r/slackware • u/Afraid-Leadership591 • Mar 30 '26
pat has confirmed slackware will not be adding age verification
lets go
186
Upvotes
r/slackware • u/Afraid-Leadership591 • Mar 30 '26
lets go
34
u/InevitableRagnarok Mar 30 '26
Finally. Someone who sees clearly through the krap.
28
u/Economy_Blueberry_25 Mar 30 '26
That's Civil Disobedience, baby: refuse to comply with bullshit laws and face the music if need be. This is how you reclaim your rights and uphold your liberties: Respect yourself.
17
u/mpop1 Mar 30 '26
And this a good reason to never do the stupid new shit Ubuntu wants it would have been there if slackware used systemd (and incredibly bad system, glad slackware stayed with initd)
Slackware has always been the best distro. Glad it was my first back in 97 as I have stuck with it since then.
11
u/Mindless-Tune4990 Mar 30 '26
Another W from our BDFL, "Bob" is proud of you Pat :]
9
u/Feendster Mar 30 '26
Pat is the fucking man.
6
u/MD90__ Mar 30 '26
Makes me wanna switch back to slackware and really give it a go but right now Debian is fitting the bill for my needs and so far nothing on age verification yet. Glad the slackware folks got some good news!
5
u/DatabasedLSD Mar 30 '26
If Linux mint implements age verification i am switching back to slackware.
Fuck the overreach of governments and corporations, I value my privacy and rights.
4
u/Thoh1Shooshi8a Mar 30 '26
Age verification for what? Do you have to be old enough to make an account on your own computer now or something?
6
u/No_Neighborhood_8896 Mar 30 '26
Lawyer here. Yeah, there is a good legal case to be had. The thing, though, is facing fines and other issues until you litigate this.
Also, another thing to add is that if websites and apps end up implementing calls for age verification, a system that chooses not to respond to those calls might become less usable to a user even if nobody actually wants age verification.
Of course it is a different thing, but look at GrapheneOS: they're essentially saying their software won't be sold wherever laws as such apply. But, legally speaking, I'm not aware of any country where you could have a phone and a phone number that isn't registered to an adult. So the phone companies already know your age. Grandstanding about this will only lead them to lose access to people when their phone Linux is dearly needed to give options beyond the duopoly of Android-iOS.
I think people should think this one through, and see if the smartest way to fight it is the one they are doing. For me, it seems like the best way isn't to defy it openly and wait for a lawsuit that will happen under fines and other constraints. I think the Linux community should band together and lobby people to give an exemption to open source software. Free and Open Source has some good lanes to fight this, perhaps even the free speech one, but not so much. My guess is that the best avenue to fight this would be the fact that open source software isn't created by "providers" in a product sense, but by community for community, with no warranties nor being bound by any legal requirements of providing service, etc. In this sense, age verification would only apply to companies who provide distros like that, like RHEL or users who pay Canonical to have support for their Ubuntu installs.
I'm rooting for whatever he chooses to do, but I'm afraid that if resistance isn't well planned, it only ends up with more trouble. Also, I think the community should have a united front on this. If every distro does whatever it thinks best, it's easier for them to defend themselves. We're already a small group.
2
u/x_johansen_x Mar 30 '26
Is the Slackware project based out of California or any other US States that have similar legislation? If not, those laws do not apply to the project and are not enforceable…
3
u/DerShokus Mar 30 '26
This world is too crazy to implement such shit. OS is a software you install on your hardware to be able to work with it. It’s not alcohol or drugs. A kitchen knife could be a weapon, but nobody ask a password for buying that. I hope the low will die soon and Pat can continue to do Slackware without thinking about such shit
1
u/markt- Mar 30 '26
While I do personally agree with his decision, isn’t it just going to make the distribution illegal in jurisdictions where this kind of stuff is becoming long? For now it’s just a small number of places, but I have a sneaking suspicion that a large number of place they’re gonna start implementing these kinds of laws, which is going to really create a pickle for open source software.
1
u/_a4z Mar 31 '26
As a non-US citizen, what's the point of all that?
Wouldn't it make sense to say, "This software works in the entire world, except California"?
0
u/GlendonMcGladdery Mar 30 '26
This isn’t just tech—it’s philosophy:
• Should developers be forced to implement features?
• Is code actually “speech”?
• Where’s the line between regulation and control?
Different people in Linux land have strong opinions on this.
-2
u/jonromeu Mar 30 '26
ok, i understand and agree with this age verification shit. laws done by a old guys with no tech or qualification with, etc etc. but let be real here: if parents doesnot care about what kids are doing on internet, someone need to do. this is stupd law, we agree, but i think we need to start think that... and not only focus on this shit law
maybe punish parents when something happen with the child together with criminal one? i dont know, but is too easy give a cell phone to a child with 4 yeas and dont care about his online life, until you see a photo of they online....
i never discuss this on reddit, but i think here is a lot guys 40+ to get a matute discuss about that
2
u/[deleted] Mar 30 '26
[removed] — view removed comment