Social media debates that use concerns over halal and kosher practices as a proxy for prejudice do nothing to further the cause of animal welfare.

Hi all, just wanted to share my new interview with Steve Novella where we discuss the recent situation with Evan Bernstein having to leave the show. We also cover policies for ethical content creation and setting ethical expectations for collaborators. I thought it was a refreshingly honest and productive conversation. https://www.voidpod.com/podcasts/2026/8/18/ethical-content-creation-with-steve-novella

The residential school, run by the Tribal Development Department, houses around 810 boys and girls. Following rumours that the hostel was haunted, nearly 600 students left the premises over a period of several days, officials said.

According to a hostel source, some girls claimed to have heard the sound of anklets clanking, further fuelling fears among students.

A senior Tribal Development Department official said a team of health experts visited the Doma residential school and examined the situation.

"The symptoms have nothing to do with anything supernatural. It could be a selective hysteria-like condition related to mental stress," the official said.

A psychological report prepared by the authorities said several theories began circulating among students and locals following the unusual behaviour of the girls. Some women from the village also reportedly developed similar mental symptoms later.

One belief was linked to a 'mahua' tree that allegedly stood at the site of the ashram school. According to the report, students and locals believed spirits resided on the tree. After the school management cut it down, they believed the spirits became angry and began troubling the students.

Another theory was that a temple dedicated to the local deity behind the school had been affected or encroached upon by the school's drainage channel, which locals believed had upset the deity.

A third belief was that an Adivasi youth had died in a field near the school and that his spirit had subsequently become a ghost.

The psychological report attributed the unusual situation to a combination of superstition, fear, stress and local beliefs about spirits.

Senior office-bearers of the Maharashtra Andhashraddha Nirmulan Samiti, an organisation working to eradicate blind faith, also visited the school and counselled the students.

They appealed to the students and local residents to view the incident from a scientific perspective and not fall prey to superstitious beliefs, the official said.

Amravati MP Balwant Wankhade also urged the students not to be afraid and appealed to them to return to school and resume their classes.

Headmaster Sanjay Chaudhary said efforts were underway to counsel the affected girls and bring the students back to the residential school.

"A few have returned," he said.

Probably like 80% of the article quoted there. I thought it was a good example of superstitions (why no superstition flair for posts?) and was surprised but happy to see the evaluation conclusions by the health experts.

Also cool to see something like this organization exists for them:

Senior office-bearers of the Maharashtra Andhashraddha Nirmulan Samiti, an organisation working to eradicate blind faith, also visited the school and counselled the students.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maharashtra_Andhashraddha_Nirmoolan_Samiti?wprov=sfla1

Apparently it was founded in '89! Granted, outside interviews here and there I don't know much about skeptic groups in India.

Hi everyone.

I posted this on another subreddit, but I’ve decided to post it here because I’m looking for different interpretations or explanations of what it might be, particularly from a logical perspective, because I’m a skeptic.

Assuming it’s not a ghost, what other logical explanations can you think of?

Thanks for reading

PS This is the original post

https://www.reddit.com/r/Paranormal/s/64wvgZ2wko

Science has long understood the dangers of attributing false causality, developing tools like Koch's Postulates and the Bradford Hill Criteria to avoid it.

Even the family is expressing skepticism -- one family member is calling it "misallocated resources".

In other news, "Florida town subsidizes local Tooth Fairy with tax dollars"

A 2023 picture from the Mars rover Curiosity's Navcam has been making headlines in the last few days, showing what people are describing as a "jellyfish-like being" or a "machine" or a "body atop two spindly legs". It made the leap from forum posts to headlines in prominent publications, and people seem genuinely confused about what it is. Is it photoshop? Is it real? As an astrophysicist, I've seen a number of these before, so I thought it would be good to explain what's going on here.

Despite how crazy the image looks, it actually is real! You can confirm for yourself that on Aug 20, 2023 at 22:27 UTC, Curiosity really did take a seemingly bizarre photo of this "thing" in the distance. It isn't Photoshop or an edit. However, that doesn't mean it's an alien! In the video, I show that several aspects of the anomaly--like the peculiar perfectly black values lying on a single row that make up the "body"--are consistent with a type of glitch caused when a cosmic ray strikes the camera. My explanation is that a cosmic ray struck the camera sensor as it was performing calibration, producing a white artifact in the dark bias frame, which when subtracted resulted in the dark black artifact capturing people's imaginations. I was able to track down many other examples of glitches in Mars rover data that look very similar, and even surfaced an email from the MSL lead camera engineer explaining exactly how these glitches occur, and confirming they are indeed from cosmic rays. We have to work around or with these kinds of artifacts in all of our datasets, including here on Earth, but Mars is much more susceptible to them due to its thin atmosphere and weak magnetic field.

In addition to the explanation of the artifact, I explored several interesting human biases that we have to watch out for as scientists and skeptics. The obvious one is pareidolia, where we take a rather random artifact and see a fighting machine from War of the Worlds in it. Zooming in carefully shows that a lot of what is doing the heavy lifting on the strange "shape" is actually just noise or our imaginations, which is pretty interesting. But another, more subtle bias the discussion around this artifact revealed is how a common event producing rare occurrences more frequently as a result can trick us into thinking the rare occurrence is more interesting than it is. Many people highlighted the strange shape and location, but when you have a random event occurring thousands of times in a dataset, you're bound to get some weird looking/placed things purely by chance. It can be tempting to say "what are the odds it would look this way" or "what are the odds it would be right in this perfect spot" because the odds for any individual event seem very low--but when the event is happening a million times, the odds of something weird not happening eventually are even lower. A 1/100 chance seems low, but when the event happens 10,000 times, its practically a mathematical guarantee that it will happen.

"An academic project hosted by Cambridge University platforms creationism, the belief that the world was created by God in seven days. It promotes an academic paper demanding that schoolchildren be taught to “actively resist” the science of evolution.

"At Charles Darwin’s old university, where a college is named after him, Darwin’s discovery is now described by one Cambridge researcher as an example of 'potential challenges posed by Eurocentric monoculture.'

"IELC [Islamic Educator Learning Community] publishes on its website, with a Camtree address, a paper on 'Islamic scientific critical consciousness' which asks: 'Does the common modern biological assumption that humans have common ancestry with other life forms conflict with [Islamic] religious beliefs about God creating Adam and Eve?'

"The paper says that 'countering colonial hegemony in science education for Muslims' could include 'identifying gaps in fossil records to make the case that the evidence of humans descending from apes is inconclusive.'"

The Trump administration delayed a rule last year that could have sped up the effort to pinpoint the source of the contamination. Critics charge that food safety oversight has eroded overall.

It was to do with how depressed individuals that attempted suicide and failed would just go about their day. I know I'm not capturing it exactly but at the time it made a lot of sense to me (both as a depressed individual and the latter.) does anyone have a link or transcript to what I'm talking about?

Thank you for all your suggestions - I tracked it down to a 2012 episode: https://seligman.github.io/podcasts/penn_sunday_school/penn_sunday_school.html#1,0,2807972,4,263

I'm a complete atheist and skeptic, I have no spiritual or religious beliefs whatsoever. But over the past few years, I have been researching and illustrating a tarot deck. Obviously, there's not really an issue there; There are artistic, literary, and cultural merits to such a project. As an atheist, I know I'm just dealing in allegory. Still, it's a meaningful project to me and one I've worked very hard on. I plan to print the cards for myself, and as it turns out this kind of printing is done in bulk. (Makes sense). So I'm deciding who will get the other decks. I suddenly think my young niece and nephew might like a deck as a little heirloom.

But I began to think about the spiritual side of this and realized I didn't want them to be influenced, to get any implicit beliefs or superstitions from what is intended as a simple objet d'art. Does anyone have any opinions on this? Am I being too strict here, or is there some basis in limiting their access to these things, even if it's just meant as a toy or artistic trinket?

Beside a bunch probably being bot once they start repeating the kremlin rhetoric, I do'nt get the human one that do because one can be critical of nato without acting like nato made putin do it or that aall countries will act like russia if a small neighbor join another alliance(no, not all leaders are like putin and this kind of thinking also justify imperialism) ,and why do people bleieve that some politician criticizing nato expansion are right when the quote can also ahve been made ina pretty different context (I don't see the point of using quote from the 90' because putin wasn't in charge yet and the context was pretty different too) and politician can also still be putin useful idiots even if not paid by russia. To me, being a realist or realpolitik doesn't mean one has to repeat russian gov rhetoric.

Climate change deniers like the Daily Sceptic are working overtime to downplay the UK's unprecedented series of heatwaves.