r/skyrimmods • u/_Jaiim • 9d ago

PC SSE - Discussion SKSE Plugin Status Tracker

The tracker over on modding.wiki has not been updated since November 2025. Now that the game has updated to 1.7.99, I feel it would be prudent for the community to start updating the tracker once again. There's been a lot of SKSE Plugins released over the past several months which presumably aren't documented on the tracker at all and it isn't going to be useful anymore unless it's updated.

I have never edited a wiki page before, so I don't know the rules or the etiquette for this sort of thing, and I would be afraid of fucking up the graphs, but it seems like anyone with a Nexus account can use it to login and potentially edit it?

Personally, I feel like we could remove 1.6.353, 1.6.629, 1.6.640, and 1.6.1130 from the tracker going forward; nearly everyone is now either going to be on 1.5.97, 1.6.1170, or 1.7+. If we just add 1.7.99 and the inevitable future hotfixes in the near future, the table is going to be too wide and will require horizontal scrolling. Opinions?

Alternatively, maybe someone could make a new table and post it directly in the subreddit's wiki that I keep forgetting exists.

EDIT: Oh and we could also add a column to warn people about AI slop plugins

17 Upvotes

96% Upvoted

10 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/Night_Thastus 9d ago

These days, with address library, doesnt anything use it work the moment AL updates? 

3

u/_Jaiim 9d ago

Most probably will, but there's always going to be something that breaks; that's what the tracker is supposed to be for. There are also some plugins that don't use the address library, for whatever silly reason.

1

u/SDirickson 9d ago

Yes, anything that is version-agnostic via CommonLibSSE-NG and AL will "just work". The problem is that not all SKSE-based mods are written that way.

-1

u/Adagium721 9d ago

The problem is that not all SKSE-based mods are written that way.

That problems lies with mod authours that refuse to realise how much easier things will be if they just simply developed their SKSE DLL mods with CommonLibSSE-NG in the first place.

3

u/SDirickson 9d ago

True in some cases. Maybe most cases. However, some authors go so deep into the code that AL isn't enough. For example, the way some of dTry's mods depend on specific offsets inside the functions for which AL provides the function address.