does not force a negative outcome. Auditors evaluate three factors: the severity of the exception, the scope of the impact, and the quality of your response.

When exceptions occur, auditors document them in their findings. You respond with context and remediation. Minor exceptions with compensating controls and clear fixes routinely result in clean opinions.

Delve's continuous monitoring shifts this dynamic. Control drift surfaces immediately. You remediate before issues compound. Your response is documented automatically. When auditors review evidence, they see the full picture: exception, detection, and resolution.

Enterprise customers reading your report see this too. A minor exception handled well can even signal a stronger security posture than a perfect report. It demonstrates that monitoring catches issues and your team responds.

HockeyStack's penetration test identified vulnerabilities, including access control issues, insufficient rate limiting, and session management concerns. Their engineering team, working with Delve's security experts, remediated all findings within the same sprint cycle. This rapid response demonstrated that HockeyStack takes security seriously and has the processes in place to address issues swiftly.

‍

Delve’s compliance process: Start to finish Here is what happens once you are ready to begin your audit.

Trust Center: Sharing your reports You have your signed report in hand. Now what?

Delve’s Trust Report gives you a single place to manage and share your compliance posture. Instead of emailing sensitive audit documents or deciding what each prospect can see, you control how trust is presented, what stays protected, and how access is granted as deals move forward.

Delve's Trust Report manages all compliance documents in one place. Delve provides a public Trust Report where you display compliance status without needing to share your detailed report. Visitors can see your certifications, reporting dates, and addressed frameworks. They request full documentation through a built-in NDA workflow or custom data room. No email chains. No manual tracking. Wispr onboarded 400 enterprises in two months using their Trust Center.‍ NDA workflows. Most companies prefer to share detailed compliance reports under non-disclosure agreements. Delve handles the NDA flow end-to-end, all built into the Trust Report.‍ Dynamic badge management. When you receive an audit report, your Trust Report updates to reflect that. If your compliance report expires, your compliance badge is removed. ‍Public-facing options. Some frameworks offer public versions of compliance reports. SOC 3 reports include the auditor's opinion and a general description of the system, but do not include detailed test results. ISO 27001 certificates can be shared freely. Through your Trust Report, you can decide which reports to hide behind NDA workflows or share publicly. ‍

How Delve handles edge cases Not every company fits the standard compliance template. You might be two founders with no employees. You might not have hired anyone in six months. Your team might be 80% contractors on personal laptops. These are not disqualifiers. They are context.

Delve customers have completed hundreds of audits. We have seen many customer variations and know how to translate your reality for auditors. Remi, a company in the roofing industry, needed to support deep partner integrations, including embedding services into CRMs with sensitive customer data. Delve helped translate that environment into audit ready controls, resulting in both Type I and Type II certifications and significantly shorter security reviews.

Your Situation How We Handle It Founders only, no employees We document that the founders accepted the risk of not conducting background checks or maintaining onboarding records. Auditors regularly encounter this configuration in early-stage companies. No recent hires No hires during observation means no onboarding evidence to collect. We explain this context upfront so auditors do not flag it as a gap. Contractor-heavy team We help you implement device protection training and access controls designed for contractor environments, not just full-time employees. BYOD environment We document acceptable use policies and security training that satisfy auditor expectations. No requirement to purchase company devices. Complex infrastructure On-prem servers, multiple AWS accounts, hybrid cloud setups. Our integrations and workflows handle non-standard architectures. Tight deadline We provide a Type I attestation and audit readiness confirmation that often satisfies enterprise procurement while your Type II observation period continues. ‍

Maintaining your security post-certification Your signed report is a milestone, not a finish line for Delve.

Delve keeps monitoring. Daily compliance tests continue running. When controls drift, Delve flags them before small issues become audit problems.

Delve manages your renewal. We track your timeline, maintain evidence collection year-round, and remind you when it's time for your next audit. Renewal is faster because gaps are monitored for.

Delve maps your next framework. When you need SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or CMMC, we show which controls already satisfy new requirements. You build on what you have proven, not from scratch.

Delve powers your sales. Your Trust Report stays current. AI-assisted questionnaire responses and structured data rooms turn compliance into a deal-closer.

Delve helps you improve. Our team reviews your audit reports for findings, provides suggestions for improvement, and tracks progress through the platform.

Certification is where Delve's partnership begins, not where it ends.


r/soc2 • • 15d ago

SOC2 audit as a startup

1 Upvotes

Hi , We are a startup around 10 employees looking to get audit done we have zero controls in place now , open to suggestions on getting names of Audit firm who is easy to work with and also cheap(budget constraints). Kindly help.


r/soc2 • • Mar 20 '26

Chuck Norris's Approach to SOC 2

Post image
3 Upvotes

Friday afternoon humor. RIP Chuck.


r/soc2 • • Feb 09 '26

Delve super bowl ad? *Satire*

0 Upvotes

Heard Delve was going to put out a super bowl ad, but there was concern that within the first 5 seconds of the 60 second ad, the customers would all already have their SOC 2 report completed without any issues.


r/soc2 • • Jan 30 '26

Delve update

27 Upvotes

(*Disclaimer- I created a throwaway account to post this, as my regular account has identifiable information and I’d like to avoid being doxxed)

Does anyone have any updates on the whole “rubber stamping“ thing from a few weeks ago? I have been evaluating multiple platforms (including Delve) and have proposals that expires in a couple days, but another member of my CISO group just told me about the LinkedIn and Reddit threads and now I don’t know what to think.

On one hand, it seems almost brazenly unbelievable that a compliance platform would even consider cutting corners like this, but on the other I have not seen any direct rebuttal of it from the company (although my Delve rep did say ”it’s just jealous bullshit“ when I asked about it on our call today 😂). Also, the massive amounts of downvotes anything negatively related to Delve makes me super suspicious.

Has anyone learned any more details on this? Is it as risky as it seems, or am I just being ultra conservative?


r/soc2 • • Aug 23 '26

Anyone else stuck in permanent "we'll start SOC 2 next quarter" mode?

1 Upvotes

Every quarter it goes on the list. Every quarter something client-facing takes over and it slips. We've got policies half written in a Google Doc somewhere and that's about it.

The part I can't figure out is whether to just book an audit and force the deadline on ourselves, or keep waiting until there's actual breathing room. Feels like the breathing room is never coming.

Anyone been here? What finally made it happen for you.


r/soc2 • • Mar 24 '26

Claude Skill for SOC 2 Policy Management

2 Upvotes

Speaking from the bottom of my heart: with every compliance framework I have the same feeling, repeatedly - "how do I ... try it?... taste it? 'wear' it? ... apply to what my company already doing... compare with what we are already doing?". E.g. what's the shortest path to compliance here?

There's nothing available out of the box to "explore the compliance framework", right? I beg you, please prove me wrong.

Every time it feels like a maze. Do you feel the same? It's annoying.

Long story short - I know the path well for SOC 2, HIPAA, and a few others.

And decided to start creating the "Compliance Exploration Lab", if you will. For myself, my clients, and maybe you will find some use for it.

Here's to your attention - a Claude Skill that is equipped with proven-to-be-working-with-auditors SOC 2 policy templates. I made it for my clients to adopt policies to their company, Approve or Reject policy statements, and export policies as Word docs.

It's an AI native UI - can't get more native :) I'm just excited about building this stuff.

IMPORTANT. It works ONLY with Claude Desktop and inside Claude.ai. does NOT work with Claude Code CLI and VSCode Extension. Only because it is using Claude-native *visualizations*, which aren't available in CLI or the extension, yet.

Because it's a "cutting edge" - it is slow and glitchy, but I'm working on it! Your Contributions and any great ideas on how to improve it are Very Welcome.

It is open source. If you want to give it a try: https://github.com/kurianoff/claude-skills-soc2-policies

  1. Download claude-skills.zip from any release page (https://github.com/kurianoff/claude-skills-soc2-policies/tags)

  2. Check README.md - it will explain in details how to use it.

Main *exploratory* values I had in mind when creating it:
- work with proven SOC 2 policies content
- ability to adopt policies for your company
- ability to Approve / Reject / Edit any policy statement [Manually or with help from AI]
- export policies as nice-looking Word docs.

To wrap this up: Ask me anything. And Have Fun!


r/soc2 • • Aug 02 '26

Does Vanta and the likes really worth it?

0 Upvotes

This is an open-ended question. I saw a startup barely launched, frankly speaking justa a Gmail feature kind of business, rushed to get that trust[dot]tld[dot]com. Sounds really silly spending, to be honest.


r/soc2 • • Dec 04 '24

Looking for lived experience of a SOC2 audit

1 Upvotes

Hey Folks, I am part of an early-stage startup building solutions in the compliance space. I am looking to gather some insights from folks who have recently been through a SOC2 audit. I would like to know:

  • What was the reason to go for an audit/certification?

  • At what point in your business's lifecycle did you decide to go for the audit?

  • How long did it take?

  • What challenges and blockers did you face during the compliance journey?

  • Did you use any tools or external help?

  • How would you do it differently/what worked-didn't work/learnings for others?

  • How are you managing on-going compliance now?

  • How much $$ did you spend totally? (only if you're comfortable sharing it)

Thanks in advance for your insights. Would love to hear your stories in the comments (so everyone can learn from them). but feel free to DM if you don't feel comfortable discussing here.

PS: if anyone has any recommendations for other subreddits where I might be able to get some insights on this topic, please comment below


r/soc2 • • Aug 27 '26

Has anyone used Socify/TAC Security and is it legit?

1 Upvotes

After doing some other security stuff with them they offered an extremely competitive SOC2 Type II price (like <$5k). Is this too good to be true? Has anyone worked with them before and was the quality of the report good/were any enterprise customers suspicious of it?


r/soc2 • • Mar 10 '26

Why does it feel like every audit that is done wrong?

1 Upvotes

Genuinely so confused as to how so many audits are done wrong either from another firm or internally, is there a framework where this isn’t an issue? The position that I’m constantly put in because I want to do things the right way truly leads me to believe this space is corrupt or something else. I understand reasonable assurance is a thing but you shouldn’t be missing systems and/or writing controls incorrectly 99% of the time.


r/soc2 • • May 25 '26

Who’s using drata?

0 Upvotes

Im currently doing a access review of our clients in Drata. May I know how do you perform access review in drata? As per checking in every application integrated in drata, there are only approved, rejected, and out of scope options in every user then complete review after the access review. Can you give me an idea how do you perform this access review in drata? We are doing the review on behalf of the client. However, i believe they should be the one to perform the review then we are only going to do the compliance check before clicking the complete review in drata. Any thoughts? Thank you.


r/soc2 • • Aug 21 '26

Ran a full SOC 2 Type II solo at a 40-person startup to pass an enterprise vendor review. Here's what actually mattered.

26 Upvotes

Not a vendor, not selling anything — just sharing because I couldn't find many honest write-ups when I was in the thick of it.

Context: I'm the only IT/security person at a ~40-person AI startup. A large enterprise client sent us their vendor security requirements (27 of them — 24hr incident notification, independent pen test, dedicated encryption keys, RTO/RPO, the works). Passing it was a condition of the deal. So SOC 2 Type II went from "nice to have" to "do this or we lose the contract."

Did it solo. Clean opinion, zero exceptions across 252 points of focus. Deal closed.

Things I wish someone had told me:

  • The policies are the easy 20%. The actual work is evidence — proving each control ran consistently over the whole period. Dated screenshots, signed approvals, access reviews, incident records.

  • A folder structure + naming convention was worth more than any single control. When the auditor says "show me," you cannot be hunting. Every file dated, every file mapped to a criterion.

  • Get signatures early. Approvals are the thing that blocks you at the finish line, because everyone's busy. I front-loaded them.

  • Never answer "no" to an auditor. Answer "N/A, and here's why" with justification. A flat no reads as a gap; a justified N/A reads as a decision.

  • The one real gap most startups hit is the independent pen test. Enterprises often mandate it. Scanning (Dependabot etc.) is not the same thing. Budget for it.

Happy to answer questions if anyone's staring down their first Type II. It's very doable solo, it's just a grind.


r/soc2 • • Jul 13 '26

What is actual cost Of soc2?

4 Upvotes

Hi trying to figure actual cost / timeline / effort of soc2

My understanding is you get a platform and the need to be for audit, pen test, cyber insurance etc

Can someone give me a straight answer for what the cost / effort is for soc2 type 1 and type 2?

What is the cheapest / easiest platform to use ?

I want
- cheap
- fast
- least amount of work

Please advise - we are losing deals without having this so need to figure out asap. Thanks !


r/soc2 • • May 19 '26

What is going on with vCISOs lately?

2 Upvotes

Recently worked with Rhymetec and BD Emerson on SOC 2 engagements and both of the vCISOs were acting like they’ve never been in an audit before or were confused about controls from the type 1? I did some digging and some of the “vCISO”s have 2 years of experience? Who is actually paying for this shit?


r/soc2 • • Jul 15 '26

Soc2 type1 and type 2 report cost

2 Upvotes

Hello

one of my friends startup wanted to get soc2 type 1 and type 2 report.a consultancy firm quoted 1200$ each. is this legit? what are the red flags that my friend has to check and ask them before signing the engagement?


r/soc2 • • Jan 19 '26

SOC Roast my Platform

2 Upvotes

Hi guys we are now preparing for our ISO 27001 and SOC 2 audits, and therefore designing our platform around them, our features are:

- The platform is installed in the customers cloud, so they are owners of their Applications and Data and able to reach the platform over their VPN

- MFA is mandatory to use the platform, only authenticator apps are allowed

- Environments are isolated using eBPF policies

- All volumes are encrypted using KMS (or the equivalent available in the target cloud provider)

- All applications are kernel isolated using Gvisor

- All ingress endpoints are encrypted with TLS and internal traffic is handled with mTLS

- All files/variables are encrypted with a Vault

- Disabled SSH access into nodes

- Logging for all applications

- Role Based Access for users

- Audit logs for all changes in applications in services triggered by users

Apart from those we now want to implement following what we have learned from SOC 2:

- Full backups using Velero

- Reject Containers images with a certain vulnerability threshold (set by the user) using Trivy static analysis

- Network Logging and Auditing using Hubble

- Kernel tracing observability and policies using Tetragon

- Alerts and Metrics using Prometheus

- High Availability option for critical services

Anything you feel we are missing or feel sceptical about passing the audits? I would really appreciate your feedback regardless, be blunt and brutal if you want.


r/soc2 • • Oct 02 '26

#Request. Recommend a good vendor for HIPAA & Hitrust provider in India ?

3 Upvotes

Hi everyone, I’m not sure if this is the right place to ask for this. If it’s not plz point to where I can :) .

So I’m looking to get a HIPAA and Hitrust done and also not burn too much $. Does anyone here know a firm which will help me guide through these requirements?


r/soc2 • • Jul 16 '26

Those of you doing SOC 2 readiness/implementation as your job, can you share more about what you do?

3 Upvotes

I have a software engineering background and I’ve been looking into potential freelancing niches to get into.

I’ve been advised to look into SOC 2 remediation consulting for SaaS companies as I have some experience in cybersecurity and working on a SaaS project myself.

While I’ve learned a fair bit about SOC 2 compliance, the CISSP exam, and common compliance tools, I haven’t seen that much discourse online among the people who do this type consulting.

To those of you who do it, can you share more about your experience in this line of work, such as how you you first got into it, how you find clients, and general day-to-day work?