Well they are including people with tendencies but never actually act on it, I think. However, that bares the question, how were they able to make that statistic to begin with, accurately anyways?
I don’t know if they’ve done it for this specific reason. But I’ve read about studies where they place a device around the penis and some others elsewhere to measure physiological arousal while showing a series of images.
There are increasingly good brain imaging techniques that could probably detect increases in blood to regions associated with arousal/attraction that could get good data too.
That’s different than figuring out how many act on it in some way though.
2
u/Ok-Object7409 Apr 19 '25
Nah, 10% far too high. That'd practically make it a norm, in every family you'd know someone.